Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oregon Voters Pass Tax Increasing Measures by Big Margin
Oregon voters bucked decades of anti-tax and anti-Salem sentiment Tuesday, raising taxes on corporations and the wealthy to prevent further erosion of public schools and other state services.
Supporters of the Yes on 66/67 tax measures celebrate as early returns project the passage of the tax increases. Rob Melton, (from left) Eileen Wende, (holding sign) and Roger Wende cheer as early returns project the tax measures passing Tuesday night. (photo: Doug Beghtel/The Oregonian) The tax measures passed easily, with late returns showing a 54 percent to 46 percent ratio. Measure 66 raises taxes on households with taxable income above $250,000, and Measure 67 sets higher minimum taxes on corporations and increases the tax rate on upper-level profits.
The results triggered waves of relief from educators and legislative leaders, who were facing an estimated $727 million shortfall in the current two-year budget if the measures failed.
"We're absolutely ecstatic," said Hanna Vandering, a physical education teacher from Beaverton and vice president of the statewide teachers union. "What Oregonians said today is they believe in public education and vital services."
The double-barreled victory is the first voter-approved statewide income tax increase since the 1930s. Other states, facing similar budget woes, are watching the outcome closely because Oregon, after all, is a state that capped property taxes and locked a surplus tax rebate program into the constitution.
The last time voters approved a tax increase was 2002, when they agreed to bump up tobacco taxes to help pay for the Oregon Health Plan. Voters rejected income tax increases twice in recent years.
"You're going to find a lot of people are going to be talking about this," said Kevin Looper, campaign director for Vote Yes for Oregon, the main support group for the measures.
Looper was among more than 300 supporters who packed the Wonder Ballroom in Northeast Portland to watch results. Within 15 minutes of the polls closing, counties around the state released a flood of vote counts and it became clear that both measures had passed.
Multnomah County was key to the victory, with voters approving both measures by more than a 2-1 ratio. There was deep support elsewhere around the state, including Washington, Lane and Benton counties and communities on the coast. Even in more conservative areas, support was stronger than expected.
Overall statewide turnout was expected to be around 60 percent of Oregon's 2 million voters.
Tuesday's strong support also validated a strategy by Democratic lawmakers to single out the rich and corporations for targeted tax increases.
Campaign ads by supporters highlighted banks and credit card companies and showed images of well-dressed people stepping off private jets. They also hammered on the $10 minimum tax that most corporations have paid since its inception in 1931.
Those messages helped counter warnings by opponents that the taxes would lead to job losses, worsening the state's 11 percent unemployment rate, and prompt wealthy residents to move elsewhere.
"They did a great job of pounding, 'It's only $10,'" said Bob Tiernan, chairman of the state Republican Party. "We got swamped by the union money."
Supporters spent at least $6.9 million, most of it coming from teacher and public employee unions. Opponents, led by a coalition of business organizations, spent at least $4.6 million, donated by wealthy entrepreneurs such as Nike's Phil Knight and Columbia Sportswear's Tim Boyle. Opponents who gathered at the Grand Hotel in Salem were optimistic early, but as the results came in, the mood quickly darkened.
"It's disappointing and discouraging," said Pat McCormick, spokesman for Oregonians Against Job-Killing Taxes. "The tone and tenor was often venomous, trying to pit the haves against the have-nots."
He said the business community now must figure out "how to participate in a system that's largely disconnected from us."
Lawmakers, who are scheduled to convene Monday in Salem for a monthlong session, are expected to move onto other issues, such as tackling Oregon's unique "kicker" law that rebates revenue surpluses totaxpayers and reining in rapidly expanding tax credits for green energy companies.
They also may be looking to repair a broadening rift between the state's business leaders and Democrats who control both chambers of the Legislature and the governor's office.
"It means the February session won't be focused on cutting hundreds of millions of dollars from schools, public safety and health care," said House Speaker Dave Hunt, D-Gladstone.
"It's a great sign of hope that Oregonians continue to be ruggedly independent and continue to be focused on a long-term vision for the state."
Gov. Ted Kulongoski thanked voters for approving the measures but tried to set a tone of reconciliation. "The election is over," Kulongoski said in a statement. "Tomorrow is a new day, and we must make a commitment to put our differences aside and work together to make the best choices we can for Oregon's collective future."
- Posted in



42 Comments so far
Show AllCalifornia should follow Oregon's lead and do the same to help save their crumbling education system and disappearing public services. The Republican candidate for governer wants to do the exact opposite of what Oregon just did and run this great state farther down the drain.
Prop. 3 killed California.
CA is 'ruled' by the 'Elite' in LA (southland area) And SF-SAC (bay area), the rest of the state is just a 'place' to exploited for those pop. bases and WE ALL KNOW THAT (even in the 'hinterlands'.)
It is about time!!! Finally a WIN for the working class and poor of Oregon! I was beginning to wonder when the good people of Oregon were going to do something to level the economic playing field in that state. I am happy to have worked briefly on one campaign that FINALLY experienced a victory!!
I am hoping CA will get enough signatures to get a constitutional convention placed on their ballot this year and get back MAJORITY RULE and figure out a way to get the RICH and CORPORATIONS to pay their fair share of taxes in the state. I am horrified that the working people not only pay state income tax but they ALSO pay sales tax....this is just NOT RIGHT.
LET US WORK TO EQUALIZE TAXES AND PUT EDUCATION AND JOBS AS TOP PRIORITIES IN THE GREAT STATE OF CALIFORNIA!!!
Hurray for Oregonians! I'm right proud!
Now, time to get rid of Ron Wyden, corporate shill.
I am with you !!!! Wyden has FOR TOOOOOO LONG being co-opting the left and taking advantage of being in office for x amount of years!!! Bye-Bye RON!
Excellent!
Joe
I wonder whether they could pass a law punitively taxing any corporate move out of state: if you move your corporate assets out of Oregon, it costs 50% of those assets before you can go.
Now that makes the MOST sense of anything i have read in many years! (Maybe you should enter the CA Guv'ner race!)
Great idea! Same could apply for moving out of the country.
Joe
And if you dare to move the company out of the USA it will cost you 100%! Then good riddance to you and try getting cheap labor after we agitate for union solidarity everywhere.
If they off shore we just slap a 50% tariff on their products when they import them back into the country!
The built infrastructure of any company "fleeing" Oregon ought to become property of the state (if the state desires them), and nationalized by Oregon with the purpose of selling it to a cooperative to manage for the profit of its workers.
These fleeing companies (the ones Oregon actually WANTS to keep) should receive a sum of money from the Oregon government that covers the actual value of these properties, and the entire process should be entirely transparent: Oregon voters should know which companies refuse to contribute to the common good.
How predictable that a hireling for the haves will immediately begin screaming "class war!"
The reality is that since 1980 at least the Haves have waged an unrelenting class war against everyone else and have won every battle. They completely control the national government and operate it for their own narrow benefit.
Well folks, there are more of us than there are of them and that fact alone keeps them awake at night. Why do you think members of the Walton family built heavily fortified "panic homes?"
Is it stave and pitchfork time yet?
It has been for many years!
Bring the war home!
“There's class warfare, all right,” “but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning.”
- billionaire Warren Buffet
I wonder if this is a realistic measure of the pulse of the country.
For years I have been believing that the "majority" of Americans detest taxing the rich and corporations. Maybe this has been a clever deception orchestrated by those most likely to be effected?
based only on the surface impression:
IF this truly reflects the majority and ordinary citizens of oregan - namely of course the "unrich" - the people of the commons -
the OREGONIANS are to be MOST HIGHLY COMMENDED...for taking on the corporations and the rich in a HEADBUTT....
go Oregonians!
The most significant passage in this article:
"The double-barreled victory is the first voter-approved statewide income tax increase since the 1930s."
Are you paying attention Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress?
Now that we are in the worst economic depression since The Great Depression, it's a pleasent change to see voters getting in touch with the wisdom of the past. I hope we see California follow this fine example of level-headed public mandate to solve their own financial problems.
Poet
Very happy to read some good news for a change. I'm sure it helped that they have the Republic of Portland within the state borders.
I wonder if the tea party folks will embrace this tactic? They are generously referred to as conservative "populists"; surely hitting up the rich and the corporations to make up deficits in budgets for basic public services would also be a popular solution elsewhere in our bankrupt country? Especially now that we have achieved Banana Republic norms of wealth distribution, with 1% of the population owning 45% of the assets. Maybe if someone were to point this out to the hoi polloi? Or are too many of us convinced that one day we too will join the ranks of super rich?
The Oregon vote is a huge win for progressives and should be the model Obama pursues, but won’t …
If I remember correctly Oregon has an all mail election process, so getting to the polls wasn’t a problem. This is especially true for off year or special elections where conservatives push initiatives they know wouldn't pass during a presidential election ...
All mail elections should be a tool progressives imitate around the country so that there is a paper ballot for everything and polling place shenanigans couldn’t happen. All people would have to do is vote and mail, not stand in lines for hours to worry if the Diebold counted their vote ...
There are 2 lessons in the Oregon vote!
Good point, mmckinl.
Both of our corporate parties rely on vote-counting abuses.
ATMs accurately record all transactions; why can't Diebold machines?
Because ATMs are bought by businesses that need machines that work, Diebold machines are bought by politicians.
I live near Portland in a northern suburb in Washington. We also just voted in a local election, also by mail. It is very simple and effective. You have to sign the inside of the outer envelope which contains the sealed inner envelope that has the ballot. I like it a lot. It took about five minutes to read everything, mark it, put it in the inner envelope, seal it, place that in the outer envelope, sign it, and seal it, covering the signature, and put a stamp on it and drop it off. The ballot period is about two weeks. There is no delay. They are simple to mark. And there were instructions to correct errors.
At last, something that the Democrats should be cheering about and whose lesson will be totally ignored in Washington! This kind of tax structure should be embraced and duplicated in every state of this union, and once done, by the Federal Government. When the Fortune 500 biggest companies in America pay next to no taxes at all, and yet take home bonuses and send their money off-shore, something is very wrong.
Come on, America, called the corporate bluff and get this kind of change passed in DC, not just California or Oregon. America, make those who deplete our nation's resources, who exploit our workers, and who then demand government bailouts when their model of business fails so that they can get bonuses or trash union contracts pay and pay dearly for the right to do business in this nation or live an aristocratic, elitist lifestyle at our expense. It is time for us to hold these people accountable for our job losses to free trade, deplorable schools, our lost homes, and our lost retirements, not to mention our polluted waters, air, and soil. It is time America to follow Oregon's lead.
Oregon: one of the only states in America funding real wave energy research, is on top of it again.
America needs to go where Oregon has led. However, even if America defers (lets face it, the southern states will never come around. They have a long history of being economic backwaters, and proud of it: funny the long legacy of slavery), the Western states should follow Oregons lead, starting with Washington and California.
Here's a shout out to the state of my alma mater.
Oregon has the ability for its people to petition for a cause, gather the required number of signatures for that cause and then vote on it. Don't be fooled though. Even though we have a mail-in voting system, it is still capable of being hacked, cause the optical scanners are made by the same companys as the electronic voting machines. Maybe we should gather signatures to have all of the votes HAND COUNTED by ordinary people who are randomly chosen.
Go for it Oregon! You know what I'm talking about out there. Keep it up big time-- home of my alma mater-- Oregon State, one of Abraham Lincoln's gifts to this country, land grant colleges and founded in 1868. Oh, it was as I remember the 1862 legislation that created these institutions. Hey, and please let's not have any of those jokes about "you were probably around to vote for old Abe when he ran for congressman in 1846" even if it's true.
AD
Way to go, voters in Oregon!
You're leading the way in progressive populist activism!
The rest of us will jump on the bandwagon!
Go where the money is!
Benton County where Corvallis is located used to be rather conservative and even GOP country back in even the late 1960s. Lane County is where Wayne Morse called home and Eugene is or was the county seat.
The coast tended even back in the 1960s and maybe earlier to be Democratic, but not that liberal or progressive.
Washington County is part of suburban Portland Oregon. It used to be either a swing voting or even GOP voting area.
Multnomah County is where Portland is located and used to be and likely still is reliably Democratic, but not always such a hotbed of progressivism. It varied. Lane County was more liberal to progressive, but less reliably Democratic.
AD
As a resident and voter in Oregon I would like to make a few observations about the State to put things in perspective. Oregon has an area of nearly 100,000 square miles and a population of about 3.4 million (less than that of Los Angeles). Portland metro is the only large and densely populated urban area and there are a few small cities in the Willamette valley that are densely populated. Portland and these other cities are very blue and liberal. Anywhere else in Oregon the state is very red. The great majority of counties in the state rejected both measures 66 and 67 including the county that I live in and I am just 15 miles from Portland. Like most of the USA, Oregon has a few urban blue areas surrounded by a vast sea of red!
In all of the rest of the world - including our neighbor to the north, red denotes the left, blue denotes the right.
This isn't just not-picking. The reversal of these colors by the US media is deliberate - red denotes, and elicits in humans, ardor and lust for change, blue elecits submissiveness and loyalty ("true blue").
It is time for the US left to "join the world" and reclaim the color red.
Well said--I've been meaning to make that same point for awhile. The coding was reversed by a GOP pundit and, of course, eagerly adopted without even a murmur by the "left-wing" media. It was *supposed* to be that red would denote the party in power and blue the one out, but of course after BushCo left, everyone ---including the soi-disant left--- meekly accepted the GOP framing that now red would forever signify conservative in the US even though absolutely nowhere else.
Indeed let's repudiate that "exceptionalist" coding.
According to Pat McCormick, spokesman for Oregonians Against Job-Killing Taxes, "The tone and tenor was often venomous, trying to pit the haves against the have-nots."
Pretty clearly, people against taxes are the haves waging war on the have-nots.
McCormick is complaining about a 'venomous tenor'.
30 years after Reagan, people against taxes are lucky to keep their heads.
And they are the haves that have what belongs to the have nots.
I was going to paste that line also, for emphasis. Was remembering the other night how during the Bush nightmare all the corporo talking heads clucking and wagging their fingers about even mentioning class warfare in this country. Like a militatry commander not discussing the location of an ammo dump.
Congratulations Oregon. You do the middle class proud. You are great Americans who believe in the Constitution and are smart enough to use the system to redistribute some of the wealth. I hope all other states follow your example. Every little bit of anti-imperialism is needed.
Hoa binh
Screw the "middle class".
PLEASE stop using that phrase! It is code language that is laden with classist and racist connotations.
The operative word is the "poor". If a "middle class" person or "family" (another loaded word) is indeed in economic distress, then thay aren't really "middle class" anymore, aren't they? They are poor - and should declare themselves as such.
So, what, in this context, does "middle class" REALLY mean? Think!
From the article: "Those messages helped counter ...warnings by opponents that the taxes would... prompt wealthy residents to move elsewhere."
Is that a promise? Rich people screw up every community that they move into. Most of them are parasites. All I can say is: don't let the door hit your ass on the way out!
From the article: "Opponents, ...led by a coalition of business organizations, ...donated by wealthy entrepreneurs such as Nike's Phil Knight and Columbia Sportswear's Tim Boyle."
Oh yeah? Proponents, such as myself, aren't going to buy their products any more. Let's show them that their anti-community actions have consequences. Anyone care to join me?
This is a good development - hopefully it is a trend that will spread.
Pennsylvania sorely need a constitutional amendment to allow a graduated progressive income tax.