Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Tell Larry Summers, Don’t Delay!
Larry Summers is confirming rumors that he plans on leaving his job as the President’s chief economic adviser at the end of the year. While some may consider this a panicky attempt to hightail it out the door before he is blamed for significant Democratic losses this election cycle, I see it in a more positive light. Just think of the reception he will receive when he returns to Wall Street!
On Wall Street, Summers will be greeted like a conquering hero. Never have so many financiers been made so rich because of the actions of one man. Plus, he can go back to that genius Wall Street salary. When he worked for one world’s largest hedge funds, D.E. Shaw, he worked one day a week and earned $5.2 million before being picked by Obama to head the National Economic Council. Ka-ching! There will be plenty of time for him to teach a class Harvard (although you can be sure they won't let him anywhere near that endowment again.)
A Resume Only Wall Street Could Love
Summers has a long resume that makes him an ideal candidate for a job on the Street. For years, he promoted the concept of “a post-industrial age” where manufacturing takes a back seat. An expression he was fond of repeating was, “Financial markets do not just oil the wheels of economic growth. They are the wheels.” And has he worked very hard his entire career to grease those wheels.
Between 1992 and 2001, Summers held various positions in the U.S. Treasury Department, including that of Treasury Secretary from 1999 to 2001. Summers has described the 1990’s as a time when “important steps” were taken to achieve “deregulation in key sectors of the economy” such as financial services. He has also said that during this period, government officials and private financial interests collaborated in a spirit of cooperation “to provide the right framework for our financial industry to thrive.”
Role in the elimination of Glass-Steagall: Along with Robert Rubin and Alan Greenspan, Summers brought about elimination of key U.S. financial regulations, including the Glass-Steagall Act. Summers argued for elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act by saying it imposed “archaic financial restrictions. “Our leadership of the world's financial markets would be enhanced. And consumers would see the benefits in the form of greater innovation and lower prices.” That “innovation” led directly to the formation of “too big to fail firms” that were allowed to gamble in the securities market like never before, and which were a key contributor to the collapse of the global economy.
Role in killing derivatives reform: Summers was particularly aggressive in his efforts to block regulations of derivatives, regulations that might have prevented the 2008 economic meltdown. While he was at the Treasury Department, his enthusiasm for financial deregulation conflicted with the views of Brooksley Born, Chair of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CTFC). Born had extensive experience working as a lawyer in the derivatives area, and was concerned about the lack of transparency in this multi-trillion dollar financial market. Summers collaborated with Alan Greenspan, Robert Rubin, and Arthur Levitt to block Born’s efforts to regulate this burgeoning market.
According to New York Times reporter Timothy O’Brien, “They were all part of a very concerted effort to shut her up and to shut her down. And they did, in fact, shut her up and shut her down. Bob Rubin is not a guy who likes confrontation. He's confrontation-averse. But he understands that you need someone in there who can swing a heavy axe, and that person was Larry Summers. He was the enforcer.”
Former CFTC attorney Michael Greenberger has recounted how Summers called Born personally to accuse her of risking a major financial crisis with her proposal to bring transparency to the derivatives market. Summers echoed the concerns of the “13 Bankers” who were in his office at the time he made the call to Born, a conversation that gave birth to the title of Simon Johnson’s great book, 13 Bankers, about the history of the financial crisis.
Role in the Enron Crisis: When he was about to take office as Treasury Secretary, Summers received a congratulatory letter from Ken Lay, the President of Enron Corporation. The letter was addressed “Dear Larry.” In his response addressed to “Ken,” Summers promised, “I’ll keep my eye on power deregulation and energy-market infrastructure issues.” And he did.
During California’s energy crisis in 2000, Summers rejected the idea that energy companies like Enron were manipulating the market and gouging consumers. He opposed Governor Gray Davis’ plan for government intervention with price controls, claiming “This is classic supply and demand. The only way to fix this is ultimately by allowing retail prices to go wherever they have to go.”
Role in Harvard’s Financial Losses: Summers became President of Harvard University in 2001 and resigned under a cloud in 2006, leaving behind a ticking time bomb of interest rate swaps that he helped negotiate in 2004. According to Bloomberg, “the swaps, which assumed that interest rates would rise, proved so toxic that the 373-year-old institution agreed to pay banks a total of almost $1 billion to terminate them.”
Role in the Bailout and Stimulus: Summers had a key role in determining the size of the federal bailout of the financial services industry (all government programs add up to $4.7 trillion) and of the economic stimulus package the Obama administration submitted to Congress ($787 billion). The stimulus package was much smaller than what was being recommended by many economists, and as a result, the U.S. has been stuck at near double digit unemployment for almost two years. Last year, economist Paul Krugman warned that while cutting the size of the stimulus might get more Republican votes, it would fail to significantly reduce unemployment. This failure would then be blamed on the Democrats and be used to argue that government spending does not work. Krugman’s prediction has held true.
Today, Wall Street is bouncing back with healthy profit margins and even healthier bonuses, while Main Street is still mired in the Great Recession. Because Obama is seen as doing too little for the middle class, Democrats are likely to suffer steep losses this November.
The sooner Obama replaces Summers with a competent economist, the
better. There’s a high-speed Acela train leaving for Wall Street at 2:00
p.m. today, perhaps Vice President Biden will be kind enough to show
Mr. Summers the way?
This article was based on the original research by the Center for Media and Democracy in our Sourcewatch Wikipedia.
- Posted in


90 Comments so far
Show AllDon't let the door hit you in the behind on your way out Larry.
http://www.pressherald.com/business/first-wind-set-to-test-the-waters-with-ipo_2010-03-30.html
The comments here are very enlightening. I wouldn't be surprised if a few pardons are on the way.
This is another good article. The best investigative piece done by Mr. Tux Terkel at the Portland Press Herald has been scrubbed. I Wonder why?
http://www.pressherald.com/archive/backers-of-wind-power-decry-claims-of-conflict_2010-01-30.html
Furthermore, during electricity deregulation in Maine, then Governor Angus S. King used a little known trick where the Office of the Public Advocate would intervene on certain PUC issues. The problem here is that no one knew that the OPA "serves at the pleasure of the Governor". This is when Enron was gracing Maine with its presence. King was formerly in the energy business and the OPA did a heck of job representing him and not the Public interest as the name OPA implies. King is in the wind business now. His son and a former PUC commisioner (Kurt Adams) are now both executives at First Wind.
I wonder if the title, "Chief Economic Advisor" means that Summers serves at the pleasure of Obama and not the public like the OPA? My guess is YES.
Need I say more. Well Maybe......
http://bjdurk.newsvine.com/_news/2010/02/23/3941508-who-are-these-guys-cape-wind-emi-upc-first-wind-ivpc
Wind Swindlers List.
http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/news/2010/editorial-big-wind-swindle/
Larry Summers and Enron
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-11-12/larry-summers-and-enron/2/
Perhaps he should be headed to jail..
Perhaps he should be headed to jail..
maybe he should have shoes and eggs thown at him by many homeowners who have been screwed because of this asshole. i am sure there are many others who see him as a piece of crap that he is.
matt
Hello!
It is quite simple and quite evident that the Feds and Wall Street are quite happy to depress wages and crush unions and the middleclass through unemployment and foreclosures.
The Unions are the bulwark of the worker and the middleclass is the bulwark for democracy ( or has the potential to be).
The Capitalism Ponzi Scheme has progressed to the point where it now requires slave labor (in order to prop up Wall Street as long as possible).
Additionally, they need to censor the internet(s), so they can further their war on information by substituting a Constitutionally protected free press with entertainment distractions. (I haven't been able to find the other internets, but I know they're out there; I obtained this information from an unimpeachable source.)
They need to destroy rampant secularism in the schools by replacing science with more specific answers, because inquiring minds want to 'know'. Here, too, they seem to be making progress.
So, we are stuck with hope for no change. (What did they useta call that - 'lazy fare'?) Something like that.
That, "At age 28 he [Lawrence Summers] became one of the youngest professors to receive tenure at Harvard," is indicative of the complete failure of the academic "discipline" of economics (the word "complete" meant literally, not hyperbolically). [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_obama_economic_adviser;_ylt=AlzTPSfp5HC8MLOO.maZb42s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNwYTg5NzNlBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwOTIyL3VzX29iYW1hX2Vjb25vbWljX2FkdmlzZXIEY2NvZGUDbW9zdHBvcHVsYXIEY3BvcwMyBHBvcwM4BHB0A2hvbWVfY29rZQRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3J5BHNsawNvYmFtYWFpZGVzZXg-] Summarizing hopelessness of both Summers and the "discipline" of economics is,
"For years, he promoted the concept of 'a post-industrial age' where manufacturing takes a back seat. An expression he was fond of repeating was, 'Financial markets do not just oil the wheels of economic growth. They are the wheels.'”
An economy exists to produce intangibles (financial "instruments"), not tangibles which humans can actually use (like water, food, buildings, etc.). This very fact illustrates the decoupling of the "discipline" of economics, Lawrence Summers, and the Obama administration, from human life. Effectively, illustrated is why economics is NOT a SOCIAL science. Presupposing a Smithian Presbyterian mass of Calvinist solipsistic individuals, there cannot be such a thing as society. In the Hobbesian world of economics, humans care not one whit for another.
Add to this dominance of neoclassical Austrian School theories about a perfect natural economy whose ontological foundations are left unprovided, and the utter monstrous failure of the "discipline" of economics is revealed. If humans suffer, it is only because in the undefined "long run," they will be better off. If still suffering after a long run, it is because of their own incompetence, this when government should not interfere with the "natural economy" because it is perfect.
Oh, by the way, if the perfect "natural economy" exists, then the world is determined, and government can't interfere unless its "interference" is constituent of the determined "natural economy." This is a piece of logic, however, and I know of no economics department which requires its students to take logic. Ideology suffices quite well, thank you.
keynes proved economics is a science, but the rich don't want to hear the truth because they see a middle class as a threat to their power, so the put in place pseudo economists like milton friedman to ignore and "disprove" keynes and tell the rich that the best way to stimulate the economy and make everything wonderful for everyone is for the rich to be as greedy as possible
as keynes described this philosophy
"you have the worst people behaving in the worst possible ways........to the benefit of all"
On fear of being accused of some sort of bigot, what I find fascinating about Milton Friedman is how a Jew could so embrace Calvinism.
$
To understand a man, you have to understand where he came from. In the Shock Doctrine, Kline mentioned in passing that Friedman's father ran a garment sweatshop. It would be natural for Friedman, having grown up in that environment, to feel that enriching yourself through the oppression and exploitation of the weak is acceptable.
Weak is not a good word for lower income people(or non-capitalists).
Elite seems to be a poor word to describe the economically bloated.
My word choice for the economically bloated: 'Immoral, Greedy Assholes'.
(I tend to use the unabridged version of the English language dictionary, but I'll admit I can be an uncouth fuck at times. Our 'leaders' are much more refined, and always have to consider the greater good of those they represent.)
philandrel - why not save some key strokes (economize) and just say:
"the only people who trust Economists are OTHER Economists"
OK.
one of the scariest things in the world is a person w/ a MBA from an "elite" eastern school -
anything for a buck....... sums up the philosophy from these people.....
An the most dangerous occupation is economist. How much blood has been spilled as a result of the teaching of economists like Marx and Friedman?
They, of course, had to abide by the law.
"The sooner Obama replaces Summers with a competent economist, the better. There’s a high-speed Acela train leaving for Wall Street at 2:00 p.m. today, perhaps Vice President Biden will be kind enough to show Mr. Summers the way?"
I wouldn't bet the house on this one. It's not like Summers is leaving because he and Obama aren't getting along, or Obama showed him the door because he disagrees with him. But the headlines from all the blogs on HuffPo regarding this are good for a chuckle or two as the progressive pundits fall all over themselves in urging Obama to pick the "right" guy.
On Democracy Now!, this morning, this woman's name came to light as a possible replacement for Larry Summers: former Xerox head Anne Mulcahy -- a new face, sort of, but the worldview is the same.
"It's not like Summers is leaving because he and Obama aren't getting along, or Obama showed him the door because he disagrees with him." -- Samalabear
I agree with you, but I wish I didn't. This morning, Robert Sheer appeared on Democracy Now!, and although he criticizes Summers, he's too easy on Obama for my liking. Summers was Obama's choice. A couple of days ago, Amy broadcast a clip of a woman asking Obama a question at a Town Hall meeting, and the woman was clear when she spoke -- "I'm exhausted, where is the hope and change I voted for?" I'm paraphrasing -- to a degree. Obama actually looked a bit stymied and a bit sheepish. However, our elected and appointed officials continue to fail us, we the people, and I see nothing in the wind that alters that fact.
Last night, I went to hear Robert Reich speak at Barnes & Noble, here in NYC. Of course, most of us know that he resigned from the Clinton administration due to his serious disagreement with Clinton policies. Reich is intense, and it's clear that he sees and understands the immediacy and urgency of the various issues that are destroying the people of this country. At the same time, though, much of what he says is the "same old, same old." He talked about growth, Capitalism, etc., and in the end, he's still a good democrat. Personally, I think the "growth" ideology is no longer possible. Unlike others, Reich does actually present some ideas as to how to relieve, at least, some of the pressure on we the people. That said, I can't see the Obama administration implementing any of his ideas. And, Reich did back away from two or three questions that are very relevant to our times -- especially the outsourcing and insourcing of jobs.
"Kay Johnson"
So-called "Free" market capitalism is a religion and it depends upon the totally false (and ardently promoted) notion that we are all equally blessed. Washington and Wall Street are the cathedrals of this religion of domination. The dogma demands participation and submission to the prophesy of Milton Friedman wherein the wealthiest are the most "enlightened".
If we mention their ruthlessness, we are infidels and are to be (at least) ostracized.
Freedom (unregulated-ness) is the name of their chalice and it is filled by the blood of ordinary people and the environment (resources).
Money is their manifestation of divinity and anyone who wants more than they need to live is considered saintly.
Those who are crushed by this religion are seen as undeserving. The adherents believe that if you are crushed or destroyed, it is because you did not believe hard enough.
Capitalists are predatory and must be regulated. We are seeing the costs of their freedom.
Did you notice how Obama's first response to that woman at the "town hall" meeting was to laugh at her?
Keep up the good work.
BIRD: Excellent post.
there's nothing "free" about the type of capitalism we're living under right now - not for the workers, the environment or for that matter those that wish to compete against the vampires and predators running the economy.....
those such as the white house advisors and the leaders of citigroup, wells fargo, bank of america, monsanto, dupont halliburton, not to mention the Federal Reserve, etc etc etc
as I've said vampires and predators.......
Capitalism, which depends on ever-continuing sales or "growth" (too often mistaken for progress), is not compatible with a post-global warming earth.
THAT is the central fact of life ALL economists must deal with now. Nature cannot be "regulated". Runaway climate change, triggered by our consumptive (in all meanings of that word) lifestyle, will not "compromise" with capitalists (Friedmanesque, Keynesian, or otherwise), libertarians, socialists, or Marxists. It must be faced and coped with as best as we all can.
"Thinking outside the box" for the rest of this catastrophic global-warming century means creating human economies which are compatible with, not destructive of, nature, and which are humane and supportive of life, not merely obsessed only with profit$.
Economics is NOT a "science" as long as it resists learning from both its own dismal history as well as from the harsh realities of nature.
Thanks, Birdbrain Alley -- yes, I was horrified at Obama's lack of empathy and compassion for the woman who put him "on the spot."
I agree with your comments about "Free" market capitalism, and the dogmas involved with the worldview of those who perpetrate the scam.
"Capitalists are predatory and must be regulated. We are seeing the costs of their freedom." -- Birdbrain Alley
Well said!
Kay, you were horrified, but were you surprised ....
No, I was NOT surprised.
Jon Stewart did a nice little piece on that town hall last night and looking at the video again, the laugh did jump out -- although it struck me as nervous laughter, kind of like those KitKat commercials, where the guy quickly grabs a bar while he scrambles for a good response. Did you notice how there was not one smile in the audience?
Samalabear: I agree with you -- I thought Obama's laughter was of the nervous sort -- like a kid caught with his hand in the cookie jar. Yes, I noticed -- no one even smiled. It was a very telling moment, caught on film.
My hat's off to the woman who asked the question!
Jill -- I don't know why these so-called experts continue to support, and to think that Obama will do the right thing. His actions clearly demonstrate that Obama is NOT on our side. But, unlike many of them, I didn't ever buy into the Obama brand like they did. It's like that tribal instinct to cheer your team on, despite the fact that they are losing by a landslide, proving loyalty at all costs! It's a very simplistic two-team ideology that needs to be hammered to bits!
Why haven't charges been filed against these men and their corporations? From the beginning, William Black, et. al., have provided the proof that fraud has been perpetrated on the people of this country more times than can be counted on a massive scale. However, William Black finds himself marginalized -- with NO platform from which to speak and be heard.
Thinking outside the box is NOT something that even seems possible. The other night, I watched the Steven Soderbergh film, Traffic, and the Michael Douglas character, the newly appointed Drug Czar, is on a plane with all of his advisers, asking them to "think outside the box" -- about how to put together a new and fresh strategy to, perhaps, confront "the war on drugs." Everyone on the plane is silent. They can't think outside the box. They were indoctrinated, and that's where it ends. On their own, they are incapable of thinking.
Jill: "A cult leader is able to control information and to use people's deepest emotions to keep them under control."
Jill - I think you give O'Bama way too much credit... he's no Sven Garlic.
He's just elevator music in an empty suit.
I think the real problem is people (progressives/liberals/soft-left) just have a difficult time admitting to themselves how bloody easy it was to dupe them with completely empty rhetoric. 'They' are supposed to be the SMART ones!
I think it's both. The example of Obama as a cult leader is verified by the comments on HuffPo. How many are Obama cult members, now that the real question. Is it truly a minority, like the Bushbot 20-percenters? The woman in that video (who Stewart has dubbed the "Obama zapping machine") is one of the proud who wouldn't like to admit that she's been totally duped. Apparently she was on "Hardball" later and praised Obama for the many things he has done. So my guess is that people like this are frustrated but not willing to admit that it was all dupe, and this is as good as it's going to get, if not worse. But, putting Obama aside, you still have the party-loyalty question, regardless.
I don't know. All I can say is it's going to be interesting.
"The sooner Obama replaces Summers with a competent economist, the better."
The replacement won't happen until after the election. Mostly likely because whatever corporate ogre is selected will make Summers look good.
President empty-suit probably doesn't pick anyone. Summers will inform president whatsisface who his superiors in wallstreet/bostonvault/cityoflondon have picked for his replacement ("Summers replacement, or the prez's replacement?""Both.")
Most likely a more polished version of Summers; just like O-man is a more polished "bush".
proves obama doesn't really understand economics
I understand he is looking for someone to replace summers from "the business world" to prove he is not "business unfriendly"
this proves he is plenty business friendly already
and he should stop trying to pacify the right wingers
they will never accept him, he should just do what is right
Larry Summers may have said that the financial markets are "the wheels" under the economy engine, but the truth is that he and his drunken, obese, compatriots who are riding on this vehicle only care about the "club car" in which they are playing card games.
They sold the engine long ago in order to redecorate their club car with mirrors. Then they began adding cars full of so-called security apparatus which become heavier every day. Any movement of this inevitable train wreck is the result of making the vast majority of people pull and push it. They figured out that they could hire large numbers of people to police and prod the people to keep the ever-shrinking "membership" and yet ever-heavier train moving.
This train of cunning has to keep moving because the riders get bored looking at the same scenery, but it would NEVER dawn on them to get off of their lazy, greedy asses and walk. Besides, they believe that all those schmucks doing the work would be wasting time with all manner of schmaltz if it was not for the brilliance of the riders (no anti-semitism meant - I just don't get to use those words often and I like them).
In essence, this article is asking Larry the pimp to go to another room in the club car.
The last line in the article is asking Joe Biden (another pimp) to escort him, as if that will make a difference to what is happening to the people outside.
We, the people, are the ones who need to walk away. Without our belief in this sadistic freak show of an economic system, these murderous pigs would stop advancing and would have to find their way on their own.
Ignore their loud speakers, stop letting their military, dogmatic, religious, so-called free market police intimidate, and look beyond the train tracks.
Now, after responding to Kay Johnson above, I'm thinking it is the Church of Hell on wheels and we are almost constantly told that we must believe it is the route to heaven. They insist that the so-called brilliant among us stay within the box (club car).
Summers and all of his compatriots on Wall Street and in DC are just CROOKS, plain and simple. They do not work 'for the People' - they do what they can to keep the People in their place, while they strive to increase their own wealth and power. If millions of the small folks happen to die along the way, well, too bad.
Summers and all the others like him (the list is too long to type here) belong in jail.
"Political or military commentators, like astrologers, can survive almost any mistake," George Orwell once wrote. The same is true of most economic experts.
Why would anyone think that Obama could pick any kind of competent advisor or ezpert. He has proved that he cannot. Even if he did he would not listen to them.
A failed Presidency is a sad sight and considering what this group has destroyed and dragged down with their shennanigans, its a sad sight indeed.
Blame the culprits for a change...our government.
"A failed Presidency is a sad sight and considering what this group has destroyed and dragged down with their shennanigans, its a sad sight indeed."
Mighty,
It is not so much a failed Presidency..To some the past three or four Presidents have been enormous successes (Including the current President)....The failure is with the institution of the Executive Branch itself........This is not simply an Obama thing...He just happens to be the guy following orders at this time.. (There are many ways of issuing orders)If not him it would be someone else..... Yes..Somebody else lying to the people daily.
Many here love Ralph Nader (I certainly admire the man) and I assure you that if he were President he would be getting pissed on by many of those who express their love and admiration for him today ...That or he would have to resign...
The whole damn system is corrupted. (Won't work and can't work)
We have seen many failed Chief Executives. Obama is certainly no exception..he stands as more the rule......
How can this Government function when all three branches have been compromised.....
I am still an Optimist and much of this mess can be corrected..Over time...
Take Care
Thomas Gilbert
Summers is the psycopath that once said that economic comparative advantages should be used to determine industries that a countries should follow-
his example? AFRICA should be used as a toxic and radioactive waste dump as THEIR comparative advantage is they have very little political power and don't have the military power or international influence to stop it!
Thinking like that is a firm indication of megalomania and a clinically ill mind and soul........
these people running the country and the economic forces in our country are PURE SOCIOPATHS.
the fact that Obama loves, admires and follows these freaks is all the knowledge you need to know about the current white house!
SCREW THEM and the sooner summers, rahm the devils span and geitner et al leave the better......
katrine: I agree with your conclusion. Sheldon Wolin lays this out in his book, Democracy, Inc. The system is so corrupt it really makes no difference who is in charge. The momentum, or machine, is such that it just keeps chugging and ravaging anything in its path -- sort of like the creature in "The Alien," destroying because it can.
In Ken Kesey's book, One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, it was "the combine" that was the force that devoured everything and anything in its path. Kesey wrote, "The ward is a factory for the combine. it's for fixing up mistakes made in the neighborhoods and in the schools and in the churches, the hospital is."
I wanted to add something to my post -- a few months ago, someone on CD recommended the book, The Middle Mind, written by Curtis White. In the book, Curtis White lists the three enemies of imagination: 1) entertainment, 2) academic orthodoxy, and 3) political ideology. He writes, "Thought and creativity have been institutionalized in our academies. I'm not sure if it's a prison or a madhouse, or both. In any event, the inmates show little desire to bust out of the joint."
Thanks, mtdon. As chief economist for the World Bank, Summers' memo advocating dumping toxic waste and pollution on poor countries truly reads like SNL satire, copied below for the horror of CD readers. It is a window into the mind of an incorrigible sociopath, a cult true-believer, impervious to appeal or appeasement --- sadly not unlike most of Obama's Orwellian appointments of foxes to the henhouse:
http://www.counterpunch.org/summers.html
via http://attempter.wordpress.com
Larry Summers’ War Against the Earth
“DATE: December 12, 1991
“TO: Distribution
“FR: Lawrence H. Summers
“Subject: GEP
“‘Dirty’ Industries: Just between you and me, shouldn’t the World Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the LDCs [Less Developed Countries]? I can think of three reasons:
“1) The measurements of the costs of health impairing pollution depends on the foregone earnings from increased morbidity and mortality. From this point of view a given amount of health impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost, which will be the country with the lowest wages. I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.
“2) The costs of pollution are likely to be non-linear as the initial increments of pollution probably have very low cost. I’ve always though that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly UNDER-polluted, their air quality is probably vastly inefficiently low compared to Los Angeles or Mexico City. Only the lamentable facts that so much pollution is generated by non-tradable industries (transport, electrical generation) and that the unit transport costs of solid waste are so high prevent world welfare enhancing trade in air pollution and waste.
“3) The demand for a clean environment for aesthetic and health reasons is likely to have very high income elasticity. The concern over an agent that causes a one in a million change in the odds of prostrate cancer is obviously going to be much higher in a country where people survive to get prostrate cancer than in a country where under 5 mortality is is 200 per thousand. Also, much of the concern over industrial atmosphere discharge is about visibility impairing particulates. These discharges may have very little direct health impact. Clearly trade in goods that embody aesthetic pollution concerns could be welfare enhancing. While production is mobile the consumption of pretty air is a non-tradable.
“The problem with the arguments against all of these proposals for more pollution in LDCs (intrinsic rights to certain goods, moral reasons, social concerns, lack of adequate markets, etc.) could be turned around and used more or less effectively against every Bank proposal for liberalization.”
Here’s some appropriate commentary
After the memo became public in February 1992, Brazil’s then-Secretary of the Environment Jose Lutzenburger wrote back to Summers: “Your reasoning is perfectly logical but totally insane… Your thoughts [provide] a concrete example of the unbelievable alienation, reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness and the arrogant ignorance of many conventional ‘economists’ concerning the nature of the world we live in… If the World Bank keeps you as vice president it will lose all credibility. To me it would confirm what I often said… the best thing that could happen would be for the Bank to disappear.”
Unfortunately we know whose psychopathic logic has been winning since then. Obama represents its ultimate triumph to date.
Last night, when I went to hear Robert Reich speak, here in NYC, some of us in the room were discussing this memo. The fact that the Brazilian Secretary of the Environment responded to Summers, calling his reasoning logical, but insane, says it all!
The U.S. is using the world as a dumping ground for garbage and toxic waste. Here's just one example, from Democracy Now! on April 14, 2009 -- Amy's guest is Mohamed Abshir Waldo, a "Kenyan of Somali origin" --
MOHAMED ABSHIR WALDO: "Well, the two piracies are the original one, which was foreign fishing piracy by foreign trawlers and vessels, who at the same time were dumping industrial waste, toxic waste and, it also has been reported, nuclear waste. Most of the time, we feel it’s the same fishing vessels, foreign fishing vessels, that are doing both. That was the piracy that started all these problems.
"And the other piracy is the shipping piracy. When the marine resources of Somalia was pillaged, when the waters were poisoned, when the fish was stolen, and in a poverty situation in the whole country, the fishermen felt that they had no other possibilities or other recourse but to fight with, you know, the properties and the shipping of the same countries that have been doing and carrying on the fishing piracy and toxic dumping."
And, this:
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/the-worlds-rubbish-dump-a-garbage-tip-that-stretches-from-hawaii-to-japan-778016.html
In addition, I've seen video and photographs of towering piles of garbage/computers, etc., in Asian countries. Does the U.S. pay to dump the garbage in these countries? If, in fact, government agencies/corporations are paying, the amount can't possibly be enough!
Our elected and appointed officials simply have NO respect for people and animals, nor our physical environment.