The Woman Greenspan, Rubin & Summers Silenced
"Break the Glass" was the code-name high-level Treasury Department figures gave the $700 billion bailout; it was to be used only as a last- resort measure.
Now millions have been sprayed and damaged by broken glass.
But more than a decade ago, a woman you're likely never to have heard of, Brooksley Born, head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission-- a federal agency that regulates options and futures trading--was the oracle whose warnings about the dangerous boom in derivatives trading just might have averted the calamitous bust now engulfing the US and global markets. Instead she was met with scorn, condescension and outright anger by former Federal Reserve Chair Alan Greenspan, former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin and his deputy Lawrence Summers. In fact, Greenspan, the man some affectionately called "The Oracle," spent his political capital cheerleading these disastrous financial instruments.
On Thursday, the New York Times ran a masterful and revealing front page article exposing the culpability of Greenspan, Rubin and Summers for the era of dangerous turbulence we live in.
What these "three marketeers" --as they were called in a 1999 Time magazine cover story--were adept at was peddling the timebombs at the heart of this complex crisis: exotic and opaque financial instruments known as derivatives--contracts intended to hedge against risk and whose values are derived from underlying assets. To cut to the quick, Greenspan, Rubin and Summers opposed regulating them. "Proposals to bring even minimalist regulation were basically rebuffed by Greenspan and various people in the Treasury," recalls Alan Blinder, a former Federal Reserve board member and economist at Princeton University, in the Times article.
In 1997, Brooksley Born warned in congressional testimony that unregulated trading in derivatives could "threaten our regulated markets or, indeed, our economy without any federal agency knowing about it." Born called for greater transparency--disclosure of trades and reserves as a buffer against losses.
Instead of heeding this oracle's warnings, Greenspan, Rubin & Summers rushed to silence her. As the Times story reveals, Born's wise warnings "incited fierce opposition" from Greenspan and Rubin who "concluded that merely discussing new rules threatened the derivatives market." Greenspan deployed condescension and told Born she didn't know what she doing and she'd cause a financial crisis. (A senior Commission director who worked with Born suggests that Greenspan and the guys didn't like her independence. " Brooksley was this woman who was not playing tennis with these guys and not having lunch with these guys. There was a little bit of the feeling that this woman was not of Wall Street.")
In early 1998, according to the Times story, one of the guys, Larry Summers, called Born to "chastise her for taking steps he said would lead to a financial crisis. But Born kept at it, unwilling to let arrogant men undermine her good judgment. But it got tougher out there. In June 1998, Greenspan, Rubin and the then head of the SEC, Arthur Levitt, Jr., called on Congress "to prevent Ms. Born from acting until more senior regulators developed their own recommendations." (Levitt now says he regrets that decision.) Months later, the huge hedge fund Long Term Capital Management nearly collapsed--confirming some of Born's warnings. (Bets on derivatives were a key reason.)
"Despite that event," the Times reports, " Congress (apparently as a result of Greenspan & Summer's urging, influence-peddling and pressure) "froze" Born's Commissions' regulatory authority. The next year, Born left as head of the Commission.Born did not talk to the Times for their article.
What emerges is a story of reckless, willful and arrogant action and behaviour designed to undermine a wise woman's good judgment. The three marketeers' disdain for modest regulation of new and risky financial instruments reveals a faith-based fundamentalist approach to the management of markets and risk. If there is any accountability left in our system, Greenspan, Rubin and Summers should not be telling anyone how to run anything. Instead, Barack Obama might do well to bring back Brooksley Born and promote to his team economists who haven't contributed to the ugly mess we're in.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
13 Comments so far
Show AllDisbelieving and marginalizing smart and truthful women has a long history. Even the ancient Greeks recognized it in the story of Cassandra.
Those arrogant men who know little, send us to war and steal from us... don't let them get away with it because somewhere deep down we believe in testiculating Caucasian be-suited authority.
Joe
Not a whole lot of comment here, is there? Where are all the Obama folks? Saint-Just was brave to attempt a defense, but s/he needs a little help here, or do you folks realize that there really isn't any?
Nannie, I miss you! This is a GREAT place to post for Nader - as about the only guy on the scene who would, and will, put the breaks/brakes on the Rubin/Gramm/Greenspan freight train to oblivion.
I am really curious as to how the leaders of other countries are going to react to W's 'come together to solve the world financial meltdown.' HMMMM. Seem like Colin Powell said of the Iraq war "You break it, you bought it." Could be the same with W's economy, except that he broke it and we bought it.
Well, Lawrence Summers was the one who belittled women's innate scientific aptitude when he was the President of Harvard, right? Not surprised, then, that he would be so dismissive of this woman.
Empty Gitmo to make room for these louts. Greenspan first. Tally ho!!
Greenspan the "Oracle" is being discredited! Whoever thought we'd see these days? Now is the time for people to push for the long due reform. Read Noam Chomsky's article on this crisis. Nothing will be handed to us, as he says, but now some change is more possible.
Don't forget Bunnantine (Bunny) Greenhouse and Sibel Edmonds, also honorable women of probity and integrity who were steamrollered into oblivion by the Establishment.
Another 'Silkwood?'
Prophets and whistleblowers always suffer at the hands of the rich and powerful.
Rubin had been joined at the hip with Obama until the bottom fell out. Change that we can't believe in, my friends. McCain is insane. Obama is in collusion.
FINALLY! An article that directly implicates ole' Goldman Sachs, Citibank stooge Rubin in this mess! I am a bit surprised that it is coming from the Nation and vanden Heuvel, no less, one of Obama's PR core, but hey, I'll take what we can get.
Rubin has been rather scarce on the public scene, lately, hasn't he? Wonder why? As someone who helped architect our current deregulated financial climate, you'd think the press would be clamoring to nail him down, wouldn't you? Did Obama put him on a slow boat to China? Isn't it interesting that Obama is no longer mentioning having Rubin on his team? Is he "out" because Citi and Goldman can't inject more big bucks into his campaign right now? Or will he resurface after the election when it's "safe" to come out?
Why was Rubin an Obama man instead of a Hillary man? Was it because he knew that Obama was more Clintonian than Hillary? Was it because he knew he had the best chance of furthering Citi's and Goldman's fortunes with Obama? Obama's campaign coffers certainly reflected their fondness for him ...
Don't get me wrong, McCain and the Reps., Gramm, Paulson, et al, are certainly equally guilty. But up to now, relatively little has been said about the Obama/Rubin (?Friedman) school of Dems. It really needs to sink in with people that BOTH "major" party candidates are up to their hemorrhoids in this mess and, behind all the furious public finger pointing they are doing for our benefit, when the election is over, they will crawl back in Wall Street's bed together again, making up for this "lover's quarrel".
Stay tuned .....
What if Obama responds to the challenge & does bring in Booksley Born & others?
Too many readers & activists are willing to project Bill Clinton's way of decision-making with Obama's. Clinton's method was the Steinbrenner method -- get the biggest star & let him do what he wants to do in order to boost his own status. Obama's is different; the presence of some of the same advisors does not mean the same policy will result.
Saint-Just,
If you are holding your breath waiting for him to do so, I send my sympathies to your loved ones.
Booksly Born has been available, I doubt that her calender was too full to fit him in, why didn't Obama bring her in from the beginning? He had a choice between two opposing viewpoints and he chose Rubin's. What else can you say? Until he openly renounces Rubinomics, I'm afraid we are in for more of the same.
And don't forget that it was personal urging from Obama that convinced about a dozen Dems to switch their vote from NO on the bailout on Mon. to YES on Fri. - about the same margin it needed to pass. He actively promoted the bailout - it is now his as much as it is Bush's and McCain's.
Perhaps it is time for the Nation to write another of those "Please, Please, Mr. Obama" letters - in which they swear undying fealty even as they plead with him to do the "right thing". We can see how well the last one worked. Actually, I suppose, he is doing the Right thing, now that I come to think of it.
There are plenty of good men and women Greenspan, Rubin, and Summers silenced.