Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Scientists Demand Government Ban on Mountaintop Mining
Analysis of damage done leaves Obama no choice but to ban the highly destructive practice, say the authors of a new study
An article in the journal Science, by a team of 12 ecologists, hydrologists, and engineers, provides the most comprehensive analysis so far of the damage done by the controversial mining practice.
Mountain-top removal coal mining is obliterating vast swaths of Appalachia
in Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia. (flickr photo by The Sierra Club) The process involves shaving off up to 1,000 vertical feet of mountain peak – including ancient forests – to expose thin, but highly prized, seams of coal.
Margaret Palmer, an ecologist at the University of Maryland Centre for Environmental Science, who led the study, said the science left no excuse for the Obama administration not to ban the highly destructive practice.
"Scientists are not usually that comfortable coming out with policy recommendations," she said, "but this time the results were overwhelming."
The article described river and forest systems that have been disrupted well downstream from the original dumping spot of mining debris. It also said there was virtually no chance of restoring mountain, forests or streams once the mining companies have moved on to new seams.
"There is a lot of evidence suggesting that there is significant degradation, and there just isn't the evidence at all that they can reverse this," said Emily Bernhardt, an environmental biologist at Duke University, who was another co-author.
She said there were signs that contamination from the mining debris was spilling into drinking water and wells. The debris is already killing off fish. In heavily mined southern countries, 50- 60% of young fish were deformed because of high concentrations of selenium.
"That was quite an eye-opener," said Dennis Lemly, a biologist at Wake Forest University and one of the authors. He warned the fish population could soon be wiped out. "The deformed young fish – that is really the red flag. You can see right away that you are over a serious threshold."
Selenium concentrations in fish caught in some of West Virginia's rivers were twice as high as in other states that had declared them unfit for human consumption. West Virginia authorities issued a health warning – but not a ban.
"To put it quite bluntly, my jaw dropped because right away I saw concentrations that were far above toxic thresholds," added Lemly.
The authors also logged significant dangers to human health, including lung cancer, and chronic heart lung and kidney disease, as well as birth defects.
Today's report – reinforced by the rare demand from scientists for specific government action – deepens the pressure on the Obama administration from environmentalists and liberal supporters to ban mountaintop mining.
Obama administration officials had promised to toughen the lax environmental regulations of the George Bush era. But grassroots activists in West Virginia accuse the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of continuing to greenlight new projects – albeit with some additional restrictions on the mining companies.
Earlier this week, the EPA outraged activists by giving the go-ahead to two new mines. EPA officials argued that the new conditions imposed on the mining operator, Patriot Coal, would bury only three miles of mountain stream – instead of the six miles of waterways that would have been filled with debris under the company's original plan.
Until today's article, Mountaintop mining consequences, much of the research on the effects of mountaintop removal had been left to government scientists, and there was little understanding in the broader academic community of the sheer scale of destruction.
As many as 500 mountaintops across West Virginia, Virginia and Kentucky have already been replaced by dry flat plateau, and 1,200 mountain streams have been buried beneath dumped rock and dirt. By 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that more than 2,200 square miles of Appalachian forest will disappear.
At some sites, the mining companies have tried to rebuild the silhouette of the old mountain, or replant. But mostly they leave the mountain missing its crest.
In any event, there is no undoing the damage, and the scientists said the seriousness of the environmental and public health impacts compelled the EPA to ban mining.
"I think it is very clear. It is very compelling, and it would be a disservice to the people who live there to say we just have to study it more," said Michael Hendryx, a community medicine professor at the University of West Virginia. "The monetary costs of the industry in terms of premature mortality and other impacts far outweighs any benefits."
- Posted in



50 Comments so far
Show AllGood work by the scientists.
But, why is this story apearing in a newspaper 3500 miles and across an ocean from West Virginia? Will anyone in West Virginia ever read it?
Will anyone in these United States ever read the article?
isn't it nice to see the thread on mountaintop removal suddenly linked to the thread on media consolidation...
Exactly. When I tell people about mountain top removal, they think I'm kidding, or lying. "What do you mean, mountain top removal?" "Blowing the tops off mountains? You're crazy". It isn't in the news, and if it isn't in the news, then it can't be true.
curious - do you live in a red state?
It's not an issue of living in a Red state vs a Blue state. The average person who gets their "news" from the MSM is never going to hear about mountaintop removal. The subject is just not covered. This is not a conservative vs liberal issue. It's about protecting and stopping the destruction of our environment.
Yeeaaahhh but. Do you think MTM could take place in california? how about massachusetts or oregon or washington, or.... you name the blue state.
It's true MSM will not talk about it, but let's call it what it is. It's the Corporate Media. Or more correctly, the corporate-controlled, deregulated, unregulated, right-wing bought and paid for capitalist media (although as usual, many Dems were complicit: Clinton).
Senator Byrd aside, it is foolish to overlook that fact that overwhelming support for MTM is from the right. Foolish.
How about all the crimes and fraud of the Bush administration: deregulation, environmental destruction, privacy, lying into senseless wars, etc.. Do we overlook those now b/c we're all in this together? Fine, but if you don't understand the fundamental source and reasons of how things got be where we are - you are probably doomed to have it happen again.
Not to change the subject, but Wall St. is a perfect example - the fundamental reasons the Great Recession (and the Republican Great Depression, for that matter) given by the right and left are still very different:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/misunderstanding-credit-and-housing-crises-blaming-the-cra-gses/
"These memes have become a rallying cry — cognitive dissonance writ large — of those folks who have been pushing for greater and greater deregulation, and are now attempting to disown the results of their handiwork."
Anyway, I'm simply curious is to what area the above poster lives in, that's all...
West Virginia IS a "blue state"!
It's governor, both it's senators and two of it's three congressmen are democrats. It's has a republican district only becausue of some creative gerrymandering:
www.nationalatlas.gov/printable/images/pdf/
congdist/pagecgd110_wv.pdf
The congressman for District 3, where all the MTR is going on, is Nick Rahal, who has a quite "liberal" voting record.
If Vermont or Massachusetts were poor, coal-rich states, the Berkshires or the Greens would be a good bit less green. They should sing praise of their early paleozoic geologic history for not leaving them with the curse of coal.
And last time I was in Oregon, the Cascades had hardly a slope left that wasn't an ugly checkerboard of clearcuts and eroding skidder tracks - a West-Virginia-of-logging.
I live in Texas, which accounts for a lot. One acquaintance of mine said "well, so what, mother nature blows the tops off mountains too!".
But I maintain, it isn't in the national news or any news, so it isn't real for people.
"well, so what, mother nature blows the tops off mountains too!".
Nothing illustrrtes the vile arrogance of the US-right more than the typical flippancy of their responses to arguments from the left.
It is as if they say: "I will do whatever I please, support any crime I please, simply becasue I feel like it. So, I don't have to bother giving a serious reply to your argument."
If anyone can provide me with a distinction between a capitalist right-winger and a psychopath, I'd like to hear it.
It still slays me that environmental issues can even be divided into "left" and "right".
Why not?
What we call the "right" is a group of philosophies that argue for the primacy of individual selfishness, greed, and responsibility to no one except self, and manipulation of others toward selfish ends. What is best for the long-term survival of humanity as a whole is utterly of no concern to them.
What we call the "left" is a philosophy that argue that working for the harmonious continuation of humanity IS the our primary task on earth, and this will be achieved through the values of community and solidarity, as embodied in Christ's sermon on the Mount, or Eugene Deb's famous speech upon his sentencing to prison.
Which philosophy is compatable with working for environmental protection, and which philosophy isn't?
Few in the US will read the article, but it is the West Virginins and East Kentuckians who's minds have to be changed. Right now, most WV resident's brains are wholly owned subsidiarys of Massey energy. If the federal government banned MTR right now, these "Friends-of-Coal" Massey-Bots would probably form armed militias to defend their union-busting, stream-poisoning corporate masters.
Actually, a lot of the Guardian's (internet) readers are from the US, which is why they carry so many articles on the US, and not say, France, or Germany, or Spain.
I don't know, can anyone in West Virginia even read?
"...can anyone in West Virginia even read?"
That is really mean. These are the people whose homes get cracked and even moved by the explosions, whose natural landscapes are being ruined. The victims' voices aren't heard any more than the voices of environmentalists. Our bought and sold media prefers to ignore them. The yahoos who get the microphone are those who spout "jobs!" even though there are very few jobs involved in this kind of mining.
"...the science left no excuse for the Obama administration not to ban the highly destructive practice."
Given Obama's track record this past year, why do I believe that Obama will not ban the destructive practice of mountain top removal?
"Analysis of damage done leaves Obama no choice but to ban the highly destructive practice, say the authors of a new study"
_______________________________
No choice? Well, bless their hearts for hoping and believing so.
I hope they're not too flabbergasted, dumbfounded, broken-hearted, or devastated when Obama blows off the prospect with a single throwaway comment, e.g. "If 'we' could start over from scratch, 'we' would definitely discourage the practice of mountaintop mining. But 'we're' satisfied that the mining companies are doing a great job, and 'we're' not about to put them out of business!"
At best, Obama may arrange for the authors to personally meet with the appropriate Elected Misrepresentatives and mining industry executives to press their point, and receive some lovely parting gifts.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Obd't Servant,
Thanks for at least presenting the truth in your unique style of wit - razor-sharp as always.
Exactly, and once again I applaud your great use of irony and wit. If Obama had to abandon any of his cherished practices and policies because of preponderant evidence of how "highly destructive" they are, we'd be out of Iraq and Afghanistan, we'd have single-payer health care, Wall St. wouldn't have been bailed out at the expense of the rest of the economy (is there one?), we'd have R&D money going into alternative energy development, a sane rapid-transit system like other developed countries, and a jobs program to put 10 million people back to work. But none of that will happen. War, blowing up mountains for polluting coal, drilling off the Alaskan coast for oil, more war for more oil, insurance reform that gives ever higher profits to the insurance mafia, lies to justify it all--that's all we're going to get from this charlatan.
Selenium, AGAIN? Kesterson National Wildlife "Refuge", EAST! STOP it with THIS: Clean Water Act 1985 DEADLINE for such water pollution!!
>> FEDERALWATERPOLLUTIONCONTROLACT
>> (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.)
>> AN ACT To provide for water pollution control activities in the
>> Public Health Serv-
>> ice of the Federal Security Agency and in the Federal Works
>Agency,
>> and for
>> other purposes.
>> Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
>> United States of America in Congress assembled,
>> TITLE I—RESEARCH AND RELATED PROGRAMS
>> DECLARATIONOFGOALSANDPOLICY
>> SEC. 101. (a) The objective of this Act is to restore and main-
>> tain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the
>> Nation’s
>> waters. In order to achieve this objective it is hereby declared
>> that,
>> consistent with the provisions of this Act—
>> (1) it is the national goal that the discharge of pollutants
>> into the navigable waters be eliminated by 1985
It's a good thing we have teams of experts and millions of dollars in funding to come up with a comprehensive report analyzing years of data to tells us that completely and utterly destroying an entire ecological system is ... bad. And also not good.
If I hadn't seen that report, I might have still been "debating" the issue, after all, I really don't know what to make of schools of deformed fish unless the scientists can tell me that it's not a good sign.
In other words, thanks, scientists, for stating the obvious in a way that actually means the obvious.
It's mindblowing that when someone had the idea to blow up mountains for the coal, every other person didn't say, you are CRAZY!!!!
depends on who your peers are. demons don't give a fuck!!!
Obama can't win. He bans it and people have a hissy fit about jobs and energy costs. He okays it and all the progressives think he's a jerk. The man is in a prison and the American people have put him there.
How about WE all take some responsibility and let them know we are ready to reduce our energy usage 80%. That's what it will take...as long as there is demand and money to be made, somebody, some company, will find a way to provide it---guaranteed.
Such actions would be useless against MTR. As it is, MTR only accounts for a few percent of coal production in the US (maybe 10-15% of S. Appalachian production) - but it is a very profitable fraction of production. So, if demand was cut, they would simply idle the underground mines (where most of the production comes from) and keep the MTR operations going.
The economic force that would be most effective at stopping MRT would be higher diesel fuel costs, but Caterpillar has already come out with a diesel-electric hybrid dozer, and haul roads and trucks can be electrified with trolley catenaries.
Who put him in office - the people who are having a hissy fit? What view represents the majority of the voters? (the majority at the time he was elected; because now many are discouraged)
Everything that every politician does at any time at all, cannot be done without someone complaining. IMO, you never 'win'. A politician is elected to provide leadership.
Regardless of what we do, we can't relinquish control of our lives and rights and environment for any reason. I mean, there's money to be made in slavery if we want to allow it again. If the politicians don't respond to pressure from the people, and lie about what they said they would do - we are in a bad situation. Like now.
Our house of four adults does not own or drive an automobile. i do not fly. We wear hats and scarves in the house, and turn the electric heat on only very occasionally.
i ran my personal practices through one of those on-line "energy footprint" calculators, and came in around 10% of the average US profligacy.
And we DO NOT SUFFER. AT ALL. Our lives are rich, interesting, fun, and healthy.
i appreciate your call for an 80% reduction in personal energy use. It is NOT scary or painful, and WILL have an immediate effect on global energy use. IF widely practiced.
i appreciate that there are MAJOR institutional, political, economic, structural, social power imbalances. These should be directly confronted. But we also have vast personal power, and in most cases, we convince ourselves, and allow ourselves to be convinced, that we do not.
Way to go.. If we have a carbon tax (which I think we should - it's the only way, imo), you will see a $ windfall. Personally, I have relatives, and if I don't fly, I won't get to visit them.
'Personally, I have relatives, and if I don't fly, I won't get to visit them.'
Me too. That's why I moved away, and that's the way I like it :-)
You write:
"...in the long term we have to resign ourselves to figuring out to deliver ever increasing amounts of energy."
You live in a fantasy world.
In the REAL world, in the SHORT term, the living Earth is extremely stressed and obviously destabilized by human devastation and disruption, and we need to figure out how to live in ways that support and sustain the living systems of the Earth.
"Oh no! i CAN'T! We CAN'T! Bwahhhhhhhh!"
And right-wingers like you blather about "whining"...
Obama is supposed to be a leader, not someone who turns this way and that over people's "hissy fits". He campaigned on hope and change. Now he has strong scientific support for real change. Don't make excuses for him.
Democrat, eh?
Start serving deformed fish in the Senate Cafeteria and for Formal White House Banquets
and we shall see how quickly this rape of Mother Earth ceases.
Serving deformed fish in the Senate Cafeteria (if there was such a place) would only result in the beheading of the cooks. There's none so blind and he who doesn't want to see.
No, they won't behead the cooks.
On the contrary, Freedom Fishsticks will become the most popular item on the menu.
· Yr Obd't Servant
How ridiculous. When your Nation's economy starts coming back they will need more coal & nuclear power plants.
Like twin holes in the head.
How ridiculous. We need to strengthen our economy through government investment in solar, wind, algae, hemp and other forms of sustainable energy.
MTR and coal mining, and even just the generating plants, have killed far, far more people than the nuclear electric power industry ever will.
This a.m. (just before the scientific recommendation released):
Re: recent rhetorical/regulatory flip-flops on mt-top removal:
*******************************
Diane Rehm: "What's happening, is there a lot of lobbying going on?"
Pundit: "There's a lot of lobbying going on."
*******************************
Lobbying / bribery is just wrong dammit!
Congress as a whole, and each congressperson, should hold open hours, and take input from constituents, citizens, and non-citizens. "Lobbying" should be illegal.
Reps who need specific information on specific impacts of specific legislation can invite and hold open meetings with people who might provide answers to the reps questions.
OK it's late and i'm in a dream-world...
And so we grieve the death of a mountain; at the hand of President Obama. From the bailout, to the environment, to health care, to Iraq and Afghanistan, President Obama has been so disappointing. With only two parties and with both in service to corporate America and the elites, our country is a political dead zone. How can one look at the amputated stump of a beautiful mountain and feel anything but sadness? It's all so wrong and unnecessary.
Dissapointing is not exactly the word I had in mind. Destructive does come to mind, though.
US scientists should know that: (a) their government doesn't have much use for scientists who don't work on war toys; and (b) they have Blackwater to quash dissent.
Update:
This is the top story in today's Charleston Gazette.
Comments to the story seem to be running about 55%/45% in criticising/supporting the scientists' findings. The comments critical of the scientists are of the typical short-on-facts, manufactured facts, and ad-homineim type.
http://www.wvgazette.com/News/201001070420
thank you for this link...
human minds self-decieve in so many ways...
we educate as if science is critically important, yet legislate as if it isn't...
in junior high chemistry class, we were taught to observe closely, measure carefully and document clearly...
now, we are told to ignore such observations, measurements and documentation, along with their effects, even to our own peril?
the gun rules...
If you'd like to hear the scientists discuss their work, you can get the free download of the 7 January 2010 edition of "Head-On With Bob Kincaid" at
http://www.whiterosesociety.org/Kincaid.html
It was a discussion rife with chilling conclusions for those of us living in the Appalachian Mountain Removal Zone.
"To put it quite bluntly, my jaw dropped because right away I saw concentrations that were far above toxic thresholds," added Lemly.
-----------------------
Yes let the USA save the USA and continue to contaminate South America where US mines continue to contaminate drinking water with carcinogenic pathogens causing birth defects etc etc for the natives.
Its what the movie Avatar is all about and guess who are the Bad Guys ?????????????????????