Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
BP and the 'Little Eichmanns'
Cultures that do not recognize that human life and the natural world have a sacred dimension, an intrinsic value beyond monetary value, cannibalize themselves until they die. They ruthlessly exploit the natural world and the members of their society in the name of progress until exhaustion or collapse, blind to the fury of their own self-destruction. The oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico, estimated to be perhaps as much as 100,000 barrels a day, is part of our foolish death march. It is one more blow delivered by the corporate state, the trade of life for gold. But this time collapse, when it comes, will not be confined to the geography of a decayed civilization. It will be global.
Those who carry out this global genocide-men like BP's Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who assures us that "The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean. The amount of oil and dispersant we are putting into it is tiny in relation to the total water volume''-are, to steal a line from Ward Churchill, "little Eichmanns." They serve Thanatos, the forces of death, the dark instinct Sigmund Freud identified within human beings that propels us to annihilate all living things, including ourselves. These deformed individuals lack the capacity for empathy. They are at once banal and dangerous. They possess the peculiar ability to organize vast, destructive bureaucracies and yet remain blind to the ramifications. The death they dispense, whether in the pollutants and carcinogens that have made cancer an epidemic, the dead zone rapidly being created in the Gulf of Mexico, the melting polar ice caps or the deaths last year of 45,000 Americans who could not afford proper medical care, is part of the cold and rational exchange of life for money.
The corporations, and those who run them, consume, pollute, oppress and kill. The little Eichmanns who manage them reside in a parallel universe of staggering wealth, luxury and splendid isolation that rivals that of the closed court of Versailles. The elite, sheltered and enriched, continue to prosper even as the rest of us and the natural world start to die. They are numb. They will drain the last drop of profit from us until there is nothing left. And our business schools and elite universities churn out tens of thousands of these deaf, dumb and blind systems managers who are endowed with sophisticated skills of management and the incapacity for common sense, compassion or remorse. These technocrats mistake the art of manipulation with knowledge.
"The longer one listened to him, the more obvious it became that his inability to speak was closely connected with an inability to think, namely, to think from the standpoint of somebody else," Hannah Arendt wrote of "Eichmann in Jerusalem." "No communication was possible with him, not because he lied but because he was surrounded by the most reliable of all safeguards against words and the presence of others, and hence against reality as such."
Our ruling class of technocrats, as John Ralston Saul points out, is effectively illiterate. "One of the reasons that he is unable to recognize the necessary relationship between power and morality is that moral traditions are the product of civilization and he has little knowledge of his own civilization," Saul writes of the technocrat. Saul calls these technocrats "hedonists of power," and warns that their "obsession with structures and their inability or unwillingness to link these to the public good make this power an abstract force-a force that works, more often than not, at cross-purposes to the real needs of a painfully real world."
BP, which made $6.1 billion in profits in the first quarter of this year, never obtained permits from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The protection of the ecosystem did not matter. But BP is hardly alone. Drilling with utter disregard to the ecosystem is common practice among oil companies, according to a report in The New York Times. Our corporate state has gutted environmental regulation as tenaciously as it has gutted financial regulation and habeas corpus. Corporations make no distinction between our personal impoverishment and the impoverishment of the ecosystem that sustains the human species. And the abuse, of us and the natural world, is as rampant under Barack Obama as it was under George W. Bush. The branded figure who sits in the White House is a puppet, a face used to mask an insidious system under which we as citizens have been disempowered and under which we become, along with the natural world, collateral damage. As Karl Marx understood, unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force. And this force is consuming us.
Karl Polanyi in his book "The Great Transformation," written in 1944, laid out the devastating consequences-the depressions, wars and totalitarianism-that grow out of a so-called self-regulated free market. He grasped that "fascism, like socialism, was rooted in a market society that refused to function." He warned that a financial system always devolved, without heavy government control, into a Mafia capitalism-and a Mafia political system-which is a good description of our corporate government. Polanyi warned that when nature and human beings are objects whose worth is determined by the market, then human beings and nature are destroyed. Speculative excesses and growing inequality, he wrote, always dynamite the foundation for a continued prosperity and ensure "the demolition of society."
"In disposing of a man's labor power the system would, incidentally, dispose of the physical, psychological, and moral entity ‘man' attached to that tag," Polanyi wrote. "Robbed of the protective covering of cultural institutions, human beings would perish from the effects of social exposure; they would die as victims of acute social dislocation through vice, perversion, crime, and starvation. Nature would be reduced to its elements, neighborhoods and landscapes defiled, rivers polluted, military safety jeopardized, the power to produce food and raw materials destroyed. Finally, the market administration of purchasing power would periodically liquidate business enterprise, for shortages and surfeits of money would prove as disastrous to business as floods and droughts in primitive society. Undoubtedly, labor, land, and money markets are essential to a market economy. But no society could stand the effects of such a system of crude fictions even for the shortest stretch of time unless its human and natural substance as well as its business organizations was protected against the ravages of this satanic mill."
The corporate state is a runaway freight train. It shreds the Kyoto Accords in Copenhagen. It plunders the U.S. Treasury so speculators can continue to gamble with billions in taxpayer subsidies in our perverted system of casino capitalism. It disenfranchises our working class, decimates our manufacturing sector and denies us funds to sustain our infrastructure, our public schools and our social services. It poisons the planet. We are losing, every year across the globe, an area of farmland greater than Scotland to erosion and urban sprawl. There are an estimated 25,000 people who die every day somewhere in the world because of contaminated water. And some 20 million children are mentally impaired each year by malnourishment.
America is dying in the manner in which all imperial projects die. Joseph Tainter, in his book "The Collapse of Complex Societies," argues that the costs of running and defending an empire eventually become so burdensome, and the elite becomes so calcified, that it becomes more efficient to dismantle the imperial superstructures and return to local forms of organization. At that point the great monuments to empire, from the Sumer and Mayan temples to the Roman bath complexes, are abandoned, fall into disuse and are overgrown. But this time around, Tainter warns, because we have nowhere left to migrate and expand, "world civilization will disintegrate as a whole." This time around we will take the planet down with us.
"We in the lucky countries of the West now regard our two-century bubble of freedom and affluence as normal and inevitable; it has even been called the ‘end' of history, in both a temporal and teleological sense," writes Ronald Wright in "A Short History of Progress." "Yet this new order is an anomaly: the opposite of what usually happens as civilizations grow. Our age was bankrolled by the seizing of half the planet, extended by taking over most of the remaining half, and has been sustained by spending down new forms of natural capital, especially fossil fuels. In the New World, the West hit the biggest bonanza of all time. And there won't be another like it-not unless we find the civilized Martians of H.G. Wells, complete with the vulnerability to our germs that undid them in his War of the Worlds."
The moral and physical contamination is matched by a cultural contamination. Our political and civil discourse has become gibberish. It is dominated by elaborate spectacles, celebrity gossip, the lies of advertising and scandal. The tawdry and the salacious occupy our time and energy. We do not see the walls falling around us. We invest our intellectual and emotional energy in the inane and the absurd, the empty amusements that preoccupy a degenerate culture, so that when the final collapse arrives we can be herded, uncomprehending and fearful, into the inferno.




180 Comments so far
Show AllThis essay is so depressing because it is so accurate. Chris Hedges reminds me of a raging Old Testament prophet, whose words are ignored by the ruling elite and the enslaved masses. If God exists we need his or her help more than ever, but then again, if God exists, would we be in this state?
Yea that was one heck of an article. So full of sad truths that it was almost too painful to read.
As far as "God" goes, if there is one, it appears to be only a creator of all things, and that is it, as far as I can reason. As far as we can scientifically observe and reason, the Universe as we know it did not always exist, and so was in some way "created" almost 14 billion years ago. So if it was created, there may have been a creator. Maybe that creator is simply the singularity from which the universe sprung forth from. Who knows, I sure don't, but I have no reason to believe, hope, or conclude that there is some sentient being watching over us, that we can pray to, that will save us from ourselves. As far as I can see we are on our own, and need to act accordingly.
In my opinion god was created in man's own image as a justification for man to separate himself from the animals and the natural world. Any fundamentalist will tell you that the world was put here by god to serve man. We can do no wrong to the earth because it was given to us by god. And of course that loving god will save us from ourselves if we make too many mistakes. Well, not all of us. Only the good christians will be raptured out of this world while the rest suffer from our sins. Then after god kills off all the sinners he'll return the raptured people to a renewed earth and a godly kingdom.
What a crock.
Aside from that, my opinion is that Hedges is right on. And it is depressing. But it's been obvious for years that we are headed for catastrophe.
The only question remaining is, will homo sapiens sapiens survive the collapse. I suppose that depends on how long we continue the rape of the planet.
glb,
Certain fundamentalist religous groups yes, but that belief is contradicted by the Bible's view of our stewardship of the earth...
"But the nations became wrathful, and your own wrath came, and the appointed time for the dead to be judged, and to give [their] reward to your slaves the prophets and to the holy ones and to those fearing your name, the small and the great, and to bring to ruin those ruining the earth.”
Revelation 11:18
Notice, 'to bring to ruin those ruining the earth'. The ability to ruin the earth has reached a near end as stated by Mr.Hedges.
You've hit upon a major line of division between the people & the unlawful ruling class of monied elites of the whole world. Humans are another order of creature above the natural realms of plants & animals, & therefore MUST be responsible stewards of this planet. Any "primative" shamanistic culture(I prefer the term Elder Nations) can tell you the entire creation is stunnningly complex & filled with higher/supernatural orders of beings (eg. angels,demons, djinns,devtas,faeries, gods & goddesses,tricksters,rakshas,elves, etc...). Humans are the humblest species of THIS order of creature, NOT entirely of the NATURAL realm.Any wiseman or wisewoman can tell you much better than I,( a wounded/mutilated speciman of MODERN humanity)about the totality of the creation, BOTH seen AND unseen.
The unlawful rulers WANT you to believe you are nothing more than a beast-of-burden/slave/serf/etc (so they can justify in their sociopathic minds their continuing abuse of you) existing in a "dog-eat-dog" world of nature that is RED in tooth & claw.
My understanding of native cultures (the "primitive" ones) is that they believed every individual of a tribe to be just as important as every other. Each had the responsibility of contributing to the survival of the tribe. And the leaders were looked upon to lead and never to benefit personally from the experience. And if they failed the tribe simply stopped following and followed someone else.
They were also aware of their place in the universe as an individual with an intimate connection to the universe and every other living thing on the planet. And respect for all life and honor were the cornerstones of their societies.
Respect is gone. Honor has been perverted.
Mother nature will crush us and our "leaders" will fight her to the death. Our death.
While posting this will bring the wrath of certain people...the Bible does presciently indicate this period of time in mankind's affairs.
"Also, there will be signs in sun and moon and stars, and on the earth anguish of nations, not knowing the way out because of the roaring of the sea and [its] agitation, 26) while men become faint out of fear and expectation of the things coming upon the inhabited earth; for the powers of the heavens will be shaken. 27) And then they will see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 28) But as these things start to occur, raise yourselves erect and lift YOUR heads up, because YOUR deliverance is getting near.”
Luke 21:25-28
Not wrath, but scorn and even contempt. Biblical twaddle is of no value in these times.
Twaddle is as twaddle does.
A quote from a book 150 years after the carpenter died makes as much sence as the usual pauline christianity rubbish
Pete
I wonder if Luke used mustard and mayonnaise with his BALOONEY sandwich?
The Bible, the Koran and the Ramayana to, where written by people.
Sometimes inspired people, but people. Maybe even Other World people.
CD and bible study: What is this World/Forum coming to?
Interesting that you would say that PeterPP...due to the C inc CD representing the word 'common'.
What is the best selling and distributed single volume book in world history, with between 2.5 and 6 billion in ciculation?
I'll give you one guess.
And if it is that interwoven into the social fabric of mankind or such an integral part of it's 'commons', why would it be unreasonable for womone to quote from it. After all the books you would quote from are only written by 'people'.
P.S> I wouldn't eat baloney or mayo, they are grossly over processed products that are not goof for you at all.
Now mustard...that is an interesting analogy...that reminds of a Bible verse quoting Jesus, "He said to them: “...For truly I say to YOU, If YOU have faith the size of a mustard grain, YOU will say to this mountain, ‘Transfer from here to there,’ and it will transfer, and nothing will be impossible for YOU.” Matt.17:20
So what created the creator?
Hollywood.
God gives us all free will, Eagle Bill, the choice to make decisions be they good or bad. I think a better question to the question of does God exist, is why does mankind, God's ultimate creation, choose to use its free will in ways that are clearly unsustainable, if not catastrophic.
Of course, if you spend time studying the New Testament, minus the filter of organized religion, you may find the answers you're seeking.. and more importantly, your role in God;s Plan.
May God have mercy on our souls!
I'm personally not comfortable with the 'God's ultimate creation' idea. It implies a separateness from nature which is part of how we are in trouble in the first place. You could call all of nature, 'God's ultimate' - that seems a little more fair. Also, how do you know there are not some super-advanced beings elsewhere that are really the 'ultimate creation'?, leaving us like insects in comparison?
"Stay away from churches, son. The only thing they have a key to is the shit house." - William S. Burroughs
God is bullshit. There is no god. People who believe in god are scarcely worth talking to.
There is definitely no Sky Daddy, but may be a 'higher order' of being, which we are presently unaware of. I don't particularly like the word 'God'; it has been used to abuse and exploit so many. And I'd agree that organized religion is little more than mechanical superstition. Also, simply believing in something is virtually useless, and the defense of belief the cause of so much violence and oppression in the world.
And yet, General Organizational Directive assimilates us... resistance is futile...
God, if He, She, or It exists certainly does not intervene to prevent beings from destroying themselves. Does God even give us a choice in the matter? Or put another way: is it possible for us NOT to destroy ourselves? Absolutely. But apparently we cannot live unconsciously and live in harmony at the same time. This tells us that most are simply unaware of how self-destructive they are. Does that mean there is no God? Not necessarily.
It's called Capitalism, Chris. It destroys everything in it's path.
This nonsense about 'corporate capitalism' and 'predatory capitalism' is a waste of adjectives. It is Capitalism, plain and simple. Just because it's showing it's teeth doesn't make it any different than it was the day before.
Regulate, they say.
The Roosevelt boys both tried their hands at that, it works until you turn your back. Every time it is shackled it burst loose with renewed vigor and rapacity. Such is the nature of the beast, the pursuit of greater profits will not be thwarted, it is mandated by the system. The greed which some bemoan as being the problem is secondary, when the system rewards greed then greed is what you get.
So please, let's stop the parsing. If you're OK with the roller coaster ride which is inescapable with the capitalist system, the periodic misery, the institutional injustice, the imperialism, the degraded life support services of Earth and the collapse of biodiversity then by all means, declare yourself. Likewise, if you're ready for something completely different then say so and say it loudly, so that we know how strong we are. The time is now, there is no viable middle ground, the only thing on the center line is roadkill.
Which side are you on?
I thought that Chris implied his opposition to capitalism, disaster capitalism anyway. I don't see why he is not on our side.
There is no such thing as 'disaster' capitalism. The disaster is capitalism. Naomi Klein's version of this is a misreading of the thing. The implication is that there is some other version of capitalism that is not a disaster or that could, maybe, somehow be okay.
"Monopoly Capitalism", "Corporate Capitalism", "Crony Capitalism", "Disaster Capitalism", "Unbridled Capitalism", "Green Capitalism" and on and on and on...
Just more talk from the liberal fetish cult of a kinder-gentler form of capitalism which always exists just around the corner and nowadays ya' gotta have a Prius to get there.
Sorry folks but the bodies are piled a mile high from the real Beast, CAPITALISM, and all the the above imagined "variants" are nothing more than the standard operating principles of this Beast.
You'll have better luck trying to reform sharks into vegans.
Everything has to be overturned. There aren't any half-measures that are going to accomplish anything. Those are being thrown out there by people so they can avoid the truth and distract others from the truth. There is not going to be any health care reform, global warming is not going to be stopped, jobs are not coming back, wages are not going to improve. There is no way to reform the system, there is no way to make it work, there is no way to fix things.
The degree to which critical commentary on any issue leads people to see that it all must come down, it is constructive and powerful to that degree. The degree to which it leads people to think that we are or could be "doing something" to "solve" that particular problem in isolation, without challenging the entire system, is the degree to which it is destructive and reactionary.
There are not some good things about the system that we need to worry about saving, with some bad things that need to be "regulated" or overcome through "doing something" or making personal changes. The self-censorship (or denial) that so many are indulging in, supposedly in order to persuade people without "offending" them, to avoid "alienating potential friends and allies," and the whole idiotic "winning friends and influencing people" approach must end.
It all has to come down, and there is no reason to hesitate or be cautious in our critical commentary, no reason to entertain the "on the other hand" stuff that people put out there to mitigate our criticism - actually to oppose our critical view in a covert and deceptive way. Attack every aspect of it everyday everywhere with everyone. Capitalism has distorted, corrupted, and perverted all of our social relations and arrangements, everywhere. Nothing is free from its clutch. Nothing positive can exist within it. It all has to come down, it all must be overturned.
All of the "OK I see what you are saying, and agree with you, but what is your plan?" responses are also covert opposition and are reactionary. Here is the plan - it all must come down. Would we tell people to not treat pneumonia until and unless they have a plan for the rest of their lives, or a guarantee that the disease will be eliminated once and for all by their plan and that everything will then be perfect? The society is ill, the disease is Capitalism, and it has spread to all parts and is destroying everything.
Mcoyote, I share your views that the system in the US has gotten to the point that everything must collapse so that we will have the opportunity to rebuild our economy but we must also establish the correct system for doing so lest we allow the monied elites to sneak in and takeover so soon and give us another disaster. Listen, I have been to Europe and I can tell you that even there capitalism is taken rather well because it is nothing like the US although the recent economic turbulence might be pushing it that way. Yes, there is socialism and I would give anything to see this nation have a people's socialism but I find myself in agreement with most Europeans that even a little wiggle room of regulated capitalism doesn't hurt. I love socialism in Europe because it exists with regulated capitalism and is there to prevent capitalism from slipping into disaster mode. However, even in Europe and Russia, having a system that is 100% socialism will not sit well with the public. Put it to a people's vote and I guarantee you that at best 51% would accept that idea of all socialism and I am not kidding. The recent political trends and elections in Europe only confirm that people like to see socialism mixed with regulated capitalism and economic sovereignty.
Hello Jennifer,
Doesn't this socialism mixed with regulated capitalism that you advocate for still deprive most of the world from achieving a basic standard of living? Don't these economic systems in Europe and the US still require that a minority of the earth's population (about 1 billion people) act as parasites on the labor and resources of the rest (about 5.6 billion people)? How does socialism mixed with regulated capitalism address the problem of sustainability? The whole world can't live like Europe and the US can it?
The US and Europe differ on socialism and capitalism. Forget population numbers as it is a distraction. The economic system in Europe, while not perfect, is in most of those nations far better than the US. There is a socialism for everyone in Europe while in the US socialism exists for only the privileged. Capitalism also exists in Europe but governments there see to it that large corporations don't get too far out of control and giving small businesses their freedom while in the US, what we have is disaster capitalism of rewarding large corporations regardless while persecuting small businesses. Think about it. In Europe, there are more small farms from which healthy food and produce gets a fair say, people believing in sharing, education is decent compared to the US, there is universal health care in various forms from single payer to multipayer while putting a leash on Big Insurance, and caring for people of all ages. The economy could crash in Europe and there would be a soft landing for people to recover and get back on track but not in the US. However, this does not mean that I would go back and live in Europe because I have been used to living in the US all my life and especially in the heartland. I also feel like staying and fighting things out so that I just might be one of those who sees to it that Europe and the rest of the planet don't get dragged into the USA's crumbling. Socialism provides a basic safety net for all and prevents corporate misbehavior while regulated capitalism gives us a little more room to wiggle while not allowing corporate disasters to strike. The whole world cannot live like the US but I would give most European nations a chance. Other than Russia and South Africa, I haven't visited outside of Europe but hope to sometime later in my life. I still feel the need to visit Europe and the rest of the world for longer periods of time for strange reasons but that will have to wait of course.
Jennifer, I have been to the Far East this year and some of what you say about Europe is also true in much of Asia. It is somewhat a compromise between US and Europe but it isn't as bad in the less crowded nations. In most crowded nations, things are often worked out to mitigate the population issue. Beware of neo-malthusians who try to blame everything on population numbers only.
I'm not asking if European socialism is superior to the US's corporate controlled, inverted totalitarian capitalist system. That's not up for debate, of course our system is more ruthless, murderous, and built upon more human misery than the Europe socialist countries. My question is why do we need the capitalist leeches at all, including in socialist societies? As European style socialism is far superior to our crumbling and inhumane capitalist system, is is still built upon the exploitation of non-whites and their resources outside of these two continents and is completely unsustainable.
"My question is why do we need the capitalist leeches at all, including in socialist societies?"
I cannot speak for every European but what I noticed was that in each nation, people wanted to have some national pride and keep their cultures as much as could be. Further down, people like to share and do things collectively but each person still has at least a sense of wanting to show their abilities to be unique and capitalism just might give them that feeling. Of course, taken too far individualism can get dangerous. I think of socialism and regulated capitalism as a marriage. Both the man and the woman want to be happy together and each one wants to be individually happy.
"As European style socialism is far superior to our crumbling and inhumane capitalist system, is is still built upon the exploitation of non-whites and their resources outside of these two continents and is completely unsustainable."
I am aware of a lot of outsourcing going on in Europe as well as plenty of robbing Peter to pay Paul issues going on but I think that there are attempts to improve that but I cannot say for sure. I would have to have been there for at least a year to figure it out better.
thank you, mcoyote!
your passion is contagious...inspiring...
thank you for your clarity and continued strength in advancing the notion of dramatic change, rather than cautious compromise...
you condemn, correctly, capitalism...I propose, additionally, private property...
may they both be dealt with by the unified masses on September 22, 2012...
Let us say that many of us agree with you. But it is not entirely fair to label those who ask "what is your plan" as covert opponents or reactionaries. In the example you give of treating pneumonia, that is not a plan but a decision - one still needs a plan as to how to do it that entails specific details - do we pray, use chicken soup, take antibiotics? I am NOT being flippant, nor facetious, nor sarcastic, nor dismissive here. "What is the plan?" is THE relevant question and deserves an answer.
hey, Aquifer!
one of the lessons of 9\11...people leapt from the burning to their death...
why would one leap from a skyscraper to certain death? to avoid certain death...
what plan do you require? your planet is being destroyed in front of your eyes...
murderers stole the land from your predecessors, and no one has taken it back from them...the landholders are squeezing us to death, as the fire squeezed those working in those buildings on 9\11...
if I lose my job, they evict me, and I am homeless...if I keep working, and pay my rent or mortgage, they destroy my planet, and I am homeless...
do you see? there is no way to win this game...we must end the game...
if we do not, collectively, battle the forces of these landholders and retake the land, there will be nothing left to discuss...it will all be ruined...
every day we wait, more events like the gulf gusher are not only possible, but probable...
the plan, if you wish to call it that, would be to stop feeding the beast, and stand as individuals with minds and bodies and rights and responsibilities...
stop allowing policemen and lawyers and courts to decide and act for you...
the two primary pieces of the plan are consensus, and resources...the forces for change must, together, defeat the forces of the status quo...
each neighborhood will need to address their own uniquenesses in resources, populations, etc...
every other animal manages to live here without our 'conveniences'...
we must, too...
join us on Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...
Bioregionalism? O.K., like that.
Where does politics come in? or doesn't it?
Great! Just what we need, someone saying 'run away and stick my head in the sand' "each neighborhood will need to address their own uniquenesses in resources, populations, etc..." Each neighbourhood? Who will organize it? Give it space, funding... some kind of community thing a la northeastern US like the rest of the world see on the Gilmore Girls?
Just another simplistic "See Look a what WE are doing. Why arn't you? quick fix.
join us on Global Start Date: September 22, 2012
Why not start now? Why wait?
A lot of your post is very good but it falls down in your conclusions. Please suggestions that will work on a global basis, not in your local area. If I had some ideas that I think would work I would now post them. As I don't, I now as for help from all CD readers
Pete
Please define "capitalism."
Capitalism:
Well, imagine a community living near the ocean and ever since time began, family members would come down every day, or every second day, (as needed) and pick crabs, and oysters from the beach and do some fishing to feed their family for a day or two and come back when they needed more. Everyone only took what they needed.
Then an individual or a group of individuals decided to go down by the ocean and take ALL the crabs and ALL the oysters and ALL the fish and set up a store so the locals were forced to pay for the food they used to pick and fish themselves to feed their families.
The government sold that section of ocean to this business group so the people couldn't go down there anymore and get their own food. When the government didn't place any regulations on the store owners, they kept raising the price of the crabs, oysters and fish until the people had to go to work for longer and longer hours. Some of them worked for the people who now owned the beach front which used to belong to everybody, and their whole paycheque would go to the people they were working for to buy food to feed their families.
For example, look at what happened to the environmental movement. Sierra Club was a good start but very soon went downhill, colluding with big industry as a way to get funding. The organization grew in proportion to the alliances they made with industry. Today, they are toothless capitulators.
Sierra Club's first executive director, David Brower, walked out on them (they were supporting nuclear power at the time!) and founded several independent groups. One of these, Friends of the Earth, is a much smaller but committed environmental group. They struggle to stay viable. Most people have never heard of them. Brower also founded the League of Conservation Voters and Earth Island Institute.
John McPhee wrote a book about Brower: Encounters With the Arch Druid. Shortly after voting for Ralph Nader in 2000, the real Arch Druid, David Brower, died. He was 88.
"Whenever we compromised, we lost." David Brower
Thanks, coyote, for posting this. You're a good radical, and I really mean that in the very best sense.
I do think there is a time and place for "winning friends"--alienated revolts simply do not succeed historically--but it's also true that most people use those delaying excuses as just that--excuses.
You have some great posts, so keep 'em coming!
For a long time I have heard things from liberals to the effect that leaders of finance and industry "wouldn't do that. It would harm capitalism". I think Naomi Klein's book exposes a new feature in which total collapse and chaos is not something to be averted, as it was by the New Deal, but to be welcomed as an opportunity to reshape everything and tear down any rights won in the past. It helps to understand what seems to be irrational acts by the ??? - I don't know what to call them. Capitalist class is so quaint. It evokes images of top hatted people who own railroads, mines and mills. The ones in charge today are driven by financial manipulations, war profiteering; they know no national allegiences. They pretty much produce nothing of value, except dirty energy sources.
Joe
mcoyote....let me go on the record and state: I am against Capitalism! Back to basics...destroy the corporations, Impeach the entire Federal Government, destroy the Federal Reserve, shut down the banks, and then.....ransack the elites and confiscate their wealth....distribute to all equally. If we don't do this....the planet is doomed.
I am coming around to position that the problem is capitalism per se myself, but I still see a role for small producers and worker controlled enterprises. My problem is with a monolithic economic system where everything is controlled by the state. Right now I would happily applaud strong anticapitalist initiatives that focused on multinationals and giant corporations, land reform, etc.
Frances; On a different thread, you asked for contact information for the BP offices in the U.S.
BP offices in the United States:
Anchorage, Alaska
Address
BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc.
900 East Benson Boulevard
Anchorage, AK 99508-4254
Phone: +1 907 561 5111
Chicago, Illinois
Address
28100 Torch Parkway
Warrenville, IL 60555
Phone: +1 630 836 5000
Houston, Texas
Address
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, TX 77079
Phone: +1 281 366 2000
La Palma, California
Address
4 Centerpointe Drive
La Palma, California 90623
NO PHONE NUMBER LISTED
BP Chemicals
Address
28100 Torch Park Way
Warrenville, IL 60555
Phone: +1 877 701 2726
BP Solar
Address
630 Solarex Ct.
Frederick, MD 21703
Phone: +1 301 698 4200
Just for the record, worker owned (and I'm assuming by "controlled" you mean owned, otherwise there wouldn't be "control") enterprises are not capitalist by definition.
While I agree with the rest of the pinkos ( I am one, not a slam) around the site that the problem is capitalism itself, the obvious urgency is to deal with the power of large multinationals and to a lesser extent, large nationals.
I do think if there is compromise around profit and entrepneurship, it has to be localized and smaller scale.
Good point, but it seems many define this differently. I worked with a couple food coops whose managers and staff saw their enterprises as "capitalistic" because they ran a balance sheet for profit and loss, paid rent on a storefront and otherwise engaged with capitalistic businesses under a capitalistic government.
At the same time, many of us saw the organizations as socialist because we owned them.
To some degree, management was able to make decisions based on the ideas of the community of owners, often at various levels of mutual compromise. So, for instance, the grapes of growers who mistreated farm labor or the tuna from fisheries that killed dolphins appeared, but with signs to that effect.
Members often had to choose between support for smaller, more eco-friendly and labor friendly product and cheaper product created by subsidy and with economy of scale. Conflicts happened that might not have had the coops or their members been stronger financially. Compromises happened that might have been administrated differently with more money or broader community support.
To a large extent, corporate advantages of scale and subsidy were offset by donations of unpaid time by the central staff.
Cooperative ownership of the basic necessities would allow relatively independent economies within the larger system, whether we might call these libertarian for their independence or socialist for their mutuality.
Questions arise, like how broad organizations might be and how they might merge or articulate. But various possibilities do exist.
exactly !
Capitalism will destroy all, as it is proving, which means Capitalism is the losing side. I'm on the winning side, the sustainable, steady-state, communalistic, single democratic unitary state that strives to increase wisdom and wellbeing instead of material goods with zero for-profit anything side.
The Antithesis Side.
CQ from Maine
Anything --unregulated--gets quickly out of control. Imagine football or baseball without regulations. It wouldn't be long before the quarterback said: "Hey, a baseball bat would be really useful here. I could whack this defensive guard, who after all, is three times my size, in the head, and run down field for a touchdown."
But after thirty years of continual beat down, by fucking patriots no less, our government can't even regulate baseball, let alone an oil company.
Democrats have one last chance to really take the country where it needs to go. If we can't do that, if we let --as they say these days--the perfect become the enemy of the good, we are all sunk.
Running a business is no easy task and especially if one is talking about running a small business. One of the basics I learned in finance and accounting is that running a small business or a partnership requires a lot of responsibility though not as much as running a corporation. Corporations are subsidized by the government more than small businesses or partnerships. Corporations may have high taxation but they also have far more legal loopholes which cuts their taxation to near zero. With lots of money on hand, the CEO can fight their cases in court and reduce or eliminate penalty. A small business or even a partnership on the other hand cannot get away like that and would have been forced into bankruptcy by now for creating such a large oil mess. This brings us to the need for socialized and balanced responsibility which means that small oil companies need to be brought back to business. To make those small businesses sustainable, companies whose products rely heavily on oil for manufacturing need to be rewarded for putting quality production over profiteering so that demand for oil goes down. This applies to increasing gas mileage, making plastics that are less prone to breaking so soon, using truly natural ingredients in processing food and delivering instead of HFCS, aspartame, MSG, etc..., and encouraging public transportation or carpooling to say the least. I would prefer a socialistic system although most of these ideas could be accomplished under a regulated capitalistic system.
An excellent post, bringing many good ideas back, though I don't share your confidence in a socialistic system, which has never once worked, anywhere.
I didn't mean 100% socialism. I take mainly socialism with some wiggle room when I need it in the form of regulated capitalism. See my response to MCoyote.