Afghanistan Contractors Outnumber Troops
Despite Surge in U.S. Deployments, More Civilians Are Posted in War Zone; Reliance Echoes the Controversy in Iraq
Even as U.S. troops surge to new highs in Afghanistan they are outnumbered by military contractors working alongside them, according to a Defense Department census due to be distributed to Congress -- illustrating how hard it is for the U.S. to wean itself from the large numbers of war-zone contractors that proved controversial in Iraq.
The number of military contractors in Afghanistan rose to almost
74,000 by June 30, far outnumbering the roughly 58,000 U.S. soldiers on
the ground at that point. As the military force in Afghanistan grows
further, to a planned 68,000 by the end of the year, the Defense
Department expects the ranks of contractors to increase more.
The ranks of military contractors in Afghanistan have been growing along with the surge in troops. Above, contractor barracks at the Kandahar airfield.
The military requires contractors for essential functions ranging from supplying food and laundry services to guarding convoys and even military bases -- functions that were once performed by military personnel but have been outsourced so a slimmed-down military can focus more on battle-related tasks.
The Obama administration has sought to reduce its reliance on military contractors, worried that the Pentagon was ceding too much power to outside companies, failing to rein in costs and not achieving desired results.
President Obama has repeatedly called defense contractors to task since taking office. "In Iraq, too much money has been paid out for services that were never performed, buildings that were never completed, companies that skimmed off the top," he said during a March speech.
In April, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced plans to hire 30,000 civilian officials during to cut the percentage of contractors in the Pentagon's own work force, and last month he told an audience of soldiers that contractor use overseas needed better controls.
Military contractors' personnel for a time outnumbered U.S. troops in Iraq. The large contractor force was accompanied by issues ranging from questionable costs billed to the government to shooting of civilians by armed security guards. A September 2007 shooting incident involving Blackwater Worldwide guards working for the U.S. State Department, in which 17 Iraqis were killed, forced the U.S. to aggressively rework oversight of security firms.
Yet in Afghanistan as in Iraq, the Pentagon has found that the military has shrunk so much since the Cold War ended that it isn't big enough to sustain operations without using companies to directly support military operations.
"Because of the surge, we're trying to get ahead of the troops," said Gary Motsek, Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Program Support, who helps oversee the Pentagon's battlefield contractor efforts. "So we're pushing contractors in place, doing it as fast as we can, and trying to be responsible about it."
The heavy reliance on contractors in Afghanistan signals that a situation that defense planners once considered temporary has become a standard fixture of U.S. military operations.
"For a sustained fight like our current commitments, the U.S. military can't go to war without contractors on the battlefield," said Steven Arnold, a former Army general and retired executive at logistics specialists Ecolog USA and KBR Inc., military contractors formerly owned by Halliburton Co. He added, "For that matter, neither can NATO."
That poses a challenge for military planners who must keep tabs on tens of thousands of people who are crucial to their operations yet are civilians outside the chain of command.
In Congress, there's a particular concern about security contractors who might upset diplomatic and military relationships. "We've had incidents when force has been used, we believe, improperly against citizens by contractors," said Sen. Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee. "This creates huge problems, obviously, for those who have been injured or killed and their families, but it also creates huge problems for us and our policies in Afghanistan."
In Iraq, as of June 30 there were 119,706 military contractors, down 10% from three months earlier and smaller than the number of U.S. troops, which stood at approximately 132,000. But as the Pentagon has been drawing down contractors in Iraq, their ranks have been growing in Afghanistan -- rising by 9% over that same three-month period to 73,968. More than two-thirds of those are local, which reflects the desire to employ Afghans as part of the counterinsurgency there.
Many contractors in Afghanistan are likely to face combat-like conditions, particularly those manning far-flung outposts, and are exposed to possible militant attacks -- blurring the line between soldier and support staff.
The reliance on contractors has prompted a shift in the defense industry, sending more money to logistics and construction companies that can perform everything from basic functions to project engineering.
A recent contract is worth up to $15 billion to two firms, DynCorp International Inc. and Fluor Corp., to build and support U.S. military bases throughout Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, government auditors have repeatedly uncovered military mismanagement of contractors. The Wartime Contracting Commission reported finding during an April trip that the military had accepted a new headquarters building in Kabul hobbled by shoddy construction. Officials in Iraq and Afghanistan were unable to give the commission complete lists of work being contracted out at the bases they visited.
Coordination of security contractors, one of the most charged issues in Iraq, is being beefed up for Afghanistan, said Mr. Motsek, the Pentagon official. A new umbrella contract planned for later this year is designed to make awarding work speedier and to help oversight and vetting.
As well, he said more Defense Department civilians are being sent to oversee all types of contracts, and they will stay longer overseas than their predecessors did in Iraq.
Video conferencing and other remote management tools had fallen short as a substitute. The Army is also adding hundreds of civilian contracting personnel, among the measures being put in place.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
24 Comments so far
Show AllGuptao "Dumba**" Not all contractors are mercinaries (killers for hire) the majority of contractors are supplying, food, fuel, logistics, pilots. They are just as much at risk as the sodiers they serve next to. But if they are killed they not even counted, or considered a hero for risking their lives to support the military. If fact they don't even get a mention in the news when they are killed.
Contractors should be treated with at the very least respect as the majority are not guarding convoys as the news would have you believe.
MERCENARIES! They are called "mercenaries," or "killers for hire." Stop using governmentese & call them what they are-mercenaries.
And how many contractors do we have in Pakistan?
What are they going to do when the contractors want to be paid in euros?
AGG - I LOVE you! I laughed out loud.
More from your friend at Blackwater News Bulletin:
As I was sayin' earlier, we love business, just like any other American, and we are in the business of war. To us, war is a commodity, just as bananas are to the United Fruit Company. We sell war and our war competencies. We got a really nice business model.
The more wars there are, the better for our type of biz. It's not hard to understand, right? Like putting two and two together.
American biz is the best there is.
Love ya, America.
For the Obama maladministration, this story will be about as welcome as an August cole.
· Yr Obd't Servant
I think there's some misconception here about contractors. What the author is talking about but only mentionng it once is that not all the contractors are "security contractors" (what you usually see on TV being dragged dead and burned thru the streets or patrolling in cool little heicopters in the skies above). The total number of contractors includes cooks, drivers, etc. people like you and I trying to feed their family. Some of them might even be locals.
You have to look at it from the business standpoint. You have this war going on. You don't want to enlist plenty of soldiers, marines, airmen etc. You can't fire them after the war is over (ever heard of layoffs in the military?). So you use temorary workers. All civilian companies do that. Yes, they get paid more upfront due to the fact that they do not get health insurance, 401k etc that regular employees get. Same think i guess happens in the military.
Now if some of them contractors misbehave or their companies skim some money off the top it's up to the hiring enity (the US military in this case) to put a stop to it. However, being a government entity and not having to answer to anyone and having unlimited taxpayer funds that does not really happen. But that's a story for different day.
Draft the bastards and pay any survivors a soldier's wage.
I suppose this is considered an upbeat story in the Wall Street Journal.
Joe
Each new day there is new information in the form of 'news' about the many international crimes the USA is committing, and has been committing everywhere they go, for at least the past 60 years.
It adds one more point of emphasis to the statement I use often concerning the country where 'I was born a prisoner of war---- in the middle of the last century'.
"If the USA were another country ; the USA would invade the USA on the grounds that it would make the world a safer place for everybody".
The world cannot possibly tolerate the USA much longer.
Good Luck America, you really need it.
Giving a new meaning to war-profiteering.
Bring America Back !!!!..........!!!!...Well folks, I simply must call your attention to an article in todays issue of Time magazine and web page: Mexican Drug Cartels have Invaded California State Parks and Caused Wild Fires !!!!
*I really wish CD Editors would post the article here !
**If occupying California parkland, planting xmas tree sized marijuana sensimilla plants by the thousands, and causing thousands of acres of forest fires, is not an outright form
of terrorism==then I sure don't know a terrorist from Ghandi ! This stuff can flow across our borders like water, and our Leaders priorities are tied up in Afghan chasing a fantasy boogieman and his tribe of 19 airline pilot flunkouts !!
**Governor Arnold S. is cutting park ranger, police, and access protections for his state parks. The 'Time' article states this is like ceding American lands to the Cartels.
Once they are firmly ensconced--then guess what happens ?
**Instead of giving up his Parks, Gov Arnold should be asking for Emergency National Guard Assistance from Obama to take back his lands, and protect our borders at Mexico.
Arnold is Terminator enough to know what needs done !!
**The instant article is proof that the US Mission in Afghan is a fake one, a fairy tale. More paid mercenairies there than US Troops and personnel.
**Just think what they could do to button down the California State Park Systems against the known threat of the Mex Drug Cartels.
**Get these Troops out of Afghan, out of Iraq, back home to the real problems we have, instead of the imaginary crusade to find the cave-dwelling dragons we all know by now==DO NOT EXIST !!!!!
AND I MUST ADD, IF A TERRORIST REALLY AND TRULY WANTED TO DELIVER A DIRTY BOMB OR A MISSILE OF ANY KIND, JUST WHERE DO YOU THINK THEY WOULD DELIVER IT ??? THAT'S CORRECT FOLKS---RIGHT THRU THE CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS !!!
*NOW AS KUCINICH SCREAMS==WISE UP FOLKS===WAKE UP AMERICA====WAKE UP AMERICA !!
If occupying California parkland, planting xmas tree sized marijuana sensimilla plants by the thousands, and causing thousands of acres of forest fires, is not an outright form
of terrorism==then I sure don't know a terrorist from Ghandi !
______________________________________
Terrorism? Apart from the arson, this is pretty much the revolution I've been waiting for!
For years various CD commenters have argued for taking an optimistic, "half-full" viewpoint, and this is mine.
· Yr Obd't Servant
Does the military budget include contractors?
This makes it even more important that the Occupation of Afghanistan continue another 30 to 40 years.
This is Good for Business and Business is Americas business!!
Watch for a bailout package in about a decade for these firms wherein the wars expanded to Moldava, Somalia, The Congo , Burma and the like because the firms are "too big to fail".
Man alive, was Ike right, or what!?
Beyond his wildest dreams perhaps, is where we are today.
Bring America Back !!!!
***Ike sure was correct and amazingly accurate ! So Friend, please take a look
at todays Time magazine or web page for the Article about Drug Cartels Occupy California State Parks System, and Cause Wild Fires.
******Now there is a real mission against terror of a very real kind!
No Threat===it is there Now and actually happening !
you are correct there chupra..
right here:
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=e794c4dbdec73af80f69f4a4b266138e
"Weldon Case recalls Ike's warning: Corrupting Power of Military-Industrial Complex"
how they, (politicians), "funnel" money, which was supposed to be for the military into other projects, as into his own daughter's company pockets. Millions of dollars also went to his son's driving habit paid by you...the taxpayer.
Suprised?
hey, check out that article and follow the money.
It is all so damn corrupt that I fear nothing can be done to stop the continued corporate takeover of this country, The United States is the largest terrorist country in the world, and the above article simply confirms it.
So what happens to the war when the mercenaries decide to go on strike for more money, or some warlord offers them a bigger paycheck? And what happens when this mercenary army comes home if these wars are ever finished. What's to keep Erik Princes private army from taking over a city?
Caleb is right, this is a dream scenario for politicians and other power mongers.
News Bulletin from Blackwater (that's our real name, although we' been usin' other ones for public consumption):
Long live private enterprise!
We, at Blackwater, are a private enterprise, just like, say, Toys R US, and we need to grow like any other enterprise. We need more business, which means -- yes, you guessed it! -- we need more wars. Normal, isn't it? There's nothing like American business.
By the by, meant to tell ya'll, that initially we wanted to call ourselves "Wars R US", but our buddies at the Pentagon advised against it.
Also, we're darn happy about President Obama's war initiatives in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Because, as we were sayin' to him the other day, if he had not continued there and even increased our activities in Pakistan, we woulda had to sell our services and competencies to other countries that have been callin' us.
This is actually good news. Americans get upset when their soldiers are killed or wounded.
Americans get peace of mind by hiring mercenaries . . . excuse me, I meant to say "Contractors" . . . because contractors are nothing more than armed thugs who would be looking for a job with the mafia or any of America's enemies if the US government didn't hire them first. When they get blown up by IEDs, we don't care. Why should we? After all, the world is a slightly better place each time one of these thugs is consigned to hell.
In addition to making the average American feel better, the use of mercenaries also provides the pentagon with a valuable propaganda benefit in that they don't report contractor casualties. Therefore the perceived blood cost of our imperial adventures is lessened.
I think we should hire more of them, just not so many that they replace the military entirely. The danger there is that the Chinese might hire them out from under us and take over. You can be sure our mercenaries would be happy to oblige if the price was right.
Well, another issue with the hiring of these "thugs" is that many of them come from Chile (formerly under Pinochet), El Salvador, Phillipines, etc. If they are killed, then the US government has to pay out money to their families. If they are wounded/disabled, then the US government has to pay for their disability and treatment for the rest of their lives. Next time some rightwinger complains about "illegal immigrants" taking jobs and taking advantage of social services, remind them about how many millions of dollars go to professional mercenaries, many of whom are foreigners taking American soldiers' jobs- and getting paid a lot more than the US military guys and gals get.