Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Cracks in the American Way, as Labor Stands Strong in Europe
The idea of American Exceptionalism has loomed large over the last half century, creating an air of national impunity while spreading a neoliberal capitalist model to every corner of the globe. Now the Great Recession has revealed American workers to be exceptional in the worst possible way: facing exceptional pain and exceptional weakness in the labor movement.
A report published by the International Trade Union Confederation (submitted, ironically, to that pillar of the postwar American hegemony, the World Trade Organization) takes a critical view of the U.S. workforce in the context of global human and labor rights. The ITUC's findings expose many of the cracks in the American Way, from a persistent gender wage gap to a failure to uphold child labor protections to a disturbing prevalence of human trafficking. One of the key systemic problems is the institutional weakness of the labor movement:
U.S. law excludes large groups of workers from the right to organise. These include agricultural workers, many public sector workers, domestic workers, supervisors and independent contractors. Moreover, for most private sector workers forming trade unions is extremely difficult and anti-union pressure from employers is frequent. The report notes that there is a $4 billion union-busting industry which aims at undermining trade union organising.
The U.S. worker certainly stands apart from her compatriots across the Atlantic. They're the ones in the news, mobilizing against the harsh austerity plans governments are imposing in respose to an exceptional American export: the global economic crisis.
This week, worker demonstrations in France, England, Greece and other besieged economies rocked the continent with an old-school militancy seldom seen in the “developed” world and virtually unheard of in American communities.
In France, transit workers paralyzed the country's railways to show aggressive opposition to a proposed increase in the standard retirement age by two years. London's Tube went into a deep freeze on Tuesday, part of a timed-release chaos plan to strike at numerous points during the fall.
Greek truck drivers stopped traffic too, feeding into several days of protest in opposition to proposed anti-labor reforms. Workers countered a wash of teargas by lobbing stones, bottles and tomatoes at police. A day-long strike by healthcare workers left hospitals in disarray. Much of the rage was directed at the potential dismantling of the closed-shop system, which would undermine traditional labor protections and licensing regulations in trades like truck driving.
With plans for a major industrial action by public workers on October 7, the civil-service union ADEDY, Reuters reports, has called on workers to “massively participate in the rallies and demand the termination of all agreements that did away with rights to work and pensions.”
Spain, another blight on the EU's books, erupted in its first general strike in years this week. Protesters hoped the strike would force the government to confront the political costs of austerity policies. Ignacio Fernandez Toxo, head of the Workers Commissions union, told the Associated Press: “The strike was not called to topple the government but it's up to the government if it wants to stay there.”
Activists in Brussels, meanwhile, stood their ground against riot police and smoke canisters, marching toward the buildings of the European Union as officials contemplated new penalties to impose on member states with swollen deficits.
Depending on how the public reacts to the chaos, the actions could either inspire solidarity or further polarize labor and the political establishment. Either way, unions have upped the ante in the battle against the austerity frenzy.
The U.S. labor movement's fight for relevancy
Labor on this side of the ocean, however, continues to grapple with its message and mission, barely keeping pace with American-style austerity in the form of the anti-spending, anti-government agenda of Washington's deficit hawks.
Unions hope to regain some relevance with this weekend's “One Nation Working Together” rally, which labor is coordinating alongside civil rights, antiwar and environmental groups, among others. The broad, and accordingly vague, agenda centers on “jobs, justice and education.” As Art Levine reports, organizers aspiring to Tea-Party caliber charisma may find that the biggest hurdle at this point is just getting people to show up.
The greater challenge looming over the One Nation campaign isn't
just the optics—it's defining a weakened movement in an increasingly
unstable political arena. And it's tapping into the public outrage that
the right has shrewdly exploited in galvanizing new constituencies. So
the groups carrying the “One Nation” banner might want to focus a bit
less on projecting an aura of middle-class liberal harmony, and instead
learn from the mass appeal of European union militancy.
We're running into one of the most dangerous aspects of the myth of American Exceptionalism:
the concept that American workers somehow operate outside historical
class antagoisms. Folks are lulled into the belief that deep social
crisis can and should be resolved by individual upward mobility and by
negotiating within establishment institutions (like Election Day or
corporate-controlled collective bargaining).
But as the ITUC's new report starkly reveals, America's labor crises often put its people in the same quagmire as their peers in other economies. So when workers around the world are roused to action—organized, passionate, and not afraid to get a little dirty—why should American labor be any exception?
- Posted in


84 Comments so far
Show AllBut now we're being fed the same BS about how tax cuts create jobs...
well, you greedy bastards getting richer and richer, where are they??
This is all true but we must be aware that nationalism is not the answer, but part of the problem.
It's not like our brothers and sisters in China are reaping great rewards, their work conditions, their pay and the destruction of their environment is cause of concern for all of us.
Reject nationalism, which only serves capitalists, and support movements that aim to unite all workers and peoples and set them free.
I do believe I've read that somewhere. :wink:
The problem with that theory is that Nationalism is de facto foreign and trade policy in China and most other country's in the world.
If you choose to take a water gun to the knife fight, you are surely going to lose.
Your right wing agenda is showing .
Yet again you are telling us we are powerless. You wouldn't have to keep telling us if you and your masters weren't scared.
And your argument is circular. .....lol
The problem with your thought process is that you see a knife fight as the default human behavior from groups all the way up to countries. The fact that the USA is a barbarous, cut throat, take no prisoners, profit loving pig doesn't mean everybody else is. The 'knife fight' that our fascist corporate goons have been waging against your marine pension's buying power while you blindly defend greedy business practices as the 'free market' is making you poor. But that's okay with you because you only allow yourself to be gamed by American business for the 'good of our country'.
Hang on to your pension, pal.
* nationalism is not the answer*
Thanks Morticia for that statement.
We know where it ENDS.
In Soulidarity.
Simply what happens when you allow corporations to dictate the removal of the laws and regulations of a fair market economy and transfer a country's wealth to other country's where labor is cheaper and regulations are less, while surpessing wages in our country with the liberal elites blessing.
FAIR MARKET.
whoooo hoooo hoooo, bwa ha ha ha...wipes a tear of laughter
Mite, That's the funniest thing you've written here so far.
There NEVER has been a fair market to dismantle, never ever ever, not in all capitalist history and in no place.
well, maybe the Paris Commune, but that was it.
Anyone with a lick of sense would have seen that coming in 1973 when Nixon devaluated the dollar and took us off the gold standard. It's all about being 'competitive' for the Warren Buffett types that you fought to defend. 'Sanctity of contracts' is just another pretty expression you free market types use in place of 'make em' so poor that they'll work for peanuts'. We are just about there thanks to your blind fear of socialism.
Ambition and Death have this in common: they are never satisfied.
National labor has already caved on fighting austerity cuts planned by Obama, corporate Democrats, Republicans and Wall St., when they announced that they would be throwing their support and money behind the Democratic Party in the upcoming elections. In other words, they are throwing their support and money behind Obama's Cat Food Commission! Same shit, different elections.
National labor needs to remove the nose ring that the Democratic Party has been using to lead them around for the last several decades, not only do they need to be organizing the work place, they need to be organizing in the political arena also! Otherwise, there will never be, change we can believe in!
Americans need and deserve, a real opposition party!
Unions already capitulated when they supported Obamacare which will tax workers' employer-sponsored medical insurance and will further entrench employer-based medical insurance, a model that assures that Americans will not go on strike (in the US when you go on strike, you lose your medical insurance).
Let's go on strike so we lose our medical insurance.
No! let's all run down to the Tea-party, I hear Sarah's wearing a short skirt.. and we cna wave american flags all afternoon!
Meanwhile, The dow is at 18.000 yet my 201k just sent me another biil. for shortages thay want me to make up out of pocket!
Or we could hang out with the Corporate Unionists having a party in Washington, nothing will happen but I hear theres free pizza.
Christ anybody got an idea where we don't lose??
>^^<
The American middle-class doesn't know that it is competing with international labor, just as it doesn't know that it is in a class war right here in America. The empire doesn't need a middle-class.
Hoa binh
The US middle class DIDN'T KNOW about the class war and DOESN'T KNOW that the elites won the war two years ago when The US Government drained the US Treasury (and then some)to pay off the perpetrators of the 2008 financial industry meltdown.
True. But with every day that goes by, it is starting to dawn on them.
I remember those old cartoons where the character morphs into a giant all day sucker lollypop when he realizes he has been had. I don't want to be within 100 miles of mightymite and the like when they finally figure it out. Even when they know the culprits, they still might try to take it out on the poor and middle class around them. They don't have any experience thinking critically.
Now would be a good time for individuals with the resources to do so should start a "people's land bank" of sorts. A bank specifically invests it's money in real estate. With it in the charter that the land would only be leased/rented to "Natural Persons".
Were not competeing with anything! We're sitting around waiting to see if our jobs are still there next month. Meanwhile the FatCats have moved nearly everything to China and India.
How can we compete with Fifty-Cent an Hour serfs... I can't pay my rent on Fifty-cents an hour! can you?
Maybe if we can blockade the ports, Dump containers of Dell Computers and Cell Phones into Long Beach Harbor. Surround the State and Federal Capitols! Hold them until they pass Fair Trade laws and Tarrifs that make it cheaper to make things here than in China,
As it is they are only listening to lobbiests with big rolls of cash.. We don't have that. The only way we can get them to listen is to move in to the halls of power in such mass the lobbiests can't be seen or heard from.
Don't expect any of our ivory tower leaders to reach down a helping hand!
>^^<
"I can't pay my rent on Fifty-cents an hour! can you?"
I can, if the patch on the roof of my tent holds.
The American character has a unique perversity that has been exploited by the Global Corporate machine.
US workers are willing to put the interests of their employers and managements well above their own, believing that wealth and managerial status somehow are indications of divine providence _ or at least of more initiative and 'gumption.' We refuse to accept the fact that such status is often just hereditary or passed along through subtle, intertwined networks involving family connections, educational institutions, ethnicity & geography.
Many US workers associate nobility with sacrifice to the point where we're willing to tolerate the worst sort of abuse _ it is a taboo to complain, and there is peer pressure involved. The concept of labor organizing is suspect, disloyal, heretical, Communist.
Americans have to comprehend the fact that labor is an equal component of the 'Free Market' equation, not an inanimate 'resource' to be used up & tossed away. The so-called 'Protestant Work Ethic' is basically suicide. It's not going to be easy to change this, because it involves a deep cultural, social, philosophical transformation. It's not going to change overnight, but it can change.
"US workers are willing to put the interests of their employers and managements well above their own, believing that wealth and managerial status somehow are indications of divine providence _ or at least of more initiative and 'gumption.'"
That's about the most true thing I've read here. A couple of personal anecdotes confirming it:
I have heard numerous Americans fired from their jobs for less-than-clear reasons, particularly in the form of mass layoffs, say things like, "I'm not blaming them. If I was the boss, I'd do the same thing."
I've had two coworkers at low-paying jobs with little job security say, "American workers are paid too much. It's the unions that are the problem." Both people who said this happened to be fundamentalist Christians whose pastors had inculcated such warped beliefs in them. One of them was saying this in reference to her own husband's layoff months before. They explain themselves by saying, "How can the owners make any money if they're paying wages that are too high?" It's like they really do think of themselves as someday being in their bosses' position, and many Americans think that if you imagine yourself rich, you can eventually become rich.
The bizarre don't-blame-anybody-but-your-individual-self attitude is also a major factor and is fully explored in Barbara Ehrenreich's "Bright-Sided" (sold in the UK as "Smile or Die"). She also explores the topic somewhat in an earlier book, "Bait and Switch."
Hi, Yeah, I grew up with Christian fundamentalists who had this worldview. It's no accident that the 'value' of fealty to one's employer has become tied to religion. Thus the agnostic 'Free Market' ideologues cynically goad the Christian fundamentalists, but mock them in private.
The view that many American workers hold toward their employers is virtually equivalent to the 'Stockholm syndrome,' or to an abused spouse.
The sad part is, If one actually looks at what this man named Jesus was supposed to have said, he was not so much even a "Liberal" as he was a "Radical". Remember what he did in the temple courtyard, according to the Bible? I know of one "Christian Church" that puchased a mall to house itself in. They kicked out the nifty Asian grocery there first, then other stores followed. Last I knew, though, they still had a Chocolatier, a Diamond seller, a bar/taco place, and a Baskin Robbins left. consider the implications of that. And to top it off, there was a BANK in the parking lot!!!
Imagine if those that are taken to be "Christian Moral Leaders" in this country spent as much time explaining how to get a camel through the eye of a needle as they did about things that this "Jesus" guy never even bothered to talk about (gays, for instance) or in some cases, diametrically would have opposed them on (persecution and punishment of sexually liberated women, even prostitutes).
My God, you have describrd mightymite's world view!
Who knows, maybe you will help him and others who refuse to see how they have been cleverly gamed for the sake of elite profits and the detriment of American workers.
At any rate, hunger will make socialists of many of these corporate defenders in the near future.
I'll be damned. A Chen piece I finally liked.
Outstanding.
I'm finding it hard not to vote for the Democrats this election because letting the Republicans win would be to doom the working class to a fate even worse than what they endure now. I've drawn my line in the sand at Social Security
reduction. If Obama's Catfood Commission recommends lowering benefits or raising the retirement age and Congress approves, the President can veto this. If he doesn't then I'm never voting Democratic again. I have spoken!
Yes, and you can bet your last nickle that Obama will never use the veto pen for Social Security gutting or anything else after the Republicans regain control of Congress next year.
"Lame duck prez....look out for Jeb in 2012....NOT that it matters to We the People."
You know Frank I still think it will be Mitt Romney... Its just the way the Republican party appears to put forward national candidates...(You know...Hey Mitt it is your turn to bat) He will be 65 I believe in 2012.
Thomas Gilbert
Eagle Bill, I urge you to soar like an eagle instead of smashing full-speed into the plate-glass window of lesser-evilism.
And no offense, but we both know that "lines in the sand" are meant to be scattered to oblivion by the slightest breeze. Last year, we witnessed the still much-beloved trio of Feingold, Sanders, and Kuchinich obliterate their "lines in the sand" by pirouetting, tapdancing, and doing the old soft-shoe across them as if they'd never existed.
Of course, you must do as you think best.
The american labor movement had a strong history in the early part of the 20th century. That's why they don't want to teach history in schools. They want us to forget that we once took a real part in the class war and it looks like they're getting their wish.
Read Howard Zinn.
Yes, read Howard Zinn while also not neglecting Eugene V. Debs whom Zinn had often praised in the past as being a true friend of the working class. A good place to begin would be to read The Bending Cross which is a biography of Debs and which was written by Ray Ginger.
Rudolph Rocker would also be a good perspective, especially as to how the Class War played out in Spain.
A simply stunning, depressing but most informative set of facts and statistics set forth by Frank Cash at 8:38 am. In light of the information that Frank has sent our way one has to wonder where the 21st century equivalent of Eugene V. Debs is in this country. Where is the man or woman who will rally the masses against the ruling class and against both major political parties?
"And here's to you Eugene V. Debs
Our nation turns its lonely eyes toward you"
"The master class has always declared the wars;
the subject class has always fought the battles.
The master class has had all to gain and nothing
to lose, while the subject class has had nothing
to gain and all to lose-especially their lives."-Eugene V. Debs [1855-1926], American labor and political leader
To create unions, you need to have a society. The suburban lifestyle of isolation and consumption has guaranteed that Americans don't make the daily social contacts that lead to organizing unions.
Mission accomplished, suburbia.
I think you're right. Consumerism has destroyed society. We've become isolated from one another.
American labor is paying the price for its' long-term strategic mistakes, with it's foolish participation in the Red Scares (which SAG did under the direction of Grandpa Caligula) of the post-WW2 period (which led to Taft-Hartley, for example) a particular error. Now American unions find themselves in a position almost unimaginable two generations ago: they are for all intents and purposes, back at the situation that was extant during the Robber Baron era...and their opponents do have the hindsight of history to guide them.
It's true that pervasive Amerikan myths of "rugged individualism" and the "class-free society" that provides a "level playing field" for the ambitious and determined "self-made man" has compromised and co-opted the Amerikan worker's capacity for rigorous resistance to oppressive bosses and fat-cats.
Since labor organizations have come to mimic management organizations, workers have gradually become slaves serving two masters. Here again, Amerika has found another way to apply the insidious technique of "good cop/bad cop" to neuter the individual worker and neutralize bottom-up power.
The Amerikan mass demonstrations and marches sponsored by unions and more or less moderate grassroots organizations seem more like revival meetings and media events than an expression of formidable, focused anger.
Compared to European hardball, Amerika's protests are more like wiffle ball. Or Nerf ball. Perhaps worthwhile and valuable to the participants, and certainly providing therapeutic benefit in the form of camaraderie and a taste of transient solidarity-- but not mounting any challenge to authority that strikes fear into the heart of the ruling class plutocracy.
Yes, but who manufactures all the Predator drones and advanced military weaponry and is the world's indisputable number one– in virtually all sectors of 'death' technology?
A dead nation can truly can only manufacture death.
It goes without saying the market is not a benign one for such malefic products. Who, at certain point, wants to buy them? Israel?
A nation 'manufactures' what it 'is.' It can also be said it produces the very people whom it 'is.'
Transfixed in the macabre, America cannibalizes itself. The three blazons, 'blood, money and death' have transmogrified into dominant infrastructural constructs, emblematic of a fascist economy. Truly 'end' use products– as in the terminus of all 'ends,'–the grave.
The eschatology of blood and only blood. The American demonology proceeds forthwith!
"Someone once said that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism. We can now revise that and witness the attempt to imagine capitalism by way of imagining the end of the world."
– (Frederic Jameson)
Let it come down. American history has set its course.
There are no 'second acts' in this 'danse cadaverous.'
Yep. When I read the book, "Charlie Wilson's War" about the CIA Afghanistan conflict with the Russians I learned that the stinger missle guidance system was made in a factory in good old California by mostly women (they found the precision work was better done by small hands). I bet it paid (pays) well too... As long as you don't have a conscience, then the blowback may hit someone else. What a country.
A nation 'manufactures' what it 'is.' It can also be said it produces the very people whom it 'is.': VASHKARKIM
===============
THat is what I call a STATEMENT of GENIUS. it stands right up there with the statements by many famous people in history.
I want to steal it and say it to people i know . lol.
Thanks Teddy. We appreciate it.
The statement is in the 'public domain.' Feel free to appropriate it as you like.
–(Vashkar & Kim)
Let's face it.
As some have said for years
"The American worker is too dumb to realize that he has been voting against his best interests for years. Now he/she is too timid (others say C___S____) to do anything about it"
Truth, Justice and the American Way. "We" have lost our way. Just this week news came out that "We" intentionally infected Guatemalans with preexisting syphilis and gonorrhea in the late '40. In less than five years "We" became Mengele. That is just the most recent example of US losing our way.
The "Way" is a Chinese Confucian concept that dates back to 550 BC. Confucius said, "What you do not wish for yourself, do not do to others." Jesus and Plato both preached this same "Golden Rule." Eisenhower said that under Mao the Chinese lost their Confucian ethic and are now a militaristic people like ourselves. I hope Eisenhower was wrong.
Progressives need to become the "Way." "We" need the show America the "Way."
(Read - CONFUCIAN ANALECTS
http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/3330/pg3330.html)
The Europeans have a great advantage over the Americans. They STILL have Social programs and protections that will provide for them when they are giving up wages to march in these strikes.
They also have a much higher rates of savings.
The "Ruling Class" in Europe is not much different then that in the USA in that they want to "redesign" Europe on the US model wherein the Worker is forced into a lifelong "debt slavery" and is compelled to work for less and less or become one of the honeless and destitute.
The US Government dismantled all of those programs years ago. The US worker has no savings and is in massive debt.
In order for the EU to get to where the USA is today, they have to dismantle all those Social programs first. They try and use the manufactured debt crisis in Greece and Spain to do so.
Here the societal differences are telling. In the USA through the 80's and 90's , the programs were cut by stealth using cleverly managed Campaigns under the Reagans and the Clintons. These happened with nary a peep from the US worker class.
The Workers in the EU know exactly what is going on and recognize if they act as the US worker did 30 years ago and roll over , they will end up in the same position.
The real difference is the workers in the EU believe they can still win the fight whereas the American worker surrendered 20 years ago, throwing their neighbors under the bus in order to preserve their own status thus having long since LOST that fight.
"The U.S. worker certainly stands apart from her compatriots across the Atlantic. They're the ones in the news, mobilizing against the harsh austerity plans governments are imposing in respose to an exceptional American export: the global economic crisis."
They'd better rally as if they're lives depend upon it, because they're facing nothing less than the dismantling of all the post WW-II reforms that built their social welfare states. That's the direct intention of the global elite, to crush the European Left decisively ...
See Michael Hudson's article at
http://counterpunch.org/hudson10012010.html
Funny -- we both posted at the same time!
Yes, they'd better rally as if they're lives depend upon it, since otherwise their safety nets will be torn to shreds. Likewise here in American best we do the same, because disappearing the safety net is what cutting taxes on the rich & reducing social spending are all about.
From Michael Hudson:
http://www.counterpunch.org/hudson10012010.html
10 million people turned out in Spain. Can you imagine that?
Possibly, instead of a single march/rally planned in D.C. -- we should turn out in our various states -- in the capitols and other major cities within the states. Of course, I turn out for events, rallies and protests here in NYC.
Myself, I wasn't able to afford a ticket to D.C. today. I admit this fact with a twinge of guilt, except for the fact that I attended every single march and rally in D.C. between 2000 and 2007, when I lost my job in December of 2007. No matter the size of the crowds, we were rendered invisible by M$M.
If only...
"One of the key systemic problems is the institutional weakness of the labor movement,"
–(Michelle Chen)
'Institutional weakness' aside, the true problem American workers have is ideological, or lack thereof.
American ideology is incorrigibly and fundamentally rightist at core. When Bush ordered the West coast Longshoreman back to work under Taft-Hartley, the last, most militant union bastion was breached and overrun and has now degenerated into business unionism.
"10 million people turned out in Spain. Can you imagine that?"
–(Kay Johnson)
These figures are impressive only in relation to America, which shows that America must be written off entirely. How many came out in America in class solidarity with their brethren in Europe? Ten, Twenty?
20 Million could have come out and it would still be ineffectual. Marches accomplish little, as did the massive turnouts (even in America!) prior to the fascist invasion of Iraq. Imperialism prevailed and the tranquil quiescence of 'private' life was restored with hardly a hiccup.
"Revolutionary progress determines its directions when it rouses a powerful self centered counterrevolution by engendering an adversary that can only cause the insurgent party to evolve in its battle against the counterrevolutionaries into a veritable revolutionary party."
–(Karl Marx, as cited by Ulrike Meinhoff.)
Not until these 'marches' see direct, concerted attacks on capitalist property and institutional infrastructure, state power, and the police apparatus can they be deemed serious. This is not to say that the possibility does not exist. This exacerbation of possibility only configures itself, if there is a shift in how 'reality' itself is perceived. As of now, they are merely 'decorative' events.
"The dictatorship is necessary because it is a case, not of partial changes, but of the very existence of the bourgeoisie. No agreement is possible on this ground. Only force can be the deciding factor"
–(Leon Trotsky)
I don't think you missed much, Kay.
Despite the disingenuous non-denominational window dressing, the “One Nation Coming Together” rally is at best a plainclothes Democratic Party pep rally. Don't let the rainbow pom-poms fool you.
Perhaps the articles published here and elsewhere in the upcoming week will challenge this preliminary conclusion. Maybe those who urged attendance in order to "take over" the rally to express suitably radical critiques of the intolerable status quo succeeded in ways not reported by corporate media.
However, despite some evidence that "progressives" are confused and perplexed by, or skeptical of, the Democrats, it appears that the speakers uniformly mocked and bashed Republicans, and exhorted the crowd to go home and work like hell to "support the progressive agenda" in the upcoming elections.
I'm no fan of Politico.com, and regret that CD now regularly publishes their articles, but the "Liberals Seek to Rally Base" confirms my opinion-- even if one takes Politico articles with a salt shaker in hand.
Ed Schultz's rhetorical growling, quoted in the Politico article, captures the essence of the event: "We cannot give up on Nov. 2. We have not gotten everything we've wanted for the last two years," he said. "We have to stand up for a progressive agenda that is for the people and not the corporations."
The high-flown, high-minded pwogspeak slogans demanding "Jobs, Justice, and Education" are simply ludicrous when coupled to the assumption that Democrats are, as we Sixties folk say, "part of the solution".
Those in attendance are urged to get fired up, and more importantly STAY fired up when they get home-- to pound the streets, knock on doors, and leave no stone unturned to spread the message far and wide. But what IS the message, except to vote for the lesser evil in November?
That's their consensus on how to best achieve a pro-people, anti-corporate agenda.
IMO, it's sad, exasperating, and wryly amusing that the rally organizers seem to be purposely maintaining "deniability" that this is indeed a pre-election Democratic Party pep rally disguised as a non-partisan expression of dissent.