Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Bigot-Whisperers of the Right
I was born, at slightly past the midpoint of the Twentieth Century, in the Deep South city of Birmingham, Alabama -- “The Heart of Dixie.” My earliest memories are of a time of societal upheaval and cultural trauma. At the time, as the world witnessed and history chronicles, Birmingham could be an ugly, mean place.
My father, employed at the time as a freelance photojournalist, would arrive home from work, his clothes redolent of tear gas, his adrenal system locked in overdrive, his mind reeling, trying to make sense of the brutality he witnessed, perpetrated by both city officials and ordinary citizens, transpiring on the streets of the city.
The print and media images transmitted from Birmingham shocked and baffled the nation as well. But there was a hidden calculus underpinning the architecture of institutionalized hatred of the Jim Crow South. The viciousness of Birmingham’s white underclass served the purpose of the ruling order. The city was controlled, in de facto colonial manner, by coal and steel barons whose seat of power was located up the Appalachian mountain chain in Pittsburgh, PA. The locals dubbed them the Big Mules. They resided in the lofty air up on Red Mountain; most everyone else dwelled down in the industrial smog.
These social and economic inequities, perpetuated by exploitative labor practices, roiled Birmingham’s white men with resentment. If they asked for higher wages, they were told: “I can hire any n*gg*r off the street for half of what I pay you.” In the colonial model, all the big dollars flowed back to Pennsylvania, and economic rivalry and state-codified delusions of racial entitlement, vis-à-vis Jim Crow Laws, was used to ensure the working class white majority rage at the ruling elite remained displaced -- their animus fixed on those with even less power and economic security than themselves. This was the poisoned cultural milieu, wherein George Wallace’s “segregation today . . . segregation tomorrow . . . segregation forever” demagogic dirt kicking caused the embedded rage of the white working class to pour forth like fire ants from a trampled bed.
In a similar manner, manufactured controversies such as the gay marriage and gays in the military dust-ups of the present time have little to do with gays or marriage or the military. These issues are served as red meat to arouse the passions -- and loosen the purse strings -- of the fear-driven, status quo-enabling, confused souls residing at the center of the black spleen of the Republican ideological base.
Although, as a rule, the right’s lies and displacements are most effective when liberals offer working people only bromides, platitudes, and lectures on propriety and good taste. Obama and the Democrats, time and time again, present demagogues with an opening the size of the cracks in Glenn Beck’s gray matter. Hence, the bigot-whisperers of the right are provided with a void that they can seed with false narratives; wherein, they are given free rein to cloud the air and clog the airwaves with palaver about fifth columnist threats from terrorist-toady mosque builders and gays in uniform undermining moral in the ranks by belting out show tunes in foxholes and impromptu shower stall instruction on the art of hand to hand sodomy.
Cultures are organic in nature. Combine the elements of the scorched earth policies of neoliberal capitalism, its austerity cuts and downsizing, plus the hybrid seeds of the consumer age -- and what alien foliage will rise from the degraded soil -- fields of right-wing AstroTurf. Add: industrial strength fertilizer. And see how our garden grows, with: Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin -- the mutant seed sprouted Chia Pets of corporate oligarchy.
Yet the idea of Beck and Palin leading a populist, pitchforks and torches style uprising in the US is sheer fantasy. Most Americans wouldn’t rally en mass unless they could bring their couches with them. It would look like The Prague Spring but held in a Rooms to Go showroom.
The recent demonstrations, in Washington, DC, attended by the ranks of the chronically discontent right, are about as populist as a vintage Soviet-era May Day parade was a celebration of the proletarian masses.
By the informal design of our present oligarchs and the self-referential nature of the corporate owned media, US citizens have the right to say almost anything that is on their minds, as long as it has little to no effect on the status quo. If there was ever a mass movement that effectively challenged the nation’s massive class inequity and threatened to rein in the excesses of the National Security State, it would be shut down faster than an open air, live sex show in the middle of Temple Square in Salt Lake City.
Moreover, the mid-life snit-fest engendered by the fading political power of the country’s white, middle class majority, as was the case with the racial resentment of the white underclass of my native Birmingham, serves the agenda of the moneyed elite. And its goals (which its rank and file seem ill-equipped to define, i.e., vague resentments and inarticulate rage, hardly constitutes an agenda for societal transformation and governmental reform) are equally as self-defeating in their ramifications for debt-beleaguered, economic security-bereft working people as were the racist displacement of rage embraced and perpetuated by the exploited, working class, white majority of the Jim Crow south. Working and middle class Republicans agitating for lower taxes for the wealthy is as silly as gaunt peasants, clutching torches and wielding pitchforks, besieging Louis XVI’s palace at Versailles, demanding their bread rations be cut so that the royal court could enjoy larger and more lavish feasts.
Part of the irrational fear arising from economically forsaken members of the white laboring class toward President Obama is informed by race. Another aspect of it is more inchoate, as evanescent as the nature of the man himself.
Obama seems no more real, nor connected with the concerns of their lives than any other ghost in the media hologram. But Glenn Beck’s flutterhead histrionics reflect their desperation. This is the seduction of any garden-variety demagogue: Although their narrative is fictive, even malevolent in its deception, the emotional tone resonates with the deep-seated, helpless rage and nebulous night terrors of their audience. Beck’s community theater actor’s ability to cry on cue and work himself into a lather of outrage and anguish reflects the inner desperation of his audience’s experiences regarding their powerlessness before the crushing, impersonal complexity of events.
My childhood, in Birmingham, bestowed the knowledge: do not underestimate the danger of ignorant, angry people in large groups.
The feelings of drift of contemporary life in the US: its media empires -- with content as weightless in meaning and resonance as the electrons that transport the images, and the Internet’s pixel fiefdoms, in combination with the ad hoc, fast-buck-driven architecture of suburban nothingvilles gives present day life in the US a flimsy, provisional quality.
President Obama’s aura of weightlessness, his quality of emotional remoteness, only exacerbates the nebulous sense of unease on the irrational right who think with their guts not their minds. Conversely, guns feel real to these adrift denizens of the nation’s spleenland. The weapon’s weight in their hands wards off their unfocused sense of dread; its heft, momentarily, mitigates the unease inherent in feelings of being helplessly unmoored . . . Looking down the precise beauty of its barrel distills hazy hatreds into identifiable targets. Momentarily, the ground feels solid beneath their feet. Hence, guns must be stockpiled; massive amounts of ammunition stored for ballast. The mystifying events of the era . . . so muffled by the white noise of uncertainty, must yield to something as clear and decisive as the crack of a rifle shot.
Human beings will never transcend being capable of dwelling in madness on a collective level. David Hare quotes Rebecca West, in the introduction to his play, The Secret Rapture: “Only half of us is sane: only part of us loves . . . [desires] happiness, wants to die in peace . . . in a house that we built, that shall shelter those who come after us. The other half of us is nearly mad. It prefers the disagreeable to the agreeable . . . and wants to die in a catastrophe . . . and leave nothing of our house save its blackened foundations.”
Because we, on a personal level, in most cases, chose the primary option, our hidden, shadow half can live out the latter on a collective basis. Empires gather their élan vital from such bacchanals of blood. Individually, the atomized populace of empire attempts to mitigate alienation by a vicarious revelry in violence; collectively, in the manner of any mob, from the road rage and carnage enacted on soul-devoid US interstate to the phosphorous-poisoned flesh of the people of Fallujah, the mob finds its collective comfort zone in catastrophe. Beck, Palin, and their followers are the empire’s human delivery system of The Second Law of Thermodynamics. Used as tools, by corporatists, to preserve the status quo, their hidden half might well serve as its wrecking crew.
The paranoid, domestic douchescape works in the service of the US created deathscapes overseas and vice versa in a self-resonating feedback loop. Therefore, whenever the neoliberal economic policies of corporate oligarchy and the empire’s ever expanding military industrial/national security/surveillance/prison complex are questioned, many conservatives personalize the critique. In their gut, they feel as if their identity is under attack. Consequently, the limbic system ascends to the throne of consciousness, as palace guards of casuistry defend the status quo. This could be termed Authoritarian Simpatico Syndrome (ASS) -- a pathology manifested in personalities who have been traumatized by authority, but who seek to assuage the hurt and humiliation by identification with their victimizer.
This phenomenon is what is at the root of the rage rising from the faux populist right: the ground level realities of life in the corporate state are vastly incommensurate with the capitalist hagiography they hold in their heads. Moreover, when one’s mental imprinting and social conditioning is challenged, one can find oneself in a bewildering place. Though the state is emotional in nature, it feels akin to being physically lost . . . same disorientation, same sense of panic. Many people were never given and/or didn’t develop a compass of logic by which to navigate the novel landscape that one is cast into when one’s sacred beliefs are challenged. This is why change is a long time coming, and when it arrives it will not be greeted fondly.
- Posted in




123 Comments so far
Show AllVery well written. Thanks CD, for posting this.
Right on brother! Down with the domestic douchescape!
Thanks Jill for allowing me to say nothing. You summed it up nicely.
Yep, another east-coast elist-raised, and educated self-hating white boy. Probably trying to show off for a girl.. sad
It have some cute lines,, I especially liked the part ablout americans not going to rallys unless they could take their couchs.. That was neet!
>^^<
Jill, you must have read a different essay than I did. I see nothing judgemental here about the working class.
I see an unbiased and unafraid description based on a loving understanding of working class people in the south and how those lives are lived.
I'll read it again to make sure. mmmkay
Read it for the third time, there is nothing judgemental about working class people in that essay
It is a VERY SAVAGE indictment of the culture created by the rich and powerful, created knowlingly , of a manufactured race war and impotent rage.
Exactly!
Just proves that reading is as subjective as writing.
Very savage, yes, and accurate, I might add.
???? Where ????
>^^<
The writer is angry - at the same social phenomena that anger you; however, he is actually sympathetic with those YOU call "stupid working class troglodytes." More than you are, apparently.
Beautifully said, Jill.
Jill, you are assuming that the writer is applying his characterizations to the entire working class. You are also assuming that he does not come from the southern working class. A freelance photographer usually doesn't make much money, so I don't know this writer's living standard as a boy and a young man, but it may have been well within what most of us think of as working class socio-economic status.
I don't see a basis for either assumption in the piece. I see a guy appalled by the rank dishonesty and cynicism of the frothers, hate-mongers and know-nothings, as well as the violently guarded privilege of what he refers to "the big mules".
Finally, let's be honest. Jay Gould was right. You can hire half the working class to kill the other half. There is always an army of resentful, uncurious, uneducable people out there, happy to blame their troubles on anybody except those who are actually causing their troubles. How did the Southern aristocracy get 100,000s of dirt poor white boys to fight and die defending a slave system that caused their poverty and hopelessness in 1860? Napoleon brought education and land reform to Spain (along with a lot of slaughter), but illiterate, superstitious Spanish peasants rose up against him to defend the authority of the most medieval, oppressive church in all of Europe. Why?
Do middle class and upper middle class people (the superwealthy are a different breed. Let's leave them out of this for now)also hold stupid, irrational ideas, harber unfounded resentments, act out of the narrowest possible self-interest? Sure! So what? That doesn't excuse violent, reactionary working class politics.
You can buy a large number of these people by improvements in employment, infrastructure, health care, etc. You cannot convince them to change their minds about gays, abortion and war. They won't. You can't "tack Right" on these issues or on economics and expect these people suddenly to change their minds and support you. They won't. You have to change the subject to kitchen table needs. That's the only way you can neutralize this violent, dangerous, paranoid, authoritarian trend in American politics. A chicken in every pot! A guy with his mouth full of chicken can't shout idiocy("God Hates Fags!") as easily as a guy who doesn't know where his next chicken is coming from.
I didn't get it,, maybe it's because I don't care one way or another about gays. I don't hate them, your hobby is your hobby, as long as you aren't trying to grab me on the bus.
Get married, don't, does not affect my day in the slightest. If anything bothers me it would be why do I have to acknowledge them at all, Stay in the houuse or bar or closet, I'm not allowed to be an Open Hetro-Sexual why should they have a privledge I don't. I'm supposed to be totally nuter, at work, in the street, in the store, I have to comply. Or lose my job, be ostrasized in polite company. I don't want that, so I keep my sex to myself.
>^^<
I hope you read this yhru before you flame me.
Jill -
Thought I often find your commentary enlightening, I think you have completely mis-read this article. If anything Phil Rockstroh is on YOUR side - he certainly cannot be considered an elitist nor class monger.
Granted, he writes in a style seldom seen here on CD (poet background?) but I don't understand how you can see him attacking poor or working people. If anything it is the complete opposite.
PR has a firm grasp who the predators are in the US class structure and only tries to illuminate how they are often coopted by their victimizers to do their dirty work.
He really is on the side of the poor and disenfranchized of this country and adamantly anti Government - perhaps a re-read is in order.
Mightymite - the ship seems to have sailed with you still on the dock also.
Jill -
Since your post CD has added a video interview with the author of the piece you are so critical of.
Check it out... Rockstroh is hardly an elitist, and is very enlightened in his historical analysis.
And because I am happy, & dance & sing,
They think they have done me no injury:
And are gone to praise God & his Priest & King
Who make up a heaven of our misery.
--William Blake
Who did you write this for? The people who need to hear and understand it are the very same people you shame by using a language they can't understand. You make them feel ignorant, and this alone is enough to get anger started.
Don't misunderstand. You are obviously intelligent, witty, and poetic. If your objective was to impress me you certainly succeeded.
I broadly agree with Nietzsche, though I enjoyed reading the piece. As long as readers already understand the basic underpinnings of our situation, this kind of writing brings out the detail into clearer focus. But for those who are already hazy, it doesn't help. This style is mainly for "the already converted", but I think it's valuable even so.
I got a lot that I hadn't previously appreciated or fully understood from the piece - EG: ~~~~
"President Obama’s aura of weightlessness, his quality of emotional remoteness, only exacerbates the nebulous sense of unease on the irrational right who think with their guts not their minds. Conversely, guns feel real to these adrift denizens of the nation’s spleenland. The weapon’s weight in their hands wards off their unfocused sense of dread; its heft, momentarily, mitigates the unease inherent in feelings of being helplessly unmoored . . . Looking down the precise beauty of its barrel distills hazy hatreds into identifiable targets. Momentarily, the ground feels solid beneath their feet. Hence, guns must be stockpiled; massive amounts of ammunition stored for ballast. The mystifying events of the era . . . so muffled by the white noise of uncertainty, must yield to something as clear and decisive as the crack of a rifle shot.
Human beings will never transcend being capable of dwelling in madness on a collective level. "
Jill ~~~ I'm not wise enough to know the correct answer, if there is one.
I wonder whether Obama, as well as past presidents and administrations are just a bigger manifestation of the same syndrome, but on a huge, huge scale ? But then there's the $$$$$$$$$ issue to factor in with the MIC as well.
Perhaps every layer in the hierarchy of human life from elite on downward is subject to that same "unfocused sense of dread".
We're all, whatever our station, whistling in the dark, now more than ever before in human experience.
"the lower orders"
Jesus Christ, you have a high opinion of yourself don't you?
Or is it possible that I, MYSELF, am the only representative of "the lower orders" who might, while not drinking my beer and shooting my guns, somehow find time to read an occasional article or two on Common Dreams? Sometimes I even put down my beer and guns long enough to actually read a book.
"the lower orders" indeed. There but for the accident of birth go you.
"The people who need to hear and understand it are the very same people you shame by using a language they can't understand. You make them feel igonrant... "
You just added yourself to the same category of which you accuse the author! You vastly underestimate the intelligence of the people "who need to hear and understand". There may be cultural roots that need to be reformed, but the intelligence and ability to understand is certainly there.
"You make them feel ignorant..."? You just did the same, Nietzsche, sorry to say.
I've read many of your comments and do not regard you to be a limosine liberal, but you shot yourself in the foot with this comment.
Excellent piece-Keep it up.
The arrogance encompassed in this is endemic to a certain mindset that is impressed with verbal gymnastics and writes with a self gratifying sense of elite privilage.
People understand far more than he would like, perhaps he should look up the definition of bigotry?
I see NO arrogance in the essay. None whatsoever.
I see joy in the use and power of the english language. It's wonderful.
So mitey, are you going to call him 'elitist' next. ( he did!.......lol )
And Phil, that they are using invective against you , from that same tired old book of invective, means you are a threat.
So KUDOS again Phil..............lol
Hi Morticia,
I just wanted to weigh in on the elitism/enjoyment of language "controversy."
As the only child of a sheet metal worker and a housewife, I understand clearly why some folks come away from this essay feeling that it is elitist. For my family, and for most of the folks with whom I grew up, language (like so much else in life) was strictly utilitarian. Say what you need to say without being "flowery" or "wordy" or "uppity." They were definitely not a family of readers (although my mom, bless her, read to ME regularly). The only book in my house when I was a toddler was the Bible, and who really understands the language of the KJV? (It was written by God, though, so any "elitism" is to be expected!) So for many working class families, this sort of writing would be self-evidently elitist, "over the heads" of the regular folks who weld, mop, shovel, etc. for a living.
That said, I've spent twenty years learning to love the language I inherited from all my English-speaking predecessors (in spite of, rather than as a consequence of university and graduate school, sadly), and so appreciate playful and ebullient (ludic!) uses of language as much as utilitarian. I've even gotten to the point where I prefer Thomas Pynchon over Stephen King (although I still need to read one hundred-plus pages to sink into the flow of such ludic language). Sadly, most USAmericans don't a copy of *USA Today,* let alone a novel by Stephen King, let alone *Gravity's Rainbow.* So while ludic language can really work its way into the bones for some of us, for others it is simply off-putting. For the functionally literate who (often rightly--think Ben Bernanke etal)dismiss education as mere "book learning," a "poet" (especially one whose poetry doesn't rhyme) is often just another word for "self-important asshole."
My dream is of a country where we all appreciate our amazing linguistic inheritance, but first we need a country where kids aren't homeless and basic reading skills are universal.
Rev. T. Monkey
It's not the language per se that causes a negative reaction and rejection , it's WHO is using it and what they are saying with it.
Look at the language and vocabulary of Glenn Beck et all. It is just as "technical", if not more so, and is certainly very emotive. ( I would like to see or do a study on the vocab used by the right )
What is different is the approach and the history.
The rightests do not demand logic and thought in their polemic. They start from the position of wanting to win a debate and they don't care how.
The left starts from a position of wanting to responsibly educate, they think if they present a dispassionate and logical argument they will win their audience over. ( I'm doing it now....lol )
To read a left article that is uses language passionately and aims to win hearts using emotion is counter to experience.
We have the centuries of anti-intellectualism which has created an automatic distrust of academia and erudition.
There has been the century of anti-left demogogery which has near destroyed the language of politics.
There is the legacy of marxian scientism which still influences how the left, and the dems, present themselves and their position.
The left has to acknowledge all this and acknowledge that the old way of communicating has been ineffective and that what the right does is effective.
Let's do what works. ( this is not to be pro-dem nor to be unethical, we should bloody well use the techniques that have been shown to work )
http://thepoliticalbrain.com/videos.php
mighty - you seem so very threatened by the poetic use of the English language.
Do you fear most the language or the message contained therein?
If you desire language only of the caliber delivered by Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, then perhaps you are visiting the wrong site.
I can read a poem by Shakespeare and understand what the man is saying even though he wrote in Elizabethan English and we no longer speak or write that today.
This guy? I find myself wanting to pull away from reading his essay because it's literally painful to wade through. And I'm no intellectual slouch. Not a genius, but certainly not an idiot.
This must be "poetry" on the same level that free verse is "poetry". The trouble is that everyone writes in goddamn free verse. It gets old after a while. And if you pick apart what they write, the metaphor is sadly lacking and the rhythm was already dispensed with. And you're lucky if you can even figure out what the poem is about.
If people are going to be "poetic" they still need to speak the language of the majority of their intended audience. If this guy doesn't intend to speak to the lower classes, if all he wants to do is preach to the choir, I suppose he has his reward.
I can see a point where this language does fly over the heads of many who would benefit from it.
It has been said that if you really understand something, no matter what that thing is, you should be able to explain it to a second grader in words they can understand.
There are some for whom the display of anything more than the most basic grasp of the language is seen as "pretentious"
Yes the wording of some of this article forces you to think a bit to follow it, however, I kind of think that is the point.
KUDOS Phil. :kiss:
This was a joy to read and exactly what we need more of. Much much more.
My GOD this is a potent piece! I only wish Mr. Rockstroh would employ a proofreader. The otherwise powerful effect is somewhat weakened by too many typos and sloppy word choices (reign for rein, moral for morale, Glen for Glenn, insure for ensure, welding for wielding, etc. etc.). I suppose some will see this as quibbling; but for me, the way one expresses oneself is no light matter - especially when one has something worth expressing.
Though somewhat long-winded, this piece does help to bring to light the tendency of the American working & middle classes to be easy prey to the paid shills of the rapacious portion of the corporate elite.
There is also a basic of mammalian social organization at work here as well, as the nastiest fights in any pack are not between the alpha & beta members, but amongst the middle and lower ranks. This pack dynamic helps explain why 'divide and conquer' is such an effective tactic.
Thus corporate shills like Glenn Beck & Scumbaugh do not have to work too hard to deceive their deluded listeners, as scapegoating has a long and dubious tradition. All they and their ilk have to do is dish out their toxic nonsense, then collect their fat paychecks and laugh all the way to the bank and their mansions.
Morticia 3, Jill 0
Having lived in the South during those days as a 'plebe', I think Rockstroh is dead on.
One usually criticizes that which they have in themselves.
This is not a competition.
Sorry, but this is clearly a bigoted piece which divides people. What's his point? To preach to his choir of "elites", or to be productive?
The author never mentions the North's own racist past, or more importantly--its present--as in NYC.
Nothing beautiful about what is written here.
"One usually criticizes that which they have in themselves."
PO-leeeze.
Not mentioning the north is not the same as absolving them
The point of the article ( do I really need to state it? ) is that the manipulation of culture the writer saw in the past is being repeated and repeated for the same reasons.
It's about the creation of race war and general environment of bigotry to channel the anger of the working class and exploited from their true opressors, the oligarchs, and thus to suppress dissent before it even starts.
Pittsburgh is a Southern city? News to me.
I wasn't aware the West was counted as part of the South, either. Ask the average Southerner who isn't thoroughly modernized culturally and they will tell you they consider Westerners to be Yankees too.
Not that I disagree with your central point that this is merely another volley fired in the latest class-warfare conflict. There are plenty of middle-class people on the Left who feel threatened by Obama in ways having nothing to do with his race. And not just Obama but the entire Washington establishment. People defending this essay would be amazed to discover just how much they really do have in common with the average tea-party sympathetic on the street if they took two seconds to respect the Constitution and stopped and listened to what the TPS was actually saying.
Better authors pull from their own personal experience to write.
There is such a thing as literacy amongst those who had no real experiences in NYC to pull from, you know.
Thanks for your posts Jill. I agree. And I agree that this is not and should not be a competition. It is competition that is killing us. There is no more need for competition. We humans have won. We won by evolving into the most skillful competitors on the planet.
We can't stop. Having wiped out most of the other species on the planet we have turned on each other. There is enough for everyone but we can't stop. We compete for the most money, the most expensive house and car. Competition at work is too obvious for comment, after work the games we play incorporate competition, we want OUR kids to be the best and brightest.
THERE IS ENOUGH FOR EVERYONE. Our justice system is based on competition between your lawyer and mine. This serves justice only slightly better than trial by ordeal. We are governed by the most successful candidate in every election. They lie to us but we still allow them to push our buttons. Game shows and movie dramas have winners and losers. We are incapable of thinking in any other terms.
It is time to learn and learn fast. The fact that we have a working class, an educated class, and a ruling class in which any of us would move up to the next level if we could is proof that we have little hope of changing fast enough to learn to cooperate before we destroy ourselves.
We have plenty of prophets: "It seems such a waste of time/If that's what you're all about/If that's moving up/ Then I'm moving out"----Billy Joel
We are what we are. A tree is not a dog, and we are not gods that have mastery over ourselves.
I assure you we did not become successful by competition. That is a myth, much like the notion that "we" all evolved out of being hunter-gatherers into farmers and then "we" all evolved on to become industrialists and then "we" all became post-industrial computer users. That must be startling news to the hunter-gatherers still in existence today.
If all we ever did was fight one another to see who was the biggest and the toughest, we'd have died out long ago. We don't have the claws and the huge canines and the thick fur to protect us. But we HAVE always been a social animal, as far back as anyone can tell. Which means... we *cooperated.*
Every single social and political ill we suffer from these days, I could blame directly on some facet of our evolutionary reality which we have chosen to ignore or flaunt. We're tribal (150 people or less--that's the upper limit for what our neurological systems can keep track of), we're non-obligate carnivores (a fancy way of saying "omnivore that eats mostly meat", like dogs--all primates are insectivores, and insects are animals), we're very family-centered, we learn best by imitation, and we're nomadic. And we're *cooperative.* Can you think of ways our modern culture interferes with all these tendencies? I sure can.
Jill -
This is now bordering on delusional on your part...you seem unable to comprehend the content of the article.
The guy is REALLY on your side... you are tilting at windmills.
Has someone highjacked your screen name?
The author did not mention "the lower orders". That distinction belongs to Jill, who first used the term in this particular thread.
duplicate deleted.
So what exactly is the point of your reply to my original post?
Where and who it comes from is secondary to what is being written...and what is being written is on point. It is well past due you and other like you give up your membership cards in the circular firing squad, as all it does is aid those who profit from divide and conquer.
Brilliant piece! Powerful writing! Love the imagery - the power of poetry unleashed on the hegemons.
Bravissimo, Phil!
We saw the "ignorant, angry people in large groups" and
their resistance to overturning Segregation Inc. during
the Civil Rights struggle. It helped defeat them.
Fortunately, for those whites in the South.
And, if we respond properly to the insanity of the O'Reilly's
and Beck's and Palin's we will also help them defeat
themselves.
The difference today is that the right wing's efforts at
creating a violent American society have succeeded to such
a point that T-baggers have shown up with rifles slung over
their shoulders. All of this was accomplished by right wing
use of the dollar bill to take over the NRA and use it to
target liberal and moderate members of their own party -
and naturally Democrats who understood that only the right
wing would benefit from a "Wild West America."
We are ALL labor -- a new labor movement might help wake up
America ...
.
"According to all myth, the female - not the male -- gives life"
"The difference today is that the right wing's efforts at
creating a violent American society have succeeded to such
a point that T-baggers have shown up with rifles slung over
their shoulders."
"The Right"? Sorry, but I beg to differ.
Much if not all of the blame with modern day violence/bravado has its roots in Hollywood, and on NBC nightly--broadcast free on the public airwaves nearly every stinking night of the week. And lets not forget the Bush/Obama administration(s) warmongering and efforts to terrorize the world. Don't forget violent video games, either. You can thank Madison Avenue for the convict/pirate look a.k.a. tatoos, and 'skint or shaved heads, and black SUVs running the streets in car commercials, for the overall generic motif--24/7/365.
Beck and the rest are simply picking up on a theme made possible by--yes--Hollywood liberals who make their billions off of violence. Imagine: Stopping the MIC, calling for peace and love--by Obama and liberals? It'd be bad for bidness. A new 'worldview". Are you f*cking crazy?
Its the money baby. Never ever forget that.
The argument that the less fortunate whites are so dumb & violent while liberals declare their innocence is outright laughable. Perhaps the real problem is that liberals operate in a way to squeeze us in the middle, that is, the east coast liberal intelligentsia provides the script while the west coast shoots and edits.
In any case, liberals have absolutely the bloodiest hands in America today. This piece is bullshit. "Elegantly" written? Perhaps. But, bullshit nonetheless.
i was going to ask "what is the point of this flowery writing?"
it turns out: to impress the "educated and sophisticated" class to which the writer belongs.
what i know for fact is, the "educated" class have completely betrayed the "uneducated and bigoted" class throughout the US history.
obama is the symbol of that fact at the moment.
Flowery?
Why are you putting down the writer's voice? Are you bigotted against any and all uses of the intellect?
Listen to his message and share what he wishes to share with you.
his message is quite simple. his method of delivery doesn't enhance his simple message: it only shows his elitest attitude.
if "educated" people had used their intellect for justice for all and come up with right kind of alternatives, the "uneducated and bigotted" wouldn't have to turn to wrong kind of "alternatives".
the "uneducated and stupid" can't help themselves. they don't know better, by definition. the "educated" have no excuse.