Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Children's Art and Children's Rights
We’ve been here before, confronting this question of children’s art, and why it creates such a stir. I wrote about it in May 2006 when Brandeis University cancelled an exhibit of Palestinian children’s art. This cancellation seems even more egregious because the museum in question is specifically a children’s museum.
Who objects to children’s art in a children’s art museum? And, what should we make of a children’s museum that allows the concerns of those constituents to censor the views of children, denying their right to expression? I’m talking about the Oakland Children’s Museum (MOCHA) and its decision to cancel the exhibit A Child’s View of Gaza, which was to have opened there this week, on September 24.
One can only conclude that those who have objected to this exhibit are troubled by the content. For whatever reason they want it buried, out of site and out of mind. They must be a powerful group. They succeeded in convincing the museum’s board to ignore its stated goal of “...advocating for the arts as an essential part of a strong, vital and diverse community”. And, they have put the museum in the uncomfortable position of denying Palestinian children their rights as guaranteed by Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC): the right of every child to express his or her views and to have those views given due consideration.
“The artist's job is to be a witness to his time in history.” said the artist Robert Rauschenberg, and so it is with our young artists. Seeing, as we know, comes before words. A child looks and recognizes people, places and things before she or he can speak; “views” are developing from the moment of birth. So, imagine the views taken in during the long, wide-eyed hours of childhood in Palestine or in Baghdad on in Afghanistan. Imagine the tension, worry and preoccupation on the faces of the adults; imagine the looks on the faces of the of soldiers as they patrol the streets, or search homes. Imagine the hundreds upon hundreds of violent scenes that could and do play out in front of children living in war zones. This is their world. It surrounds them day in and day out. And oftentimes, they have not only no words, but no opportunity to tell us what they think and feel about this.
Taking crayon or pencil in hand, a child speaks out on his or her own behalf: this is me, my situation, this is what my life looks like. It isn’t easy for adults to bare witness to these stories. I’ve seen exhibits of children’s art from Hiroshima, from Spain during the Civil War, from Viet Nam, from Darfur, from the concentration camps in WWII and from Iraqi children. What we see in some of this art is the human cost of war, the terror and agony of being a child in an unpredictable, dangerous and violent world, a world gone inexplicably mad. A world where you are not safe, where even your parents cannot protect you.
This art is not about politics, it is about the human condition. If we cannot look at it, if it is too painful, it is because the world we have created, full of violence and conflict, is not one that is good for children. The famous 60’s poster with one giant flower said it all: War is Not Healthy for Children and Other Living Things.
We have a legal as well as a moral obligation to let Palestinian children, and all children express their views freely and to give those views our due consideration. If we are disturbed by children’s images from war zones, we should work on their behalf to create a better, more just and peaceful world , a world where children are truly valued and where their care, protection and overall well being is a social, economic and political priority. To do anything less is to deny the significance of children as the future of our planet.
Aldous Huxley wrote this, in his introduction to “They Still Draw Pictures! A collection of 60 drawings made by Spanish children during the war” (1938): The most that individual men and women of good will can do is to work on behalf of some general solution of the problem of large-scale violence and, meanwhile to succour those who, like the child artists of this exhibition, have been made the victims of the worlds collective crime and madness.
The museum, in canceling the exhibit has dealt yet another blow to children and their rights; surely a children’s museum, of all institutions, can do better than this.
To see examples from this exhibit: mocha.org


7 Comments so far
Show AllDisturbing. I would also point out the more local cases where kids (well, boys, always the boys, who will of course grow up to be evil white planet fuckers) have been harshly reproved for drawing stick figures fighting, or for drawing toy guns. Perhaps, as Ray Bradbury would have appreciated, a more disturbing form of censorship happens not just by governments but by the very people themselves. Fahrenheit 451, to be precise - is that not the western world as we see it today?
I think that if you don't want to go to MOCHA, you ought not go and a boycott is in order. However, why do you think there is a law that obliges them to show one set of art over another? They are a private museum, not run by the city. They can show exactly what they want for any reason they want.
There are plenty of places to have an exhibition of this art and there is even a protest today in front of MOCHA with people holding the art in a line. An excellent protest in conception and probably in delivery. They were talking about it on KPFA.
This is interesting, but not an outrage.
I missed the part of the article that said anything about 'laws' at all. Perhaps you could point it out to me?
Of course, if you read the article, you might not have written anything at all.
Kids draw the darndest things!
The persons who lobbied for the removal of said drawings should be charged with "Interfering with the right to be heard" as were the 11 Muslims were charged for interrupting a speech.
(brings to mind)...
a child's eyes peered....
a child's eyes peered through an age splattered pane...
upon brisk moving matters inside a vacant domain...
where foot-noted minds on a broad spectrum tier...
were stepping up progress for successive premieres...
they stood clustered around a fact measurement scale...
busy weighing these things through discerning detail...
stacks of evidence prepared in decisive cling wrap...
gathered seems into linings underneath thinking caps...
from mentors to inventors and whoevers in-between...
onto typical perception to distinguish what it means...
they studied and quoted and replayed their findings...
pitting bits against bits in domestication's classifiying...
with semi-finalized round-ups propping elbows on desks...
each trial run soon tunneled to a narrowed-down test...
it precluded exceptions should they somewhat forget...
how this prefaced existence needs its options close kept...
well the youngster's fresh wonder let his eyeballs roll clear...
beyond walls in those hallways where thoughts profiteer...
so when an undetermined factor quickly backed into view...
he left these men to their illusions and he took off with truth!...