New 'Prisoner Abuse' Photographs Emerge Despite US Bid to Block Publication
Graphic photographs of alleged prisoner abuse, thought to be among up to 2,000 images Barack Obama is trying to prevent from being released, emerged yesterday.
The shocking images of inmates in Iraq and Afghanistan were published just a day after the US president announced plans for a legal battle stop them ever being seen.
They risked provoking renewed hostility in the Middle East as Mr Obama attempts to build bridges with the Islamic world.
He is scheduled to make a major speech in Cairo on June 4 when he will launch his version of a plan to bring peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
One picture showed a prisoner hung up upside down while another showed a naked man smeared in excrement standing in a corridor with a guard standing menacingly in front of him. Another prisoner is handcuffed to the window frame of his cell with underpants pulled over his head.
Others yet to be released reportedly show military guards threatening to sexually assault a detainee with a broomstick and hooded prisoners on transport planes with Playboy magazines opened to pictures of nude women on their laps.
The images emerged from Australia yesterday where they were originally obtained by the channel SBS in 2006 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal. They were not distributed around the world at the time but are now believed to be among those the president is trying to block.
Mr Obama previously committed to allowing thousands of images to be published but changed his mind after senior generals warned that their publication could place US troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan in greater danger.
The president's change of heart brought bitter criticism from the left wingers and the American Civil Liberties Union, which had brought a freedom of information case against the US government applying to see the pictures.
Pledging to fight the case all the way to the Supreme Court, the ACLU accused him of betraying his principles of open government and "complicity in covering up" the "commission of torture by the Bush administration".
"It is true that these photos would be disturbing. The day we are no longer disturbed by such repugnant acts would be a sad one," said Anthony Romero, executive director.
"Only by looking squarely in the mirror, acknowledging the crimes of the past and achieving accountability can we move forward and ensure that these atrocities are not repeated."
The White House legal team was yesterday preparing for a June 9 deadline to present its case that it would be against the interests of national security to make the pictures public.
The controversy came as it was revealed that the administration is considering detaining terror suspects from Guantanamo Bay indefinitely and without trial on US soil.
Lindsey Graham, a Republican senator, said after meeting White House lawyers that terror suspects deemed too dangerous to release could be jailed permanently by a new national security court.
Other options include revising the Bush administration's military commissions for senior al-Qaeda suspects that have been criticised for relying too heavily on hearsay and uncontestable intelligence information.
When he took office on Jan 20 Mr Obama ordered that the prison at a US naval base on Cuba be closed within a year.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
127 Comments so far
Show AllHey i make a ad to help poor people from climate change!... see the video and sent it to all the people you know, together we can press the world leaders. See the video and send it please!!! this is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHRYCjStKr8
There will be a protest in Spokane, Washington on Thursday, May 21, 2009 at 5 PM at the corner of Washington and Riverside in front of the American Legion Building where CIA psychologists Mitchell and Jessen have offices. Spokane is the home of psychologists Mitchell and Jessen who, using the U.S. military's SERE survival training program (one of which is located just outside Spokane at Fairchild Air Force Base), reverse engineered those survival techinques to more successfully torture and breakdown human beings in the service of the post-9/11 lie of the empire's global war on terror. Mitchell and Jessen along with several hundred employees and contractors associated with other companies make up a key part of ground zero in the U.S. policy of torture.
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/06/21/cia_sere/
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/07/torture200707?curren...
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2009/04/levin-torture-int...
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/07/11/050711fa_fact4?currentPage=a...
http://psychoanalystsopposewar.org/blog/2007/08/27/protest-at-spokane-ci...
http://spokanepoliceabuses.wordpress.com/torture-sere-fairchild-spokane/
They do this stuff in US jails too. Abuse is everywhere, police enjoy it. We are too far gone already. Obama is an Uncle Tom.
The people involved are HOMOCIDAL MANIACS, they enjoy this twisted murderous crap. They run a country of fundamentally homocidal maniacs, there can be no other explanation.
So much for Operation Iraqi Freedom !
Talk is cheap americanos. The rest of the planet is wondering when you are going to get up off your big fat overfed asses and do something about your mass murdering,torturing,criminal government. And there's nothing new about these pics, they've been floating around the net for some time:
http://www.uruknet.info?p=20656
ps I include satan's little helper Canada in the above remarks, which is now fully infected with the same disease.
I would offer one point reguarding the argument that releasing more photos of Abu Ghraib would endanger U.S. troops, presumably by angering the populaces of the countries where these troops are stationed.
This argument is highly condescending, as well as factually without a foundation. The populaces of the Middle East countries where U.S. troops are stationed ALREADY KNOW about the atrocities -- because they are the victims of these crimes.
Dear rloh,
Here is your paraphrase of my remarks:
"Hidden efforts to obscure the truth?"
Here is what I actually wrote to jlocke123:
"I conclude by repeating my main point. . .
because I will not allow it to be hidden by your
efforts to obscure the truth."
In your two responses to my remarks, you have consistently distorted or omitted the facts of the case. Since you appear to be incapable of speaking truthfully, I shall waste no more time on you. The other members of this discussion forum can judge your actions for themselves.
Sincerely,
bsol
Dear rfloh,
Unfortunately, you are being less than candid in your characterization of the recent Pew poll. Here is a direct quotation from that poll, dated 23 April 2009:
"Currently, nearly half say the use of torture
under such circumstances is often (15%) or
sometimes (34%) justified; about the same
proportion believes that the torture of
suspected terrorists is rarely (22%) or never
(25%) justified."
You challenge my statement that "many people who oppose torture. . . are politically moderate." But the only other possibility is that the 47% of the U.S. population who say that torture is never or rarely justified are actually to the left of politically moderate. I dearly wish that this were so, yet realistically I am unable to accept this as fact.
Sincerely,
bsol
"Mr Obama previously committed to allowing thousands of images to be published but changed his mind after senior generals warned that their publication could place US troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan in greater danger."
--------------------
These people already hate our guts for what they know we've done to them, and what they *suspect* we've done to them. If they find out that what they suspect is not even as bad as what we've *actually* done to them, they will go f**king berserk.
So, let's not show them, OK ?
We promise not to rape little boys in front of their mothers, and to release the hounds on naked dangling testicles anymore, or waterboard prisoners to death, or smother prisoners to death, or beat prisoners to death, or let them die from hypothermia *anymore*.
And we'll try to tone down the 'gay sex slave in hell' Pulp Fiction stuff, a bit.
Promise.
So let's just keep this quiet...
You know, to Support the Troops.
I suppose it will be unpopular to say this, but I think sharing these photographs around the world only further exploits those who were tortured.
Here we are: curious and gawking at them.
It also makes us complict in the psychological torture of these men, to know that photos of their naked and tormented bodies are being broadcast all over the world.
It is difficult to imagine the double humiliation they must be experiencing now (provided they are still alive).
The third problem is that seeing these pictures (and I am not opposed to the truth coming out) helps to make this practice "normal" and so can't help but desensitize ALL of us to torture.
The situation is beyond horrible, with no good solution but to stop it once and for all (though extremely unlikely for that to happen).
My prediction is that not only will it continue, but that many more will actually embrace the idea.
Look at the accelerated race hatred and threats coming from the right for confirmation of this idea.
I agree.
And people should never have taken photos of those poor Holocaust dead. It just added to their humiliation and degradation. The world only needed to *hear* about what the Nazi's did to all those Jews and Gypsies, not actually *see* it.
I mean, you don't need a photo for PROOF of crimes, it is enough that there is a document, somewhere, that states that the crime happened, right ?
People should not be encouraged to gawk.
Nobody will ever deny the Holocaust, and no one will ever deny that Americans tortured Iraqis and Afghanis, so who needs photographs and videos ? They should all be destroyed, just to be polite to the victims.
I mean, look how *horrible* these kinds of photos are:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/holocaust4.jpg
http://isurvived.org/Pictures_iSurvived-4/HOLOCAUST-2corpses.GIF
http://sherryx.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/holocaust00.jpg
Nobody ever needs to see THOSE.
And all those "Holocaust Remembrance" Museums should be destroyed, they are just further exploiting those poor, murdered people.
I would say not exactly "curious and gawking" but since there is no energy in prosecuting these crimes which would be equal to encouraging this to happen again and again, it is one of the Responsibilities of Citizenship that we look at them, become enraged, and do something about it. If I was in one of those photos I would want people to know what happened and I would want at least justice if not full revenge. These photos are the truth, the memos are the truth, the executive orders are the truth. All of them painfully necessary because we let Bush take the Presidency away from Gore and Kerry. Having to view these photos is hard but necessary and important for us to demand a government which complements our soul.
I disagree that this is a left and right thing. Everybody from Obama on down is shrinking from their duty as citizens to prosecute and in many cases execute every single person who was involved in this. If these photos produce rage I am happy, for sometimes you (we) have to be willing to look over the edge of the abyss and see what is there if we don't take care of this nasty mess. Sweeping it under the rug is where it is going if we don't act quickly.
I am not ready for "Good Germanhood". We saw what happened there and it is ready to begin here with this stupid decision by Obama. Somewhere between 27 and 150 men and boys were murdered and nobody gets brownie points for commuting the death sentences for all of those involved in those murders which Obama is desperately trying to do.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
Good points, Penelope. I didn't look at the pictures, other than the one here. I don't need to and I don't want to - I am outraged enough without it. But I am glad that they have become public, because I hope that maybe it will finally get the attention of people who haven't been paying attention. I hope it will help them finally notice what has been done - what is being done, in one form or another - in their name.
Yes and the other 50% of the population needs to get it as well. Thanks for letting others in your circle now about it so they will DO something about it.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
ah jeez americathebrave
the world of myth
the world we want to want
wants you to be heroic
brave when it's difficult
not just when everyone's outgunned
brave enough to look squarely in the mirror
(which U should never do on acid)
Obamajestic promisedland o' freedom
step up
return to reason
or build more torture chambers and
pull the hood down
As bad as these pictures may be; only thing worse than these pictures....is not punishing the perpetrators.
Amen to that my friend.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
To JLocke,
I shall make one more effort to sort out your deceptions and crude insults. Your original message states:
"The only two parties that won seats in your parliament. . . ."
The United States does not have a parliament. So your use of the possessive pronoun "your" could best be construed, grammatically, to mean that you assume that the other author is a citizen of a country which does have a parliament -- e.g., Great Britain, which also is where The Telegraph is based.
Initially I read your first message as inaccurate but well-meaning. I could have interpreted your remarks as deceptive and dishonest, but I chose to reply to my more favorable estimation of your character. I see now that I was mistaken.
I conclude by repeating my main point, which you did not address at all, because I will not allow it to be hidden by your efforts to obscure the truth:
"Finally, of course The Telegraph is going to "call it as it sees it."
Which news organization does not? This is precisely my point --
that The Telegraph's conservative language and ideology ought not
to be accepted and repeated -- and thus given more prominence
and support -- by an organization which claims to be politically
progressive -- such as OCD. I repeat: OCD, please explain your
actions."
Hidden efforts to obscure the truth?
Here's a hint: the Telegraph ran the story. Prominently. On the top of the front page of their newspage when they first ran the story. Whereas a progressive newspaper such as the UK Guardian have not really reported on Obama's attempt to block the release of the photos. And the Guardian's editor of their US section, loves Obama. Even now, he is writing worshipful blog posts about him.
I didn't vote for Obama. I took him at his word that he would expand the war in Afghanistan. But I hoped that he would turn out overall better than I expected. He's turning out far worse.
The most chilling part of this is that Obama was involved in this horrible crap. He was a member of these committees. What a blow for the hopes of black people being trashed by a surrogate figure who was nothing but a perp who signed on to torture right in front of their hopeful eyes!!! Ugh!
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
I am devastated by the complicity in abuse that the Obama Admin (which I voted for) supports. He is the most accomplished bs'er we have ever had to endure.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
I am sickened and appalled when I think about our torturing other human beings. However, I want to see everything that was done to other people in my name as a US citizen.To gloss over what has been done to protect our troops is ridiculous. Is the public so stupid or "sensitive" that they shouldn't know or can't understand what the military does for "their good?" We just shouldn't have gone to Iraq. It does no one any good to ignore what we did. It is so sad. If only all the religions and other non-religious people who know what the "Golden Rule" means would consider that before they acted...
We have no right to call others,-Terrorist, and the Bush Regime have no right to walk Free, and Obama has no right to continue, where Bush left off. When will the madness stop?
How many more will be tortured, and die, in another crazy war?
It is imperative that these things that were done in our name become part of the public record. This is just the sort of thing we need an independent media for. Kudos to them for releasing the photos.
I agree that Obama is spending political capital he doesn't have. His bouyant approval ratings don't mesh with what I'm hearing on the streets and from my friends.
The best face you can put on it is that his naivety and inexperience have played into the hands of some malevolent forces who are manipulating him into thinking that American can have a military victory in the Middle East and frightening him with the spector of being the president who lost a war.
Releasing the photos won't endanger our soldiers as much as it will endanger the enterprise itself. Making the public the atrocities of war will bleed support for the ongoing wars and occupaton.
He doesn't seem to be adept enough or desirous of changing the paradigm; the war was a misbeggoten enterprise based on lies, a war crime by anyone's definition. The people who are the winners are the ones that stop the crime.
Horrendous as torture is, it doesn't compare to crime of aggressive war; destroying the lives of more a million people, ruining their countries and usurping their resources.
It remains to be seen if the American people can make their voices heard and to what extremes they will be forced to go to get the attention of a president and congress who are clearly hell bent on ignoring them.
he is a conniver, not an American president;...just a jive ass motherfucker which the republicans said he was. Oh my vote for him is so compromised and defiled by his actions. (SIGH) from a human who made a bad choice in a time of desperation.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
What is that old saying "The truth will out." Obama has made a serious mistake to think he could suppress the truth about what went on and perhaps still goes on in US clandestine prisons. Obama's credibility is fast eroding. He had a chance to make right the wrongs, but he has chosen to side with BushCo. Sad indeed.
Thanks for the tip on where to find other pix. At this point I can only say, Nazi is as Nazi does. Joe, Adolph and all the others would laugh their heads off.
Any Obama supporters still out there?
Care to defend this?
Sure it would endager our troops. Clearly in the war of ideas, what we are seen to have done legitimizes return in kind. I think we've clearly gotten the picture of what was done in our name, however vehemently we may disown them. It's simply politic to await the groundswell of public demand for the release, while preparing the prosecution of those responsible.
The conservative tactic in such matters has always been to sacrifice a few low-ranking operatives and hold a state funeral for those responsible umpteen years later when they die. Obama has already made it clear that he will not prosecute the minions, but that policy does not extend to those who gave the commands. So quit your belly-aching for immediate satisfaction. Make a few obvious connections by looking beyond the immediate shituation by thinking instead of merely ranting.
We have a role in all this, which is to hold his feet to the fire, and the attention of the nation. There are people out there who don't believe or understand that they've betrayed.
To that end, the pictures are leaking out, and the addition of those unbelievers to the groundswell is what will win the way. I think it's called persuasion, or teaching. Like all people, the unbelievers insist upon their natural right of making up their own mind themselves, and our strategy must respect that. Ranting will not suffice in its stead.
Once it has been determined to release the photographs, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. To the contrary, vox populi, the instigation of which is our job, can redirect the present stance.
" Obama has already made it clear that he will not prosecute the minions, but that policy does not extend to those who gave the commands "
then why hasn't he appointed a special prosecutor ? (if he's serious about holding policy makers accountable) is he waiting for franken ? what is he waiting for ? crimes were committed orders were crafted and implemented by someone.
easy solution for obama, no brain power required - appoint a special prosecutor and prosecute torturers and war criminals...
...peace...
"Your parliament"??
My family has been in the United States since soon after the Civil War; I have never even been to the U.K.
Although OCD did not say whether it had edited this news report, what there is of it refers solely to U.S. political culture -- where many people who oppose torture are politically moderate. Indeed, Obama's effort to quash the public release of such photographs has met with a popular outcry from a substantial portion of the political spectrum.
Third, since Obama's decision is very recent, it is not possible to ascertain how the U.K. population would vote on his shift in policy.
Finally, of course The Telegraph is going to "call it as it sees it." Which news organization does not? This is precisely my point -- that The Telegraph's conservative language and ideology ought not to be accepted and repeated -- and thus given more prominence and support -- by an organization which claims to be politically progressive -- such as OCD.
I repeat: OCD, please explain your actions.
"Although OCD did not say whether it had edited this news report, what there is of it refers solely to U.S. political culture -- where many people who oppose torture are politically moderate. Indeed, Obama's effort to quash the public release of such photographs has met with a popular outcry from a substantial portion of the political spectrum."
49% of Americans believe torture is acceptable, in a recent Pew poll. 49%. One in 2 Americans. Are those the "many people who oppose torture who are politically moderate" you are talking about?
-My family has been in the United States since soon after the Civil War; I have never even been to the U.K.
What in God's name are you going on about? Who said you visited the UK? Are you on drugs?
-"explain your actions"???
Take your meds my friend.
lol
OCD's behavior continues to lower its level of competence and honesty, in my view. This news story originated with The Telegraph, a fairly conservative publication:
"The president's change of heart brought bitter criticism from the left wingers and the American Civil Liberties Union, which had brought a freedom of information case against the US government applying to see the pictures."
Are we to conclude, then, that anyone who opposes a cover-up of atrocities is a "left-winger"? That, amid the world population, any such person is among a tiny minority?
Either OCD is asleep at the switch, or else it agrees with The Telegraph's ideology. Which is it, OCD?
CD, like a lot of sites, prints things it doesn't entirely (or even mostly) agree with. in this case, there is a larger issue that needs to be bro't out, even if CD doesn't agree w/every sentence.
also, reprinting stories from another newspaper? there are copyright/permission issues involved. i'm sure CD would like to reprint a lot of things, and it can't.
the problem w/CD is not its newspaper article reprints, but some of the individual submissions it accepts (eg., david michael green, joe brewer.) but even this statement reflects my own biases. for trying to appeal to a diverse "progressive" audience, CD does a pretty good job, much better than Kos, HuffPo, etc.
You are right, the telegraph tends towards the conservative, but in this case, they would say that they are calling it as they see it. The only two parties that won seats in your parliament, both of them support this decision either tacitly or explicitly. The parties that would oppose it were completely shut out by the voters.
Jeevee
This has become a fascist country, due to GREED.
Its amazing how happily some greet these pictures.
Would you be more "happy" were they never released?
Any elation comes from the FACT That the truth is revealed and not that the actions occurred.
Some people do not like the truth and are NOT happy when it is told. It seems mr More falls into that category.
There comes a time when you have to stop believing in Santa Claus, for your own good.
Thomas More -------- 4:07 ------- I assume when you are rendered to Libya and tortured , you will be quite content with no justice.
I am sure the Nazi's had a similiar mindset of smugness, exceptionalism, racism,denial,lack of accountibilty for crimes. And lastly no clue they were to be completely annihilated.
Moore name one country,in the last fifty years, that has been responsible for the deaths of more people outside it's borders than the one you are defending. Hint the total deaths need to be around 15 million or more More.
And why are you spelling your name incorrectly?
I know I could attract the rock throwers but I actually agreed with the administration's decision to attempt to block the publication of these photographs. For some reason I feel more comfortable with this decision being in the hands of the courts. I don't know exactly why I feel this way...but..... Thomas, I guess at the end of the day I felt that the administration must know something I don't. (Of course they do) Yet at the same time I want those responsible to be held accountable for their actions....Does that make any sense Thomas....??? Perhaps it is that I feel that this President (or any President) does not change his mind without good reason for doing so....Just a feeling...I could be wrong...
I think you have to weigh the public good of releasing these images. If we were talking about a common crime, then yes, don't feed the prurient. Here however we have front line senators and ex vice presidents disputing what happened on their watch, on your payroll...
And they are not advocating torture dolce voce either, They are making no bones about it -"the constitution is a gd piece of paper" -the law is a "nicety" -"torture works"
You chaps have a serious problem on your hands my friends.
1) What is one way complicity and group think start?
a) Accepting the assumption that these photos represent the photos Obama blocks from the public. We have no proof of evidence, only allegations from those who are releasing imagery out of Australia.
2) Why would people accept these images as the images that are blocked by Obama?
a) We are led to believe the information is representative of the facts. Still to this day, one of the best examples of the public's willingness to accept a news source use of "alleged" connections formulated in the false implications of Richard Jewell.
b) Because sensationalism and affirmation of our prejudice are desired even here on CD.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Olympic_Park_bombing#Richard_Jewell_falsely_implicated
==============
If we accept anything other than the release of the federal documents and federal photos from Obama and the federal government, then we risk allowing ourselves to accept a false document as the alleged document. How do we know these images are not a red herring? How do we know this is not a crafted plan? We do not because we can not validate and replicate. The only way for this to occur is with transparency from Obama who is stonewalling you and me, the public.
Today is Friday, and if one thing I learned from Bush, cover ups and sweeps and propaganda are best release on Friday because the news cycle doesn't have enough time to ferret out the facts in time to combat the spin and/or sensationalism.
Both voiceofreason and chuk-it-levi-strauss have a good point. There may be some intentional deception or "cashing on" on the part of tabloid papers.
Correct me if I'm wrong but some of these photos circulating are apparently from the same subset of pictures that the press got hold of at the time of the original abu ghraib scandal.
What Obama is withholding are, by all accounts, thousands of other photos and many videos that congress people who have seen them have described as much more shocking. These pictures form a more broad view of the torture programme and were taken not only in Iraq but in other countries hosting US prisons.
So you think that if the Feds release the photos (or ANYTHING, for that matter), it adds an air of credibility or authenticity?
Not in itself, per say.
What is needed is court process, and validation through replication of facts and evidence.
Once again it appears we are being duped by the tabloid journalism that has become SO prevalent even in the more mainstream media, for to pass these photos off as "newly released" seems to be nothing less than a bold faced lie.
For example, the photo accompanying this article was published as part of a 10 picture series on the Wired.com website on February 28, 2008 -- well over a year ago, and I have some of the same images saved on my computer dating back to May 4, 2004 -- over 5 years ago.
It should be noted that the article in the Daily Mail passing these images off as newly released has already been pulled. Hopefully the Telegraph will follow suit.
However, if anyone is interested, the original 2008 Wired.com uncensored photos may still be viewed at:
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/
multimedia/2008/02/gallery_abu_ghraib
Now I agree that these images are not just disturbing, but outrageous, and I personally believe the conduct displayed DEMANDS criminal prosecution TO THE TOP OF THE CHAIN OF COMMAND, yet one simply cannot ignore why these photos are being re-released now under the guise of being new. Is this just more of a media frenzy that feeds on whomever is in office?
And NO -- I did not vote for Obama! I voted as I have for the past 40 years -- for the person who most closely reflects my beliefs.
In Peace
In 1973 my kid brother and I walked around behind a brick courthouse in Deer Lodge, Montana and came upon six large deputies kicking the shit out of a prone, handcuffed man in a doorway. This went on for some time until one of them noticed us. They stopped and looked at us. "Can we help you?" one said. We quietly left.
This kind of thing, occasionally caught on somebody's candid camera, is absolutely common in every jailhouse in America, and probably even worse elsewhere in the world. Everybody knows it. Most people have glimpsed it. Prisons and battle zones were invented to give human nastiness a place to vent. To whom do we report it? If some federal judge ordered us to bring it all to light and fix it, where would we begin? Where would it end? I can understand Obama wanting to leave the bodies under the rug. Under a thin veneer of military jargon and the pretense of legality and correctness lies a dark void, vaster and more ugly than the administration or the American people will want to deal with. Whoever put into our children the wish to hurt and kill people, that's your culprit. And the crime occurred many thousands of years ago.
Great post voxclamantis. I suggest that this behaviour is enhanced and supported by sport hunting. Small-brained people with an underdeveloped cortex acting with teach their children to hunt and kill animals for kicks and encourage them to build within themselves a callous disregard for the feelings of living things (before the wingnuts start to clamor about killing for food I am not suggesting that if you are starving that you might not consider it but nobody really has to go that route). What we are talking about is a form of lobotomy for these people. Colonel Kurtz tries to elaborate this to Willard. Moonby (Hopper) learned the lesson and tries to warn Willard what he is going to find in Kurtz. There is so much in that film, I go back to it again and again for insight.
The sport killer (Dick Cheney is one) kills the stirrings of humanity in his soul so that conscience is drowned. It is a small step to kill and torture humans after that and makes barely a blip on emotional radar. The US Marines are especially adept at exploiting this weakness in their recruits. You are right that it is deep but it needs the nourishment of a drill sergeant to make eliminating conscience a shared community value. It is similar to "going native" and to my way of thinking, reprehensible. The killing of the peace impulse is a necessity for war.
When I was 10 I was taught that killing living animals was wrong. I took my Daisy BB carbine out one day and shot a bird in a tree dead; I felt so completely empty at the senseless act. When I gazed at the lifeless bird who a minute earlier was singing. I must have been real weird when I returned home and my mother immediately knew what had happened from the way I was acting. I told her what I did and she asked me "how did it make you feel?" I said "sad, very bad, and uncomfortable". That was 1957 and the first and last sentient being I ever killed.
The proto-humans who walk among us spiritually free men do not have these sensitivities and as a result they are very dangerous to everyone who walks the earth. And as we are becoming increasingly aware many of these lobotomized become police officers when they can't find employment after killing in the war. And you are right there is little we can do to stop it, except maybe through moral education which gets very little attention here in America. Other cultures, and especially the Hindus, have very strong moral traditions against killing; so much so that orthodoxy forbids even the breathing in of bugs for fear of harming them. This reluctance to murder has probably diminished since the British Empire poluted India with Western (lack of) Values. I agree that it is a largely American malady.
michael jordan
http://sites.google.com/site/apolloguide/
I had the exact same experience. It was 1955, I was fifteen. The gun was a .22 rifle. The bird was a camp robber (a kind a jay common to the northwest woods.) As it happened I only stunned it, so it came around and flew away about a half hour later. During that half hour I put my killer instinct to bed. This creature forfeits the enjoyment of the rest of its life so that I can see whether I'm still a good shot. I'm not squeamish. I still am able to kill half dead rabbits that have been hit by cars.
Because children take to killing with a kind of innocence and curiosity, then later either outgrow it or not, I think it is embedded in our nature. I agree with rtdrury that a just society should be pursued, per Kant. It has been done with some success. But human nature is always there, just as the primitive brain remains at our center. Kant knew this. Like the little dead girl in the well, our resident killer never sleeps but watches for ways to express itself in the world, right through our religious proscriptions and our community laws and our idealistic posturing. The price of peace is constant vigilance, not of imaginary evildoers so much as of ourselves. It is our society (Thomas More) that is exceptional, not ourselves. Our society is purely dumb luck - a new continent easily and decisively appropriated (by the slaughter of the Indians) full of natural resources and generally free of ancient tribal grudges. We are fat and generally content, and this is often mistaken for peacefulness. We've killed more Afghans than the Taliban has, so from their perspective (the crosshairs of American gunsights) we are perhaps not such sweeties. And there it is, after all. Little boys with guns, smoking motherfuckers and spreading democracy.
Great post voxclamantis. And so true. For every Rodney King tape, there are a million unfilmed incidences.
I submit that religion and television does this to us. It oversimplifies the world into Good and Evil. The Christian soldier vs the Devil. Not recognizing of course, that in each Homo sapien are both genes for anger and killing, and at the same time genes for empathy and symbiotic relationships. Behaviors ingrained in over four billion years of conflict and survival.
Before T.V. it was books glorifying war. And before books were oral stories around campfires.
But we don't have to live in a police state or a war economy. We can fix this mess. We can publicly execute Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield and GWB for nazi-type war crimes. Then the chance of this every happening again is lower.
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
The crime is ongoing everyday it is called Culture. And the USA is one of the most violent cultures in the World. Witness, Murder, Wars, Genocide and Torture. Yes there are worse and better Cultures. But not since the British empire has the duration and magnitude of the violence been so horrendous.
And yes every single USA citizen who is not participating in civil disobedience may be labeled as a "good German" i.e. supporter of atrocities.
Just as Nazi Germany committed war crimes and atrocities until the world rose up and crushed them, so will the same happen to the USA.
Remember 9/11 was aimed at the economic wellbeing of the USA, maybe it is succeeding even now.
You must be kidding. For God's sake, get out into the world and see some real violent cultures. See what people do that no one cares to talk about or see. See what real genocide is like rather than using the word for shock value.
I hope you aren't going to hold your breath waiting for someone to come along and crush us. We are not Nazi Germany, not even Germany in the thirties.
Go over to Burma (I refuse to use their trumped up name), the Sudan, Tibet, North Korea............................
Millions of Amerindians killed during the conquest
Millions of African slaves dead during the crossing of the Atlantic
Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Congo (1961), Chile (1973), Iran (1953), Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq...
2,319,258 USans behind bars in 2008, most of any nation (that's 1 in every 100 adults) [Feb. 29, 2008, The Baltimore Sun, also posted on Common Dreams]
"...since the murders of Robert Kennedy and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, well over a million Americans have been killed by firearms in the United States. That's more than the combined U.S. combat deaths in all the wars in all of American history." [Bob Herbert, "Hooked on Violence," The New York Times, April 26, 2007; also posted at Common Dreams]
See the number of people killed in multiple killings in the U.S. since the Columbine massacre
So, basically you are saying that the US is better than the worst in the world when it comes to human rights?
And about 49% of Americans in the Pew poll support the use of torture. About 49% of Americans in the Pew poll believe that what we pictures we are seeing here is acceptable. To keep them safe.
49%. Think about that. Not some just nutcases on the fringe. One in 2 Americans.
Moore ------ 4:05 --------- USA exceptionalism is part of your mindset.
One major reason for the USA revolution was to remove the British restraint protecting Native Americans from the colonists.
I suggest you ask a Native American if his people suffered Genocide.
10 Million dead SE Asians should shock anyone even if it not technically genocide.
And the use of agent orange to silt the canals and cause crop failure may be considered a genocidal stategy.
The USA tortured people, some completely innocent, in order to justify a criminal war.
1 Million Iraq's may make you think that yes the USA does rank with the worst Murders in all of history such as Stalin,Mao and Hitler.
The numbers do not lie unless you deny them.
Two atomic bombs on civilians, does not that put one with the worst of the worst?
The Murder rate in the USA is number twentyfive in the world even worse than some war zones.
Just because you live in a country does not mean you have to uphold it's criminality.
The US is the most violent culture on the planet.
Always has been, and getting worse.
Denial and lies do not change reality.
"Go over to Burma (I refuse to use their trumped up name), the Sudan, Tibet, North Korea"- Thomas More
Some more perspective for you Mr. More- none of those countries you listed have the fantasmic weapons systems in the most massive quantities as does the US. And we not only have them- we use them, with shocking 'success'.
And to glenn ford- most excellent reminder! "Remember 9/11 was aimed at the economic well being of the USA, maybe it is succeeding even now."-glenn ford
-get out into the world and see some real violent cultures
Yes, maintain perspective, I agree,...But on the other hand:
America's new slogan - "At least we're not Burma" (said with a resigned shrug of the shoulders)
Vox, human nature isn't the problem. The problem is the people's failure to achieve what is in their capacity to achieve - a just society. It has to be promoted.
As I posted earlier, by promising to release the pictures and then banning them, Obama's in fact giving the material greater prominence, which is ultimately his prime objective. This release by the Australians might have been orchestrated by the White House itself.
To inflame anti-American sentiment has always been mission number one of the Obama/Cheney White House and all administrations preceding it. America's mission has always been to throw as much gasoline in the fire as possible, so to justify and intensify the endless wars of terror against these infuriated, unfairly provoked civilians. Israel does the exact loathsome thing to Palestinians.
As if releasing these pictures could possibly increase anti-American sentiment any further anyway. Bush was right: the mission was accomplished a long time ago.
America has been HIJACKED to throw as much gasoline in the fire as possible.
Obama can’t alter this crime. He is a wheel, a gofer in the machine.
Take a view behind the curtain and be shocked.
>>> www.scribd.com/people/documents/2169400-ep-heidner <<<
Read “Collateral Damage” part I and II.
It will change the way you look at history, politics, finance, war and terrorism.
The details are well researched and referenced. The consequences are BEJOND BELIEF.
It's pretty amazing, Yachie, just as you said. I printed the whole thing out just in case it disappears. I would like to know more about the author, his background etc.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
There is nothing I could find about E.P.Heidner.
Quite likely a pseudonym for someone who seems to know an awful lot, maybe too much.
The articles are quite new (from early this year) and seem to wait for more public acknowledgment.
The facilty where I work has roughly 50% exmilitary, with a variety of "specialties". Since torture as a component of what our armed forces "do" in Iraq and Afghanistan has become public knowledge, many lips have loosened regarding the extent and TIMETABLE of the despicable practice.
Straight to my point- it's been going on for a LONG time; certainly at least back to Viet Nam. The federal government of the United States of America needs to be dismantled, post-haste.
On the right-wing and even centrist (like Yahoo.com) web sites I've visited, most people think these pictures show that the torture "wasn't that bad." Like this guy in the photo above was compared to doing yoga. Posters compare these pics with "the real evil" the "terrorists" do to "us."
I think the release of these pictures may be an elaborate show to cover-up the much more violent torture that goes on, including torture unto death.
This is nothing. For a time, I saw a cache of photos up on a picture server that included those shown by the MSM but included hundreds more of the same cells and same interrogators. Apparent decapitations?, a blood soaked hallway between cells, dogs biting prisoners, piles of dead bodies stacked on top of each other.... it was so horrific I had to just jerk the power cord out of the wall and go get drunk.
Then, that cache of photos mysteriously disappeared.
Some guards, no doubt, who posses these photos, occasionally release these to atone for their crimes or expose the crimes of their co-workers. How could you sleep when you found out there were no WMD's in Iraq and the bushmonkey made it all up?
I submit that, if the truth be known, most wars are like this. In the revolutionary war, in Jersey the british put captured prisoners on decommissioned rotting ships below decks in chains without food or water. Over a thousand died a slow agonizing death defecating on each other in the extreme foul heat. But the British military felt these subhuman "colonials" deserved no better.
Some things never change.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Oh, yeah--it wasn't that bad.
Perhaps every person who participated in torturing his or her fellow beings should be given EXACTLY the treatment they dished out?
Then we'll see how bad it was.
Wait till you see the blood.
Check out the link I posted earlier, one of the photos is practically nothing but blood.
Gringos invented gore.
And snuff movies, too.
It's already common knowledge around the world that the US tortures its prisoners.
The entire world knows the US is sick and depraved. Dogs and broomsticks were not used for confessions - they were used for the enjoyment of guards EMPLOYED and DIRECTED by US Officials.
There was a series of pictures showing the wounded of Falujah. Women with their faces destroyed (yet still alive) pictures of kids with missing limbs, burned civilians, kids playing in the sewage where there used to be a water system.
Where have these pictures gone ...where are the new pictures showing the horrors inflicted on the innocent -
There are hundreds of Bush officials and generals who should be held accountable in the world court.Instead they are given speaking engagements and honorariums and large sums of money for their revisionist biographies.
Obama should not fear pictures from GITMO. He should fear the pictures that show what we have done as heartless and callous imperialists
Wounded Afghan kids should be juxtaposed against Cheney feeding his grotesquely fat face.
Where are the pictures from the refugee camps that house millions of unfortunate Iraqis, Afghans and now Pakistanis.
The Iraqi war is far worse than Darfur
Obama must apologize to the world and begin by exposing the truth of what we have done as a sick and depraved nation
Screw you Barack Obama. Hopefully the USA will go behind your back on other issues as well.
Don't you all remember, it's not torture if the President says its 'ok'.
Once again we are told these sadistic acts are done by a few bad apples. These men or women who did this must have been taught to hate the victims they torture. Recently a soldier who had a comment posted called the people he was sent to fight rag heads ,They are dehumanized. The Islamic Law prohibits anyone from seeing the body of a Muslim except the Muslims spouse.This is torture that goes beyond the physical,and mental to the spiritual.
End the wars, the hate and torture and work for reconciliation, justice and peace please, President Obama.
"Once again we are told these sadistic acts are done by a few bad apples."- genie
And we've also been told in Cheney's own words that he and Bush approved it. So is this a straight up admission that THEY infact are the bad apples?
What causes a person to vote for the same party over and over again, and then Complain when that Political Party does not deliver on their promises?
I heard of an interesting experiment done by researchers where a Human was stacked up against a bird and a rat in a game.
The "game" was to hit a button corresponding to a red light that would appear on a screen. If they hit the correct button they would receive a reward. If they hit the wrong one, they could not press another.
The Bird and the Rat blew the human away. This was not because of faster reaction times. They blew the human away because they waited for the red light to "show its colors" before making their choice.
They found the human would press a button BEFORE the light appeared on the screen in the anticipation the correct one would be pressed.
Further studies showed that dopamine levels in the human test case were elevated BEFORE the button pressed rather then after the button pressed and reward won.
The human would make a choice BEFORE the light appeared in the HOPE they had selected the correct one and this anticipation was more rewarding in the way of dopamines then the reward itself.
In other words, if you truly want an INFORMED electorate who will cast a vote based upon a sober assessment of the reality of what best for them.
You would be better off were birds or rats to vote and humans left out of the equation.
Gawd. That is fascinating.
"...The images emerged from Australia yesterday where they were originally obtained by the channel SBS in 2006 in the wake of the Abu Ghraib scandal..."
- This is odd. It means SBS has been sitting on the pictures for 3 years, & has only decided to release them now -- right in the thick of the dispute over the photos in Washington?
I wonder what made SBS do this now, as opposed to earlier?
I found this on sbs:
--------------
Mr Carey said he could not explain why the photographs had not yet been published, as he thought it was likely that some journalists had them.
"It think it's strange, maybe they think its more of the same."
-------- I'll break the url in two as this site seems to have difficulty with them.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/the-photos-america-doesnt-want-
seen/2006/02/14/1139890737099.html
-----------------
this is from the bbc:
--------------
One of the videos broadcast on the Dateline programme appears to show prisoners being forced to masturbate for the camera.
Other video footage appears to show a prisoner hitting his head against a wall.
The channel said he was a mentally disturbed patient who became a plaything of guards who practised ways of restraining him.
Some photos are said to show corpses. There are also images of prisoners with body and head wounds.
Some of the pictures have now been re-broadcast on US networks and on Arab satellite channels al-Arabiya and al-Jazeera.
------------------------
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/
world/middle_east/4718328.stm
"One of the videos broadcast on the Dateline programme appears to show prisoners being forced to masturbate for the camera. "
This did happen, this video appears in the documentary Taxi to the Dark Side. It was pretty disturbing.
If we don't publicly fry "the Bush Six" for this, then we are as complicit as the nazis or AIPAC in Gaza. And the message that is sent to the rest of the world is "here is how to run a successful empire."
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Howard, maybe?
"It is true that these photos would be disturbing. The day we are no longer disturbed by such repugnant acts would be a sad one," said Anthony Romero, executive director.
That would make this a sad day for Obama.
It is a sad day for America that these acts of torture took place and are still taking place now,I believe! It makes me sad when I see more torture images but the truth needs to be revealed - fully.
RedTide May 15th, 2009 11:21 am..................."Shame on us all? I object! Do you blame all Germans for thr Nazi madness? This current mess the responsibility of the Republican and Democratic parties, which are the tools of imperialism. It is people who support those parties that are guilty of mass murder and torture."
You contradict yourself right in this paragraph.
I do not know if Communism or Socialism is the answer. At this point, I have come to trust NO form of leadership, since it constantly seems to be corrupted with the desire for power and wealth.
Further, I do not know what responsibility looks like in the case of the genocide we have committed, but an apology and some reparations would be a first step.
I admit to not having the answers....since you seem to, go ahead and start to initiate your program. I wish you the best of luck and fortune.
Where and how did RT contradict himself...?
Please enlighten us...