KBR Must Be Accountable for Iraq Deaths: US Senators
WASHINGTON - U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday raised concerns about the U.S. military's increased use of private contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan, and said KBR and other companies should be held accountable for the electrocution deaths of U.S. soldiers and other mistakes.
Democratic Sens. Robert Casey of Pennsylvania and Byron Dorgan of North Dakota said the Army recently told the mother of a U.S. soldier that her son's electrocution death in Iraq was not accidental, but a "negligent homicide" by contractor KBR and two of its supervisors.
"Soldiers have died. Someone needs to be accountable for that," Dorgan told a news conference, describing the Pentagon's use of contractors in Iraq a "huge mess."
KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne said the company's investigation had produced no evidence linking the company to the death of Staff Sgt. Ryan Maseth, who died from electrocution while taking a shower at his Baghdad base.
"KBR takes exception to the senators' assertion that we have been derelict in our duties to protect the troops," she said, pledging continued cooperation with the investigation.
Sen. Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who heads the Senate Armed Services Committee, repeatedly questioned Defense Secretary Robert Gates at a hearing Tuesday about the use of contractors to protect U.S. facilities in war zones.
Such work was "an inherently governmental function," he said. "It should not be performed by contractors."
Gates told the committee the U.S. military would need to continue using private contractors to provide security in Afghanistan, at least until U.S. troop levels there increased.
But he said he was creating a supervisory structure to oversee the work of private contractors in Afghanistan, based on an oversight body built up in Iraq over the past year.
"We're trying to take the lessons learned out of Iraq over the last couple of years in terms of the lack of oversight, and transfer that to Afghanistan," Gates said, adding that a broad study was underway about the use of private contractors.
He declined to comment on a report in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday which said U.S. troops had come into conflict with private security companies in Afghanistan, and some employees were taking orders from the Taliban.
Last month, five security guards who worked for North Carolina-based Blackwater, the largest security contractor in Iraq, were charged with killing 14 unarmed civilians and wounding 20 others in a 2007 shooting in Baghdad that outraged Iraqis and strained U.S.-Iraqi relations.
Gates did not address the electrocution death or the Blackwater incident directly. But he said the use of contractors "grew willy-nilly in Iraq after 2003."
"All of a sudden, we had a very large number of people over there and ... as became clear, inadequate capacity to monitor them," Gates told the committee.
He said training was one area that could be done legitimately and less expensively by contractors, but there had not been any coherent strategy thus far on "what we will allow contractors to do and what we won't allow contractors to do."
Gates said the military also needed to decide what to do with large quantities of U.S. government-owned equipment now being operated by private contractors, particularly once the United States began drawing down its forces in Iraq.
"All of this is going to require a high level of supervision and I think we need to think pretty quickly and ... with some agility in the Department of Defense to make sure that we get this right," Gates said.
Dorgan and Casey said they asked Gates to meet with them and Cheryl Harris, Maseth's mother, after an Army investigator told Harris in a December email that two KBR employees and the company itself could be criminally liable for Maseth's death.
Dorgan, who heads the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, said he has chaired 18 oversight hearings on contracting abuses and corruption in Iraq and Afghanistan, exposing "billions of dollars in wasteful spending," shoddy work by private contractors, and unsafe water supplies.
(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Richard Chang)
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
36 Comments so far
Show AllHere is the website with exhaustive documentation of KBR / Halliburton corruption: http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/
"KBR takes exception to the senators' assertion that we have been derelict in our duties to protect the troops." The only two ways anyone can say something like this is (1) you are being paid well as a weaselly lawyer or PR staffer, or (2) you have your head up your butt. There is a VERY long list of KBR issues, many of which are currently lawsuits in court.
And what is more appalling than the long list is that the Pentagon keeps giving them contracts. The main secretary in the military that did the typing of contracts and other official documents turned whistleblower on the issue of the Pentagon hiring KBR cronies into the contracting process. She was fired for her courage to speak out. Then there is the issue that KBR is not paid up on back taxes plus use offshore banking as a tax evasion strategy. So why are we continuing to employ a contractor that is unwilling to pay taxes???
The Pentagon's argument is circular. They hire KBR because they are the only company big enough to do the job. And why are they the biggest company? They keep getting no bid contracts or preferential treatment in the bidding process.
The Pentagon needs to be purged of all KBR cronies and held accountable for every penny of hard earn taxpayer money (or at least the money we are borrowing from China, Saudi Arabia and Russia).
The Nuremberg Trials made it clear that individuals would not be allowed to pass the buck trying to defend themselves from war crimes charges. For the U.S.A. to ignore this monumental decision that we have agreed to in the past, is treason from government and sheer stupidity for those who refuse to learn from history. Brain washing whether for the U.S. or Al Qaeda is a crime. How can the american people have become so ignorant and self serving?
Are the American people so stupid as to not understand what is really meant by the "talking point" on "Supporting our Troops!" How did a majority of the 350 million or so folks who call themselves "Americans" get so incredibly dumb? Bush, who for his purposes, served as an officer and a pilot, and his kind, those of the Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly ilk, aren't serious when they say they say the troops, because they know what it means. If there are still so many Americans who actually believe we support our youngsters, these guys get to go on with their garbage. How it is that any of them are still walking this earth is a mystery to me. If you really want to support your children, don't let them near any military for any reason whatsoever. Never again.
"Bush, who for his purposes, served as an officer and a pilot"
That coward "served" in the Reserves WHEN he showed up. Simply on the roles to avoid Viet Nam. None of the people you mentioned know anything about the "troops" They never served, but then those are the ones usually shouting the loudest and waving the flag hardest.
Supporting our troops is not a talking point when you mean it. No matter how you feel about these wars, remember these kids didn't have a choice nor did the 30-50 year old's in the reserves. Supporting them simply means taking care of them when they come back and not betraying them while they are there.
If you don't let your children near the military, then who would serve? Everyone else but your children? Not exactly fair I'd say.
If you are suggesting no military at all, then your children won't be posting anywhere and will not enjoy what you do. Or you are right and I'm wrong and the world is really filled with warm fuzzy folks that mean us no harm.
Thank you for your concurrence.
"They still have the firing squad available to them."
Sorry Grappa, the firing squad is far to easy and honorable for this bunch. Even under the UCMJ they have standards. Never waste bullets on carrion.
Grappa
An easy fix , they must be guided by what the servicemen are guided by ,the UCMJ . This would make them accountable to the Military high hierarchy. This would simply move it out of the private sector and into the DOD as pseudo enlisted men and woman, Just an act of Congress and the signature of President Obama to make it happen. Problem solved. Then if they screw up ,the military can handle it. They still have the firing squad available to them.
And Nancy Pelosi took impeachment off the table? It's time we got these bastards to pay for their crimes, especially since our elected representatives lack the principles to do their jobs.
SAMBO
where is Halli....I mean Chaney, he'll straighten this out
I would to see these KBR thugs take "electric" showers and see how they like it.
I'll be happy to pedal the generator.
"But he(Gates) said the use of contractors "grew willy-nilly in Iraq after 2003."..."willy-nilly": how quaint; or is such a statement better said to be outlandish or odd? Another day another dollar another reason to scream and holler! "I think we need to think pretty quickly and ... with some agility in the Department of Defense to make sure that we get this right," Gates said(weren't they suppose to add "said enthusiastically and sincerely"?) I suppose in NVC terms scoffing in Gates' face over such statements would be counter productive.
Halliburton has reached agreement with the Justice Dept. to pay $559,000,000 relating to corruption of it's former subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root.
(Dr. Strangelove collected $1,000,000 a year + stock options worth millions more from Halliburton in 'deferred compensation' while vice-president in contravention of the law while this rape of the U.S. tax-payer unfolded. The obvious conflict of interest being why it's illegal.)
Gates said training could legitimately be done by contractors.....well even if the truth was not that we should get out of Afghanistan, every last American, which it is, why should the U.S. tax-payer pay these creeps several times what a G.I. makes to do the same thing?
U.S. out of Central Asia. The Middle East. And North America too. azjoe.
$559,000,000 as a settlement for KBR corruption is corrupt in and of itself I'd say.
Thomas More. A-Greed. KBR had $16,000,000,000 worth of contracts in Iraq & Afghanistan from 2004 through 2006 alone. Sixteen Billion.
Given their absolutely corrupt, rotted, thieving core, I'd agree with you. The 559 million was token penance. A citation for a serial-rapist. azjoe.
There should be no private contractor military, and construction contractors should use their OWN equipment which should be figured into the cost. However, anyone who thinks contractors can do the same work cheaper and better than a government employee is an idiot who has never worked for the government. I worked for a municipal government water department for 21 years. The rest of my working career thus far was in the private sector. I have made a surprising discovery: Human beings worked for both; average human beings. NO superheros worked for either. Everyone for the most part put in a good 8 hour day. No one working for the City made the kind of money upper management makes in the private sector. No one in the specialized trades at the city made what their counterparts made in the private sector. What we had at the city was a pretty much guaranteed no-layoff, no lock-out, no strike kind of job that would be their when you retired. We also had pretty good Union negotiated benefits. Collective bargaining is a good thing, America. Government jobs are done by people too! When a private contractor gets into the mix, you get waste and corruption on a much grander scale. Not because they are more corrupt(they are mere humans too), but they have less oversight. Remember, the people who you might think are so inept that contractors are needed to do their jobs, are the ones who have the job of overseeing the contractors work.
As a long-time governemnt employee, I want to reinforce your comment that the belief that the private sector can ALWAYS do thing cheaper and better is misguided. The private sector can provide additional manpower and resources to assist in completing taasks, but whether or not this results in cost savings or an improved product, is on a case-by-case basis.
Perhaps the biggest drawback to outsourcing is the motivation behind how the work is done. For a business, it's maximizing profits and personnal gain. Just as Alan Greenspan was "Shocked" that buisnesses wouldn't act in there own self-interest, a private contractor isn't automatically going to provide the best and least costly results.
As a government employee, whose wages and benefits are fixed, your motivation is to do your best work. Personnal gain, outside of illegal and/or corrupt activities, it is not attainable. Shoddy construction, with the potential for personnal gain, would not be tolerated. Quality, longevity and safety, a wise expenditure of public dollars, is the driving force.
"I want to reinforce your comment that the belief that the private sector can ALWAYS do thing cheaper and better is misguided."
You are much too nice. Its an absurd theory put forth by folks that would like to do a little looting.
Check out the privitization of welfare services in Texas. A disaster. Check out the deregulation of electricity, its now in the hands of KKR, a hedge fund, and we pay much more than our surrounding states.
There are functions that only the government can do well.
"[Privitization] is an absurd theory put forth by folks that would like to do a
little looting."
I agree. And, it's more than "a little" looting.
"I agree. And, it's more than "a little" looting."
I stand corrected!
Good old Yankee ingenuity; you hire, train, supply and battle the same people you originally hired in exotic places on taxpayers dollars.
Do the Iraqis and Afghans a favor: Withdraw all troops and contractors. We've done enough damage already. What they need now are building materials and funding for their own people to do the work that needs to be done in reconstruction.
Does anyone remember when the highest-ranking civilian contracting officer in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bunnatine “Bunny” Greenhouse, testified before a congressional committee in 2005 that she found widespread fraud in multibillion-dollar contracts awarded to former Halliburton subsidiary KBR?
Aside from the fact that Bunny was demoted after blowing the whistle, why has it taken Congress all this time to acknowledge the massive fraud and losses as a result of hiring these money-grubbing contractors?
Has Congress been in a coma for the past 3 years?
I certainly do remember, and yes, Congress has been in a coma - intentionally, because the Speaker has been complicit.
Has Congress been in a coma for the past three years?....No! They have been complicit for even longer than three years.
I think it had something to do with Congress passing laws and the Bush gang responding with "signing statements" saying they were ignoring those laws. Perhaps also the fear of black ops against members of Congress. In other words, murder. That all changes with the new administration.
Naturally -------- Paul Wellstone ?
I once read everything Jim Fetzer had written about Wellstone's plane crash -- which was a lot -- and found the substance just wasn't there to back up his assassination theory. Although, it hasn't been disproved either.
But, I think congress persons feared the Bush gang's unbounded lawlessness and appetite for power and wealth. The anthrax attacks appear to be an inside job. The Kennedys, MLK, Hoover's FBI . . . the history is there. The entire Iraq War was founded on Bush/Cheney lies. When a president and vice president's criminal acts could literally result in prison terms there is an incentive to take the criminality to the next level. Fear of the power held by warped and possibly even mentally ill men may explain recent congressional actions and inactions. Moving this criminal gang out of Washington seemed to be the most prudent course.
The fact that we even entertain the idea that assassination is a possibility says enough about the political climate.
Joe
It was widely reported that congress was being threatened with Marshall Law as late as the Bankers Heist. A possibility that the Gaza Holocaust might have been a similiar situation.
12 years is more llike it and the coma continues.
GoldenMean
Thanks for the reminder. I'm ashamed to say I had forgotten it.
Of course... No mention of the Hellabortion employee who was gang raped by KBR employees... Then locked in a cargo container for a few weeks...
The headline is the soldier's death, but that's only emblematic of the larger issue: the "billions of dollars in wasteful spending," shoddy work by private contractors, and unsafe water supplies that Sen. Byron Dorgan -- a hero in the Senate -- has already uncovered in hearings. And, that's just the tip of the iceberg. The Bush gang has been looting the U.S. treasury, with no regard for either human life or our national interests.
This issue will be a litmus test for Obama. As a Senator he declined to support a bill banning the use of mercenaries and other contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. Will he now act to end the abuses, both human and financial, or not?
Its about time someone started holding these slugs accountable.
"KBR takes exception to the senators' assertion that we have been derelict in our duties to protect the troops," she said, pledging continued cooperation with the investigation."
I am overjoyed she is "pledging continued cooperation with the investigation." If not, I'd throw her ass in jail too.
These people not only stole billions of dollars, but murdered some of our troops in Iraq by their inepititude, cost cutting and downright fraud.
I'd bring back flogging around the fleet and keel hauling, but it would be too good for these slimey pieces of excrement.
My guess; negligent Homicide by electrocution in a shower equates with getting rid of a whistleblower in the shower.
negligent Homicide my a.., it was murder, but whistleblower, thats a possibility. Certainly is.