Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Report: Public Banking Can Democratize the Economy
In the wake of the financial crisis that the U.S. is still clawing its way out of, a handful of ideas have begun to surface that might actually shore up our still-floundering economy and, potentially, avert future devastation. (No, not the eminently gutless Dodd-Frank bill.) Rather, public banks — also known as state banks or partnership banks — provide a path for the people to harness some economic power of their own in order to build a broad-based, ground-level prosperity which is rooted in their community.
Public banks bring the power back to Main Street rather than Wall Street.
John David, of the Public Banking Institute, recently outlined the basic public banking model for Shareable in great and accessible detail. As evidence of the almost 100 years of success of the Bank of North Dakota (BND), David writes, “Currently, North Dakota ― in part due to the BND’s beneficent influence ― has the lowest unemployment rate in the nation (just over 4%), has no debt to service, has a $1.1 billion surplus, has experienced no bank failures in the state, and is the only state in the last two years to avoid a budget deficit.” Basically, while so many other states were capsizing on the waves of job loss and crashing on the rocks of failed mortgages, North Dakota maintained a smooth and steady course.
Thanks to BND's impressive and indisputable history, the legwork has already been done, the game plan all mapped out. Other states simply need the political will to move their own economies out of the turbulent waters ruled by the pirates of Wall Street. Thankfully, we're starting to see just that sort of action.
In California, AB 750 “would establish the investment trust blue ribbon task force to consider the viability of establishing the California Investment Trust, which would be a state bank receiving deposits of state funds.” The bill, having passed through various committee vetting and approvals, goes to a vote on June 1. With its efforts, California joins Oregon, Washington, Massachusetts, Arizona, Maryland, New Mexico, Maine, Illinois, Virginia, Hawaii, and Louisiana in pursuit of a public bank.

Demos, a non-partisan public policy organization, in conjunction with the Center for State Innovation, recently issued a studied look at the potential for partnership banks across the country, including an eye toward the 11 states already considering such legislation. These various proposals would “move general revenue deposits out of the Wall Street banks that dominate the banking business today, and use them to capitalize a new local public structure with a mission to grow the local economy.”
In essence, Main Streets and state capitols alike would flourish, if given the chance and the resources. Local economies and state budgets would both be bolstered by a “bankers' bank” system — one that increases revenues (partially through dividends earned on loans to small businesses and community banks) without raising taxes.
The study found that, using the BND model, public banks would:
- Create new jobs and spur economic growth. Partnership banks are participation lenders, meaning they partner — never compete — with local banks to drive lending through local banks to small businesses. If Washington state had a fully operational partnership bank capitalized at $100 million during the Great Recession, it would have supported $2.6 billion in new lending and helped to create 8,212 new small business jobs. A proposed Oregon bank could help community banks expand lending by $1.3 billion and help small business create 5,391 new Oregon jobs in its first three to five years. All of this would be accomplished at a profit, which partnership banks should share with the state.
- Generate new revenues for states directly, through annual bank dividend payments, and indirectly by creating jobs and spurring local economic growth. The table above shows projected dividends for established partnership banks in the states considering such proposals, based on BND’s 2009 dividend payment to North Dakota’s General Fund.
- Lower debt costs for local governments. Like the Bank of North Dakota, partnership banks can get access to low-cost funds from the regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The banks can pass savings on to local governments when they buy debt for infrastructure investments. The banks can also provide Letters of Credit for tax-exempt bonds at lower interest rates.
- Strengthen local banks, even out credit cycles, and preserve real competition in local credit markets. There have been no bank failures in North Dakota during the financial crisis. BND’s charter is clear that its goal is to “be helpful to and to assist in the development of [North Dakota banks]... and not, in any manner, to destroy or to be harmful to existing financial institutions.” By purchasing local bank stock, partnering with them on large loans, and providing other support, partnership banks would strengthen small banks in an era when federal policy encourages bank consolidation.
- Build up small businesses. Surveys by the Main Street Alliance in Oregon and Washington show at least 75% support among small business owners. In markets increasingly dominated by large corporations and the banks that fund them, partnership banks would increase lending capabilities at the smaller banks that provide the majority of small business loans in America.
In his Shareable piece, John David took the possibilities even further, suggesting that public banks might:
- Stimulate the economy by prioritizing the creation of essential jobs;
- Cut investment costs in half or more with low-interest financing for homeowners and businesses;
- Make health care affordable;
- Issue import-replacement loans to develop in-state versions of products that are currently imported;
- Issue credit cards at affordable interest, say 6%;
- Tie a portion of the increase in state revenues from the bank to tax reduction;
- Offer zero-interest loans as community equity loans for public infrastructure/benefit;
- As the Ithaca Hours Bank does, offer such loans to individuals for home improvements, etc.
He also imagines a network of these institutions that would, essentially, create a shareable banking system, inasmuch as there ever can be such a thing: “Sister public banks could align and strengthen their efforts, exchanging exposures among themselves so as to self-insure. Through networking them, we will create a national community credit-generating system, a large source of investment dollars that has been sorely lacking. That would transform the ongoing race to the bottom into prosperity for all.”

30 Comments so far
Show AllPublic banking can Democratize the economy.
True. That's why it will never happen.
I think the Aussies had a wonderful public bank called the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. And then it was plundered by the usual, capitalist-villain suspects, who've been so busy destroying the rest of the world economy. It had been an enormous asset to everyone.
There's more to learn at Ellen Brown's website on Public Banking:
http://publicbanking.wordpress.com/ Of course, the Federal Reserve Bank is trying to discredit public banking so they can maintain their stronghold on their perverted system of domination at the expense of everyone but the super-wealthy.
May I substitute death grip for stronghold?
Expect the bankster media shills to go into full froth mode over this one, especially if California AB 750 moves forward. Considering that California is the ATM of American politics and is the home to one of the largest institutional investors, CALPERS, in the USA, plus factoring the truism of the state being the bellweather of America, expect the bankster, led by Wells Fargo to pull out every dirty trick they can think of to defeat this. It is incumbent upon progressives to be ready for this and to push hard for this to happen, because as the saying goes, 'Money makes the world go round.'
This is the first time I've heard the "public bank" idea, and it sounds very good. Generally, I find alternative economy to be one of the most important projects in building a better world, around progressive, green, etc. values.
However, the ideas in this article are painted with a very, very wide brush. I still feel that I'm not exactly sure what a public bank is, as compared to conventional banks.
Also, as a person living in Minnesota, I'm aware that there is a ton of new development of petroleum resources in North Dakota. A skeptic could read this article, and since the new petro-development is not addressed here, they could refute the claim that public banking has anything to do with the current economic well-being of North Dakota. They could argue that it has everything to do with new oil. So, that should be addressed, even if only briefly, if North Dakota is to serve as an instructive example.
ND may have signed their death warrant in these endeavors. The twin brothers of petro-development and private banking go hand in hand wherever they land. Boom/busts are inevitable in such cases. Either ND legislators knew this going in, or is wholly unaware of who has been introduced into their so far, "closed" economic house. Time will tell.
I believe that anything that will help get wall street thieves and the thieving hedge funders out of our pockets is a great benefit, but the fact is these people own our politicians leaving us just screwed. The recalls in Wisconsin would help show that the Republicans taking the house and so many governor races was a mistake.The banking industry is ran by people like the koch brothers, they do not give a shit about you or main street.
Good point. The reason nothing is made here anymore is that the big banks don't give a damn about the United States or its people. For the past two generations the banksters have only been interested in breaking unions and would only invest in new plant and equipment in places with slave labor like China. There never has been anything wrong with the American worker. The jobs were sent overseas by the bankers and the trade barriers that protected the American worker were destroyed by politicians who were bought and paid for by the Wall Street crowd.
This idea makes me think that the ability to make money out of thin air, lend that money and charge interest could belong to the people and not just to the private interests. Why should the people of this country be compeled to borrow money from some profit oriented private business (if held by shareholders or not)?
Let us be our own bankers. Kill the monopoly on creating money and lending.
It is the Federal Reserve that decides how much money is to be printed and what the interest rate will be to borrow it. They have a mysterious formula like, how many new people will enter the work force so how much money should we print for added payroll, old money destroyed, whatever. So when the head of the Federal Reserve says we're in deep shit, you'd better believe it, as Ben just told us.
This is neither new nor breaking news. CD itself has listed articles on the BND several times over the past couple of years, but it sure is refreshing to read nonetheless. The fact that states are finally "researching" the viability of a 150 year old institution, though ludicrously late to the game, gives me a small amount of hope. Unfortunately, what should happen when establishing more BND like state financial institution models is that they should be organized even more democratically than the existing one so that any money earned really is used to establish and enhance existing public services. I'm sure i'm not the only one, being stuck in this comically criminal political environment, that feels that any effort to establish such a system seems very far-fetched.
How do we start one?
The first link leads to the Public Banking Institute, which seems to have some good info on Legislative and other action.
How do we make sure that our bankers don't get too rich and powerful?
new48er: "A skeptic could read this article, and since the new petro-development is not addressed here, they could refute the claim that public banking has anything to do with the current economic well-being of North Dakota. "
Good point - In fact, this has been addressed by the Public Banking Institute in their report, "Banking on America"
( http://www.demos.org/pubs/Demos_State_Bank_Paper.pdf ): "The Center for State Innovation analyses compare North Dakota’s lending market against those in states with similar populations and economies: Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming. All four states also have benefited from a boom in energy prices—in fact, Montana and Wyoming have extracted much more gas than North Dakota—but North Dakota ranks ahead on the measures that BND influences: loan-to-asset ratios, average loans per capita, quality of bank assets, HHI, and numbers of banks per capita."
Polonius:
Neither a borrower nor a lender be,
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
Hamlet Act 1, scene 3, 75–77
Manysummits
=======
So what f---head. Socialism is anathema to the big banks which own the U.S. Government and chained lackey dog Congress. I would like to see it tried.
Right on.
About a third of the way through the linked shareable article one comes across this line:
"Public banks, on the other hand, invest in our needs, not Wall Street greed. Unlike socialism, where the people work for the state, this is the state working for the benefit of the people. The idea is to complement private banking with a public, non-profit alternative. Complete transparency is essential to prevent corruption of this essential public utility."
Complete transparency. Check. How can one have complete transparency while working hand in hand with or complementing private institutions that have repeatedly proven themselves to be criminals?
Do I even have to mention the blatant misrepresentation of socialism? That alone had me stuck on this paragraph...rereading and rereading. I'm not sure why people can't let go of capitalism. Even within a topic such as this where the argument should be undeniably strong in favor of it.
I love the idea of a state bank... but, I fear that the "partnership" model would eventually become a poison pill, with the private banks working continuously to increase their share of the profits. I fear much the same with the "public option" version of providing health care insurance.
Libya set up a similar institution. Will NATO start a bombing campaign to "protect civilians" if California decides to keep its pension funds instead of turning them over to Wall Street as is done now?
Yet public loans are of a different breed.
So let thy judgement pause and lose its haste.
The megabanks are steeped in wanton greed.
While community banks in partner with a state
Support small business in their time of need.
Borrowing is the only way small business can operate.
Most jobs are created by small business.
The big banks are gobbling up community banks
and whatever else they can grab.
The big banks have mostly stopped lending to small business
because, in part, there is more profit to be made elsewhere.
Public banks are a vital counterbalance to private banking power.
If kept transparent, they can help local economies thrive.
I wrote the statement about socialism because public banking has been attacked as being socialism. That could prevent it from helping us out of the mess we're in. Is public banking the total answer? No, but it's the only thing we have with a proven track record that could improve local economies at a time when the megabanks are grabbing for all the marbles. The socialism many Americans are afraid of is the Soviet Union's version, and that was about working for the state. America has always had socialist institutions, but the propaganda has made it difficult to promote. And now the privatize everything movement is on the march.
State banks don't partner with the megabanks, but with the community banks that are not, by and large, criminal. The big boys are arguing against the idea at public hearings, but the CA bill did pass the house.
Undermining a positive solution to appease the ill-informed will always be less effective than educating them. I disagree on the method, but relate to the bogeyman status the word "socialist" often evokes.
Where can one find more about these public hearings? My state and city cites don't mention anything about them, though Arizona is on the list of those supposedly contemplating it.
Do you really believe in your most delusional moment, that Golden Sacks, Skank of America, Wackhovia, President Zero, Timothy Geithner, Ben Bernanke or the Boner would ever allow public banking without first destroying our economy more than it already is. The American taxpayer is a cash cow that these bastards are going to milk for every penny they can get. Anything that helps the everyday American is socialism, and socialism is evil, evil because.........well, because Milton Freidman and the rest of them told us so! Right? What a bunch of Maroons!!!
Exactly! If anything they will pass a bill allowing banks to own property. That's the beginning of the end. Anti-trust that's only for people who can't afford expensive lawyers.
pbecke (6/12 12:36pm) has pointed out a serious flaw here, i.e., the plundering of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Anyone pursuing this option in their state should be very careful of the co-opting phenomenon. Do not let rose-colored glasses hide truth and reality. Will Robert Rubin be on a committee?
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance" Thomas Jefferson (maybe)
To keep track of the hearings, see publicbankinginstitute.org.
As far as the megabanks letting it happen, we do have a 100-year-old success story in North Dakota. The FED tried to sue them out of existence in 1919 but the court said no. As conditions continue to worsen, the push for public banking will grow as its the only counterbalance we have right now. The nasty ways of the financial elite are becoming more and more known. Perhaps we will soon be able to challenge their legitimacy and end the hundreds (if not thousands) of years of domination.
We're doing it all wrong trying to play by their rules. We need "New Rules". Hear's one - put a ten # bluefish in a safety deposit box and leave town. That's how you deal with those suckers. They can't open that box and the stink will make them close the bank.
When organizing in Boston in the 70s, the electric company was planning a hike. By law they had to have an open hearing, but they were planing their own quiet personal hearing which Mass Fair Share found out about. They pulled together all the little communities like (mine Dorchester) and showed up at the State House 10,000 strong, 9AM, including every daycare center we could get (cause they won't cart you off to jail if your holden onto 4 kids). Not only did they NOT get the rate hike but had to give back 2 million in over charges. That's how you do it. Teach the kids how to do it.