Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Murder Capital of the World
On January 31, an armed commando unit pulled up to a house in a working-class neighborhood in Ciudad Juarez on the Mexican side of the border with the United States. Inside the house, 60 teenagers were celebrating a friend's birthday. Wielding high-caliber weapons, the commandos opened fire on the kids, robbed the house, then drove away from the scene — amid human cries, the scent of gunpowder, and the total absence of law enforcement officials.
To date, 16 people are dead as more lie wounded in the local hospital. Photographs capture the concrete floors stained with blood, the bereaved families, the frightened neighbors. Local residents interviewed in the aftermath of the tragedy called the security forces "useless." Fearing to give their names, they noted that the gunmen entered the neighborhood, hunted down the victims, and passed right by a group of soldiers in the vicinity.
"We heard a lot of shots, at first we thought they were bottle rockets, but later we heard the running and the cries of the young girls that were at the party. Then came silence and a strong odor of gunpowder," a witness reported. Residents say that even 10 hours after the murders, the crime scene had not been secured.
So far, no one knows the motive of the crime. The Washington Post reported that Ciudad Juarez Mayor Jose Reyes put forward the preposterous hypothesis that the hit was "random." Mexico's secretary of government chalked it up to "delinquents" and ended up blaming the victims. He stated that the new strategy in the region would be focused on "the gang wars." The state attorney general presented a suspect who claimed the victims were associated with a gang called the "Artist Assassins" that works for the Sinaloa drug cartel. According to this story, the rival Gulf cartel carried out the mass hit as punishment and a warning to others.
Mexico's Drug War
Ciudad Juarez now holds the world record in homicides per capita. The city beats out war zones in the number of violent deaths because unofficially, it too is a war zone. This border city of two million is the frontline of one of the most violent and most ill-conceived war of our times — the war on drugs. On March 27, 2008, Mexican President Felipe Calderon launched "Operation Chihuahua," and since then thousands of soldiers have been sent in to beat back the cartels.
The bodies of the slain teenagers and thousands of others attest to the results of this strategy. Last year, Ciudad Juarez's over 2,600 murders accounted for more than a third of Mexico's reported 7,724 drug war-related deaths. With 227 assassinations related to organized crime in January alone, 2010 stands to be the bloodiest year yet.
If governments based their security strategies on hard evidence and proven results, this city would be rightly viewed as a case study in the failure of the drug war. Instead, for years the strategy has been reinforced, with worse results. Ciudad Juarez stands out as a tragic example of what happens when a black-market economy creates massive corruption and avarice, and partisan politics and special interests determine government responses.
Calderon initiated the drug war to secure the support of the armed forces following huge protests over electoral fraud. He needed to unite the country against an enemy and organized crime was growing. Since Calderon announced the offensive against organized crime soon after taking office, somewhere between 15,000 and 17,000 people have been killed. The government has deployed 50,000 troops to fight the war nationwide, racking up human rights violations and criticisms that their new domestic role violates the constitution, accelerates the downward spiral of violence, and militarizes a nation still undergoing a shaky transition from authoritarian rule.
Now public anger over the government's failure to control the violence has reached a boiling point in Mexico. Perched atop the open casket of one of the young people, a hand-written sign read "Mr. President, We demand responses and solutions. No False Promises or False Hopes." Some groups in Juarez have called for Calderon's resignation.
The Mexican Congress has demanded that the cabinet members charged with security policy explain the failure in Ciudad Juarez in light of the recent killings. The massacre comes on the heels of the announcement of a change in strategy to withdraw soldiers and replace them with police officers. U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Carlos Pascual praised the move: "What the government has done now is an intelligent measure to introduce the federal police, which has all the legal capacities, and put them on the front line in the war on against drug-traffickers."
However, experts like General Francisco Gallardo of the Mexican armed forces, now a human rights leader, note that the difference between the armed forces and the police is often just a change of uniform. Although some groups in Washington have insisted that a shift from army to police represents a major improvement in the drug war strategy, the massacre and continued violence indicates that the impunity of organized crime will continue unabated as long as the confrontation model itself remains the same.
In an 2008 article for the Americas Program on the failure of Operation Chihuahua, congressman and human rights activist Victor Quintana wrote that "Crowding soldiers into different parts of the country, far from dissuading drug dealers and their hired gunmen, exponentially increases the risk for civilians, who now have to take care on all sides: hired gunmen breaking into their daily activities, stray bullets, and human rights violations by the police and the army."
A New Strategy?
Calderon has made the most self-critical statements yet regarding the failure of his drug war. Speaking from Japan, he said he would alter the strategy. He went on to announce a more integral approach to attack the "social deterioration" of Ciudad Juarez, adding that the new approach would revamp the police and justice system and tackle social problems. "It's clear that the action of the police or government and armed forces is not enough," he said. "We need an integral strategy of social recomposition, prevention and treatment for addictions, a search for opportunities for employment and recreation and education for youth."
The same week, in its 2011 budget request, the Obama administration called for an additional $310 million for Mexico's drug war under the Merida initiative. Through this initiative, the U.S. government, first under Bush and now under Obama, has pledged its support for the enforcement strategy with over $1.4 billion, mostly to the Mexican armed forces and police. But this approach doesn't address the reduction in the demand for illicit drugs, the treatment and prevention of addiction, or the financial structure of organized crime. Moreover a recent story in the Mexican daily El Universal notes that 70 percent of Merida resources remain in the United States, doled out in contracts for military and intelligence equipment.
The irony of announcing further U.S. support for the drug war strategy, at the same time as Mexican society and even the president called for a change in strategy, was not missed. The daily paper La Jornada dedicated an indignant February 2 editorial to the coincidence. "Based on the results, the application of the Merida Initiative has translated into a sustained and exasperating deterioration in public security," the editorial concludes. "Crimes linked to drug trafficking are more frequent than when it was signed, which is a disaster for Mexico. Through this instrument it was agreed we would fight a war that isn't ours, one that contains an immoral and unacceptable clause: the U.S. pays in dollars and Mexico pays in lives."
U.S. officials explain the violence in Ciudad Juarez as the result of turf battles for control of heavy trafficking routes. But the city has become the center for traffickers because of what's happening on the other side of the border. U.S. demand for drugs sustains the market, and U.S. laws do little to prevent the illicit trade — weapons going in, drugs coming out — that has made this border area a war-zone.
- Posted in



15 Comments so far
Show AllI beg to differ with Ms Carlsen. As bad as the situation is in Mexico, the place where more murders are planned and carried out is Washington DC--otherwise known as Depravity Central, where the deaths and displacement of millions are central to its plans, making it the epicenter of global terrorism.
Karlof1: I agree, as I use to live and work in Mexico. The Mexican drug cartels are like street junkies compared to what happens in D.C.; where the godfather resides.
Stop calling it a "war zone" and hold the criminals, on both sides of the border, accountable.
What's happening in Mexico is also happening in the United States. Wall Street and the MIC are our version of the organized drug gangs that are battling the government of Mexico for control of that nation. It seems that in both countries, the criminals are winning . . . and winning easily.
It's high time (excuse the pun) we ended this stupid endless "war on drugs"! It has caused more death, more corruption, more unnecessary bureaucracy than any real war. It has corruption our neighbor to the south to the point where no one in Mexico trusts the police or other authorities to be anything but bandits. It has made corruption a way of life in Mexico, and has helped make corruption a fact of life here in the United States. You could take all the junkies in the United States for the past 80 years and they would not approach the number of people harmed by our "War on Drugs". Our jails are full of people who have run afoul of the completely idiotic laws which our 'War' has created. While serial killers and murders of all stripes (including 'hate crime murderers') get off scot free or are handed unbelievably light sentences, thousands who have smoked a joint or who have been caught with an ounce of marijuana are languishing in prison, learning how to be criminals by the pros who run our jails. Stopping this stupid corruption should be a priority with the Obama administration. But it is not, or course. To many people high in our system have gotten and are getting fabulously rich, and the bureaucracy which runs the 'war' has grown fat and powerful. The only change I see with Obama is him changing into his evening clothes to dine with the powerful 'massas' who own the plantation.
Don't forget the effect the prohibition on alcohol had on the US. That one stupid decision led to the development of organized crime, a parasitic pestilence that we will likely never eradicate.
Neither will Mexico even if "drugs" were de-criminalized tomorrow.
Somebody is benefitting from this insanity. It isn't us.
Excellent article at CounterPunch that reveals more about the history of pot prohibition, http://www.counterpunch.org/gardner02082010.html
We must support drug cartels, kill and maim thousands, invade, bomb and spray herbicides in poor countries because conservatives think its the moral thing to do.
I thought the article was going to be about Washington, not Ciudad Juarez. Because of Washington, millions are murdered yearly in cities all over the world, it makes the numbers in Ciudad Juarez insignificant.
2,600 drug related deaths last year. Since Calderon show up between 15,000 and 17,000 people have been killed. Peanuts!!
Americans have murdered over 1,000,000,000 Americans since 1960. Not to mention the millions murdered by Americans in other countries.
Murder capital of the world is now the good old USA.
Careful with your zeroes.
Half the politicians ("conservatives" is truly a misnomer) in this country who vote for the War on Drugs are Bourbon swilling cigar smoking nicotine-addicted perverts.
Half of the Wall Street traders and schemers who cooked up the current global financial disaster snort coke.
Hitler and Stalin were high on amphetamines long before WWII, as were their pilots in the war. U.S. pilots have a "speed" allotment as British sailors had their rum.
The War on Drugs is truly a War on the Poor. ALL INDIGENOUS peoples have their own PHARMACOLOGY. Historically, Imperialism has been a war on Medicine.
It has its concomitant in Big Pharma's ready payments to politicians who vote FOR the War on Drugs. Ironic, is it not, that Big Pharma's drugs tend to kill and maim, and our government subsidizes them through for example, Medicare Part Duh! We decry Afghanistan's opium production while it is courtesy of the CIA and Turkey. All over the world, old people experience pain upon awaking every day. Please! Give me cheap opium. I don't want the goddam heroin. I have the pipe! But, not so cheap these days, eh? Would it be surprising if we discovered that Goldman-Sachs and AIG were/are doing a derivatives market in opium production in Afghanistan? Let alone the heroin market? After all, this stuff passes through "Homeland Security" the way shit passes through a corn-fed goose.
This is called "market rationalization."
The public discourse about any and all of these relationships---including "health care reform"---has become a method of social control. Hundreds of thousands of Americans are rotting in jails and prisons because of this "social control," for minor crimes involving "illicit" drugs that are generally safer than many prescription drugs, costing taxpayers millions and millions of dollars that are funneled to an increasingly privatized penal system which profits by the incarceration of PERSONS, regardless of innocence or guilt and regardless of the nature of the alleged "crime." If the private prison contractors do not obtain enough prisoners then they cannot pay off the debt they entered into to build their prisons. Create Crime! Let's call Environmentalists "Ecoterrorists"! You see where this goes...
At first I wanted to dismiss this article as lightweight but then I reread it, and was struck by this sentence:
"Residents say that even 10 hours after the murders, the crime scene had not been secured."
I once worked as a police reporter for a very good newspaper. This might have been our lede story top-of-front-page headline:
"Cops fail to secure carnage. Worse than Afghanistan!"
Is Mexico, or large parts of it, a "failed state"?
The United States certainly is, and has been since Reagan. Dare I add that Gorbachev, a student of history, knew this, and went along for the ride, knowing that the Russians have a far deeper sense of history.
My bet is that the Ciudad Juarez "drug war" is a "turf war" transcending drugs. And with tentacles reaching very deep. Governments do not allow this kind of carnage unless they have no perceived choice.
People talk about the three-war front---Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Pakistan and the drones---also now Yemen.
How about Mexico? I once visited Juarez, back in the early 60s. My boss at the time took me there. I paid $25 for a whore in a bar. I couldn't get it up and I told her I loved her. I was an idiot and too young. She really was quite attractive and about my age. Today I wonder how the world might be different if I had asked her to marry me!
Let's just all agree to maintain the Global Debt Economy. After all, money is imaginary.
Oops. Iceland. Oops, Greece. How much now depends on Mind over Matter? The price of gold versus the International Order?
Over the past week I lost a lot of money in the market. I surprise myself. I really do not care! THE WORLD is more important.
All is Vanity!
-30-
It appears from the Comments et al that most of the humans on this planet suffer from paranoia. Very, very sad...
No worries. Americons would rather keep killing thousands, invading countries, smashing down people's doors, making war, raising the price of drugs for cartels sake, subverting our judiciary, letting addicts die from AIDS and OD's, subverting politics, spending trillions on a useless WOD, spreading herbicides, imprisoning non-violent drug offenders, building private prisons, checking our piss and more to preserve your conservative "morals".