Proposition 8 Protesters Target Businesses
Activists who oppose the ban on gay marriage are boycotting businesses whose employees or owners contributed money to the Yes on 8 campaign.
LOS ANGELES - More than a week after the passage of Proposition 8, activists opposed to the ban on gay marriage have shifted their protests to new arenas -- using boycotts to target businesses and individuals who contributed to the winning side.
The effect of the boycotts remains unclear.
Merchants said that the overall poor economy made it difficult to tell
whether their businesses were declining specifically because of the
threats. But the protests have been highly visible and have drawn
strong objections from backers of the initiative.
"No matter your opinion of Proposition 8, we should all agree that it is wrong to intimidate and harass churches, businesses and individuals for participating in the democratic process," Ron Prentice, of ProtectMarriage.com, said in a statement. Boycotters were "unabashedly trampling on the rights of others," he said.
Activists behind the boycott effort argue they are simply exercising their political rights.
"People are determining who their friends are, and who are not their friends," said Fred Karger, a Los Angeles resident and retired political consultant. "I think people need to be held accountable for their financial support."
The activists have pored though campaign contribution databases and then "outed" Proposition 8 donors on sites like Facebook.com and craigslist.com. "People are going to do what they want, and it's in this society where you have campaign reporting that is all public information," said Karger.
Some gay rights activists also have gone onto the restaurant website yelp.com, giving bad reviews to eateries linked to the Yes on 8 movement.
"This one star is for their stance on Prop. 8," one poster wrote of El Coyote Mexican Cafe. "Enjoy it. . . . You deserve it."
Hundreds of protesters converged on El Coyote on Beverly Boulevard on Wednesday night, and the picketing got so heated that LAPD officers in riot gear had to be called.
All because Marjorie Christoffersen, a manager there and a daughter of El Coyote's owner, had contributed $100 to the Yes on 8 campaign.
Christoffersen, who is Mormon, met with protesters Wednesday and at one point broke down in tears, said Arnoldo Archila, another El Coyote manager. But the activists were not satisfied with her explanation and continued to post protests about her on the Web.
"She had a chance to make nice and blew it. I was almost feeling a tiny bit of sympathy for her. Not no more!!" wrote one blog poster, who also listed competing Mexican restaurants where diners should go instead of El Coyote.
By Thursday, Christoffersen had left town, said Archila, who said El Coyote employees -- some of whom are gay -- were left staggered by the protests, including more than 50 calls a day criticizing the restaurant.
"We are all a family," Archila said. "If this is going to affect the business, its going to affect them. There are people who have to feed children and pay mortgages."
Some activists are now turning their attention to Texas-based Cinemark, one of America's largest theater chains, whose chief executive contributed nearly $10,000 to Yes on 8.
A prolonged protest could cause trouble for the Sundance Film Festival, which uses Cinemark screens to show movies during the January event in Park City, Utah. The state of Utah is a focus of some boycotts because the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which has its headquarters there, marshaled millions of dollars in contributions from its members for the Yes on 8 campaign.
Brooks Addicott, a spokeswoman for the Sundance Institute, said the festival received about 100 e-mails over the last few week, many of which had the same text, but it appeared that the efforts had peaked.
"Our position is that we have a festival that is essentially three months away," Addicott said. "We are committed to having our 25th festival; it's a celebration for us. We would be incredibly disappointed if people decided not to come because of a boycott."
Officials at Cinemark did not return calls for comment.
Gay marriage activists had been targeting some Yes on 8 donors well before the Nov. 4 election. In July, Karger started the website Californians Against Hate, which lists a "dishonor roll" detailing more than 800 donations of $5,000 or more to the Yes on 8 campaign. He said the site was getting 300 to 350 hits a day before the election. Now, it's receiving an average of 7,500 hits daily.
Californians Against HateOne business affected by the campaign is Lassen's, a family-owned chain of nine health food stores throughout California, from Bakersfield to Thousand Oaks. Lassen's owners gave $27,500 to the Yes on 8 campaign.
Scott Parvel, general manager of the Ventura store, said the contribution was a "private donation" by family members who are Mormon.
But No on 8 supporters listed their stores along with many others on websites, urging a boycott.
Since the election, the stores have received angry calls about Proposition 8 as well as comments from customers. "They have a right to their views, but they should take it up with the person who did it, not the people who work here. . . . We're providing a business, that's all we do," said Parvel, who has worked for the company since 2001.
Robert Hoehn was another person who made Karger's "dishonor roll." Hoehn, vice president of the Carlsbad-based Hoehn Motors, gave $25,000 of his own money to the Yes on 8 campaign in February. And he called what followed "a really, really ugly experience."
Hoehn said that most of the campaign against him came before the vote, when he received "dozens and dozens and dozens" of phone calls and his Honda dealership was picketed. Since the proposition passed, he said, he has received a few "vitriolic messages and phone calls."
Next time, he said, he will be "smarter" about how he gives such a donation, possibly in a way that doesn't require listing his business. "I wouldn't not do it because of fear," he said. "I am not ashamed of it, but it has been a very educational experience."
Despite the criticism, activists say they plan to continue applying pressure. "It doesn't matter if it's the CEO or if it's the hostess that greets you at El Coyote. It really makes no difference," said Gerry Moylan, 47, a Los Angeles Realtor who planned a night of picketing in front of the restaurant Thursday.
"If I'm going to eat dinner at El Coyote and part of my money is going to pay the hostess' pay and she turns around and uses her pay to promote a proposition that takes away my rights, then I'm going to stop paying my money to her."
Abdollah and DiMassa are Times staff writers.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
14 Comments so far
Show Allthis has gone too far. they have gone after individual employees and not just businesses. do you really want to go down this path? imagine if pro lifers decided to boycott business that had employees donate to planned parenthood. to them it would be perfectly justifiable, don't do business with baby killers right?
and anti gay forces, doing the same to get gays fired from companies, imagine that? its just an ugly path to go down, you really dont want politics to go this way. perhaps it seems almost reasonable when you are doing it, just imagine your opponents doing the same.
this is a seriously stupid move on the part of the gay movement.
like it or not, this has nothing to do with hate. many people who supported prop 8 are perfectly fine with civil unions. so the people you go after can be people you dont want to turn into enemies. like it or not homosexuality is not the same as race or skin color. it is a relatively benign defect that remains that way because it is not infectious. like it or not it is not an optimal condition for a species to survive. it is not the same as race which is purely superficial. and this fact while uncomfortable has nothing to do with hate. it is just a difference that has to be acknowledged. as such it doesn't automatically mean institutions like marriage need to be opened to homosexuals. civil unions are enough of a compromise.
Boycotting is NOT hate.
The "power of the purse" is an effective and totally legitimate power that any individual wields over community policies.
I applaud these boycotts and hope they shake the self righteous arrogance of those who think they should make decisions about the private lives of others - let alone with impunity!
As has been said countless times - if you effort to deny others the sanctity of their private lives, why would you expect that they would continue to support your livelihood?
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
What a truly hate-filled country America has become. Huddled masses? Huh-uh. Freedom and liberty? With limitations. Peace and prosperity? Hahahahaha.
May the revolution be as swift as it is peaceful.
I'm sorry, but the anti Prop 8 folks got out-campaigned.
Before the election, many opponents tried to start rallies and demonstrations to drum up support for their opposition to Prop 8.
NOBODY could be bothered to take to the streets in opposition.
It seems like a lot of sour grapes. Next time show support of Gay marriage BEFORE the election, NOT AFTER.
I personally voted against Prop 8 because of its blatant denial of rights. I was outraged by the Prop 8 support ads.
I actually know at least 3 people who thought voting YES meant they were supporting gay marriage. Only because they were close friends did they admit they did not bother to read up on Prop 8.
Better luck and hard work next time. I know the outcome of Prop 8 is an egrigious violation of rights.
BUT, that said: where were the anti-Prop 8 support BEFORE the election?
But I could be wrong !
Sour grapes?
Is the fear and whining from the businesses who are being boycotted also "sour grapes"?
This isn't some sporting competition.
That said, you're correct in that the anti prop 8 campaign was poorly conducted.
Yep! Sour Grapes.
people did not seem to want to defeat Prop 8 badly enough to work for its demise.
But then whine about its passage.
Kinda like the rest of us sheepies who are whining about loss of liberties AFTER the Bushies shredded them with no public demos.
At least Prop 8 proponets are now acting, unlike the rest of us about our civil liberties, such as privacy & habeas corpus.
But I could be wrong !
Well then,
the business owners who are backtracking, crying, whining that their business should not be held responsible for their decisions to donate to, and to support Prop 8, are also engaging in "sour grapes".
"Sour grapes" actually refers to someone saying they really never did want the thing that they tried to get and failed to get - the fox that couldn't jump high enough to get the grapes walked away saying they were probably sour (that's the basic fable - I think it's from Aesop). I really don't get how protesting the destruction of civil rights is "sour grapes." If gay people, after Prop 8's passage, now said they never really wanted to be married anyway (because marriage was "bad" in some way), that would be "sour grapes." But we are precisely standing up for our rights to the "grapes" (marriage and equality) and proclaiming how great the "grapes" are and saying that we will keep fighting until the "grapes" are ours! We're not "whining," we're organizing!
It's called a backlash. They get exactly what they deserve. These people voted against rights for members of their community, thinking they would have no repercussions? How naive. They only have themselves to blame.
I hope it gets worse for them. If they can't do the right thing in a vote, they'll have to learn it'll hit their bankbook. Maybe then they'll do the right thing.
It's so ridiculous that they can call a boycott "taking away someone's rights". This is BS - your rights are safe. Clearly, you were able to donate the money. All the public is saying is, if you're going to contribute to a bigoted campaign of lies that steals hard-won rights away from hard-working Americans, expect there to be consequences!
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You want your business to be considered "gay-friendly"? Vote and contribute gay-friendly. You want to take away our rights? Expect us to protest you, and certainly don't expect us to give you any more money to promote your bigotry. This is America, this is how things work. We all have the right to free association in this regard.
Remember, Jesus said, Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. We're just doing to you exactly what you did to us - you take away our rights, we take away our money.
I love how many of these 8 donors are now trying to disassociate their "business" enterprises from their "personal" discrimination actions, as if their businesses are completely unconnected to themselves and their resources and the values they want to project upon the world. And then some of them cowardly try to hide behind the old standby, "don't hurt our employees and their children". Yes, their employees would suffer less if their employers weren't intolerant pricks.
The protesters understand the links between owners and managers and their enterprises, and they understand that the language of money is often the only thing they respond to. More power to these protesters.
I am a gay MARRIED man living in Sacramento, CA...where there have been demonstrations and protests DAILY since the election and passage of Proposition h8. While I TOTALLY disagree with any threats of violence, or any vandalism (such as a recent spray-painting incident at one of our local Mormon churches), I absolutely, 100% agree with boycotting the businesses and individuals that donated to this disgusting proposition. Voting to discriminate against gays & lesbians was THEIR CHOICE. Certainly these people cannot expect us to show up at their businesses and hand them our money in return. The money that we handed these businesses in the past was used, either directly or indirectly, to help pass one of the most disgusting and hurtful propositions in California history. I will NOT allow my money to be used in such a manner anymore! BOYCOT!!! But please, do it peacefully!
Disagreement doesn't equal hate. Thats a neocon concept.
More power to the protesters. This was an incredibly stupid move on the part of the California voters who passed this dog turd. But you reap what you sow: If hate is what you have, hate is what you shall get.