Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraqi Parliament Approves Landmark US Military Pact
BAGHDAD - Iraq's parliament on Thursday approved a landmark military pact that will see all US troops withdraw by the end of 2011, eight years after the invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein and plunged the country into chaos.
After 11 months of hard-nosed
negotiations with Washington and a flurry of domestic political
horse-trading leading up to the vote, the pact was approved by 149
members of the 198 who attended the session of the 275-member assembly.
The final count of the votes was provided by the office of Deputy Parliamentary Speaker Khaled al-Attiya, which corrected an earlier count announced during the parliamentary session itself.
Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shiite-led government succeeded in corralling a majority to support the historic agreement, including the main blocs representing the country's Sunni and Kurdish minorities.
"Today if this passes it will be a victory for democracy because the opposition have done their part and the supporters have done their part," government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said ahead of the vote.
"It is good to see that representatives have reached a national consensus."
The agreement was approved by the cabinet a week ago and is now virtually guaranteed to be ratified by Iraq's presidential council.
The United States hailed the passing of the agreement, saying it would "formalise a strong and equal partnership" in a statement from Ambassador Ryan Crocker and General Ray Odierno, the top commander of US troops in Iraq.
"(The agreement) provides the means to secure the significant security gains we have achieved together and to deter future aggression," they said. "We congratulate the government of Iraq and its elected representatives."
The measure would govern some 150,000 US troops stationed in over 400 bases when their UN mandate expires at the end of the year, giving the Iraqi government veto power over virtually all of their operations.
It marks a coming-of-age for Maliki's government, which drove a hard bargain with Washington, securing a number of concessions over nearly a year of tough negotiations.
The accord has still drawn fire from certain quarters, including followers of the hardline Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, who reject any agreement with the United States and who protested at the accord in Baghdad last Friday.
As the voting on the pact began several Sadrist MPs pounded tables in a bid to hinder the vote, chanting "Yes, yes to Iraq... No, no, to the occupation," but the 30-member bloc failed to defeat the agreement.
The vote came after a flurry of last-minute negotiations in which the main Sunni parties secured a package of political reforms from the government and a commitment to hold a referendum on the pact in the middle of next year.
Should the Iraqi government decide to cancel the pact after the referendum it would have to give Washington one year's notice, meaning that troops would be allowed to remain in the country only until the middle of 2010.
The pact was made possible in part by dramatic improvements in security over the past year, with US and Iraqi forces largely containing the violence and the chaos that erupted in the wake of the 2003 US-led invasion and Saddam's ouster.
But moments before the vote two people were killed and more than two dozen wounded in separate suicide bombings in northern Iraq targeting local security forces, underscoring the lingering violence in the country.
In the first attack south of the city of Mosul, a suicide car bomb rammed into a police patrol, killing two civilians and wounding 25 others, including 15 policemen, police said.
In the second, a bomber strapped with explosives wounded four people when the attacker targeted a police patrol in the centre of Mosul -- which the US military considers the last urban bastion of Al-Qaeda in Iraq.
Iraq won a number of concessions in the agreement, including a hard timeline for withdrawal, the right to search US military cargo and the right to try US soldiers for crimes committed while they are off their bases and off-duty.
The agreement also requires that US troops obtain Iraqi permission for all military operations, and that they hand over the files of all detainees in US custody to the Iraqi authorities, who will decide their fate.
The pact also forbids US troops from using Iraq as a launch-pad or transit point for attacking another country, which may reassure Syria and Iran, according to the official Arabic version of the pact, translated by AFP.
- Posted in



16 Comments so far
Show AllI see nothing here about removal of all the "enduring" military bases. What about them? Will they be turned over to the Iraqi government? Somehow I think not.
Peggy
This sounds like another case of the Bushies setting the table to straightjacket the Obama admin.
I don't like the idea of extending Obama's pledge to withdraw troops from Iraq within 16 months, and will fight it. However, I also realize that Bush has set many roadside IED's for the subsequent administration with the hope of taking as many casualties as possible. That is the ugly reality in which Obama must maneuver. I hope he chooses wisely.
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
This "agreement" memorializes the shift in power from the Sunnis to the Shia, with the Kurds as an independent third force. Like any undertaking originating with Dubya, Cheney, & Co., the details are hazy and not too worked out (considering their background as failed corporate types, is it any surprise). If I was a mercenary in Iraq right now, I would concentrate on getting out of there post haste, as the warning signs are there of the Iraqi government bringing some of the more egregious outrages to their version of justice.
www.wunderman-comics.com
"If I was a mercenary in Iraq right now, I would concentrate on getting out of there post haste"
Good point!
Secret SOFA provisions exposed
Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:43:39 GMT
An Iraqi media outlet has exposed 'secret' provisions of the US-sought security pact amid ongoing parliamentary deliberations on the deal.
The US seeks to legitimize its presence in Iraq beyond the expiration of its December 31 UN mandate in the country. The Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) it has pressured Iraq to finalize could provide Washington the legal backing it needs.
As far as the actual content of the pending SOFA is concerned, the White House has refused to publish the official English text of the agreement.
While US and Iraqi government officials have alleged that no part of the US agreement has been kept confidential, al-Moheet on Wednesday published what it called secret segments of the pending agreement.
The 'secret' articles posted on the Arabic-language website follows:
1. US forces are authorized to set up military bases to support Iraqi troops based on the security situation in the country.
2. This document is an agreement and not a treaty.
3. The Iraqi government and judiciary cannot prosecute US civilians or military personnel stationed in the country. All Americans are subject to immunity.
4. US forces are authorized to set up security establishments such as prison centers, which will be operated by the US military.
5. US forces have the privilege to do as they please inside their military bases and in transit. The Iraqi government has no authority to intervene.
6. US forces are authorized to arrest individuals who disrupt security and stability without Iraqi government approval.
7. The Iraqi intelligence, interior and defense ministries will remain under US supervision for 10 years.
The US-proposed SOFA has been passed by the Iraqi Cabinet and has received parliamentary approval but will be put to a referendum in 2009.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=76714§ionid=351020201
Lies. We are constantly fed lies and half truths. I believe nothing anymore. Its a sad state of affairs. But if we just give away another trillion to the already filthy rich I think everything will be okay.
-- EKATON --
This is President Bush's effort to prevent President-elect Obama from exiting Iraq. Obama has pledged to remove our troops in 16 months. I for one intend to hold him to that pledge. That will be sufficient time to collect, prepare for shipment and remove all of our military hardware from the country. Then as we leave, turn the bases over to the Iraqi military and except for the Embassy all troops should be brought home or re-deployed as necessary.
Jack
You write, "Obama has pledged to remove our troops in 16 months"
The president-elect wants US combat troops out of Iraq by May 2010, well before the pact's deadline. The joker in Obama's policy is his call for a "residual force" to stay to fight al-Qaida and carry on training Iraqis.
Plenty of flexability in the details. I stronly doubt any intention to leave "completely".
Bush is just trying to steal Obama's thunder.
Obama ended the Iraq war not Bush.
Joe Hope,
you wrote "Obama ended the Iraq war not Bush."
Are you serious? This is typical of the mentality that got Obama elected in the first place, in that it is DELUSIONAL!
Obama isn't even in office yet, the occupation isn't over in the least, and you are already claiming Obama ended the war.
Wake up!
SOFAs mean what I say?
WASHINGTON — The Bush administration has adopted a much looser interpretation than the Iraqi government of several key provisions of the pending U.S.- Iraq security agreement, U.S. officials said Tuesday — just hours before the Iraqi parliament was to hold its historic vote.
These include a provision that bans the launch of attacks on other countries from Iraq , a requirement to notify the Iraqis in advance of U.S. military operations and the question of Iraqi legal jurisdiction over American troops and military contractors.
Officials in Washington said the administration has withheld the official English translation of the agreement in an effort to suppress a public dispute with the Iraqis until after the Iraqi parliament votes.
When John McCain said we could be there 100 years, he was probably the most accurate out of all the politicians. How many bases do we have around the world in democratic countries? Germany is one I can think of right off the top, after WW II we have been there. Hmmm....most of the Island territories have bases like Guam, Puerto Rico, etc. Even Cuba has guantanamo and we have an embargo against that country. So our troops may be taken out of Iraq but we will forever have a base there as long as the dems and reps run our country...and a base requires some form of military personnel.
Tired of oil and pipeline wars? Join us.
http://freepublictransit.org
If they keep feeding us lies, eventually it becomes truth.
A 'democratic' government established under an ongoing foreign military occupation is not legitimate; nor are the acts of that government.
Harvey,
The USA is/was responsible for a Holocaust which it caused in Iraq from the 1990's to the present day.
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Iraq/US_Holocaust_Denial_Iraq.html
The sanctions etc during the 1990's caused 1.5 deaths -- the Gulf war with its Depleted Uranium etc -- has been the cause of 1,000's deaths and the birth of 1,000's of malformed children etc etc. Then the Invasion & subsequent occupation with over 1,200,000 deaths and over 4 Million displaced people !!!!
This has all been orchestrated by the American neocons (mainly Jewish) in the US Administration !!!
Their loyalty to the USA was "trumped" by their prime loyalty to the Right Wing Likud Government of Israel !!!
The people in this picture and many others could be considered traitors to the US.
http://nowarforisrael.com/
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
The US gives Israel $10 Billion per year and part of that money comes back to "control" American Politicians & the US Administration via AIPAC.
President Elect Obama's White House chief of staff is Rahm Emanuel and he and Michael Chertoff, and Daniel Samuel ,Joseph Adam Ereli are all sons of Jewish (Israeli )Zionist "terrorists".
They are all Dual citizens of the USA & Israel & have family in Israel and have a history of very strong support for the Interests of right wing Israel including the strong interest Israel has/had to "destroy" Iraq ,Iran ,Syria & Palestine etc etc.
Why is it totally ignored that these sons of Israeli Zionist terrorists from the Hagana, Irgun, and Stern Gang, have been and are are directing U.S. policy in the Middle East ??????
They could be as good as Zionist agents "groomed in Israel" with the intention to control the U.S. government ??
You would think that this "connection" would have raised a few questions !!! but never a mention in the American Media & the American sheeple now are buying the war against Iran from the same gang.
Dual loyalty & dual citizenship and a big invested interest should be of concern but is it ????
http://wake-up-america.net/
Are Americans aware of this very serious infiltration and is it in America's best interests ???
Is the "War on Terror" sold to the USA by the same mainly Jewish neocons just a War on Islam or a War on "any country " that Israel designates as an enemy ??
Is there is a danger of a future wave of Anti Semitism if enough Patriotic Americans get these facts.
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_STF.htm