Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- The Rise of the New Economy Movement
- Preying on Poverty: How Government and Corporations Use the Poor as Piggy Banks
- The Organic Watergate: Alarming Report Reveals USDA's Cozy Relationship with Corporate Agribusinesses in 'Organics'
- Updated: Under Pressure, TED Releases 'Income Inequality' Talk
- 'Biggest Act of Civil Disobedience in Canadian History'
Popular content
Today's Top News
Did Bush Create The Most Secretive US Govt Ever?
NEW YORK - The administration of President George W. Bush continues to expand government secrecy across a broad array of agencies and actions -- and at greatly increased cost to taxpayers, according to a coalition of groups that promote greater transparency.
Dr. Patrice McDermott, director of Open the Government, a watchdog group, told IPS, "The federal government under the Bush administration has shown its commitment to secrecy by where it has put its money -- more no-bid contracts, fewer government employees processing FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] requests, less on training on classification issues, and almost 200 dollars spent on keeping secrets to every dollar allocated to open them."
"Given our growing deficit, the next administration faces difficult choices in restoring accountable government," he added.
In its "Secrecy Report Card 2008," released Sep. 9, the group concluded that the Bush administration "exercised unprecedented levels not only of restriction of access to information about federal government's policies and decisions, but also of suppression of discussion of those policies and their underpinnings and sources."
Open the Government is a Washington-based coalition of consumer and good government groups, librarians, environmentalists, labour, journalists, and others.
It says that that classification activity remains significantly higher than before 2001. In 2006, the number of original classification decisions increased to 233,639, after dropping for the two previous years.
The government spent 195 dollars maintaining the secrets already on the books for every one dollar it spent declassifying documents in 2007, a five percent increase in one year.
At the same time, fewer pages were declassified than in 2006. The nation's 16 intelligence agencies, which account for a large segment of the declassification numbers, are excluded from the total reported figures.
Classified or "black" programmes accounted for about 31.9 billion dollars, or 18 percent of the fiscal year (FY) 2008 Department of Defence (DOD) acquisition funding requested last year. Classified acquisition funding has more than doubled in real terms since FY 1995.
Almost 22 million requests were received under FOIA in 2007, an increase of almost 2 percent over the previous year. But a 2008 study revealed that, in 2007, FOIA spending at 25 key agencies fell by 7.0 million dollars, to 233.8 million dollars, and the agencies put 209 fewer people to work processing FOIA requests.
While the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court does not reveal much about its activities, the Department of Justice reported that, in 2007, the court approved 2,371 orders -- rejecting only three and approving two left over from the previous year. Since 2000, federal surveillance activity under the jurisdiction of the court has risen for the ninth year in a row -- more than doubling during the Bush administration.
The court was established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in 1978 after revelations of the widespread wiretapping by the administration of Richard M. Nixon to spy on political and activist groups. Recently, efforts to reform the act have been triggered by the Bush administration's admission that it had conducted secret surveillance programmes in the U.S. without warrants from the court.
In addition, more than 25 percent (worth 114.2 billion dollars) of all contracts awarded by the federal government last year were not subject to open competition -- a proportion that has remained largely unchanged for the last eight years.
Investigations by Congress and independent government agencies of the war in Iraq have revealed billions of dollars in no-bid contracts, covering everything from delivering food and water to U.S. troops to providing armed security for U.S. officials and visiting dignitaries. There have been widespread allegations of waste, fraud and abuse by contractors. Several have been convicted and prosecutions of others are pending.
During 2007, government-wide, 64 percent of meetings of the Federal Advisory Committee were closed to the public. Excluding groups advising three agencies that historically have accounted for the majority of closed meetings, 15 percent of the remainder were closed -- a 24 percent increase over the number closed in 2006. These numbers do not reflect closed meetings of subcommittees and taskforces.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act was passed in 1972 to ensure that advice by the various advisory committees formed over the years is objective and accessible to the public.
The report also found that in seven years, President Bush has issued at least 156 "signing statements", challenging over 1,000 provisions of laws passed by Congress. In 2007, eight were issued.
The so-called "state secrets privilege" -- invoked only six times between 1953 and 1976 -- has been used by the Bush administration a reported 45 times, an average of 6.4 times per year in seven years. This is more than double the average (2.46) in the previous 24 years.
The "state secrets privilege" is a legal doctrine that contends that admission of certain information into court proceedings would endanger U.S. national security. The Bush administration has frequently invoked the privilege to dismiss lawsuits that would be embarrassing to the government, and the courts have generally been deferential to the government's claims.
National Security Letter (NSL) requests continued to rise; the 2007 numbers are still classified, but the recently unclassified new number for 2006 shows a 4.7 percent increase in requests over 2005. Since enactment of the USA Patriot Act in 2001, the number of NSLs issued has seen an astronomical increase.
The NSL provision of the Patriot Act radically expanded the authority of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to demand personal customer records from Internet Service Providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval.
Through NSLs, the FBI is authorised to compile dossiers about innocent people and obtain sensitive information such as the web sites a person visits, a list of e-mail addresses with which a person has corresponded, or even unmask the identity of a person who has posted anonymous speech on a political website.
The provision also allows the FBI to forbid or "gag" anyone who receives an NSL from telling anyone about the record demand.

26 Comments so far
Show AllIt's interesting that Bush and Cheney's supporters defend the intrusions into our private affairs by government and corporate agencies with the whine that the only people who could possibly object are those with something to hide.
I guess that we can apply the same standard to our government.
q
If Obama wins, we need to encourage hin to sign off on the legislation Feingold and the Judiciary Commitee wrote up today , following the hearing (C-SPAN broadcasted GOP screaming "drill baby dril" instead) It was (is) on C-SPAN.org. It is wroth watching
I'd like to see the GOP partisans on this site "defend" this kind of Big Government they supposedly despise. Government that is secretive is bound to be bigger and more intrusive whereas open government means the public has its say. When it comes to Wall Street, government spoonfeeds them but when it comes to everyone else who have to pay more taxes than Wall Street, it's screw you. At this point, Russia and China might as well battle out their plans to takeover America and be done with this country !
Fascism is more expensive for citizens than it is for companies; the former pays the bills that the latter invoices.
Mussolini said: "Fascism is not really the right name; it should just be corporatism, a blending of government and corporations". If corporations actually run the government with their 'elected' enablers, of course corporations are not going to pay taxes and they're going to bleed the workers, the people who actually produce the wealth through all kinds of regressive taxes. (We obviously need to pay taxes in a functioning democracy, but they should be progressive which means corporations pay their share.)
So very close to the essence of fascism is the reality that corporations pay no taxes or extremely little. Why would they?? They call the shots completely. And of course they rig the elections (control or parties, etc.) so that elected officials are totally in their pockets. Sound familiar??
"Through NSLs, the FBI is authorised to compile dossiers about innocent people and obtain sensitive information such as the web sites a person visits, a list of e-mail addresses with which a person has corresponded, or even unmask the identity of a person who has posted anonymous speech on a political website."
Hey wait a minute. Isn't this a political website?
Yeah compile a dossier on this.... FUCK BUSH. FUCK THE FBI. FUCK THE FASCIST REPUGS
I prefer,
Suck a bag of dicks you fucking, motherfuckers who fuck their own sisters and mothers for genetic purity and the fucking shitbag morons on SCOTUS, who broke the law and GAVE you scum the election of 2000. A prostitute who sucks dick for crack has more honor than any 10 of you inbred reptiles. This includes any cretin who voted for you both times.
Further proof 50% of Americans are of average and lower intelligence and the other 40% are of average or lower intelligence, also.
The other 10% believe we need to genetically modify the gene pool to protect the species from it's own stupidity.
Hey Quickstepper, no flies on you. What if every Constitutional guarantee against the government getting out of hand were to be used,in the contrary, as a blueprint for total fascisti rule? What is the point of snooping on people who are not up to anything? Maybe free speech isn't against the rules yet; but, if and when the fascists gain total control all your past free speech might become actionable.
It is no accident that fascist states tend to be expensive and inefficient in terms of services delivered from money raised: they are spending way too much of it on stuff that merely assuages their paranoia. There is also the cost adders of crony capitalism that is rampant in these countries (Indonesia under Suharto was a classic of this). Dubya, Cheney, & Co. introduced an over-riding element of this to rival the "Spoils System" in place before the Civil Service Act of 1881, combined with a rapaciousness that the figures of the Robber Baron era would envy. As a result, the damage done by the Bush crime family in their second stay in the White House would probably rival the theft committed before the burning of the Forbidden City in 1918 (which the Guiness Book of World Records records as the greatest theft in history). Thus the need to cover their tracks in order to get away with the spoils. As any professional thief will tell you: it is one thing to commit the heist, it is another to get away with it.
Spike and others, You said "if and when the fascists gain total control" sorry to be the one to tell you this it's " Now and Forever"
While I am glad to see so many talking about "progressive" issues, I wonder why no one has commented on the HPV article? Why is it that only war and destuction gets people motivated to talk?
Aside from Roe v Wade that is one of the most (if not the most) imoprtant issues in women's and men's lives for decades to come
Finally, follow the money.Americans Right and Left should pay very close attention to the DHS money going to non-bid private corporations for the purpose of providing warrant less surveillance. These companys will create suspects nation wide to keep the massive amounts of money flowing into their company's.
There is no real Patriotism here, its greedy fear mongering.
They are building their own private army's to create suspects using cointel pro tactics all over the country.Create fear, and recruit Zombie hero wanna be citizens to do the surveillance and dirty work.
These corporations are going to steal America from us using our own tax dollars and a complacent well bribed congress.
Its going to take all of us and some very clever legal manoeuvrings to stop this unpatriotic take over of our country by the military industrial complex and National security fear mongering freaks.
Follow the Money.
BornFreeMen
The Democrats were Bush enablers. Vote for either Dem's or Rep's and you too become an enabler.
President Palin and the 'God is Supreme' Court thank you for your support.
No fooling. They're ever more transparent.
Vote anyone other than Obama you enable McCain/Palin into the White House, no matter what principles or long term goals your vote represents to you.
Tell me, if you care to, why it is A) preferable to build a 3rd party under McCain rather than Obama?
Or do you B) feel electing McCain will 'change the Democrats for the better'
Just Curious. Why ANYONE would want to see McCain Elected.
Thanks.
"Just Curious. Why ANYONE would want to see McCain Elected."
To screw themselves?
Actually, your first question (A) assumes that a 3rd party will not exist under McCain. To the contrary, if he wins we will automatically be ruled by a third party in the form of a Reich. Sieg heil, baby, sieg heil!
If they were Rovian agents! These sites are crawling with Karl Rove agents pretending to be hard leftists pooping on both parties and urging progressives to vote for Nader. Nader's votes will come from the left and so a vote for Nader is a vote for McCain, a vote removed from Obama.
If Nader worked hard between elections to really create a movement that could lead to a true progressive party to challenge the Dems and Repugs, that would obviously be great. Instead, he doesn't achieve anything, and his ego makes him run for president where all he can do for the left is what Ross Perot did on the right in 1992--split the vote and allow the other side to win. Clinton would not have won without Perot in 92. If even a small percentage of progressives vote for Nader, that could easily hand the election to McCain.
I've explained my reasoning so many times: I'm ONLY interested in growing and building a true PROGRESSIVE MAJORITY in the United States, and we don't get there by voting for this terrible candidate by the name of Barack Obama. This is why I advocate for voting for either Cynthia McKinney or Ralph Nader. I do think there are slight differences for the better in voting for Obama over McCain. If there are no Republican shennanigans, I think Obama will "win" this election, but I suspect there will be shennanigans.
Yes, he created the most secretive govt; and with mccain and palin it will be even worse. they will be like two reckless kids in a candy store with the clerk gone. signing statements? spying on people? they will go nuts. Palin already has a secret government in Alaska, did not even use official emails because they would be part of the record. Both have a reputation for holding grudges, punishing people, having people sign loyalty pledges (Palin) not to the city or state, but to her personally--she is Bush on steroids. She has brought her HIGH SCHOOL friends in to have top state jobs, ex: a real estate salesperson appointed sec of agriculture!
It may be altruistic to vote for McKinney or Nader, but it is death to the country with McPain.
Here in Arizona, we are working hard to elect Obama--we even made our own video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqsvAf2FR0Y
Look up "false dichotomy."
Republican enablers don't represent me any more than Republicans do, so spare us the phony umbrage.
It's a two-party system. Nothing false about that dichotomy. Oh, you can vote for a third party candidate who will never be President. That's just another dichotomy. In system or out. Or you can choose not to vote. Vote/Not vote. Oops, another dichotomy.
There are two candidates who have a chance to be elected.
Nothing false about it.
Imposing a dichotomy does not make it automatically valid. Maybe you should take the advice I gave to the other poster: look it up.
I cannot - and will not - separate political activity from those things that give meaning to political activity. If you and the other fellow want to do that, I guess that's your business, but it hardly puts you in a position to dictate or scold.
"Fundamentals"
http://www.wilypython.net/Fundamentals%20.asp
la dee da. the mainstream middle class begins to get a taste of the treatment that's always been dealt to minorities and organized labor.