EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
With Jailed Minister, DREAM Act Hunger Strike Nears Critical 30-Day Stage, Spreads Across Nation
On the heels of a new Congressional Budget Office report that the DREAM Act would reduce the deficit by $1.4 billion over the next decade and public support by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, seven university students in San Antonio prepare themselves to enter their 28th day of a debilitating hunger strike that has now spread across the country.
The Texas students are weary, reaching a critical 30-day stage in a liquid-only fast that health experts warn could lead to organ failure, but hardly alone. A doctor now monitors their health daily. One student striker has diabetes.
In the tradition of famed labor leader Cesar Chavez, whose own "spiritual fasts" won workplace safety concessions for their parents' generation, the students' hunger strike has been joined by United Farm Worker cofounder Dolores Huerta and League of United Latin American Citizens executive director Brent Wilkes, along with thousands of students across the country.
Declaring that they don't plan to end their hunger strike until the Senate and House pass the DREAM Act, including a recent streamlined version unveiled by US Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) that would require minors who arrived as undocumented immigrants to pass a 10-year waiting period, the strikers were joined last week by Rev. Lorenza Andrade Smith, who remains locked up at the Bexar County Adult Detention Center. The United Methodist minister was arrested on Nov. 30th, along with 15 other activists, at a nonviolent sit-in at the San Antonio office of US Sen. Kay Hutchison (R-TX), a one-time supporter of the Dream Act in 2007.
Along with two of the student strikers, Rev. Andrade Smith is on a complete fast--refusing water, as well as food. Supporters of the Methodist pastor and the students conduct daily vigils in front of the detention center.
"We're completely exhausted," said Felipe Vargas, a PhD student in History, Philosophy and Education Policy at Indiana University, who was born and raised in San Antonio, "but our spirit is stronger than ever. When we launched this hunger strike, we had no idea we would receive such wide support."
Along with other DREAM Act supporters and organizations, Vargas said the students are part of a national campaign called United We Dream.
Calling on Sen. Hutchison to champion the Act during the lame duck session, the students were joined in their sit-in last week by legendary San Antonio activist and former city councilwoman Maria Berriozábal.
San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro met with some of the strikers today, and declared his public support for the DREAM Act, though he called on the students to end their strike.
Noting that all of his siblings have earned doctorates at American universities, Vargas pointed to a broad range of supporters--from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to conservatives like former House leader Newt Gingrich--who have called for similar reforms.
Earlier this fall, a Rasmussen poll noted that a majority of Americans supported the DREAM Act.
"I do support the DREAM Act; I think it is a very reasonable and sensible way to assist young people to have an opportunity for citizenship," said Bishop James E. Dorff, San Antonio Episcopal Area of The United Methodist Church. On Rev. Andrade Smith's participation, Dorff released this statement:
"As her bishop, I wanted to support her personally, affirm her statement of conscience, affirm her Christian witness," he said. "I do not condone nor recommend breaking the law and she is aware of that, but I appreciate the depth, compassion and sense of commitment she has to seeking some kind of just immigration reform."
Pointing out the limited scope of the DREAM Act, which would only apply to minors under the age of 30 who are able to complete a 2-year university degree or military service, San Antonio defense attorney Maria Salazar declared: "If we can't pass the DREAM Act at this point, then I think we are looking at very little success for positive imigration reform laws." Salazar is defending a number of the protestors arrested at the sit-in at Hutchison's office last week. Salazar added: "We have to pass this now at least to convey to the new leadership that immigration reform is something we must act on now."
While the Congressional battle over the DREAM Act remains uncertain, the students--and their growing supporters across the nation--vow they will continue their strike until legislation makes it way through Congress.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


9 Comments so far
Show AllEven the plutocracy must respect suicide as a power larger than themselves.
Now isn't the time for the Dream Act, there isn't enough Jobs to go around for citizens . Whats the point of giving out amnesty when all the jobs are gone.
That is illogical. Why didn't we close the border back 200 years ago if what you say is true?
Workers create more jobs. Capital being drained out of the economy and into the hands of the few causes fewer jobs. Labor creates wealth, capital does not create wealth.
If we are going to completely roll over for management, if we are going to lick the boots of our masters, why not just convene a panel of corporate CEOs and ask them how many jobs we are allowed to have, what they want to pay us, and what sort of people they want us to be. Then we can just deport all of the excess, no matter where they are from.
By all means, deport the fruit harvest crews to Latin America and the corporations can set up plantation farms down there and pay the workers 50 cents a day instead of small farmers paying them $100 a day here. Then all of our produce can come from overseas. Since the owners will have more really, really cheap labor on the other side of the border, more manufacturing will be moved there, there will be downward pressure on wags here, and there will be fewer jobs here.
Most of the counties where small farmers are reliant on immigrants for harvest are 95-97% whites who were born here. So even if every single immigrant is taking a job away from a "real American" how many jobs are we talking about? Having harvest crews means more fruit can be grown here rather than imported. That creates jobs in sales, transportation, support services, processing and packaging and management.
There examples of this all over the United States of America.
There one town in Pennsylvania, the name escaped me now that had a factory that made Vacuum Cleaners.
There were a lot of "Illegal Immigrants" employed there and after complaints ICE raided them and shipped the "Illegal workers" home.
The plant shut down and moved all operations to Mexico. Unemployment rocketed upwards and businesses of all types went under.
People have to understand that if CAPITAL is going to be allowed to move freely across borders to take advantage of working conditions then LABOR must be offerred that same right or everything will fail.
Restrict the movement of Capital. Slap tariffs on exports and imports to protect local industry and farmers. Stop the dumping of subsidized goods into other markets and THEN and only then can one address "Illegal Immigration".
Capital moves freely across borders. People are calling for restrictions on Labor moving across borders.
Here is what that really means - "Capital" means wealthy people, "Labor" means poor people. Wealthy people move across borders and do whatever they like - set up factories, exploit natural resources and workers, bribe local governments, and run plantation farms, all for the purpose of extracting and amassing wealth. Poor people move across borders out of desperation and at great risk, for the purpose of surviving and feeding their families.
Why would anyone with even the slightest pretense of being anything other than a pro-corporate extreme right winger deny to poor people that which they freely grant to wealthy people?
Capital - the wealthy - move businesses in order to find the cheapest possible workers. Workers move toward the highest possible wages. Which activity depresses wages? If management is free to seek out the lowest wags while workers are not free to seek the highest wages, that clearly has a depressive effect on wages for all of us.
I understand that there will always be some people opposed to immigrants. I don't have a problem with that. But I do have a problem with people who claim to not be right wingers yet who oppose immigration.
The Trojan horse of the dream act is that it is really a military conscription act. This is very bad public policy. We should be forcing elites to risk their own hides in their despicable wars, and not allow elites to conscript foreign nationals to fight wars that few Americans support.
Not many comments. Maybe the anti-immigrant people don't realize what the Dream Act is about.
Yes I do,,, Maybe your Dream. To the rest of us, It's a bloody NIGHTMARE!!
>^^<
I fear that your sentiments will prevail, and we will all be living your nightmare and not the dream.
What sort of person has nightmares about children who have grown up here being naturalized and not having to live in fear of being deported to places they have never known - punished for the sacrifices and risk their parents took for them, often when they were infants or toddlers? Very bizarre.