EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Ocean Expected to Rise 5 Feet Along Coastlines
SAN FRANCISCO - Driven by global warming, the ocean is expected to rise nearly 5 feet along California's coastline by the end of the century, hitting San Francisco Bay the hardest of all, according to a state study released Wednesday.
Runways along the bay at SFO could be under water by the end of this century. (Michael Macor / The Chronicle) Nearly half a million people and $100 billion in property, two-thirds of it concentrated around the bay, are at risk of major flooding, researchers found in the most comprehensive study to date of how climate change will alter the state's coastal areas.
Rising seas, storms and extreme high tides are expected to send saltwater into low-lying areas, flooding freeways, the Oakland and San Francisco airports, hospitals, power plants, schools and sewage plants. Thousands of structures at risk are the homes of low- and middle-income people, the study said.
Vast wetlands that nourish fish and birds and act as a buffer against flooding will be inundated and could turn into dead pools. Constructing seawalls and levees, if needed, could cost $14 billion plus an annual maintenance cost of $1.4 billion, the study said.
The study shows a greater sea-level rise for California than previous studies because it takes into account recent changes in glaciers and ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland.
Worldwide forecasts
Scientists worldwide forecast that sea levels will rise for centuries even if greenhouse gas emissions are halted immediately, and California cities and counties must learn to deal with that inevitability just as they plan for earthquakes, the study advises.
Regional planners are recommending that some new construction be halted, other properties protected and still others abandoned.
The study was conducted by the internationally known Pacific Institute, a nonprofit research group in Oakland, and was paid for by the California Energy Commission, Caltrans and the state Ocean Protection Council.
With California leading the nation in regulating greenhouse gas emissions, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2005 ordered state agencies to form a Climate Action Team to research and plan for global warming. Three dozen studies are expected this year, on air quality and health, frequency of wildfires, the use of energy and fresh water supplies.
"No other state has done this kind of assessment of coastal risk," said Peter Gleick, president and founder of the Pacific Institute and a leading water expert. The new assessment, he said, puts the state "far ahead in our ability to both identify possible impacts and implement effective policies to prevent them."
Although large sections of the Pacific Coast are not vulnerable to flooding, sea-level rise is expected to accelerate erosion, resulting in a loss of 41 square miles of the coast and affecting 14,000 people, the study said.
Flooding projections
Researchers at the U.S. Geological Survey prepared maps of San Francisco Bay showing projected inundation, though they don't include the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Calculations for inundation don't take into account existing seawalls and levees along the Peninsula and at Oakland International Airport.
Large portions of the Bay Area are at risk because European settlers in the 1800s filled shoreline marshes to build towns and cities.
Will Travis, executive director of the Bay Conservation and Development Commission, said the Pacific Institute study struck him because two-thirds of the projected property damage was in low-lying areas around San Francisco Bay. Cities and counties haven't planned for the rise, he said, and his agency is trying to build awareness.
"We as a region have to get out in front of the state and nation in dealing with the problem. The study shows that low- and moderate-income people will be dealing with it. We have the equivalent of New Orleans' Lower Ninth Ward."
Lessons from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina are not to build below sea level, he said. But parts of northern Silicon Valley - where pumping groundwater in past decades has caused land to subside - are already below sea level, he said, leaving Google, Sun, Intel and other large company complexes vulnerable to inundation.
Earthquake lessons
Just as Californians learned about seismic safety in response to earthquakes, "we have to learn to build in areas that will someday be below sea level," he said. It's particularly difficult, he said, because there is "no certainty which areas would be below sea level." His agency is co-sponsoring an international design competition to come up with designs for sea-level rise.
As the atmosphere and oceans warm, ice sheets and glaciers melt, swelling the volume of oceans. Oceans already have started to rise. Over the past century, San Francisco waterfront tidal gauges show a rise of 8 inches.
The new projection of a 4.6-foot, or 55-inch, rise is higher than the 23-inch estimate of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the body that compiles findings of international scientists.
In its last calculations, the panel didn't include melt from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, which have accelerated over the past decade. Since then, scientists have begun to forecast higher rises.
For the regional study, Pacific Institute scientists used the 4.6-foot sea-level rise based on forecasts by a Scripps Institution of Oceanography team led by oceanographer Daniel Cayan, which draws on sophisticated models, satellite sensors and a broad range of data.
Concentrations of greenhouse gases have been increasing in the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution, and the bulk of climate scientists agree that the gases are trapping the sun's radiation emanating from Earth, warming the planet.
Infrastructure in danger along the bay, coast
Some of the infrastructure at risk along the 1,000-mile- long shore of San Francisco Bay and the 1,200-mile-long California coast, according to a new study on the rising sea level:
3,500 miles of roads and highways
330 hazardous waste sites, including several in Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo and Los Angeles counties
280 miles of railway
140 schools
34 police and fire stations
30 coastal power plants
29 sewage-treatment plants, including 22 on the bay and seven on the Pacific Coast
2 Bay Area airports:
San Francisco and Oakland international
To learn more: Read the study at links.sfgate.com/ZGJX.
Source: Pacific Institute
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

16 Comments so far
Show AllOh well, here on the east coast, it will be good to be rid of these once-wonerful, lonely barrier islands and dunes, now completely destroyed by 15,000 sq ft 4 story ticky-tack monstrosities called "beach houses". And if you try to take a walk on the beach seeking solitude, you are likely to get run over by an SUV's with the requisite "OBX" stickers on the bumber.
And these beaches are, technically speaking, a national park.
Good riddance!
---USAn---
Yes, and we'll have a whole lot less of Florida and the Gulf Coast to worry about as well. Perhaps we can force all those old styrofoam cups under New Orleans, so it will just float regardless of sea level rise. "Kill 2 birds with 1 stone" and recycle, all at the same time.
My favorite oldie: "On the Way to Cape May."
Some of those 30 coastal power plants are nukes.
I wonder what's the CO2-scenario underlying the predicted sea-level rise. I fear it's the overly optimistic IPCC best guess.
Start dredging the oceans and fill in low lying areas. Pump sea water into Death Valley and the Dead Sea. Sure that would take money and energy, but how much money and energy would it take to replace all the infrastructure memtioned above multiplied by all the low lying cities around the world?
Hmmmm... a five foot rise of global sea level (covering 70% of the surface of a 4,000-mile radius sphere) would amount to:
133,280 cubic MILES of sea water !!
Slightly bigger than the Dead Sea basin, I think.
Time to get a sailboat...
Two big problems with this forecast.
First, the strengths of the hundred year storms hitting almost all areas of the world are expected to increase quickly and dramatically. The five feet rise mentioned doesn't compare with an extra ten feet of storm surge. Some of the storm surge problem is this year or soon, not in a century.
Second, I don't trust the forecast. We are in an accelerating methane curve right now where Arctic melting releases even more greenhouse gases and changes the Arctic albedo even more, and probably we're also in an accelerating carbon dioxide curve where the forests burn and the ocean acidifies and croaks, increasing CO2 growth. The majority of scientists, frightened by the sheer economic power of Exxon/Mobil put to political ends, are being overly conservative. Then they have to come out with upward revisions every year, just like the past 10 years. So, Dr. Chicken, how would you like your job to be cancelled?
>> Ocean Expected to Rise 5 Feet Along Coastlines
The "along coastlines" part seems unnecessary, unless the author envisions something different happening in the open ocean.
"No other state has done this kind of assessment of coastal risk," said Peter Gleick
What're the chances Florida has done this kind of study?? LOL. The southern half of that state is going underwater. Better sell your real-estate now. When the general population figures it out, that property won't be worth a dime.
well, not much of it is worth a dime now anyway! but seriously... we are not so dumb here... and more seriously, honestly I don't think about it much in terms of needing to sell property and get away, it wont be an issue in my life-time. I do think that any property I have I will not be able to leave to my grandkids... and sure we should all do what we can to live sustainably. my point is when you are living here, like living in LA with constant threat of earthquakes... i dont think it is much of a day-to-day issue.
I was only a kid in the seventies, but I remember writing reports on pollution, population growth, etc. for my teachers. Are we really such a stupid species that we find ourselves in this position? Permaculture, self-sufficiency (urban & rural), bartering for goods & services seems the only way out of this mess (if there is a way out).
Even in 1971, even as goofy a band as Hawkwind wrote a song that has been playing in my head the past couple of days:
1971
Think about the things that we should have done before
The way things are going the end is about to fall.
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
Look around and see the warnings close at hand
Already weeds are writing their scriptures in the sand
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
The morning sun is rising, casting rays across the land,
Already nature's calling, take heed of the warning,
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
Think about the things that we should have done before
The way things are going the end is about to fall.
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
We took the wrong step years ago
We can do it the right way (and hunger can and must become a thing of the past - especially in the fertile lands of Africa):
Imagine if every spare scrap of land, every urban garden, every flat rooftop was growing vegetables and bee-friendly crops.
See the following youtube video: Homegrown Revolution at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCPEBM5ol0Q&feature=PlayList&p=33B0FAF643...
The bees and the banks. !
Bechtel's "wet dream"
It stuns me that in all this discussion no one has once mentioned the one issue that underlies this and all other environmental problems we face today. That issue was, to my knowledge, first articulated in 1948 by H. Fairfield Osborne in his book "Our Plundered Planet" and was elaborated in the 1960s by Paul Ehrlich, Garrett Hardin, and many others. The Conservation Society picked up the cudgel and crystallized the concept into their rallying cry "Whatever your cause, it's a lost cause unless we control population!" That cry was muted, even muffled, since the '60s by the institution of aggressive conservation measures backed with legal force, but in fact, these "worthy" measures have merely postponed the inevitable reckoning and, indeed, guaranteed that it will be far worse than it would have been if we had had the courage to address the population issue back when our numbers were only a little more than half what they are today. Perhaps if we could appreciate the analogy between an inexorably rising sea level and an inexorably rising human population, it might help us realize the futility of hoping to solve the problem by continuing to stick our fingers in the dike.
Now may be the time to buy waterfront property along an ocean. The value of all those beach houses and condos is diminishing rapidly because of the economic insanity and, yes because the water level in rising. If you are close to retirement age - do it but do not plan on leaving what remains as a legacy to your heirs.
When the coal companies are done with mountain top removal, expect they will sell burial places with lovely views of KY and WV.
Sea is not rising because of melting floating icebergs or floating ice shelves. They have already displaced their dimensions.
Additional fresh water from on land glaciers will add volume. Icebergs and ice shelves are mostly fresh water and their melt will have little volume effect. Diluting sea water will harm organisms that depend on 35 0/00 salinity and fresh water expands to take up more space than salt. Sea water dilution will inhibit deep water upwelling of nutrients on which organisms require. Thus mid level organisms and surface plankton will go out of business and they do use up lots of C02.