

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A just-completed survey of Bernie Sanders delegates to the national convention gauged opinions of the Biden-Harris ticket. The survey, conducted by the Bernie Delegates Network, found that 33 percent "strongly disapprove" of the ticket, while 19 percent "somewhat disapprove," 24 percent are "ambivalent," 17 percent "somewhat approve" and 7 percent "strongly approve." (Charts are below.)
The survey is by far the largest sampling ever conducted of the Sanders delegates to the 2020 convention. A total of 510 Sanders delegates completed the survey online (each using a unique link that prevented duplicate voting). The survey was conducted Aug. 14-16.
"It's unclear whether Biden realizes the political realities that are reflected in these numbers -- and how they could hurt him in swing states if he mistakenly believes he has the left adequately on board for the Biden-Harris ticket," said Norman Solomon, a Sanders delegate from California who is national director of RootsAction.org, one of the groups sponsoring the Bernie Delegates Network. "This should be a wakeup call for the Biden strategists."
Jeff Cohen, a Sanders delegate from New York and co-founder of RootsAction.org, commented: "This survey shows that the Biden-Harris team needs to go further to unify the party in order to crush Trump in November. Bernie delegates are some of the most dedicated activists and respected Democrats in their communities, and hundreds of them are influential grassroots leaders in battleground states. Go-slow tepid liberalism may satisfy party power brokers and excite corporate media pundits, but it isn't getting the job done with important activists who know how to reach swing voters on the left."
Alan Minsky, executive director of Progressive Democrats of America, said: "This is hard data and the message is clear. To this group of core progressives, the Biden-Harris ticket has yet to close the deal adequately. We, at PDA, understand it is essential that Donald Trump be defeated this fall. We also feel that the huge progressive constituency is key to achieving that result. These poll results suggest that progressive activists are looking for the Democratic ticket to signal greater commitment to progressive goals. I do think that would be a winning approach, especially since progressive policies fit our emergency needs during the pandemic."
A former chair of the Progressive Caucus of the California Democratic Party who is a Sanders delegate, Karen Bernal, said: "The challenge the ticket represents is that we are fighting for something that goes well beyond returning to the days before Trump -- that's what sets us apart from establishment Democrats who pine for the days of Obama. We are committed to the push for changes that are necessary and foundational if our nation and the planet are to survive and have any sense of well-being. Improved Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, ending a racist criminal injustice system at home and militarism abroad -- if Biden is inaugurated, expect the honeymoon to last about 30 seconds."
The survey offered respondents the option of adding their comments, and 170 of the delegates chose to do so. Here is a sampling of comments:
** "I, of course, would have 100% preferred Bernie as President but at this point I am focusing my efforts on getting Biden elected and other progressives in office."
** "I think the ticket has the potential to defeat Trump/Pence, but that alone is insufficient. I am unconvinced that this ticket will lead to necessary structural change to how our government works for its citizens (and not corporations). I am troubled that the ticket has not (yet?) embraced M4A [Medicare for All]."
** "Excited to have a black and South Asian woman on the ticket. But not convinced the policies we need will be forwarded by this administration."
** "I will support the ticket but would like to see bolder candidates supporting MFA [Medicare for All] and GND [Green New Deal]. These are the transformative issues for the next generation and this ticket does not speak to these issues."
** "It'd be great if they could extend an olive branch to progressives but they keep missing the opportunity."
** "I think it's incredibly tone deaf to pick a former prosecutor and AG after an entire summer of the largest social uprisings since the 1960s, protesting police brutality and systemic racism. I believe Harris brings more baggage to the table and doesn't do enough to unite the party. There were plenty of other women of color who would have been exceptional choices, that would bring everyone to the table and mobilize thousands of grassroots activists around the country."
** "This country needs leaders who are not taking big money from or are aligned with corporate interests. We need Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, real criminal justice system reform, and to get big corporate money out of politics."


RootsAction is dedicated to galvanizing people who are committed to economic fairness, equal rights for all, civil liberties, environmental protection -- and defunding endless wars. We mobilize on these issues no matter whether Democrats or Republicans control Washington D.C.
The president is trying to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook for alleged mortgage fraud. Critics say he's targeting another one of his political foes.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell reportedly plans to attend Wednesday's US Supreme Court oral arguments in the case involving President Donald Trump's attempt to fire Fed Gov. Lisa Cook.
A "person familiar with the matter" told the Associated Press on condition of anonymity that Powell would attend the high court session in the face of Trump's unprecedented effort to oust one of the seven members of the Fed's governing board.
Last August, Trump announced his termination of Cook—an appointee of former President Joe Biden—for alleged fraud, accusing her of signing two primary residence mortgages within weeks of each other. An investigation published last month by ProPublica revealed that Trump did the same thing that he's accusing Cook of doing.
Cook denies any wrongdoing, has not been charged with any crime, and has filed a lawsuit challenging Trump’s attempt to fire her. In October, the Supreme Court declined to immediately remove Cook and agreed to hear oral arguments in the case.
In what many critics allege is an attempt by Trump to strong-arm the Fed into further interest rate cuts, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) earlier this month served the central bank with grand jury subpoenas related to Powell's congressional testimony on renovations to Fed headquarters in Washington, DC.
Powell—who was nominated by Trump in 2017 and whose four-year term as Fed chair ends May 15—responded by alleging that “the threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the president."
"This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation," he added.
Trump is trying to install his puppets at the Fed.First by trying to fire Lisa Cook and rushing in his top econ adviser.Now by abusing the law to try to push Jerome Powell out for good.Next he'll nominate a new Chair—and Trump says “anybody that disagrees" with him is out.
[image or embed]
— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) January 15, 2026 at 7:54 AM
In addition to Cook, Trump has targeted a number of Democrats with what critics say are dubious mortgage fraud claims.
Last November, a federal judge dismissed a DOJ criminal case against New York Attorney General Letitia James, who was charged with bank fraud and false statements regarding a property in Virginia. Critics called the charges against James—who successfully prosecuted Trump for financial crimes—baseless and politically motivated. A federal grand jury subsequently rejected another administration attempt to indict James.
The president has accused other political foes, including US Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Eric Swalwell—both California Democrats who played key roles in both of the president’s House impeachments—of similar fraud. Swalwell is currently under formal criminal investigation. Both lawmakers deny the allegations.
"Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
After flirting last year with forming his own political party, far-right billionaire Elon Musk is funding Republican political candidates once again.
Axios reported on Monday that Musk recently made a massive $10 million donation to bolster Nate Morris, a MAGA candidate who is vying to replace retiring US Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
Axios described the massive donation, the largest Musk has ever given to a Senate candidate, as "the biggest sign yet that Musk plans to spend big in the 2026 midterms, giving Republicans a formidable weapon in the expensive battle to keep their congressional majorities."
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) reacted with disgust to the news, and said that Musk's enormous donation was indicative of a broken campaign finance system.
"Are we really living in a democracy when the richest man on earth can spend as much as he wants to elect his candidates?" Sanders asked in a social media post.
"The most important thing our nation can do is end Citizens United and move to public funding of elections," he added, referring to the 2010 Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for unlimited spending on elections by corporations. "Billionaires can’t be allowed to buy elections."
Democratic Maine State Auditor Matt Dunlap, currently running to represent Maine's second congressional district, also denounced Musk for throwing his weight around to buy politicians.
"Billionaires buy our elections, rig the tax code, and undermine our democracy," wrote Dunlap. "Working people deserve a government that works for them—not for billionaires like Elon Musk."
Musk is no stranger to spending big to help elect Republicans, having spent more than $250 million in 2024 to help secure President Donald Trump's victory.
However, his riches are no guarantee of a GOP win. Last year, for example, Musk spent millions to elect former Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel to a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court, only to wind up losing the race by 10 points.
"This is the third person who has died in the $1.24 billion privately-run facility that focuses on profits instead of meeting basic standards," said one lawmaker.
Officials in both Texas and Minnesota are calling for accountability and a full investigation into conditions at Camp East Montana, the sprawling detention complex at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas, following the third reported death at the facility in less than two months.
Victor Manuel Diaz, 36, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in Minneapolis, where ICE has been carrying out violent immigration arrests, cracking down on dissent, and where one officer fatally shot a legal observer earlier this month.
He was one of roughly 2,903 detainees being held at Camp East Montana at Fort Bliss US Army base, one of the largest ICE detention centers in the country, on January 14 when contract security workers found him “unconscious and unresponsive” in his cell.
He was later pronounced dead and ICE released a statement saying he had died of "presumed suicide," but officials arre still investigating his cause of death.
Diaz's death comes days after it was reported that a medical examiner in Texas was planning to classify another death reported at Camp East Montana—that of Geraldo Lunas Campos—as a homicide.
A doctor said Lunas Campos' preliminary cause of death in early January was "asphyxia due to neck and chest compression." An eyewitness said he had seen several guards in a struggle with the 55-year-old Cuban immigrant and then saw guards choking Lunas Campos.
A month prior of Lunas Campos' death, 49-year-old Guatemalan immigrant Francisco Gaspar-Andres died at a nearby hospital; he was a detainee at Camp East Montana. ICE said medical staff attributed his death to "natural liver and kidney failure.”
Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan called for a "complete and transparent investigation" into what happened to Diaz after his death was announced Sunday.
"We deserve answers," said Flanagan.
US Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), who last year expressed concern about the US government's deal with a small private business, Acquisition Logistics LLC, to run Camp East Montana, said the detention center "must be shut down immediately," warning that "two deaths in one month means conditions are worsening."
After the administration awarded a $1.2 billion contract to Acquisition Logistics to build and operate the camp, lawmakers and legal experts raised questions about the decision, considering the small company had no listed experience running detention centers, its headquarters was listed as a Virginia residential address, and the president and CEO of the company did not respond to media inquiries.
"It's far too easy for standards to slip," Escobar told PBS Newshour after touring the facility. "Private facilities far too frequently operate with a profit margin in mind as opposed to a governmental facility."
In September, ICE's own inspectors found at least 60 violations of federal standards, with employees failing to treat and monitor detainees' medical conditions and the center lacking safety procedures and methods for detainees to contact their lawyers.
Across all of ICE's detention facilities, 2025 was the deadliest year for immigrant detainees in more than two decades, with 32 people dying in the agency's centers.
After Diaz's death was reported Sunday, former National Nurses United communications adviser Charles Idelson said that "ICE detention centers are functioning like death camps."