Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Israel's New Laws Promote Repression
As Arabs across the region struggle for freedom and democracy, Israeli law seems to be headed in the opposite direction.
"Bad laws," Edmund Burke once said, "are the worst sort of tyranny."
The millions of people who have been protesting - from Tunis, Egypt and Libya, to Bahrain, Yemen and Syria - appear to have recognised this truism and are demanding the end of emergency law and the drafting of new constitutions that will guarantee the separation of powers, free, fair and regular elections, and basic political, social and economic rights for all citizens.
To put it succinctly, they are fighting to end tyranny.
Within this dramatic context it is also fruitful to look at Israel, which is considered by many as the only democracy in the Middle East and which has, in many ways, been an outlier in the region. One might ask whether Israel or not stands as a beacon of light for those fighting tyranny.
On the one hand, the book of laws under which Israel's citizenry live is - with the exception of a handful of significant laws that privilege Jews over non-Jews - currently very similar to those used in most liberal democracies, where the executive, legislative and judicial powers are separated, there are free, fair and regular elections, and the citizens enjoy basic rights - including freedom of expression and association.
Israel's double standard
However, on the other hand, the Israeli military law used to manage the Palestinians are similar to those deployed in most Arab countries, where there is no real separation of powers and people are in many respects without rights. Even though there has been a Palestinian Authority since the mid-1990s, there is no doubt that sovereignty still lies in Israeli hands.
One accordingly notices that in this so-called free and democratic country, there are in fact two books of laws, one liberal for its own citizenry and the other for Palestinians under its occupation. Hence, Israel looks an awful lot like apartheid or colonialism.
But can Israel's democratic parts serve as a model of emulation for pro-democracy activists in the neighbouring Arab countries?
The answer is mixed - because as Arab citizens across the region struggle against tyranny, in Israel there appears to be an opposite trend, whereby large parts of the citizenry are not only acquiescent but have been supportive of Knesset members who are drafting new legislation to silence public criticism and to delegitimize political rivals, human rights organizations, and the Palestinian minority. The idea is to legally restrict individuals and groups that hold positions at odds with the government's right-wing agenda by presenting them as enemies of the State.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel recently warned that the laws promoted by the Knesset are dangerous and will have severe ramifications for basic human rights and civil liberties. The association, which is known for its evenhanded approach, went on to claim that the new laws "contribute to undemocratic and racist public stands, which have been increasingly salient in Israeli society in the past few years".
New wave of repressive laws
Here are just a few examples of approximately twenty bills that have either been approved or are currently under consideration.
• The Knesset approved a new law stating that organisations and institutions that commemorate Nakba Day, "deny the Jewish and democratic character of the State", and shall not receive public funds. Thus, even in the Arab schools within Israel, the Nakba must be erased. So much for democratic contestation and multiculturalism.
• Another new law states that "acceptance committees" of villages and communities may turn down a candidate if he or she "fails to meet the fundamental views of the community". According to ACRI, this bill intends to deny ethnic minorities' access to Jewish communities set up on predominantly public lands. So unless the new Arab pro-democracy movements want to base their countries on apartheid-like segregation, this is also not a law to emulate.
• The Knesset has approved a bill that pardons most of the protesters who demonstrated against Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. Although legislation easing punitive measures against persons who exercise their right to political protest is, in principle, positive, this particular bill blatantly favours activists with a certain political ideology. This does not bode well for the basic notion of equality before the law.
• An amendment to the existing Penalty Code stipulates that people who publish a call that denies the existence of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state shall be imprisoned. This extension of the existing law criminalises political views that the ruling political group does not accept. It is supported by the government and has passed a preliminary reading. Burgeoning democracies should definitely shy away from such legislation.
• There is currently a proposed bill to punish persons who initiate, promote, or publish material that might serve as grounds for imposing a boycott. The bill insists that these people are committing an offence and may be ordered to compensate parties economically affected by that boycott, including fixed reparations of 30,000 New Israeli Shekels (US$8,700), without an obligation on the plaintiffs to prove damages. This bill has already passed the first reading.
• Finally, a bill presented to the Knesset in October would require members of local and city councils, as well as some other civil servants, to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state.
Democracy for a few
There is a clear logic underlying this spate of new laws; namely, the Israeli government's decision to criminalise alternate political ideologies, such as the idea that Israel should be a democracy for all its citizens.
Hence, one witnesses an inverse trend - as the Arab citizens in the region struggle for more openness and indeed democracy, toppling dictators and pressuring governments to make significant liberal reforms, the Israeli book of laws is being rewritten so as to undercut democratic values.
Israelis celebrating the state's 63rd birthday should closely examine the pro-democracy movements in Tahrir, Deraa and across the Arab world. They might very well learn a thing or two.
- Posted in


13 Comments so far
Show AllI'm not sure how many of these laws promote repression in a way that America's do not. For example - our public officers also have to take an oath and pledge allegiance to the USA. Likewise, those who burn the flag will also be arrested - a symbolic gesture to bring down the state. Israel does offensive things and there are definitely human rights violations going on, but this article feels skewed. It's pulling a little too hard for the proof the author obviously wanted to find.
This would be the "we're not worse than anyone else" argument that zionists like to use.
The subject of the article is Israel's status as a democracy. It may seem "skewed" to you because you fear criticism of Israel. Accordingly, you try to deflect that criticism to others.
If the facts weren't there then the author wouldn't have found them.
q
mirosest said ""our public officers also have to take an oath and pledge allegiance to the USA"
I am not sure if you have deliberately misconstrued the article and its message or are just confused. As for your purported example of is the norm in the USA, the oaths and pledges in the USA are to the USA as a nation. A more accurate parallel with the USA pledge would be if Americans were required to pledge to a white Christian, democratic USA. (Insert any particular religion, culture or ethnic identity in the pledge to help you get the flavor of this and then see how it feels, especially if you are an American who is not part of that group,)
Why should an Israeli not focus his attentions on Israel, including its problems?
Your comparison to the USA is well taken except that I don't see that it takes anything from the article itself.
I might speculate what an author does or does not wish to find, and surely such designs do shape articles. But what does one do when the author actually does find what he or she has looked for?
If one is reduced to defending Israel by comparing it to the United States, perhaps one should excuse or even applaud Israelis sufficiently concerned with what they have of democracy to want to find evidence of where it does not function.
If you fear that an accurate assessment might play into the hands of the racists who would partly excuse American transgressions in the larger region by blaming these on AIPAC or "the Jews" as some sort of unitary construct sort of equivalent somehow to the state of Israel, wouldn't it be better to say so rather than condemn Israeli criticism of Israeli oppression of Israeli citizenry?
(Alright, maybe fear of drawing out the anti-Semites has nothing to do with your observation and I am just reading things in where they don't belong. But otherwise I can't imagine why anyone would defend a governmental action by "The US does the same thing").
To start off, the Israel-apologist misrepresents the US laws somewhat. I think you'll find that most oaths of office promise to protect and uphold the Constitution. Also, flag-burning as an expression of political protest has been expressly protected under the first amendment by the Supreme Court. Which is not to say that it can't be suppressed and prosecuted by creative law-enforcers as littering, loitering, polluting, demonstrating without a license, disorderly conduct, public disturbance, failure to obey a lawful police order, conspiracy to riot (i.e., to express dissident views) and any number of other blanket charges that are routinely employed by our first-responders and rubber-stamped by our compliant judiciary.
Which brings me to the point of this comment. Why does Israel not learn from its principal benefactor that it is not necessary to adopt laws so odious on their face when the same, or similar, results can be obtained by letting the cops and prosecutors deal with the dissident elements in accordance with their (and the government's) biases? Is it that Israel does not have a constitution that protects individual rights against the state to creatively violate? Or is it that the Israeli authorities are so unimaginative that they must resort to facially oppressive laws?
Public elected officials in the U. S. either take an oath to uphold the laws and charters/constitutions of the local or state governments they represent, and in the case of elected federal officials - up to and including the President - take an oath to uphold the Constitution, as in "...preserve, protect and defend". They do not take an oath to support an administration, government agency, military department, or specific individual. Also, burning the U. S. flag has been upheld by the Supreme Court to be speech protected by the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution, so no, people who burn the flag cannot be arrested for doing that. That doesn't mean local jingoistic officials may not arrest and try someone doing so for a lame excuse like disturbing the peace.
Israel does more than offensive "things". The Zionist "founders" of this illegitimate and immoral state engaged in terrorism and thuggery to gain control of Palestine, and use the tactics of U. S. racists, segregationists, and South African Apartheid-ists to maintain their stranglehold of control. If they were not propped up by the West, there is no way they could continue to control the historically legitimate country of Palestine, and those oppressed people, along with the support of their outraged neighbors would quickly end Israel's unholy occupation of Palestine, which really would be justice.
the author writes a column on the racists laws of zion and then writes:
But can Israel's democratic parts serve as a model of emulation for pro-democracy activists in the neighbouring Arab countries?
The answer is mixed...
wow!!!!!!!! quick get me a list of her meds - i want some
what in the hell would make this foolish writer think the arabs want anything to do with anything that zion is doing
answer me that one
"what in the hell would make this foolish writer think the arabs want anything to do with anything that zion is doing
answer me that one"
That's incredibly easy to do. There are millions of Arabs out in the streets fighting for the rights that the Israelis enjoy. Fighting for human rights, the rule of law, democracy, an end to fundamentalist tyranny, and the prosperity that Israelis enjoy. It's more than obvious that the majority of Arabs are ready to join the Israelis in the modern world. It's the despots they are fighting, Gaddafi, Saleh, Assad, etc., who are anti-semitic and oppose the changes. Time for the anti-semites in the west to wake up and realize their time has passed.
You need to amend your phrases "that the Israelis enjoy" and "that Israelis enjoy" to say "that some Israelis enjoy."
Also, Israel is not in "the modern world." Only the IDF's weapons systems are.
Opposition to Israel's murderous theft of land and resources does not qualify as "anti-semitism (sic)".
q
After the George Bush crash-course on using fear to get people to support the destruction of their own liberties, it is easier to understand how Israel is increasingly in the grip of a fanatical group of right-wingers.
What is less clear is how both Israel and the US can be brought to some semblance of sanity.
Israeli laws have been promoting repression against Arabs for decades. I do not see anything ``new'' about it.
Ilan Pappe 12 May 2011
Tags: israel | palestine
Camp Ofer near Ramallah is an Israeli ‘incarceration facility’ for detaining and processing Palestinian prisoners, including children (there are currently more than 200 Palestinian children in Israeli detention; a fifth of them are under 16). A delegation of three British Labour MPs who visited Camp Ofer last December told Amira Hass in Haaretz what they saw. More than two-thirds of detained children said they had been beaten. They were all ‘better off pleading guilty regardless of whether they had done something, because if they were detained until the end of proceedings, this could be three times longer than their punishment’. One of the MPs was disturbed to hear from his escort that this was a relatively good day: the children’s hands were cuffed in front of them rather than behind their backs.
A report on the prison in Haaretz last month included the case of a 14-year-old boy who had been in custody for six days before being brought before the judge (in Israel suspects have to be brought before a judge within 24 hours; in the Occupied Territories they can be held for up to eight days). His lawyer told the court that the child had been ‘interrogated in a cruel, undignified fashion’. As is common in such cases, the defendant and his lawyer didn’t know what the charges were. The boy was remanded in custody for another ten days, after which ‘he will be sentenced to another few months in prison’ for a crime he has no idea of.
Aya Kaniuk and Tamar Goldschmidt of Machsom Watch have described a typical Monday in the ‘children’s court’ at Camp Ofer. The judge works efficiently and quickly, sending one child after another to jail, processing 23 boys in one day. Twenty-one of them were rounded up in the middle of the night from Kalandia refugee camp. ‘Some boy gave their names in,’ Kaniuk and Goldschmidt explain.
That is how it usually happens. A child is arrested for one reason or another. And he is told, give us fifteen names and we’ll let you go. First he says, no way. Eventually he gives them names. Usually they are the names of boys he knows, his age, sometimes of boys he’d never met, in order to supply the required number.
The children are dressed in brown or orange prisoners’ uniforms. ‘Chained feet. Shackled hands, one hand shackled to that of another boy,’ Kaniuk and Goldschmidt write. ‘Some of them are so small that their feet wave in the air when they are seated on the bench.’
The Israeli treatment of Palestinian children in detention violates both international and Israeli law. In his powerful documentary Arna’s Children, filmed over more than ten years, Juliano Mar-Hamis followed the Palestinian children who belonged to a theatre group set up by his mother in Jenin. Three of the children were killed by the IDF; one became a suicide bomber; two were imprisoned by Israel. Juliano was murdered last month by masked gunmen. The slow infanticide of Palestine continues.
This is tautological--anyone who denies that Israel is a Jewish and democratic state can be imprisoned. If you can be imprisoned for an opinion, a statement, then it ISN'T a democratic state in any meaningful sense. Jewish, yes...sad to see the Jews embracing an ideology so similar to that of the enemy that perpetrated the Holocaust...an ideology likely to mean the death of the Jews in the end, as they are counting on superior weapons to protect them against the enemies they constantly create through violent repression of a small group allied with a huge group containing a billion members, including most of the surrounding countries. And the superior weapons are almost entirely supplied by another country, where the ruling elite are committed to Israel's defense--but the people are not, especially as the oppression gets more and more extreme. And the US has problems of its own. What happens when the empire crashes, or the oil runs out and everyone relocalizes? It's not only Israel embracing the idea that the best response to feeling threatened is aggressive belligerance. Sometimes it even works--for awhile. In the long run, in a case like this, it's suicide.