Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oil Spill Could Bring Mass Extinction to the Gulf Coast
A cap placed over a severed pipe is siphoning some oil from the broken BP well in the Gulf Coast, the company said today. The company’s CEO said this morning on CBS that it was possible that this fix could capture up to 90% of the oil, but that it will take 24 to 48 hours to understand how well this solution is working. Adm. Thad Allen, the former Coast Guard chief and oil spill incident commander, called the cap “only a temporary and partial fix.”
Despite the capping procedure, it became clear this week that the onrush of oil from the BP Deepwater Horizon rig will not cease any time soon. Even in the best case scenario, thousands of barrels of oil will still flow into the ocean. Destruction is already spreading along the Gulf Coast, and before the oil stops leaking, species might be extinct and industries destroyed.
In the coming months—it’s not clear how many—oil will continue to pollute the Gulf of Mexico. BP and the Obama administration are talking about August as the end of this crisis, but other experts have projected that the spill could last until Christmas.
As Justin Elliott reports for TPMMuckraker, BP told the government it could handle a spill much larger than this one. In the initial exploration plan for the well, BP claimed “it was prepared to respond to a blowout flowing at 300,000 barrels per day — as much as 25 times the rate of the current spill,” Elliott writes. BP cannot, it turns out, respond to a blowout flowing less than 20,000 barrels per day, and the consequences for the Gulf communities are only beginning to emerge. The first casualty will be Gulf ecosystem and its inhabitants. The second casualty will be the livelihood of Gulf communities that have depended on fish, shrimp, and oysters for survival.
How long?
In 1979, another company released torrents of oil in the Gulf of Mexico, in much shallower waters than where BP was drilling. As Rachel Slajda writes for TPMMuckeraker, the clean-up methods the oil industry relied on three decades ago are similar to the technology BP is trying now. The Ixtoc spill was comparatively easy to address; yet it still took 10 months to stop.
During that spill, the nearest state, Texas, had two months to prepare for the oil to hit shore, and still “1,421 birds were found with oiled feathers and feet,” Slajda writes. The fishing industry escaped much damage, but the tourism industry lost 7-10% of its business.
Dead fish
In Louisiana, Mississippi, Florida, and other states affected by this spill, fish, fowl, restaurateurs, and oystermen won’t get off easy. As Care2 reports, the National Wildlife Federation has already documented the deaths of more than 150 threatened or endangered sea turtles and of 316 seabirds (“mostly brown pelicans and northern gannets”).
And BP is trying to keep images of the animal victims away from the public. Julia Whitty, reporting from Louisiana, writes for Mother Jones:
All up and down this shoreline angry and scared people told me some scary and infuriating stories in the past few days. I heard about the the dead and dying wildlife we’re never going to see because the victims are being carted away to early responder ships and to inaccessible buildings onshore. I’ve seen some of those photographs which can’t be shown (according to BP’s new orders) of dolphins swimming through thick gunky oil, struggling sperm whales trailing wakes a mile long in thick gunky oil, dead jellyfish in gunky oil.
Extinction
The impact of the oil spill goes beyond those individual bodies, though. As Inter Press Service reports, environmentalists and scientists “are beginning to reckon with the reality of a massive annihilation of sea creatures and wildlife.”
“You could potentially lose whole species, have extinction events,” Michael Blum, a Tulane ecology professor told IPS. “Brown pelicans were just taken off the endangered species list. On this threshold, a big dieback and mortality event, they would be pushed back into a situation where they could be endangered.” Also at Care2, Jay Holcomb, Executive Director of the International Bird Rescue Research Center, demonstrates a brown pelican being de-oiled, her feathers shampooed with Dawn detergent, her head and pouch cleaned with Q-tips.
Livelihoods destroyed
For generations, Gulf Coast residents made their living by fishing. Their fishing grounds are now off-limits. Some have found short-term work with BP fighting the oil. But those jobs come with new hazards.
Some clean-up workers have reported dizziness, nausea, and shortness of breath that they think comes from exposure to chemical dispersants. BP is not providing safety gear that would clean the air workers breathe and has threatened to fire clean-up workers who bring their own, Colorlines reports.
In the long-term, Gulf Coast fishermen may have no source of income and will have to abandon their homes and professions.
“It’s a way of life,” shrimper Dean Blachard told Democracy Now!’s Amy Goodman this week. “They destroyed a way of life, a way of life that if you take it away too long, you can’t learn this in a school. This is passed from generation to generation, so the daddy teaches the son, and the son teaches his son. And, you know, once the chain is broke, you’re never going to get it back.”
It’s understandable that the residents of the Gulf Coast might want BP to pay for the damage. At The Nation, Chris Hayes reveals that BP could be on the hook for mitigation, the cash value of injured property, and for punitive damages–all beyond the cost of cleanup itself. But, as Zygmunt J. B. Plater, a law professor who chaired a legal task force on the Exxon Valdez spill, explains:
“In Alaska, most of the damage was suffered by communities who had their quality of life destroyed, and there’s no way to put a dollar value on that.”

10 Comments so far
Show AllWhat effect will this have on other Caribbean countries: especially Mexico? (It is the Gulf of MEXICO)
I don't expect conservative americans to care about their neighbors.
Let's at least bring other affected countries into the dialogue.
This is a global problem -
Yes. But, as currently projected, it's first scheduled to afflict Teh Red States:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pE-1G_476nA
Now THAT is politically interesting.
Let`s just ask that great oilman, Dick Cheney, what we should do. He and his daughter have been all over the airwaves with their great ideas of how to run the country for a year or more. How is it that now we are not hearing from them on this crisis? Cheney was instrumental in meeting with oil execs to get their input on how to regulate their (and his) companies, so where are those bright folks now that we need them?
Everyone knows we don't need the oil. The oil is being pushed on us. Who asked for all of these petro-opiates? Nobody.
Lost somewhere in the babble of monetary restitution is the one question that can't be answered: How do you put a dollar amount on the extinction of a species?
As sad as it is to see people lose their livelihood at least they still have a life which is more than can be said for all those pitiful, tragic animals. No money can bring them back once they are gone.
"And BP is trying to keep images of the animal victims away from the public. Julia Whitty, reporting from Louisiana, writes for Mother Jones":
"All up and down this shoreline angry and scared people told me some scary and infuriating stories in the past few days. I heard about the the dead and dying wildlife we’re never going to see because the victims are being carted away to early responder ships and to inaccessible buildings onshore. I’ve seen some of those photographs which can’t be shown (according to BP’s new orders) of dolphins swimming through thick gunky oil, struggling sperm whales trailing wakes a mile long in thick gunky oil, dead jellyfish in gunky oil"
I do not understand how or why people allow BP or the Coast Guard or anyone or any Agency to tell them that they can not walk these beaches and grasslands to photograph this carnage...This is beyond belief that people would allow ANY FKN authority to tell them that they have no rights in AMERICA.
I say that ten thousand+ of you people march around and Photograph and DOCUMENT this whole window of oportunity to let future generations know what happened here...It is time to grow some balls people and take over this crime scene!!!They can't and won't arrest thousands of you and if they do you need another thousand to go out the next day and get this crime scene documented...For Chists sake people!!!!
I do not believe that BP is at all interested in the amounts of oil that they are going to spew into OUR OCEAN so this is the only idea I could come up with...I can not see anything that they have to offer as A solution, and keep in mind that this directional drilling to "cement and kill" the well in August/September/October or whenever their hollow lies play out, may indeed not work... Anyway this is what I came up with and I would appreciate any other ideas or comments...
Stuart Sneed
Reply |Stuart Sneed to Tom
show details May 21
Tom,
If you have the ears of anyone that can present an idea you might consider running this one by them...
You take an Oil Tanker the size of the Exxon Valdez for example.{It could be much smaller but hey, BP is footing the bill so lets say bigger is better..}. I am assuming that these tankers are fairly flat bottomed but if not they or anything else can be modified and fabricated...You cut A hole out of the bottom in any shape that suits the function {square, round. pentagon etc.} You build A strong steel cyllinder or box around this opening in the bottom of the tanker which is large enough to encircle the christmas tree at the well where the leaking valve is, and this cuts into the ocean floor to form A seal... The riser can be cut if it's leaks are too far from the tree and valve, but it appears from the footage that the riser leaks are near the well head christmas tree.
You pump the vessel/barge full of sea water and weigh it down with as much iron as it will hold.
You then sink the unit after fitting several 3" to 6" hose or pipe couplings onto the deck for connecting hoses/pipes to the surface, these would be connected to high pressure pumps on the surface ship.....
once the barge has settled over the leaking oil source you use high powered pumps from A surface oil tanker to displace/suck the sea water out of the submerged barge at the same rate that the oil is entering the bottom of the submerged tanker, which is also anchored to the sea floor in place to hold it steady.
I know that there are pumps large enough to suck all the fluid that enters that sunken barge at the same rate that it is being filled with the oil..
You have A small armada of tankers filling up from the leak capturing submerged barge and as the surface tankers are filled they can head for the nearest refinery for unloading and then get back in line...
I am not an engineer but I can see how this might work.
Those silly triangular units were to small and flimsy and could not handle the volume of frozen methane and oil and gas. What was missing was the volume of the container...
The only problem I can see here is if the leaker/gusher is on such uneven seafloor that it would not accomodate the vessel/Oil tanker being sunk over the gushing oil source.....I know that the depth would not crush the vessel if it were full of water as it descended to the bottom and if that is A problem, use A huge submarine....
This is surely A better approach than those silly units they tryed already for PR only.....I think this would work well enough until that relief hole is drilled.{assuming that that will be A workable solution}
My greatest fear is that BP will go in there with their stumble ass five thumb approach and open that hole up to where there is A million barrels A day coming out..Eventually erosion will have it's way with anything down stream of the subsurface well line, that partially open valve is just A sacrificial piece of metal for erosion will have its way with that.
This sunken vessel would "contain" that Oil and if freezing were A problem they could run heat trace in those areas. Once the sea water was pumped out of the barge to the point of that barge being full of oil I think that the temperature of the oil would stop the freezing effect of the methane gasses. Is this worth considering???
I personally think that any reasonable solution is worth trying and if this did indeed work, BP would be able to market the oil to start paying for A serious effort to cut the people of the Gulf and all of the creatures losses....
Or maybe they could alter another BOP, so a pipe protrudes at the bottom; this pipe is designed to go down the throat of the other pipe and fit tightly inside. There would be plenty of lubrication slip it inside, and carefully mount and weld the other BOP to the existing one. Let the oil spew out of the top of it until the second blow out prevent-er is welded in place. They will want to seal the 2 together with concrete where the two pipes meet, so no oil leaks out of the junction. Then use the second BOP to turn off the flow. Didn't BP originally plan to do something like this?
When that diamond circular saw failed they took those big sheer type cutters and pinched the pipe out of round. The pipe opening pobably resmbles A football now more than A circle...This may make this consideration difficult....
Environmental destruction and extinction for profit is not sustainable. Redoubling our individual efforts to care for local wildlife is an appropriate response.