EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Photos a Leveller for Maids and Their Employers
SANTIAGO - Fifty pairs of women -- maids and their employers -- from Argentina, Chile and Colombia abandoned their daily routines to pose for photographs for a project about the hierarchical relationship that unites them.
The photography exhibit "Lugar Común" (Common Place), by French-U.S. photographer Justine Graham and Colombian visual artist Ruby Rumié, opened Jun. 15 at the Museum of Visual Arts (MAVI) in the Chilean capital.
"We were both interested in the issue of domestic employment in the Latin American context, and over time we created this platform to show the points that these women have in common as they share the domestic environment in a hierarchical work relationship," said Graham, who like Rumié has lived many years in Chile.
The artists used a variety of poses to portray each of the employer-employee pairs: seated, standing, facing forward, facing each other, or facing backwards. They found the women for the project through family members and friends in Santiago and Buenos Aires, and Bogotá and Cartagena in Colombia.
For the photos the employers and maids wore the same thing: a white shirt and no jewelery or decoration. With the images made under these "equalizing" conditions, the artists leave it up to the viewer to guess -- using one's own cultural codes -- which woman is which.
In total, 100 Argentine, Chilean and Colombian women, between ages 19 and 95, posed for Graham and Rumié and answered 15 items on a questionnaire, including the number of children they have, their wishes and fears, the age of their first menstruation and when they lost their virginity.
The exposition at the MAVI runs until Aug. 8. It has two walls with the photographs of the pairs portrayed facing forward and backwards, and three videos that show how the project unfolded in 2008 and 2009.
One of the videos shows the women posing in the photo sessions, and another shows some of the participants invited to a luncheon served by women university students.
The third uses graphics that group the women according to the characteristics they share, for example, those who have two children, those who fear being alone, and those who have lost a loved one.
"Each pair had a different relationship; some were much closer, lasting 30 years or more, and others knew each other just three or four months," said Graham. But for all of the pairs, it was difficult to be photographed looking each other in the eyes, she said.
In Rumié's view, "in some way, all Latin Americans who have experienced this (being cared for by a domestic employee) feel a debt to these women who have turned over part of their lives to the intimate chores of another family, often even giving up their own personal lives."
The reality of the domestic employees who work "behind closed doors" in Chile was brilliantly portrayed in the 2009 film "La Nana" (The Maid), directed by Sebastián Silva and starring Catalina Saavedra. The film won several awards at U.S. festivals.
In Latin America, paid domestic employment is mostly carried out by women. The "nanas" -- as they are known in Chile -- total 14 million and represent 14 percent of all working women in the region.
In recent years, several Latin American countries -- Chile, Guatemala, Paraguay and Uruguay -- have established policies that improve working conditions for maids and nannies. But in general, this type of job lags behind other forms of work.
While some places domestic service is increasingly professionalized, there are still cases of near slavery and child labor, experts warn.
During the project, Rumié found that "fortunately there has been a change" in labor relations within the household in recent years, with greater respect for maids, who in turn are less submissive.
But more than highlighting the negatives and lack of job security that these women face, what interested the artists was to show how society tends to "stratify a person" based only on appearance, said Rumié.
"We are completely guided by our prejudices," she said, and in the case of domestic employment, many of those ideas are holdovers from the Spanish colonial era.
"This project is not only a visual staging, but also an initiative that provided a symbolic experience for the women," she added.
"The act of seating them facing the camera in the same position was an exercise in dignifying the two women, so that they would look at the camera with the same pride, with the same openness."
In November, some of the photographs were published in the magazine "Paula," of La Tercera newspaper. The show is slated for exhibition in Washington in July 2011.
To pursue these issues further, the MAVI held a colloquium titled "Employee- Employer" Jun. 17, with the participation of the two artists, former minister of the Chilean National Women's Service Carmen Andrade, psychiatrist Luz María Gómez and historian Alejandra Araya.
For those of us who can't make it to the photo exhibition in Chile's Museum of Visual Arts, -- this PDF has many of the photos and some commentary (in Spanish).
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

21 Comments so far
Show AllRay Berthiaume
Unexpectedly I was very moved by this project. I think it touches on a basic prejudice we seldom acknowledge. When I have done serious manual labor and we all sit around after it has been done, I have always felt a warm kinship with those around me. Sweating people are truly family.
"Unexpectedly I was very moved by this project."
I was, too.
It's not only our prejudices that we bring to this exhibition. We have the knowledge of the social stratification based on class and ethnicity to assist us. For the pictures shown, the whiter, the less tired, the expensive haircut, the straighter, less burdened-looking pose is much more likely to be the employer than employee. It is an interesting work of art and it shows the common humanity of both.
it shows the common humanity of both.
---------------------------------------
And the power of money and privilege to create differences not found in nature...which are then used to back-justify the money and privilege.
Exactly! Sometimes, things really are this simple.
It has always fascinated me how economic class translates so clearly into facial features - regardless of ethnicity or race. While the darker native-American features may be reasonably reliable in South America, it is the tiredness, the lines, and that certain, well, "poor" appearance that most reliably distinguishes domestic worker.
Now, if only Michael Albert had his Parecon fans can come up with a more slogan-worthy-term term for the solution than "balanced job complexes". I simply can't imagine workers in the streets shouting: "We demand balanced job complexes now!"
Agreed. At the end of the day, we are all just people. Our differences are only environmental - not biological. No need to be defensive; there is no name calling going on here. I had some physical disabilities and needed some assistance with house cleaning so I hired a woman from Brazil. She is thoughtful and kind and respectful and I think she would say that I am the same way to her. She has cried in my arms and I have cried in hers. We have laughed together. She has fixed my mistakes and I have fixed hers. I pay her for extra work and at times we both choose to be flexible in our schedules or not. As my health has improved, I have chosen to keep her on as my employee. I do feel an obiligation to her although I'm sure that she would survive just fine without me. Although my life would be harder without her, I would adjust as well. If both our lives are improved by our relationship, then it is a good thing. Yes? I realize that our roles could have easily been reversed based on where and when we were born. Everyone deserves respect and kindness.
It would be interesting to engage a similar artistic exercise between the directors of the financial world and the millions of people displaced by extractive and exclusionary development enterprises. Those who see to the machiavelian maintenance of the profit margin through political and information manipulation and those who are sacrificed by being marginalized.
Let any of us in the same room with those Emeffers and we will not be sitting quietly next to them...probably have to clean some blood and spittle off the camera lens before any photography could be done
very interesting... thanks to Common Dreams for getting the word out about this exhibit.
I've always refused to occupy willingly a position above or below anyone in any class hierarchy. I scrub my own toilet. I recommend anyone/everyone who shares this position to take full credit for it. Don't let the liberals bury you in their noise.
Now put 50 married couples together in white T shirts and try to guess who does the housework
I guess this project is intended to highlight the common humanity that exists between those who can afford a maid and those who must do the work of a maid. Am I to believe that those who can afford a maid are somehow less human because of their position in life? Being able to afford a maid doesn’t necessarily imply less humanity. Some of the wealthier people are too busy doing other types of work just as important to a functioning society and have the intellectual capacity or in many cases, dumb luck, to perform on a different level. That doesn’t make them better, but it certainly doesn’t make them worse either. They employ others who need a job and are not qualified to do jobs other than those that require manual labor. Contrary to popular belief, all people were not created equal.
"Am I to believe that those who can afford a maid are somehow less human because of their position in life?"
Is *that* what you got out of this?
Yea, that’s pretty much it. Perhaps you could enlighten me to the deeper philosophical meaning that I evidently missed. Thanks in advance for educating my intellectually inferior reading comprehension and interpretation skills.
It's more of a case of looking at something with rigid preconceived notions.
Are you honestly saying to me that a photographic exhibit the purpose of which is to show the common humanity of people regardless of social position, says to you "that those who can afford a maid are somehow less human because of their position in life"?
Sorry, that's just mind-boggling.
It’s amusing to see you use my own words to describe your position, misrepresent mine, and make some sort of desperate attempt to slander me. Perhaps that’s why I just don’t seem to appreciate this photography exhibit as much as you. I don’t harbor any “rigid preconceived notions” as you seem to infer. Also, it’s just wrong for you to use a partial quote from a question I asked and accuse me of believing something that has the exact opposite meaning of my question and my beliefs.
Here I was hoping for some deep philosophical insight from a more thoughtful person. As shallow as the photo exhibit was (in my opinion), your attack on my credibility is an even greater disappointment as I witness your inability to even comprehend any of my words and thoughts, let alone argue against me at a rational level. Please forgive me if it’s inappropriate to apologize for blowing your mind, but I really am sorry and didn’t intend to do that.
You're exhibiting a great deal of emotion for someone who believes this exhibit to be shallow. Perhaps you need to examine why you feel so challenged by others who do not share your opinion. I think you're defensive posturing is the best justification for such an exhibit. You've been caught pondering by the artist.
Thanks for the strange reply. As I did actually use your own words in stating your position and, in fact, asked you if I was correct in my assumption that it is what you really thought about the exhibit, and you replied that I was correct and now you say that I wasn't...well, this is getting deeper into never-never land. Not a great basis for a philosophical discussion.
I'm on to other things...
I can easily see which one is which,I'm looking forward to seeing all of the photo's to see if I can guess each one ! I bet I can :) The difference between the haves and have nots is only now in the flesh.. in the end we are all the same, the only thing that matters is that you lead your life with kindness, and dignity.
interesting project,
background - I have about 12 staff (give or take) mostly in the summer and down to about 4 in the winter. I always pay my bills and I pay staff what they ask for. I have pretty well only let go people who have upset other staff and I have what seems to be a very good name around. Perhaps a little different, but that's about it.
If I was photographed with my people - I reckon you would be able to tell me from several, but not all - no way. My main staff member would be picked as the toff imo and I have a couple of others who look the part as well. I would probably be classed as some sort of odd ball - who knows.
I do have quite a few who you would pick as being staff, but they are all great people.
My observations are what interest me. I make a lot of money and all my staff know it - they know how I do it - no incorrect, they know what I do, but they don't know how I do it. It is not that they don't like what I do - they always say I have an easy life, and I do. I always say that I could not do what they do day in day out.
Several of them are brighter than me in many ways I think, and I believe they could be very wealthy if they chose - or at least way better off than they are - and they all would like more money - however, not one of them has ever asked me how - not one.
Now this should not be from a lack of invitation - I have said many times that if anyone ever wants to learn how to 'get' things - I am happy to teach.
Now I think I am approachable - they seem more than happy to socialise and open up about rather personal matters - but when it comes to changing their way of life - they prefer to stay the same and hope.
It is not that they don't like what I do, many times they say they wish they could have such an easy life. It's funny, they have as much smarts as I have when it all boils down (we just have different skills, but these can be taught) - but it is the attitude and beliefs that make the difference.
Our photographs tell a story also - we have fun, we support each other and we have a very strong network. I could not do what I do without them - some of them have a little difficulty accepting that, but it is true. They also have someone with means to turn to if they have unexpected problems - it works well.
What the photographs do not show though - just as this project cannot show - is the inner belief system. Photos only show the result, they do not show the mechanism. Visual and audio can do that if the right questions are asked.
I think the project is valuable - but I think it is limited and incorrect conclusions can be drawn.
There is no level that can be projected without - the levels are within and they are set early in life.
They can be changed - but it takes effort, and the desire has to be there.
have a good day
Pinto
I would love to follow this up by aggregating the skin colors of mades and madams and comparing them.