Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Violence Within Is The Veteran Without
It's time to take care of your troops, America. We are mired in violence and gun lust, post traumatic stress and substance abuse; outward anxiety and inward extremism. Maj. Nidal Hassan is one of us.
Eight years we've been at war now. The youngest victim of Hassan's murderous rampage was but 11 when the towers fell. For years, Maj. Hassan listened to the horrors of the occupations which resulted, and it made him crazy, as it made me crazy. Then they told him it was his turn to go, as they told me it was my turn.
We military few are carrying a burden larger than most in this country would care to comprehend. Blood has been spilt, and the only solution we're given is more spilt blood. So we kill, like they do in combat, like they did in Fort Carson, Fort Benning, Fort Bragg, Fort Hood...Oklahoma City.
We kill ourselves, like we do on every base, in every state, in my bedroom...all too close. I was called up for Iraq. Five years I survived to be discharged and recalled. While I never deployed, I was a journalist. I heard stories.
As Maj. Hassan heard stories. The kinds of which nightmares are made of and then medicated. If they were like the ones I heard, memories have rubbed off on Maj. Hassan of murder, torture, racism, rabid aggression, sexual deviance, mutilation, brutalization and dehumanization.
When they told me to deploy, after I was out, after I'd started college, all I could see was the same thing I'd seen the night before I flew home from the Army: myself in a chair with a pistol in my mouth. It goes off. My problems seem to end.
But I have always directed my violence inward, despite the Army's coaching to the contrary. The angrier I feel, the more I want to destroy myself. Maj. Hassan directed his violence outward as trained; violence which resulted from entrapment by endless war and occupation.
Maj. Hassan knew this war is not against terrorists but the indigenous peoples of his Father's land. He begged his command on several occasions not to make him deploy. They refused because in America, a Soldier does not have that right.
Seeing no institutional recourse, Maj. Hassan chose a tragic redress of his grievances. I chose the path of outright resistance. I did not end my life. I reclaimed it and refused deployment to Iraq. I was found guilty of misconduct, but I know from experience how often the Army's dead wrong, as is our nation. Resisting slavery was once illegal too.
But the usual suspects are asserting that it's not the war, the guns, or the Army's brand of illness and callousness at fault here. It's Islam and the terrorists, they say, while their ethnocentricity goes unchecked by good people and knowledgeable veterans.
So he screamed Allahu Akbar before he pulled the trigger. Ever hear what Soldiers scream in combat? It's a combination of profane, blood-lustful jargon and cries for reassurance from the almighty. "Ain't no such thing as an atheist in a fox-hole," I've heard. What about Christians behind mass murder?
They happen in Iraq and Afghanistan all the time. There's a million dead, and they didn't all kill themselves. Knowledge of this is what drove Maj. Hassan to the realization that our wars are genocidal. Lack of legal recourse is what drove him to violent madness, as it nearly did me.
I wish we could have just said no and walked away, but the law is wrong, and many in our all-volunteer Army would actually consider themselves prisoners of war. Bound by contract often signed under duress to carry out the bloody will of others; waiting for their time in service to end, praying to avoid stop-loss.
The Greatest Generation's involvement in WWII lasted three-and-a-half years. Three and a half years ago, we were already trapped in a civil war that we helped start two years prior! With 30 percent of those deploying to Iraq and Afghanistan coming home with mental illness, we can expect a lot more tragedy where this came from, unless we do something now.
Soldiers must be given the right to walk away as Maj. Hassan tried to do so many times. If half the military quits, so be it. We'll rest assured knowing our truly volunteer force is getting twice the care and attention. But the first step in repairing trauma is curtailing the trauma, a luxury not afforded to our troops, many on their third and fourth tours. What better way to put needless war in check?
Next, we must provide health care professionals at any cost. We need a VA that is fully funded and staffed, like a defense contracting firm, oil company or bank. Six month waiting lists for mental health services are simply unacceptable when the number one killer of Soldiers is not combat but self.
Lastly, we must meaningfully grieve. We must grieve for our lost. Our lost in Fort Hood. Our lost in Iraq and Afghanistan, at home, those who are slipping away. We grieve for you, and we are sorry.
The orphans, the widows, the homeless, the hopeless. We grieve for your losses and will support you, we promise. The survivors and the truth-tellers, the veterans, the Winter Soldiers. May we one day be forgiven and in turn forgive ourselves. Happy Veteran's Day America.
- Posted in


22 Comments so far
Show All"May we one day be forgiven and in turn forgive ourselves."
the second may prove the more difficult.
good luck with that.
"Blood has been spilt, and the only solution we're given is more spilt blood." Right. And we are given a hundred million rationalizations for doing that.
"Our government is the potent, omnipresent teacher. For good or ill, it teaches the whole people by its example." (Louis Brandeis)
I think you have described the ongoing example. It seems to be mostly ill these days.
Thanks for your honesty, Matthis.
by now, EVERYONE knows Iraq and Afghanistan are wars based on the lies of Bush and Obama. To serve such men and such policies, then, makes our soldiers war criminals, which they don't deserve to be. I think we would all have praised soldiers who refused to fight for Hitler. Similarly....
We could not agree with you more..Always seems strange that people who refuse to die for a cause that is against humanity are put down and those who blindly carry on with the killing are called heroes. It seems clear that once the powers to be have you in there power and on the battle field your ability to quit is limited. You must fight or die. And of course you have to protect your buddies.. However after the "war" you are just as likely to sit down and have a beer with the person you were trying to kill in the "war" We see no difference in the tactics the Germans used in ww2 to the tactics that all countries use to use the humans that they can con into protecting the interest of the ruling class of that particular country.
We endorse the reinstatement of the usa military draft..When the rich kids are faced with the prospect of killing or being killed they will run for cover and this occupation will be over in a few months.
"We endorse the reinstatement of the usa military draft..When the rich kids are faced with the prospect of killing or being killed they will run for cover and this occupation will be over in a few months."
Ah, the royal we. Do you really (royally?) believe that with the reinstatement of a draft the rich kids would not be offered a way out? Please.
"We endorse the reinstatement of the usa military draft.."
do "we" also want to bring back slavery?
read that goddamned piece of paper: involuntary servitude is prohibited.
these fools who do volunteer have, in the end, only themselves to blame.
"We endorse the reinstatement of the usa military draft..When the rich kids are faced with the prospect of killing or being killed they will run for cover and this occupation will be over in a few months"
------------------
The only problem is that, even with a draft, the rich kids don't serve. Their daddys buy them out of that. Remember one Dan Quayle? How about one George W. Bush? The rich are always rich and the poor are always doing the dirty work for them. I have an 18-year old boy so NO! the draft is not an option and if they reinstate it, I'm getting the F*** out of here with him. I've already told him that. Of course, the other problem with that theory is that, this time around, they'll also be recruiting the women. So, females won't be spared as they were in the past.
False Flag Operation down there?
I am not convinced by this "official story" we have been hearing repeated endlessly in the media.....
Neither do I. It fits the current agenda too perfectly. The poor slob was as Curly of The 3 Stooges would say "a victim of soiconstance" - He happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time and when the shooting was over, they happened to spot his Muslim name and realized that they stroke gold. Compare that to the incident in May with John Russell, the guy that killed another 5 at a psychiatric facility in Iraq. That was hushed real fast and wasn't even a bleap in anybody's radar
bligh4
PDST BEFORE he ever went over there? Yelling "Allah Akbar" ?
Guy should have been discharged years ago.
"PTSD BEFORE he ever went over there? "
Pre-TSD.
Seriously.
Or he was pre-empting.
Take your pick.
PTSD, but of course he should have been discharged.
On the other hand, why not "Allah Akbar"?
After all, the main difference between Nidal Hassan killing American soldiers and some kid going to Afghanistan or Iraq to avenge 9/11 is that the American soldiers that Hassan shot were actually contributing in some way to violence.
One possible effect of listening to soldiers' stories of murder may have been the decision that he had to do what he could to prevent it.
I certainly congratulate Matthis Chiroux on having made what I find a more apt decision, but I have to wonder whether Hassan's actions did not constitute a tactical error, and a rather understandable one at that.
A very well written article by Mr. Chiroux. On TCM today there is a plethora of ultra patriotic movies on that channel while there is a very slim, if not a zero chance, that one will see any antiwar films on that station such as All Quiet On The Western Front or, God forbid, a film that would dare question the authority of the military such as the powerful Sir! No Sir! which one suspects may have been the inspiration for Matthis Chiroux. It would seem that a nation so obsessed with war as the United States is in little danger of honoring those soldiers such as Mattthis Chiroux and others who have had the courage and integrity to speak out against American militarism. As Pete Seeger inquired: When will they ever learn?
movie recommendation: Johnny Got His Gun
Ray Berthiaume
And did anyone see THE GOOD SOLDIER shown on the Jim Lehrer News Hour last Friday?
As a member of Veterans for Peace, I wholeheartedly endorse Matthis Chiroux's creative suggested remedy for reviving meaningful restraints upon the Pentagon war machine.
Congress should pass a simple statute, part of the existing Uniform Code of Military Justice, tailored to remedy the major injustices of our current all-volunteer force highlighted by the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Simply declare that no member of the US armed services can be court martialed, or otherwise punished in any way, for refusing to obey an order to deploy overseas into a combat zone unless Congress has first formally passed a declaration of war, as the United States Constitution plainly requires. Period.
Those that want to go can still go. Those that want to stay stateside, and make Uncle Sam abide by the mutual understandings and obligations of their National Guard, Reserve, and active duty enlistment contracts, can simply refuse to deploy and stay home. This is a simple, straightfoward piece of legislation that Congress could pass tomorrow if it wanted to - which would be a very fitting thing to do for Veterans' Day.
Then, just sit back. Let the soldiers vote with their feet on whether we should escalate or withdraw from Afghanistan, and end the military occupation of Iraq.
What could possibly be fairer?
Why shouldn't citizen soldiers be legally empowered to refuse to take part in a war that has not been declared in the manner that the Constitution clearly mandates?
Bill from Saginaw
Former member, American Servicemens Union
US Army infantry, 1968-1970
The militarism conundrum in a nation that is "of the people, by the people, for the people" and the caveats against a standing military (now further skewed by mercenary standing armies) changes the national mythology of serving one's country.
The service done by persons such as the author are essential in order for us to cease and desist from the national premise of blood sacrifice. Otherwise we see the fundamental human desire to do good is straightjacketed by lies, coersion and greed.
The struggle for a legitimate people is conceptual not sacrificial. It is process and journey that each of us undertakes in that 'quaint' concept of solidarity. We all die, but how that comes to pass is the legacy of one's life. We are the ancestors of the future and the profile has become a pantheon of negation that exceeds any 'civilization' in history. We are introducing this experientially and exponentially by the model of economic militaristic industrial hegemony.
Can it actually be said that the US is a "member" of the international community when we defy treaties to which we are signatory and actively thwart the continued development of international bodies for human rights?
"Can it actually be said that the US is a 'member' of the international community ...?"
perhaps in the sense that a penis is a "member".
President Barack Obama went to visit soldiers at Fort Lewis, Wa. which is the largest army base on the west coast. While there, Obama stopped at the locker of Michael Kerns, a member of the Iraq Veterans Against the War. Kerns told Obama that he had a letter which expressed six concerns from the IVAW, such as making sure the same soldiers do not receive multiple deployments and that people who have mental health problems should not get sent overseas to a combat zone. Obama did not take the missive [the Secret Service relieved the letter from Kern], nor did he speak to Kern, but instead went on to speak to the next soldier. The hope is that if Obama has any semblance of an open mind [which, admittedly, seems rather doubtful] he will not only keep in mind what the letter said but also take the advice offered from the IVAW.
http://ivaw.org/membersspeak/letter-ivaw-president-obama
It is frustrating and puzzling why Common Dreams does not allow, for whatever reason, commenters to view links that are posted on the site.
"Eight years we've been at war now. The youngest victim of Hassan's murderous rampage was but 11 when the towers fell. For years, Maj. Hassan listened to the horrors of the occupations which resulted, and it made him crazy, as it made me crazy. Then they told him it was his turn to go, as they told me it was my turn."
-----------------------------------
I take great offense at this. You don't know what happened there and neither do we. Only a few chosen ones know the truth and they'll never speak. So, please, spare us our intelligence and dignity and don't assume that we believe all the bullcrap we're fed by the corporate media and the government shills.
Remember, Hasan is a psychiatrist; therefore, ALL psychiatrists are potential mass murderers.
"Eight years we've been at war now. The youngest victim of Hassan's murderous rampage was but 11 when the towers fell."
Ummm... WHAT? I've got two words for you soldier... building seven.