Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
- More Damning Evidence Points to Pesticide as Cause of Mass Bee Deaths
- Nobel Peace Prize Jury Under Investigation
- 'Gasland' Film Director Arrested at US Capitol Hearing
- The Cancerous Politics and Ideology of the Susan G. Komen Foundation
- A Journey To The End Of Empire: It Is Always Darkest Right Before It Goes Completely Black
Popular content
Today's Top News
Leading an Empire in Decline: Obama’s First Year
Almost a year ago, in an editorial published on this site we called on Barack Obama to be the hero our country so sorely needed. We pointed back in time to the flush of hope that greeted Bill Clinton's election in 1992, hope that was quickly dashed on the shoals of NAFTA and the Contract with America. Would Obama's early tenure follow a similar trajectory?
So far it has. Obama's first year, including the ongoing health care snafu, has served only to amplify the fact that the government of our country is run by corporations. As Ralph Nader pointed out over a decade ago, it is government "of the Exxons, by the General Motors, and for the DuPonts." Meanwhile, these corporate "persons" slyly deflect public anger back onto the government for the dysfunction and cruelty that results.
This is a society in which the gap between rich and poor grows ever wider even as the work-for-a-living class forks it over to cover bad bets made by the wealthiest. It's a society in which health care remains a privilege, tens of millions of middle-class homes are submerged and untold millions of well-paying industrial and information jobs have been outsourced. Public and private debt has reached astronomical proportions. It's a society inured to perpetual war in service to a vast armaments industry. As Rabbi Michael Lerner put it, it's a society that "leaves people hungry not only for life's necessities, but for ethical and spiritual fulfillment as well."
While the failure to reach a climate agreement in Copenhagen is being blamed on China, it was the US -- the world's lone superpower -- that lost face. Mark Lynas exposed this in the Guardian writing "The Chinese premier, Wen Jinbao, did not deign to attend the meetings personally, instead sending a second-tier official in the country's foreign ministry to sit opposite Obama himself. The diplomatic snub was obvious and brutal..."
But the most hideous manifestations of the current moral, ethical and legal swamp we inhabit -- worse even than the ongoing hijacking by Wall Street banksters -- are the nearly decade-old wars/occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. These demonstrate how far we have strayed from the nation's founding principles. Today, our patriarchs are people like Alan Greenspan, who casually admit that "The Iraq War is really about oil." In truth, as author Dallas Darling recently put it, "In the end, the Global War on Terror is really a ruse for a centuries old dream by western powers to dominate the Arabian Peninsula."
The AfPak war is more of the same. Asia Times correspondent Pepe Escobar's sums it up: "Once again, since the late 1990s, it all comes back to TAPI -- the Turkmenistan/Afghanistan/Pakistan/India gas pipeline -- the key reason Afghanistan is of any strategic importance to the US."
Barack Obama understands this. He also knows that beneath the soil of Afghanistan is a rich store of uranium, tungsten, molybdenum and rare earths (used for everything from TVs to wind turbines to Priuses). And the corporations that supply the missiles, the drones, the surveillance equipment, the helicopters and the fighter jets know that Obama knows this. Why else would they have made him the heavily funded presidential hopeful in history?
In fulfillment of his pledge to the armchair warriors, President Obama has just signed the largest military budget in history, larger than the combined spending of the rest of the planet. Now this military is being unleashed on a semi-literate people engaged in a decades-long civil war. Chances of "success" are slim. As Florida Democrat Alan Grayson explains, "This is an 18th century strategy being employed against a 14th century enemy."
Military intelligence inside the Obama administration estimates that there are approximately 100 al Qaeda fighters in the entire country of Afghanistan. This is the "cancer" the president says justifies sending 30,000 more troops at a cost of a billion dollars for every thousand soldiers. Once the latest Obama surge is in place, the US will have twice as many troops and contractors in Afghanistan as did the USSR at the height of their south Asian disaster.
While the elites -- economic, military and political -- hold tight to their faith in the "exceptional" character of the American imperium, pressure is building for a new narrative. "Burgeoning forces for democracy are emerging," writes Middle East scholar Mark Levine, "both in the Muslim world and across the global south." These forces were on display in Copenhagen and are now bravely gathering on the streets of Tehran. US preoccupation with the Global War on Terror has helped Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, and other Latin American countries free themselves from decades of subservience.
The new decade could even bring a resurgence of democracy here at home. If Barack Obama isn't prepared to help lead such a movement, he'll have to get out of the way. As Dylan warned a few decades back, "You'd better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone."
- Posted in



70 Comments so far
Show All"But the most hideous manifestations of the current moral, ethical and legal swamp we inhabit -- worse even than the ongoing hijacking by Wall Street banksters -- are the nearly decade-old wars/occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan. These demonstrate how far we have strayed from the nation's founding principles."
Founding principles??? Are you kidding? The USA was the only nation in history founded as an empire. The founding fathers has intentions on Florida, Canada, all areas west of the Appalachians, Cuba, etc etc etc... None of which were territories within the United States. The idea behind the country from the beginning is that the world belongs to us and the hapless two-legged beasts who happen to inhabit the lands with our resources underneath it have to be removed, placated, and made to understand the United States have no borders. It never has. The faster we can come to grips with our own history the faster we can made REAL change.
sorry. coming to grips with our history is counter to exceptionalism. ain't gonna happen any time soon.
more's the pity.
There is a dire reason why they make history the dullest subject in school, despite it's got all the makings of a thriller, with violence, heroic actions, sex and mayhem in endless amounts. To dumbth down American children. And therefore voting adults.
I was lucky, got taught American history by a true historian and he made it come alive. I pity those condemned to endless recycling of past mistakes by an ignorance of them. That they don't understand why Rev. Wright could legitimately declare "God damn the United States," and still love his county's people and promises. Promises more often spoken than implemented.
Gary
excellent comments here throughout. thanks. the repeat of the Hedges article is also appropriate and bears repeating over and over.. I slept on it and thought about it after watching a film, an american one and read some pages of history written by an american. yesterday I read some poetry by langston hughes. truly we are a nation with a foreign policy and a politics beset by violence and corruptions. by murder and torture. by imperialism and selfishness and greed. it is not all bad however. I look at our artists and scientists, our filmmakers, our writers our doctors our nurses our farmers our workers and our 'common' people in small towns and large cities and have to say that yes. we are a great people and I like the good Reverend have to repeat his,
"God damn the United States," and still love his county's people and promises
Right you are!
You forgot Mexico on the city-on-the-hill's shopping list.
"The new decade could even bring a resurgence of democracy here at home. If Barack Obama isn't prepared to help lead such a movement, he'll have to get out of the way. As Dylan warned a few decades back, "You'd better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone."
Barack Obama is the poster child for the corruption of America. George W. Bush was merely a runner up. This is why Barack would never be able to lead such a movement. Barack Obama's biggest concern appears to be Barack Obama and his bright, shiny, stinking wealthy future.
It seems to have been entirely missed by the public. This man, the Obomber is spending the week in Hawaii in a $5000.00 a night house.. This is stuff out of the Arabian Knights. The man thinks he is the king.. I watched the news last night with him and his indignation that someone would dare stand up to the empire (and light their pants on fire). You could not see that he was in Hawaii.. It looked like he was at the white house.
by the way does anyone know what the hell kind of thing this guy had really brought down a aircraft. Like seems to me that when the hype cleared a way the shoe bomber turned out to be some fool tricking into a charade. They really had no chance at downing a plane. But played into the empires propaganda machines hands..
It really amasses me how surprised Amerikans are that someone would be pissed off enough at the taking over of their country to stand up and fight.
I suppose the fact that not a one of them are angry enough at the take over of our country by the corporations to get their fat asses off the couch is evidence enough.
we live in the twilight zone!!
Maybe I'm cynical, maybe I'm paranoid, or maybe I'm being realistic, but what if this was a false-flag type event. This guy is given a dud "bomb" which the CIA, (Or insert your favorite clandestine organization), knew wouldn't explode. It was designed in a way that they knew it would not blow up but would make for a very nice show, so they could push a new agenda using Naomi Klein's "shock doctrine".
Why not?
Entirely possible! Never underestimate the deviousness of the rulers. As Bob Marley warned-"They would do ANYTHING to materialize their every wish." They could be playing the public like a lute. and on the other hand perhaps it is not a grand scheme or a conspiracy. I like to keep my options open but it certainly would be to their advantage to keep the masses frightened and diverted.
Check out Lauri & Kurt Haskell's stories.
Stating that Obama is "leading" the US in decline is akin to saying that the driver on a 4-man bobsled is "leading" his team. He may affect the course of the sled to some degree but it's going to continue down that run regardless of what he may do (apologies to the ladies if there are women's bobsled teams).
It's time to get off of the sled.
q
Obama is a hoop shootin puppet who provides cover for the corporations that own him.
The Obama faithful are puppets who provide cover for Obama.
Being 66 years old and living on Social Security, I can no longer afford to entertain the possibility of relocating to another country in order to find a "decent" place to live, i.e., a place that is not at war with another country. I must remain here in the U.S.
However, I do not belong to a political party (I never registered with one and in VA you don't have to belong to a political party to vote.)
However, I find that I can no longer participate in the recitation of the "Pledge of Allegiance" because I would be pledging faithfulness to something I no longer believe in (but rather despise) - thanks to what our corrupt government and the "Corporatocracy" that owns it has done to our country.
They're not fooling astute people who open their eyes and see the mess our country is in, with no hope in view for any authentic change or reform.
I feel that in every possible way I have "gotten off the sled." Until someone worthy of my vote runs for office, someone who will comdemn our current warmongering governmental policies and corrupt practices - who is NOT a democrat or republican in the current sense of the word, I simply cannot not participate in the "sham" that we call elections.
The older I get, the more I find it absolutely necessary and important to be true to my innermost beliefs and principles - which usually has meant that I let go of "beliefs" that I have been taught but which, in reality, are on their face not true. It has something to do with being an "authentic individual" and that individual within me doesn't feel any congruence whatsoever with any political party in the U.S.
I would vote for someone in whom I could "truly believe" as proven clearly by her/his actions, but never again for someone who stands up and spouts such precious words just for the sake of election to public office.
I'm two years younger than you and I feel precisely the same way. I'd like to get out of the USA if I could but I can't. Anyway, I found your comments moving. Thanks.
Thanks, Mordechai. It's a comfort to know there are real patriots with like mind out there!
Double thanks for saying what I am thinking. About to be a grandparent for the first time, I hate to give up on trying to make this country a decent place to live, though. Your refusing to say the Pledge is a little effort, but a great thing All we can do is say "no" to the demands of the warped oligarchs who control this country whenever they ask for something. Maybe that is a start.
Thanks, drosera. Congratulations on becoming a grandparent! If we get enough patriots who are willing to say "no" to the power elites, we'll eventually win.
Thx for your comment, FrankS. Same here, 66, on SS, sticking to my principles. I don't lie or steal, why in the world should I put up with it from those in power?
You're absolutely right, dus7. There isn't a reason in the world why we should tolerate the thievery of the "power elites." And constant opposition is the only thing that will put an end to it.
To put an end to it, we will all have to get past the divide and conquer strategy that has been so successful until now.
FrankS;The one thing,for me,is that if there is to be a critical mass of anything it will have to be of the mind.If there are enough folks out there with the same mind set there can be an effect.Thoughts are things."Staring at goats" was a parody but it has been proven that ESP at a distance works.I believe the repugs and dims use a variation of this along with propaganda and bribes to get people to go against their own best interest.Would it be better to against our percieved enemies or go for the positive and try to get more people to our way of thinking?The mind wars!At this stage though with our thoughts scattered every where it would be very difficult.Dont know psychology but have read a few books in my younger days that have been out of mind for awhile.Would it work,am I crazy?At 73 and knowing the way that I am this is an idea that had to come out;if you think I'm crazy fine and let me know but!If you have some ideas let us all hear it.In any case no dims or repugs ever again.Used to think boxer was a boxer but all she does is take a dive for the "cause".Tony
I agree with you mustbefree. The critical mass of the mind for real change will eventually come, I sincerely believe. And it will come when the electorate finally percieves, through our best efforts, that there is something fatally wrong with our governmental system. Lobbying must be labeled for what it is: BRIBERY. And it must be prosecuted for what it is: BRIBING A PUBLIC OFFICIAL.
FrankS; Thanks for the reply and I'm not going to hold my breath on the lobby thing and so the only chance we have is to get enough people on our side of the divide to take this whole mess to criticl mass and dont care what they call themselves.Once there may the best system win and we know that is us for it is a we system and not a me.Tony
I'm as angry as anyone over our out-of-whack military spending, but shouldn't that read a million, with an "m" not a "b", dollars per soldier? Let's get our numbers straight to keep our credibility straight.
I "knew" IT! It's the dupes' FAULT!! Their price per pair of boots on the ground keeps going UP EXPONENTIALLY from $1M to $1B!!! But just don't make apologies for DEM! MuffOn from Bushs' to Pelosi's to Bush Shadow's!!!! Nothing to see down there.
Perhaps only one in a thousand "troops" is actually a "soldier"
Thank you to CommonDreams, and to the authors who write the essays that end up in CommonDreams, for having the courage, care, and competence to speak against the suicidal direction of our nation and its allies. Freud's theories have long been in disrepute, but it seems that his idea of "death wish" is alive and well in the political culture of the USA. We are addicted to Death, and we are doing everything possible to destroy ourselves. Is there anyway to change this trend, to turn the society and the government towards pursuit of Life?
It would be interesting to see if there are statistics on a) emigration from the USA, b) people buying property and getting passports for other lands in preparation to flee, and c) people of conscience writing in their diaries about the duties of civil disobedience. I wonder sometimes, at what point in the 1930s Germans began to realize that they had elected and re-elected a monstrous government that would destroy them? Are we near that point yet?
Freud's theories have long been in disrepute, but it seems that his idea of "death wish" is alive and well in the political culture of the USA. We are addicted to Death, and we are doing everything possible to destroy ourselves.
As a lifelong adult believer in the death wish, thanks for the comment. And, yes, we are destroying ourselves and smiling all the while.
Technically, Freud's Thanatos was considered by him to be a death-instinct in opposition to Eros. It was his great student, Wilhelm Reich, who corrected him (though Freud opposed him on this) by showing that the "death-instinct" was a secondary drive created by the damaging of natural functioning by authoritarian culture, and not an innate attribute of human beings.
"Freud's ... idea of "death wish" is alive and well in the political culture of the USA."
Definitely alive and well in the U.S. is the enduring legacy brought to America by Freud's nephew Edward Bernays whose "vision was of a utopian society in which the dangerous libidinal energies that lurked just below the surface of every individual could be harnessed and channeled by a corporate elite for economic benefit."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Bernays
Once again a woefully one-sided, hence dangerously misleading explanation for our country's imperialism has appeared on this site.
The truth is that nearly all of us Americans are riding the imperialist "Streetcar named Desire" whose drivers are Exxon, General Motors, and so on. It is our voracious "Desire" for a higher living standard than any other nation on Earth which keeps us from jumping out of that streetcar. Exxon, General Motors, Obama, and the other nations know it.
I gave it up and so can anybody else. Life is much simpler without all the junk. Still, I appreciate running water, but learned to take three minute showers while living off the grid. Don't miss tv a bit, listen to radio when in my truck. I'd lose the truck if I could but can't just yet. Despite my love of books, 80% were sold or given away. "Standard of living" is relative. I find that less is better.
Thanks gdgoodman, jm37219, pjd412, and Buck for responding in one way or another to my "Streetcar named Desire". To Buck I would like to point out that I wrote "nearly all of us Americans". To all of you I would like to point out that I did not consider an absolute 'standard of living' but the 'desire of one higher than that of other nations'. The fact that there are numerous enclaves of poor persons in the US does not really change my view. I should have added "whether true or imagined" because there are nations whose standard of living is higher than ours.
At least two things must happen to change this pernicious 'desire'. Firstly the country must give up wanting to be the 'hegemon' of the world which automatically will lower our 'standard of living' and throttle the production of numerous useless gadgets. Secondly there must be another "Bretton Woods-type" eco-financial conference at which the International Monetary Fund with its power to punish debtors is buried forever and the current substitute 'Dollar = gold standard' is replaced by some international chit. This too will lower our 'standard of living' and throttle the production of useless gadgets.
Crowsnest, My response was to jm. Just wanted people to know that it's not everyone that desires wealth above all things and the "american" dream lifestyle of pet rocks and silly string.
Having just come back from that automobile-and-corporate-crap-driven cultural wasteland of disfunctionality called the Commonwealth of Virginia, I see no "standard of living" in the stuff the corporations sell us. The people there spend half their waking hours in a car in traffic, in order to get to the nearest "Red Lobster" to eat toxic plastic crap. There are no walkable, human-scale town centers or neighborhoods, no community, no culture. Yet, like someone kept in a soundproof chamber fed shit from early childhood, they seem oblivious to how low their living atandard actually is!
When I moved to a townhouse in older, poorer, rust-belt urban neighborhood where I could walk or take the bus everywhere, and get food from real Italian groceries and restaurants instead of "Olive Garden", drink real beer from small breweres withing a mile of the house, my living standard improved a thousand percent. Amazingly enough this neighborhood is even quieter than suburbia.
You should join the campaign for free public transit. It is the path to elimination of the private auto. http://frepubtra.blogspot.com
Since the days of the Eastern Trading Companies, corporations have exploited the baser instincts of their patrons. Be it greed for a better car, home, or even computer (when older and cooler and less energy intensive units running Linux can do the jobs most of us perform); to vanity, to gluttony. First it was spices to make badly preserved foods platable, to fine silks and curios for decoration of our bodies and homes, presently to the near infinite choice of goods a modern shopping mall offers.
Corporations has taken over the economy, the farmland, the remaining manufacturing base (while shipping the jobs to where near-slaves work ofr a few cents per hour), and our goverment. WE need real laws and enforcement to get them in check. We need an uprising of the people demanding genuine change. We need hope that the future is not doomed to ever greater corporate control and a world failing under the onser of climate change.
We need to speak pot, oraganize and fight. Get out them pitchforks and torches and let's storm the castle.
Gary
Lewis Seiler & Dan Hamburg,
And you are surprised?
I have to believe that both of you are tools of the ruling elite. You could only have been fooled by Mr. Obama rhetoric if you are of the same mind and class as Mr. Obama.
Both of you are shamelessly trying to maintain your broken credibility now that your hero has shown himself to have feet of clay.
If you had checked facts you would find that the vast majority of Obama voters were poor compared to all the politicians.
If you are implying that only the rich class can get fooled, it is a poor concept about class.
To Paul Whiting---
You made the correction I had calculated. 30,000 added troops at a million dollars each (not a billion each) equals the $30 billion additional expenditure commonly used in the Media.
Meanwhile, the article's closing paragraph starts with:
"The new decade could even bring a resurgence of democracy here at home. If Barack Obama isn't prepared to help lead such a movement, he'll have to get out of the way."
What an absurd logical fallacy. Obama "lead" a "resurgence of democracy"? Naive idealistic claptrap. Have the authors learned nothing in the year about which they write?
Flunks English 101.
-30-
While there is some good info in this piece it is rather troubling to hear such liberal wonkery like "If Obama isn't prepared to lead such a movement..." or the opener, "...we called on Obama to be the hero..." etc...
I wonder what fantasy land must one occupy to even have believed Obama ever intended what the authors hoped for or why they think a "hero" is the answer to our oppression(s). I wonder further how they can even entertain the possibility that Obama could be some type of leader of some imagined "progressive" movement. They must not have done their homework to have imagined Obama could've been "this hero", and must not be paying attention (despite some spots in the article which indicate they are) to what is happening in broad daylight if they still hold on to such illusions.
More deeply they must not understand the political apparatus of The Homeland nor understand what the CEO of Empire's assignment is. The President is there to sign off on the business of Big Business not to lead some populist movement that would counter the owner's of the country. Obama's role is to, as best he can, manage and control public outrage not to turn that justifiable outrage into a People's Movement.
Now here's a re-post of an earlier comment from Hedge's article:
----------
What gets to me is people thinking America was once a great country with a moral compass? When was that? I must have missed that part of history. From the massacres of Indians, to slavery, to Hiroshima, Vietnam, to its policies in Latin America, to its support for the creation of the terrorist state of Israel, to supporting the Shah of Iran, to supporting Saddam with intelligence and chemical weapons against the Iranian people, to these modern day Middle East massacres, America has by far the worst track record. They just have a very powerful propaganda machine to show they are the land of the free.
"The United States" stole half of Mexico by armed force -- the nice parts with rich deposits of gold and silver (and, as it turned out, oil -- though "we" didn't actually recognize that at the time.)
"We" made sure that "our" influence over Latin America was such that wealth would be steadily transferred from their countries to ours. "We" sent the Marines to Nicaragua, Haiti, & Guatemala often enough to insure that life in those countries would be a permanent living hell for most of the inhabitants. "We" imposed military dictatorships in almost every Central & South American country, stunting the aspirations of their people, & imposing conditions from which some of those countries will never recover. (So if some of the people want to escape from the living conditions in those countries, "we" had very much to do with creating those conditions.)
Interestingly, "we" started doing all this at the same time that "we" were exterminating the indigenous people here, AND using black slaves from Africa. What a loveable, righteous people "we" are, here in the "Land of the Free"!!
"We" came here somewhere in the early 1600s. "We" found this Promised Land, rich beyond imagination with fresh water and fertile earth and abundant game and timber for the felling. And to "our" further delight, it was largely uninhabited--if "we" didn't count the Red Ones.
"We" didn't see too many of them at first; they avoided our noise and the smoke from our fires, which were always too big. But soon enough, "we" were here in such numbers that they couldn't go around us anymore.
"We" were shocked--SHOCKED, I tell ya--that there were Savages in "our" Promised Land! So "we" set about exterminating them. "We" killed them whenever "we" saw them, "we" drove them from their land and their homes, "we" slaughtered their food supply and left the buffalo bodies to rot in the sun by the hundreds of acres. "We" gave them blankets full of smallpox, murdered their children and raped their women before "we" murdered them as well. "We" rounded them up into concentration camps and ate their food while they starved. "We" made them cut their hair, wear britches and beat them to death if they wouldn't speak "our" language.
"We" stole a whole fucking continent from them and paid them in Genocide.
The United States has been a slaughterhouse since day one.
All so true. For years I have thought the same thing. The American people need to face the facts and stop running away from looking in the mirror and looking at what the Empire has done in the world.
Today the Crow Creek Reservation can use your help. Call Chairman Sazue.
Switch your registration to third January 13 th. !!!!!
God, I hate to say anything against what you've said about the Indian wars of the nineteenth century, but I'll say it anyway. The Indians did not "own" North America simply because they did not have the concept of individual property. They did have the concept of "hunting and fishing rights" and they defended those against other tribes before the coming of the white man. When you come to think of it, How can anyone own land? You can only take care of it. Which, I agree, whites did not do either.
You have imbibed this "noble savage" idea of the American Indian, a view I believe few Indians of the 18th and 19th centuries would accept. It is more a European notion. Things weren't so great always living in the wilderness. There was famine, pestilence, and frigid weather, not to mention wars with neighboring tribes. Most Indian women were treated like possessions, sometimes to be given to other men in marriage to cement power relationships. And there are advantages to being able to read, as most Indians of the nineteenth century would readily admit.
All of which is to say that the whites took much, but they also gave. There are ideas of the worth of women, shared decision-making, the value of education, trial by jury as well as the technological advances which gave whites the advantage in warfare. Later would come advances in medicine.
I know you will never accept this point of view--since it seems like you have built your life around the victimization of Indians, but I think you should go back to what Indians really said about their lives back in the nineteenth century, not just be consumed by your anger. You might be surprised.
NO NO NO. Your argument says that Genocide was justified, that we were "entitled" to anything we could take and hold. Your argument said they had no "rights" to anything, including their lives and we brought them "Civilization".
Side Note: Being a "female" in ANY culture over the last 6000 years is a guarantee of Gender Slavery by Males, including ours. Having made a couple of "reforms" in that regard in the late 20th century, males have spent all the time since trying (and succeeding) to restore full on Gender Slavery here (still can't get an abortion in 85% of the counties in the US and the number is growing).
When we arrived on these shores we wanted just one thing, Everything, Forever - and we took it. For fun we skinned indigenous mommies and daddies alive in front of their children. Several of the major ideas in our governmental structure came from Iroquois social organization. I only wish that here, as was normal in several indigenous societies, "Only Women Vote". I believe in some cases they also chose the "Head Guy".
Beyond that, your ignorance is PHENOMENAL and very America.
I said "genocide was justified"? Where? No, I said that whites had committed heinous acts upon indigenous populations, but that there was some good mixed in: literacy, technology, and in certain values (God knows, not all). I said that nobody owns the land--the prior possession of America does not exclude the arrival of immigrants. Were treaties made and broken? You bet. I said the idea of the "noble savage" was a European idea, not something most Indians from earlier centuries would have agreed with.
As for your describing atrocities of whites against Indians, they no doubt did occur, though they were not everyday occurrences. On the other hand there were scalpings and torture going the other way, too.
As for your charge of ignorance, you should look at yourself first. Have you really studied the history with an open mind? Or are you just repeating stuff you picked up somewhere? I have done the research and feel confident I can defend my point of view. Do you feel confident, too?
Yes, of course. Might is right. Power is destiny. Man is ruled by the territorial imperative and shit happens. Greed is okay. It's just human nature to stomp and kill the competition. Yeah, those native Americans should have made big canoes and invaded England, raped the women and killed off the men. These native Americans were really dumb to just stay where they were. They were just asking for it. But hey, willow bark isn't as good as aspirin made by Bayer, right?
European science was flawed from the outset. Experimentation on living creatures with no regard for those creatures is cruel. Experimentation with chemicals with no regard for the environment is species suicide. It's taken a while, but the native ways of a hard, short life with famine or feast as well as many dangers was, and is, sustainable living. You think humans are better than the rest of the planet's inhabitants? Keep believing your science in the European white sky. I'm white and have scientific training. It's mostly destructive to nature and though we cannot unlearn what we know, we must strive to force responsible behavior on people who justify the modern crap because of brutal power.
My point is that if you go back to the eighteenth and nineteenth century, your anti-Western views were not widely held among Indians of the time. They had respect for what the white civilization could do, even if you don't. And they adopted elements of white culture they could use. Most of the posters here are so far separated from the past that they cannot speak for Indians of past times--they only speak from a twenty-first century point of view i.e. civilization is bad and European cultures created most of the evil in the world. That view might be the dominant one among CommonDreams posters, but it is not the dominant view among all peoples past and present.