EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- NSA Whistleblower Revealed: Q&A with Edward Snowden
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- 'Reprehensible, Reckless, Illegal': Washington Officials Slam Heroic NSA Surveillance Leaker
Popular content
Today's Top News
Relatives Sue Banana Firm Over Killings in Colombia
Families of victims in Colombia’s civil war are suing the biggest banana importer in the United States for its role in funding illegal armed groups in the country’s conflict.
Relatives of 931 people killed by left-wing guerrillas and right-wing paramilitaries want compensation after Chiquita Brands admitted paying the groups at various times during the conflict to protect its banana plantations in the Caribbean Urabá region.
One of the filings made with a US federal court in Washington DC on Tuesday relates to 254 murders by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or Farc.
Chiquita paid the guerrilla movement between 1987 and 1999 to defend its plantations from attack by a rival guerrilla force, the Popular Liberation Army.
The second filing concerns 677 victims of the right-wing United Self-Defence Forces of Colombia (AUC), which received money from Chiquita after the militia took control of the area where the company’s plantations were located.
In the 1990s Colombia was wracked by violence as Marxist guerrillas battled the AUC and the country’s military in a war marked by massacres and other atrocities, where most of the victims were civilians caught in the crossfire.
These latest filings bring to over 4,000 deaths in Colombia for which Chiquita is being sued for civil damages by families of victims. The civil cases follow Chiquita’s admission in 2007 that it paid $1.7 million (€1.2 million) to the AUC between 1997 and 2004 and acknowledged previous payments to other groups.
That admission followed a secret investigation by the US justice department into violations of US counter-terrorism laws. The company, which was then represented by current US attorney general Eric Holder, was fined $25 million to be paid over four five years. Chiquita sold its Colombian subsidiary in 2004. Its revenues in 2009 totalled $3.47 billion.
“They just considered these payments part of the business of growing bananas. Chiquita had a policy of paying whoever it was they had to pay off and to this day still consider themselves the victims in all this,” says Paul Wolf, the human rights lawyer representing many of the families.
Mr Wolf says Chiquita’s involvement with the AUC went beyond paying them to protect its plantations and included granting the group access to Chiquita facilities for the illegal shipment of thousands of weapons into the country.
In a 2009 interview with Al Jazeera, the former commander of the AUC’s “banana bloc” admitted murdering 70 union members in 1995 alone. “One of my tasks was to make people work and to avoid strikes against the bosses. There were so many murders already in the area, they wanted to bring the banana region under their control,” said Ever Veloza.
Chiquita was originally called the United Fruit Company and has a long record of human rights abuses in Latin America. In 1954 it successfully lobbied for the overthrow of the democratically elected president of Guatemala after he pledged to nationalise the company’s plantations in the country. A massacre of striking United Fruit Workers in Colombia in 1928 forms the climax of Gabriel García Márquez’s masterpiece One Hundred Years of Solitude.
Despite having pleaded guilty to the criminal charges made against it by the US justice department, Chiquita is fighting the Colombian families’ claims.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...




12 Comments so far
Show All"The company, which was then represented by current US attorney general Eric Holder,.."
It's still 1954, if you know what I mean and I think you do. Only the names have changed.
Isn't this George H.W.Bush's old United Fruit company?
What about the overthrow of the Honduras democracy?
you know it. :-)
Repeat: "The company, which was then represented by current US attorney general Eric Holder,.."
FACR is listed as a terrorist group by the U.S. government. If Chiquita gave money to FARC, then Chiquita has committed a felony act of supporting terrorism, requiring the U.S. government act immediately to encumber ALL their bank accounts and other funds. But, with a fascist government in office for the past 40 years, that's not going to happen. They will go after only the little guy who can't buy the Congress off their backs. Shame on Obama.
And you wonder why the peoples of the world refer to Yanks as the ugly Americans?
All this glaring truth, lies, murderous acts....and STILL there's an abundance of murdering swine to answer the call to further this behavior for the United States of Israel. God.....DAMN America!
"They" won't be happy till they ruin the whole place. Then, it will last a lil' bit, the "high" they get from this type of activity, then they'll fight amoungst themselfs, for eachothers , then the last guy standing with all the toys wins! Only then will he think that it wasn't such a good idea after all, too late, games over.
The past is prologue in the case of Chiquita Banana/United Fruit Company. It should be added to the historical note by the author at the end of this article that Guatemala President Arbenz's buy back of land owned by United Fruit was at the price that United Fruit said the lands were worth - for tax purposes.
So, the United Fruit Company engaged in tax fraud, as well as murder in 1954. The company got backing for the bloody coup at the highest levels of the U.S. government at the time.
Today, I suppose it's arguable that Eric Holder aided a terrorist organization in providing legal help to Chiquita Banana. After all, the Bushies put attorney Lynne Stewart in jail for transferring a flier from Sheik Abdel-Rahman. He was just accused of conspiracy, whereas Chiquita funded people who murdered Colombian citizens, as well as union members.
In any case, Holder should at least recuse himself in his prosecution of U.S. activists accused of communicating with Colombian rebels since Holder's past legal representation makes him a partisan with right-wing Colombian death squads.
Chiquita represents a clear example of why there must be a death penalty for corporations. They are chartered by the state and should be just as easily dissolved. If the people ever regain power in this joke of a republic, this legal principle should be enshrined in our founding principles. Technically, those powers still exist in the United States, although unused.
"Chiquita represents a clear example of why there must be a death penalty for corporations."
That's BRILLIENT! Now that US corporations are people I wonder if they can be prosecuted for what they are doing to US & international citizens as indicated in the documentary "Gasland" and other atrocities too numerous to mention here. If corporations are killing humans with their poison and willful disregard for safety why not a charge of murder one? What would the death penalty mean under those circumstance. I wonder if anyone in the US has the balls to pursue this. Probably not... that would imply consistency.
Read William Blum's book "Killing Hope" to see the activities of not only the CIA, but those of such corporations as United Fruit/Chiquita, under both democratic and republican administrations. Why anyone would ask "why do they hate us?"