Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Paints False Picture of Afghan War: US Army Officer
“I’m going to get nuked”
A US Army officer has accused the American military of painting a misleading picture of progress in the war in Afghanistan while glossing over the Kabul government's many failings.
US soldiers stand guard at the site of a suicide attack near the gate of Kandahar's international airport in January 2012. (AFP Photo/Jangir) Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis broke ranks with the official portrayal of the war after spending a year in the country, issuing a grim assessment and accusing his superiors of covering up the harsh realities that plague the mission.
"When it comes to deciding what matters are worth plunging our nation into war and which are not, our senior leaders owe it to the nation and to the uniformed members to be candid — graphically, if necessary — in telling them what’s at stake and how expensive potential success is likely to be. U.S. citizens and their elected representatives can decide if the risk to blood and treasure is worth it."
"Likewise when having to decide whether to continue a war, alter its aims or to close off a campaign that cannot be won at an acceptable price, our senior leaders have an obligation to tell Congress and American people the unvarnished truth and let the people decide what course of action to choose. That is the very essence of civilian control of the military. The American people deserve better than what they’ve gotten from their senior uniformed leaders over the last number of years. Simply telling the truth would be a good start."
* * *
Agence France-Presse reports:
"What I saw bore no resemblance to rosy official statements by US military leaders about conditions on the ground," Davis wrote in an article published in Armed Forces Journal, a private newspaper not affiliated with the Pentagon.
Damning report: Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis said he 'witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level'"Instead, I witnessed the absence of success on virtually every level," he wrote under the headline, "Truth, Lies And Afghanistan: How military leaders have let us down."
Local Afghan government officials are failing to serve the Afghan population and their security forces are reluctant to fight insurgents or are colluding with the Taliban, he wrote.
"How many more men must die in support of a mission that is not succeeding and behind an array of more than seven years of optimistic statements by US senior leaders in Afghanistan?" he said in his article.
Davis has also reportedly shared his pessimistic view with some members of Congress and written a classified version of his article for the Defense Department, a highly unusual move that he expects will anger his commanders and short-circuit his professional career.
* * *
From the New York Times report:
“We are a values-based organization, and the integrity of what we publish and what we say is something we take very seriously”
- Col. James E. Hutton, chief of media relations for the Army[...] “I’m going to get nuked,” he said in an interview last month.
But his bosses’ initial response has been restrained. They told him that while they disagreed with him, he would not face “adverse action,” he said.
Col. James E. Hutton, chief of media relations for the Army, declined to comment specifically about Colonel Davis, but he rejected the idea that military leaders had been anything but truthful about Afghanistan.
“We are a values-based organization, and the integrity of what we publish and what we say is something we take very seriously,” he said.
* * *
From the full article by Lt Colonel Davis in the Armed Forces Journal:
Truth, Lies and Afghanistan
[...] How many more men must die in support of a mission that is not succeeding and behind an array of more than seven years of optimistic statements by U.S. senior leaders in Afghanistan? No one expects our leaders to always have a successful plan. But we do expect — and the men who do the living, fighting and dying deserve — to have our leaders tell us the truth about what’s going on. [...]
# # #

94 Comments so far
Show Allgardenernorcal:
I used to think that way also, but the economic disaster has changed my mind to some extent.
It is certainly true that some people join the military because they are blood thirsty sociopaths who have found a way to legally carry out their dreams of killing other human beings.
But I think the majority are young people who are graduating high school, college, and graduate school into a very bleak future.
I don't know how old you are, but hopefully you are old enough and settled enough financially where you would never have to think about giving your body over to the US Government to fight oil wars for the Empire.
When you can't find a job, and you are struggling, and you have 80,000 in student loans to pay off (will will probably amount to over half a million or more in 40 years), and bills to pay without the money to pay them, $50,000 in student loan forgiveness and a steady paycheck can be very tempting. Not tempting enough, in my book, but who knows if things get bad enough?
I am fairly well-versed in American foreign policy, so I know the many immoral acts committed and lies told by the Government, the Military as an institution, as well as individual soldiers who have the "shoot first, ask questions later" mentality.
But that well-established fact certainly does not mean that everyone in the military shares those values, and unfortunately the military is one of the few employers in this country that is still hiring.
I think that what this Officer has done is very brave. He has almost certainly closed off any future in the US Military as a high-ranking Officer.
I also think that, in general, Officers have a higher level of education than other military personnel, so it makes sense that they probably are more likely to question the government's policies.
I am sure there are many service men and women who share this man's thoughts, but who will not say so publicly for fear that they will harm their future employment prospects.
I just read the linked report in Armed Forces Journal.
Best of luck Daniel Davis - I believe you are doing the right thing.
Manysummits ======The first casualty of war is the truth; the journey of a thousand miles starts with where your feet are; etc... these and other admonitions to attention like them that speak to the human condition are not empty rhetoric or platitude. They represent cumulative experience that is vacated in the reasoning system/economic modeling that manipulates the idea of 'diplomacy' into hegemonic tool/weapon.
Conscientious Objection is codified in the Universal Code of Military Justice and is made particularly challenging for those soldiers experiencing the impact of conscience in the course of service, particularly in combat situations where conscience is critically impacted.
People can pass judgment on people who enlist, but do so at their own peril because we are in a nation of profound creeping militarization for profit and need to be aware that this is being conflated with civilian law, values, dynamics and resoning through the 'war on terror'.
Perhaps someone has a better resource - but here is a starter just to have awareness of long standing judicially recognized precedent : http://nlgmltf.org/leaflets/GI_Rights_free_speech.html
One of the most salient quotes I have ever read is the 1919 statement by then Supreme Court Justice Harlan Fiske Stone: "both morals and sound policy require that the state should not violate the conscience of the individual. All our history gives confirmation to the view that liberty of conscience has a moral and social value which makes it worthy of preservation at the hands of the state. So deep in its significance and vital, indeed, is it to the integrity of man's moral and spiritual nature that nothing short of the self-preservation of the state should warrant its violation; and it may well be questioned whether the state which preserves its life by a settled policy of violation of the conscience of the individual will not in fact ultimately lose it by the process."
Thanks for the find.
Compare that to the scene in the searing documentary Sir! No Sir! when the male nurse points out that of all those soldiers who were in his care and who were unable to lift a spoon to their mouths to eat and who were unable to go to the bathroom by themselves, that not one of them ever said that what they had suffered and endured in Vietnam was worth it. It appears that today's generation, unlike the one that came of age during the 1960s, is quite loath to do that which the military and the government most fears and that would be to Question Authority.
This headline is about as revelatory as: "Water is Wet" or "Food Cures Starvation".
Anybody notice that the US has about 50,000 combat troops staged and ready to deploy in Kuwait? Aboard the USS Enterprise task force in the Med and its other support ships are about 6,000 marines ready for an invasion they have been practicing with other NATO coalition forces for the past year. On the Yemani island of Socotra is yet another 50,000 troops on alert. Also, along with the four carrier task foces in the Gulf and the Med and the various air bases ringing Iran and Syria. They are conducting "Operation Bold Alligator".
Anybody still think there won't be a US/Israeli war aginst Iran and Syria within the next 30 days? Richard Nixon won the presidency in 1969 on the promise that he would "get us out of Vietnam" and the next year he invaded Cambodia. Barack Obama won the election in 2008 pledging to get the US out of Iraq and...It's the same sort of excrement coming from a different anal orifice. Watch as he wins the 2012 election.
If your troop level stationing stats are correct, without even counting the Navy heads on the aircraft carrier battle groups in the Persian Gulf neighborhood there are nearly triple the number of US ground troops deployed in the region than there are American forces stationed in South Korea. Taking a stab at the Navy head count, we are close to seeing combat ready active duty troop levels in the Kuwait/Syria/Iran/Yemen/Horn of Africa similar to those in southeast Asia at the height of the Vietnam War. And we're not even taking into account the shadowy private contract mercenaries nor the CIA's drone warriors and paramilitary spooks.
As for your ominous prediction that by March we will see "a US/Israeli war against Iran and Syria", I hope and pray such an insane catastrophe can be averted. The more honest military officers, intelligence officials, and others familiar with the true situation who speak out now, the better. What you (and many other knowledgeable observers) fear is on the immediate horizon is nothing but the Bushie neocons' apocalyptic wet dream for the Middle East come true.
If it's any consolation, if such a cataclysm does hit, and the price of gas inevitably skyrockets while the domestic economy convulses, the casualties mount over there, and the body bags stream back into Dover over here, I do not think we will watch the current Commander-in-Chief win reelection in the fall of 2012. Although it was certainly one tough act to follow, Barack the Nobel Peace Prize laureate would leave the White House more reviled than even Little George and Deadeye Dick.
Blowback comes around, and bloody chickens fly home to roost, in lots of different ways.
Bill from Saginaw
US still using crayons dipped in blood.
We are engaged in a war on terror, we are fighting insurgency, so all of the above have a target on their back and on their chest. Our boys get some target practice.
If the situation were reversed, We the People would be praising and supporting our Freedom Fighters.
I don't think Colonel Davis will suffer, because as a Lt. Colonel, he almost for sure have a vested pension plan and because he used to work for Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson, who probably will have his back. Tons of military officers make their homes in Texas (one of my own relatives is a retired full colonel from the air force down there). Tons of non-general staff officers feel the same as Colonel Davis.
Sure, he will never make general, but that probably wouldn't have happened anyway because he served as a reserve for many years. He might make full colonel, because the publicity will make it hard for the military to punish him.
He won't get one of the lucrative TV military expert slots either. But he won't get shot through the forehead like tons of innocent Afghans, or through the back of the head like the 7 teenagers around Christmas 2009.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24290.htm
Why is it that some times my html links work (like now), but most times they don't?
Unfortunately, Poet (Feb 7 2012 - 11:13am) is right.
What else is new? The US military lies to get into wars and then, when the US is economically and militarily exhausted, to get out of them.
It's called the pathology of thinking of oneself as the Greatest Country in the World (instead of one decent nation among others that is respectful of others).
"Misleading"??? - Try "TOTALLY FALSE"!
Read Patrick Cockburn's excellent article "How the war was lost" of Feb. 6 on the subject:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/02/06/how-the-war-was-lost/
We spend about $50 billion a year on the Department of Education.
Many good comments here. Especially zero G who points out "If only "we" could find a legitimate Afghan leader? Wouldn't the very fact that "we" found such deny the very legitimacy sought after? "
" How many more men must die ". Lieutenant Colonel Daniel Davis: That is a no brainer and a very easy answer for any informed citizen: AS MANY AS IT TAKES TO KEEP THE EMPIRE IN POWER!
That too many people have died?"
_____________________
Like the gift that keeps on giving, in the Amerikan Imperium this is the question that keeps on asking.
Oil in particular makes necessary the world-bestriding imperial military that the US possesses.
Has anyone ridden their bicycle to work today?
Get real, and lose the supercilious attitude.
I view the US lifestyle as a contributor to our dilemmas. Is that far-fetched? Not in this writer's view. Our absurd attachment to oil has consequences. Only Saudi Arabia consumes more per capita-- mostly because of desalination plants. Why is it that European countries can exist comfortably on much less oil? And don't tell me it's because they are smaller. The US has never addressed the problem of its suburbanized sprawling lifestyle.
And you ask a pertinent question. How many people could ride a bike to work, indeed? To come to grip with the facts can be useful, can it not?
"Less than one-third of working Americans commute five miles or less one-way." http://www.bikesbelong.org/resources/stats-and-research/statistics/parti...
That is far from a majority, but it is considerably more than .1 percent. And while all of us cannot commute via bicycle, any move to ending oil addiction is a positive.
"About 50% of New York City's workforce lives within bicycling distance of work". http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/transportation/bike_share_part1.pdf
The average bicycle commute is 7.5 miles each way and takes 30.7 minutes.
Europeans bicycle an average of 188 km per year; United States residents bike only 40 km a year.
http://www.bikesbelong.org/resources/stats-and-research/statistics/parti... I hope you were not hurt by my earlier reply-- I try not to pick fights in this forum, or any other one. Nor did I intend to project arrogance. I merely agreed with the points you made, albeit with an over-the-top enthusiasm. These exchanges are a place to test our ideas, and a reasonable give-and-take is a part of the process. Or so I think.
No, it's not a bad start. And it sends a message. A lot of people stopped smoking because a growing number of "holier than thou" folks made them feel like pariahs. I was one of them - the pariahs, that is. It was for our own good! And I suspect you do more than just ride your bike. You eat local foods, you eschew high end bathrooms and homes you can get lost in, you probably don't have cable tv, you keep your hot water heater set low, you avoid overly packaged food. You're an example of someone who cares enough for our environment to get up early just so you can ride your bike to work. I admire that. But I don't think it will keep the empire from it's wars for power and resources. What it will do is make you smarter and healthier (all that exercise!).