Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Uneducated American
If you had to explain America’s economic success with one word, that word would be “education.” In the 19th century, America led the way in universal basic education. Then, as other nations followed suit, the “high school revolution” of the early 20th century took us to a whole new level. And in the years after World War II, America established a commanding position in higher education.
But that was then. The rise of American education was, overwhelmingly, the rise of public education — and for the past 30 years our political scene has been dominated by the view that any and all government spending is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Education, as one of the largest components of public spending, has inevitably suffered.
Until now, the results of educational neglect have been gradual — a slow-motion erosion of America’s relative position. But things are about to get much worse, as the economic crisis — its effects exacerbated by the penny-wise, pound-foolish behavior that passes for “fiscal responsibility” in Washington — deals a severe blow to education across the board.
About that erosion: there has been a flurry of reporting recently about threats to the dominance of America’s elite universities. What hasn’t been reported to the same extent, at least as far as I’ve seen, is our relative decline in more mundane measures. America, which used to take the lead in educating its young, has been gradually falling behind other advanced countries.
Most people, I suspect, still have in their minds an image of America as the great land of college education, unique in the extent to which higher learning is offered to the population at large. That image used to correspond to reality. But these days young Americans are considerably less likely than young people in many other countries to graduate from college. In fact, we have a college graduation rate that’s slightly below the average across all advanced economies.
Even without the effects of the current crisis, there would be every reason to expect us to fall further in these rankings, if only because we make it so hard for those with limited financial means to stay in school. In America, with its weak social safety net and limited student aid, students are far more likely than their counterparts in, say, France to hold part-time jobs while still attending classes. Not surprisingly, given the financial pressures, young Americans are also less likely to stay in school and more likely to become full-time workers instead.
But the crisis has placed huge additional stress on our creaking educational system.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the United States economy lost 273,000 jobs last month. Of those lost jobs, 29,000 were in state and local education, bringing the total losses in that category over the past five months to 143,000. That may not sound like much, but education is one of those areas that should, and normally does, keep growing even during a recession. Markets may be troubled, but that’s no reason to stop teaching our children. Yet that’s exactly what we’re doing.
There’s no mystery about what’s going on: education is mainly the responsibility of state and local governments, which are in dire fiscal straits. Adequate federal aid could have made a big difference. But while some aid has been provided, it has made up only a fraction of the shortfall. In part, that’s because back in February centrist senators insisted on stripping much of that aid from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, a k a the stimulus bill.
As a result, education is on the chopping block. And laid-off teachers are only part of the story. Even more important is the way that we’re shutting off opportunities.
For example, the Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported on the plight of California’s community college students. For generations, talented students from less affluent families have used those colleges as a stepping stone to the state’s public universities. But in the face of the state’s budget crisis those universities have been forced to slam the door on this year’s potential transfer students. One result, almost surely, will be lifetime damage to many students’ prospects — and a large, gratuitous waste of human potential.
So what should be done?
First of all, Congress needs to undo the sins of February, and approve another big round of aid to state governments. We don’t have to call it a stimulus, but it would be a very effective way to create or save thousands of jobs. And it would, at the same time, be an investment in our future.
Beyond that, we need to wake up and realize that one of the keys to our nation’s historic success is now a wasting asset. Education made America great; neglect of education can reverse the process.
- Posted in


225 Comments so far
Show Allhow discustimapatin cuz evy buddy gots ta have a edgeamucashun!!!
lol'
xz: well said cuz - yer tongue is purtier than a 6 dollar kansas city har'
Final curtain call for the American Empire.
I believe education in the US is a right, just as healthcare should be a right. And the government should be required to provide as much education and healthcare to all of its citizens, free of charge, and as much as we feel is sufficient. The health and intelligence of our citizens is an investment in the future growth and progress of our country as well as our competitiveness in the global marketplace.
Of course this is just theory, because the truth is corporations, with the cooperation of corrupt government officials, can make lots of money on a society that is stupid and in poor health. They even make money when we die.
Yes but, but do you notice what they do spend the borrowed money on? How much did Congress appropriate for wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? I believe it was over 100 billion dollars. But hey! Ask for health care, education, the miniumum wage then you know where you stand on a list of priorities in this country.
The amount exceeds a trillion, and that's only official numbers. There is plenty of unofficial spending, the "black" budget, and, of course, the entire bloated monstrosity of spending that is the military itself.
These numbers are important, because they want to say that a trillion-dollars-over-ten-years is waaaaaay too expensive for something decent and good and right, like health care, when they piss this amount and more down the toilet every year or so to maim, murder, rape and torture.
Don't dilute the argument.
Stimpy.....I like your first sentence: "I believe education in the US is a right, just as health care should be a right. And the government should be required to provide as much education and health care to all of its citizens, free of charge, and as much as we feel is sufficient".
But your second sentence I cannot agree with: "The health and intelligence of our citizens is an investment in the future growth and progress of our country as well as our competitiveness in the global marketplace."
Education should not be all about unsustainable economic growth and being competitive in the global marketplace. Education should be more about elevating the human mind and working for a more peaceful, sustainable and compassionate world. Our colleges and universities have become merely vocational schools, on bended knee to corporate America, to feed the beast of the American capitalism. This beast is destroying the world!
Stephen,
Well to take it a step further, ideally, yes I agree with you completely regarding your point.
Stephen--yes you're talking about a Humanistic education, which was the aim of the California "master plan" for mass higher education in the 60's, derived from the smashing success of the GI Bill (an example of government-funded higher ed which succeeded beautifully!)And in the sixties, given the boomer generation, very large numbers of students in colleges & universities this goal came close to attainment (it has since been scuttled for the ostensible economic reasons, but also, I believe, for ideological reasons as well). I do think we're on track for a two-tier education system, an elite track where a Humanist education is available for the upper classes, and a vocational track where everyone else, the majority, the masses, will be trained for low-wage jobs. Resulting in a general stultification of the general population, making it more malleable for the ruling interests through mass media, as we have been experiencing for the past twenty+ years.
Edumacation is for sissies! :)
I beg to differ with prof Krugman. The problem is not money. The problem is mindset. How would throwing more cash at schools help students who graduate cannot add/subtract/read/write at highschool level? That is basic stuff. You don't even need any equipment to teach those skills. Yet I see a lot of 20somethings who cannot do math. Ant don't get me started on spelling.
I agree. When I was a kid they still taught slide rule! But anyway, when the calculators came and were allowed to be used in school, the understanding of the mechanics behind mathematical calculations was lost. School reform needs to begin in kindergarten and all the way to the top. Courses on how to brush your teeth, pay your bills on time, how to do your laundry, how to cook an egg, etc should be included.
As a teacher friend likes to put it "you can't make chicken soup out of chicken poop"
How is throwing money around going to change that?
As a teacher friend likes to put it "you can't make chicken soup, if you don't have a pot, don't have a stove, don't have gas, don't have electricity, and the cook doesn't know how to make chicken soup in the first place."
None of it works without a motivated student.
How do you motivate the student if the facilities are crap, the teacher is himself / herself poorly motivated due to being poorly paid and having to work with crap facilities?
We can test your theory by shutting down all the private schools, all the private colleges.
"the teacher is himself / herself poorly motivated due to being poorly paid and having to work with crap facilities?"
Why would someone choose a profession that's known to be poorly paid, working with crap facilities and then rationalize doing a poorly motivated, piss poor job because of it?
Because that person starts out young and idealistic. That person starts out believing that s/he can change the world. And then gets beaten down.
Not willing to try shutting down all the expensive private schools, and having the precious princes and princesses go to public schools are you? And yet, somehow, money doesn't matter.
Money won't produce a motivated student.
"In many cities, spending per student exceeds $10,000 per year, yet graduation rates are below 50 percent. For example, in Detroit, per-student spending is approximately $11,100 per year, yet only 25 percent of Detroit's students are graduating from high school according to a recent estimate."
"Continuous spending increases have not corresponded with equal improvement in American educational performance. Long-term measures of American students' academic achievement, such as long-term NAEP reading scale scores and high school graduation rates, show that the performance of American students has not improved dramatically in recent decades, despite substantial spending increases. The lack of a correlation between long-term education spending and performance does not suggest that resources are not a factor in academic performance, but it does suggest that simply increasing spending is unlikely to improve educational performance."
http://www.heritage.org/research/Education/bg2179.cfm
You're taking the narrowest and shallowest possible view.
It matters what the money is spent on.
It matters what the payoff for the student is.
Adults won't waste their time learning something that's of no use to them. They're already aware that the amount of learning they can do within their personal lifespan is limited, and they quite rightly refuse to spend their one-and-only life learning things that have no material payoff. It's only children and the wealthy who can afford to let their minds be free.
Want every edu dollar to be well-spent? Make the basic necessities of a dignified life available as a benefit of citizenship. Free people from the constant, grinding need to compete in the rat race and most people will cease to be rats!
Mairead, Thank you for your cogent comment. I work in a rural, impoverished district that is constantly mispending money. $40,000 spent by administrators to hire an outside consultant to "study" the "best way to move the district forward" in spite of budget shortfalls. 26,000K spent on figuring out how to overcome the effects of childhood poverty on reading scores. Now I'm just a college-educated dropout hired to educate the most difficult to educate children of our district (the position is classroom aide) and one day they realized, "hey she's boosted their reading scores 8% in the 12 weeks we gave her a shot at this bottom percentile reading group. Maybe we should ask her how she did it" And this is what I told them. 1) I know the children, how and where they live. I never put down their parents to the children or the children for not reading at bedtime or after school with their parents. I don't expect 2nd and 3rd shift workers to be available to do my job with the child after school. 2) I understand that Mom and Dad probably had to leave the house to report to work at 6 or 7 am before the kids put themselves on the bus with or without breakfast SO I make sure the school breakfast gets in those little tummies by reminding them on the playground, before gym class, in reading group, as they get off that morning bus that their little brains need fuel to learn all the groovy, fun, boring,hard, important and trivial things they're going to need to know to continue to be the strong, smart people I know they are. 3) I am bigger, and smarter and stronger than most of the kids that first come under my influence and they respect me because I KEEP IT REAL, respect that continues even when they do eventually exceed me in size, intellectual capacity and endurance. 4) I told the interviewers and reading specialist that I make sure the kids catch ME doing what I ask THEM to do: reading, studying, using the dictionary, saying "I don't know" and then finding out, making mistakes(sometimes deliberate :-) and saying,"There, you taught me something"
They ended up having me formally talk to administration, because I've told them all these things piecemeal all along, but I guess they wanted to hear it all in one shot. And to conclude I said : "Some people would say Jesus was the greatest teacher ever and most other persons would agree he was at least one of the greatest teachers ever. Even Jesus FED the multitudes before he tried to teach them, because He knew that until you met peoples' most basic concrete needs, they can't turn their mind to matters of abstract reasoning. If He wouldn't, why should I try? I don't think I'm a better teacher than Him. Why are we always trying to eliminate the effects of childhood poverty on learning as measured by standardized test scores? Why don't we just eliminate childhood poverty, instead. That would eliminate at least two problems with one solution. Instead of focusing our efforts on changing the children, let's force change up the policy ladder." The school board and the administrators responded lamely that it would be too overwhelming an effort to derive too little benefit. Mentioned the words " opportunity costs" or something. Sounded like they were all burnt out thinking about it. But they won't let the children be burnt out.
cont'd
Part of why children don't know the 3 R's is because we are making not just those demands on them, at a time those basics are developmentally appropriate; we are also cramming abstract, higher order reasoning down their systems before their BRAINS and BODIES are ready for those demands, at the same time reading and writing and math are being introduced. It is overwhelming. I am not kidding when I tell you that there are materials I was not introduced to until sophomore, junior, senior years of high school (30+ years ago) that are expected standard knowledge for 7,8,9 year olds today, in addition to learning the 3 R's. (I went to the one of the top schools in the nation at the time, outside Washington DC and graduated in the top 5% of my class. I include this not for bragging but for a frame of reference to show how unreasonable these demands are). Many of the children that can't read, can correctly tell me about the differing biospheres under a rainforest canopy, or can explain the principles of physics behind simple machines. How many of us at 8 years old could have precisely defined and demonstrated land forms and their origins? Yet they struggle with simple math because we teach them 4 differing methods of long division. Bet most of y'all didn't know there was more that one way to do that, did you? Lots of kids think they don't know how to divide because they don't understand the way their parents do it( but they know the 3 other ways teacher has shown them) or because they only 'get' one of the methods demonstrated. So they just decide,"What's the point? I've put in the effort, it's not recognized. Put a fork in me, I'm done." When I find out that's how they're thinking, I tell them,"You DO know how to divide because you have the right answer to the problem and I watched you work it out, just now, in front of me." When they get to standardized tests though they can't work the 3 other methods that are sprinkled through the tests so the score is skewed in the "division" section. Very few of the math questions on these tests ask for a direct answer such as "84 divided by 12 equals ?" Most say something like "Using the estimation method of division, divide 84 by 12, starting with 60 as the first product.Express any remainder as a ratio" That is a mid-range fourth grade question.
It matters very much what we're asking the children to learn, when we are asking them to learn it in their developmental growth and what educational supports the money is spent on: is the money spent directly on those things that influence the childrens' learning or is the childrens' learning money used to support influence?
Defenseless children are bombarded with media, marketing and propaganda.
They need to be taught how to identify, decode and protect themselves from each.
They need to learn the difference between information and misinformation.
They need to learn to think critically and independently.
Until they learn these skills they're sitting ducks for the professional manipulators who will control and shape what they think about themselves and the world.
giving money to education for more teachers is a redistribution of wealth that in and of itself helps the economy
also he is right it is harder and harder for poor people to go to college and when they are there they often have to work and not all people are able to sustain it
so giving more money out for both these purposes is good
i do agree however that education in grammar school level and high school level leaves a lot to be desired.....just throwing money at grammar schools and high schools without monitoring or expectations or results is a problem
but no children left behind which also schoul be called no child gets ahead, which emphasizes percent of kids who pass the test... putting all the emphasis on the marginal students and boring the hell out of the top students, is a travesty
the need to make education a stimulating experience for all the students
If the problem is not money, I take it you would have no problem if all private schools, all private colleges, were closed down, and all students were required to study in a public school, in a public college?
If the problem is not money, I take it you would have no problem if the Obama's precious Sasha and Malia, along with all the other precious little princes and princesses in exclusive expensive private schools, were assigned to public schools.
Chameleon:
When you pay teachers more you attract better educated people into teaching. Better educated people have more to teach than less educated people.
This principle works for most things. The greater the pay, the greater the competition for jobs and the more qualified the applicants have to be to get those jobs.
I have seen remarks made by teachers on student papers which were simply unbelievably illiterate. And it's still a reliable rule that academically weak female undergraduates gravitate toward "Education" degrees and academically weak male graduates gravitate toward degrees in Marketing.
Oh yeah, right.
In 2000 here in Mexico a professional shitkicker named Vicente Fox was elected president, and he said the same thing.
He was going to use head-hunters, find the best. Pay them well.
Result: first, Shitkicker doubled his salary so that he became th highest paid president o the planet.
Then he hired a bunch of cronies and paid them a fistful of dollars to put Mexico even further down in the toilet bowl than it was when he started.
Better educated people--whatever that means--don't necessarily have anything to teach--or the skills and the vocation of teaching.
It's likely that better educated people have more to teach than lesser educated people. But it's unlikely that better paid people have more to teach than lesser paid people.
ignorance is the backbone of america
only in ignorance can you live here - deep and profound ignorance at that - hopeless ignorance
i believe america is the only country in the world where creationism isn't a cartoon - it is reality - who needs that crap about evolution
god made the damn world in 6 days and rested on the 7th
that's why we have sunday - to rest our weary abortion hatin bones
only in america is newt gingrich considered - and i must say i really got a good laugh out of this - an intellectual
good one
only in america is an alcoholic drug addict allowed to steal two elections and start a war on phantoms
america is the last country in the world to believe the 9/11 tv show - there are folks living in huts in the congo who know it was an inside job
fat boy limbaugh and glen peckerhead - sob sob - i love my country man - hannity and billo - pat robertson, let's not forget palin or how about the moron from the midwest - bachman
only in america
gop'er craig giving blow jobs in the men's can and dem barney frank running a male whore agency out of his apartment
"keep the guvermen out of my medicare"
ronald reagan was smart they say - real smart - he was so smart we, as a country, couldn't even tell he was senile while in office
we are so stupid we fell for the nwo shill barry obama - we got sucked in hook line and sinker - man do i feel cheap and used
like i said - we are stooooopid
I'd sell my soul to get out of here.
I could be buying....
If you think it's worth anything give me a call.
Only you can decide if it's worth saving.
Saving from what--saving for what? "It is not for the sake of the beloved that the beloved is loved but for the sake of the Self in the beloved that the beloved is loved." --Upanishads
I give you my Soul free-for nothing-it is destined to BE regardless of who owns it. I believe that I will be united with it now and forever regardless of who owns it.
You type a 279 word diatribe in 16 paragraphs without a single comma or period, and the topic? Education! The irony is thick.
thanks lucky
lots of folks who post here have nothing but venom to share but they take comfort in their punctuation
for the person who looks through these posts and only sees commas and verbs and then makes a comment on content - man that irony is thick
but for these anal retentives - please put these periods on account and use them for any of my posts as you will
........................................................................................................................................................................
probably best if you jst skip over them
take a few commas too: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
YOU FORGOT TO BANK SOME CAPS.
don't use them as a rule
You could have told him that you start/end your sentences with double line feeds. As for spewing venom, we spew it on the elites' fruits to remind the people not to eat those. The local fruits are clean.
*
The biggest failing in "education", at all levels, is the failure to teach political economy. Krugman is a prime example of this.
?
Your "?" proves my point. :-)
you had a point??
I'm going to have to stand by djb on this one. You've not presented sufficient information in this thread to suggest that you had a point, other than to publish what must be construed as an undefined disdain for Krugman.
His/her point is that political economy isn't taught to USans but it should be. Take a look at the definition of political economy: "Political economy originally was the term for studying production, buying and selling, and their relations with law, custom, and government." - wikipedia
There is a strong suggestion in that definition, from the Enlightenment period, that industry should be considered in the context of "law, custom and government", and perhaps remain subservient to those.
What do you think? When they changed it to "Economics" in the late 19th century did they want to preserve the submission to "law, custom and government" or reinforce the capitalist battlement against the growing socialist movement?
Struggle means Marxism.
We need to wage a War on Education!
Or would it be a War for Education?
We need to defeat those communist socialist Hitler youth jack booted thug government radicals who are standing between our children and their corporate produced textbooks!
Let's commence bombing!
Does anybody have any idea which country we should bomb?
Texas! I hear thems the ones doin all the choosin of them texbooks our childuns reads.
Texas ain't so bad. Try Mississippi where I live in.