EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Robin Hood Tax Gains Ground at the G-20
The G-20 meeting in Cannes got underway this week. The sunny beach resort, playground to movie stars and media moguls was an odd choice for a somber G-20 meeting. As President Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner touched down in Air Force One, the Greek government was on the verge of collapse, austerity was sweeping Europe and the future of the Eurozone in doubt.
Much more work needs to be done to get the Obama administration to adopt the idea of a financial transaction tax (aka the Robin Hood tax), even more work to get it though Congress, but the tax now has a growing list of powerful allies and a simple common sense appeal.
But the first day of talks offered a ray of hope for the entire global economy. For the first time, the 20 most powerful countries in the world sat down to discuss taxing the financial service industry. And for the first time, the U.S. blinked.
President Sarkozy of France has long championed a small sales tax on the financial services industry. "At a time when states are making remarkable efforts to restore their public finances... how can the financial sector triumphantly continue to march, indifferent to the world around it, carelessly and without a care for the disorder it has more than its share in causing," Sarkozy said. Angela Merkel of German agrees.
President Obama too has supported the idea. Ron Suskind revealed in his new book Confidence Men that Obama thought the tax was a no brainer right after the banks collapsed the global economy -- until his economic team told him otherwise.
Behind the scenes, the “opponent in chief” has been U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner who has protected his friends on Wall Street by privately characterizing the tax as unworkable, easy to evade and not likely to bring in much income. Geithner doesn't just oppose the tax for the U.S., he has opposed the tax in the context of the G-20 and as EU member nations move forward to apply the tax in their member states.
Now the White House appears to be changing its tune. Reuters is reporting that the U.S. government is backing down from its long standing opposition to the tax.
An unnamed source told Reuters the United States now seemed "less problematic than the U.K." in resisting the idea. The U.S. is still opposed to the idea in principle but would not block others from going ahead. The Wall Street Journal confirmed the story quoting White House adviser Mark Froman as saying that the governments had decided to pursue different financial taxes, but: “I think there is broad consensus between the Europeans that the president met with this morning and ourselves about the ability of each to pursue this in their own way, whatever way they see to be most effective." Translation: Go for it, but the U.S. won’t join you.
The Wall Street Journal editorial board wasted no time, savagely attacking the idea and calling on Geithner for help.
Nurses Hold Geithner's Feet to the FireThe news reports hit the wire almost at the exact same moment that thousands of nurses took the fight for a fair economy right to Tim Geithner’s doorstep with signs demanding "An Economy for the 99%" and “Tax Timmy’s Friends.” Nurses and other groups are fed up with Geithner's soft pedaling every action that might hold the big banks accountable for the meltdown of the global economy.
The noon rally at the Treasury marks an increased effort by unions to convince the Obama administration that more needs to be done to fix the country’s broken financial system and create jobs. Obama's reelection campaign recently announced that they were hoping to turn anger against Wall Street to their advantange in the next election cycle. Hard to do if the 99% are knocking on your door, calling for meaningful measures to make Wall Street pay. The nurses later fanned out across Capitol Hill, delivering 322,844 petitions in support of the idea to Finance Chair Max Baucus and other members of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (the Super Committee).
“It is long past time for Secretary Geithner and President Obama to get on board with other world leaders in supporting this common-sense approach to raise badly needed revenues to help fund the critical programs we need to revive the U.S. and other global economies,” said NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro, who traveled to Cannes to join with nurses from around the world at a press conference and rally close to where world leaders were meeting.
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka was also in Cannes, quietly pushing the White House to do the right thing. The American labor leader was joined by one of the richest men on the planet, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, who presented a paper to the G-20 leaders advocating for the transaction tax to aid the developing world. An increasing number of unions and grassroots groups, including SEIU, AFSCME, Oxfam, Public Citizen, Rebuild the Dream and National People's Action are adopting the tax and campaigning on it, and the Occupy Wall Street crowd has embraced it as well holding small actions across the country October 29th.
The Pope was not present, and neither was the Archbishop of Canterbury, but both men came out for a financial transaction tax as economically feasible and morally right in recent days.
Actor Bill Nighy, the British actor who has long campaigned for the "Robin Hood Tax" as it is called in the U.K. and who did a wonderful video popularize the idea joined the nurses in Cannes. “I heard a banker remark the other day that 'the time for atonement is over'. I must have been out of the country at the time, or looked away momentarily because I don't remember that period of atonement taking place. It would not affect their multimillion bonuses, “ Nighy dryly observed to the Guardian.
While the domestic implementation of the tax faces continued opposition from the U.S. Congress, Geithner and the White House, proponents reintroduced the legislation this week and are rapidly picking up co-sponsors. Oregon Rep. Pete DeFazio and Iowa Senator Tom Harkin introduced a modest version of the transaction tax (HR 3313) in an effort to get the Super Committee to take a closer look. While the financial services industry will work hard to convince Congress that any tax will result in the immediate collapse of the global financial system and that grannie will be hardest hit, the facts are that the modest fee proposed in this legislation is miniscule in comparison to the management fees applied by some mutual funds.
"Wall Street is 40 percent of the economy. They don't make things. They don't feed people. They churn. They create volatility,” said DeFazio. “The first step on the long path to recovery happens when we rein in the excessive speculative activity that has destabilized our financial system.”
Much more work needs to be done to get the Obama administration to adopt the idea, even more work to get it though Congress, but the tax now has a growing list of powerful allies and a simple common sense appeal.
As Trumka puts it: "It is time to put Wall Street to work rebuilding Main Street with a financial speculation tax to create jobs, rein in speculation and lay the groundwork for long-term economic prosperity."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


7 Comments so far
Show AllThis has crossed the stage of being insane and is starting to look like propaganda! I am talking about the insistence on calling this tax a "Robin Hood tax", and I have less and less doubt that this is totally intentional, with the idea to deceive. The clean, professional logos make me even more suspicious that this is an organized attempt with a malicious motive - that of diverting attention from something else.
I'm going to spam away every time I see the name "Robin Hood" tax mentioned. But just this once, I am going to copy/paste my comment on this topic from yesterday:
>>This is the umpteenth time I am shouting about this MORONIC name for this tax!
By now, I have little doubt that the choice of this name - "Robin Hood tax" is itself a bloody conspiracy to divert attention away from other things that might have a real effect by way of wealth redistribution: such as a much more progressive tax system with steeply increasing rates at upper income slabs, a revised property tax that would make prohibitively expensive for anyone or any family to hold far too much property, an estate tax that would bring some semblance of a level-playing field, etc. If these are put together as a package, then they can be called a "Robin Hood tax".
Remember Prop-13 in California? Repealing that law could have a greater benefit for the people there than this proposed tax. And repealing it would be much harder and would be opposed much more fiercely than would be for this tax. Just watch. This tax is going to pass, and everyone is going to make a big deal of it. This tax is needed, long overdue and all that. But its real impact will be small.
Calling a transaction tax as "Robin Hood tax" has stopped being MORONIC. It is starting to look MALICIOUS with a clear intent to deceive and divert attention away from what matters even more.
Bill Gates does not trade stocks, derivatives and currency for a living. Nor does his foundation. This particular tax will have pretty much ZERO effect on his wealth. And that should suit him just fine and it is no wonder he supports the damn proposal.
Even when implemented, it will make no real dent in anybody's profits, and pretty much ZERO dent in any rich person's REAL wealth. What will accrue will be basically fiat money, the real value of which is dropping as we speak.
But the damage seems to have been done. The "Robin Hood tax" name has stuck. But that doesn't make me any less mad every time I see someone calling it by that name.
Like I said, this has stopped being just plain MORONIC and STUPID. It looks clearly malicious and insidious, a clear attempt to divert attention from something more important. And when this tax becomes law, everyone in the media, including this lady who has written this article, will be shouting that a "Robin Hood tax" has been implemented. And a lot of people stand the risk of being fooled using the "Robin Hood" legend.<<
The tax is intended for the quick trades that are just a new form of money laundering. I don't see the problem with it. Tax rates are another matter, entirely.
When I think of the nurses protesting, the following idea comes to me: Remember how pharmacists are now allowed to deny women birth control pills if filling out such prescriptions offends their morality? Well, how about if nurses boycott treating anyone in the upper echelons of Wall Street? How about a boycott like that... that's one way to make this group "see the light" with respect to initiatives designed to benefit the other 99%.
Don't know if your comment is in response to mine, or sort of a response. My objection is to the NAME. Not the tax itself.
I am really surprised that others don't see the mischief in choosing this NAME, because it gives the impression that something is "taken" from the wealthy and given to the poor. That is NOT the case. This tax would only reduce the profit margin slightly and maybe discourage some trading altogether. That is all fine. But why the NAME "Robin Hood tax" for THIS tax? I think it is a deliberate ploy, to divert attention from a real Robin Hood tax, which would be of the kind I mentioned in the other post.
Let's get Cain aboard call it the "4th Nine". lf corporations want to be people they should be taxed like people.
A financial transaction tax (FTT) is a no brainer. Why is this even a controversial issue except for the fact that money controls politics? Anyone who states that this or any similar tax "will result in the immediate collapse of the global financial system" is blowing smoke up everyone's bottoms. Investors will continue to take risks if they believe they can make money, regardless of any small percentage of taxation. This is basic economics. It is like saying that changing a hedge fund manager's income tax rate from log term capital gains rates to ordinary income rates will destroy the system and bring down Wall Street. This fear mongering by these selfish punks is pretty naive to think that people are that stupid. I just wish the media would stop covering for these loonies...
The problem for right wing politicians is they wouldn't know what to do with "too much" tax money. If the Robin Hood tax came in they wouldn't have a reason to follow their fiscal austerity model. And their philosophy does not include the idea of empowering the ordinary workers and their families with high quality free education, health care and public transit and recreation facilities that are free and accessible to all. What the right wingers are afraid of is that governments will have TOO MUCH money with the transaction tax. And the right wingers don't want governments to have too much money or even enough money to provide decent social services. At the very core of their evil hearts the privileged right wing political class needs poverty and crime to feed their fear tactics.