Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
USCG May Ignite Oil Slick to Prevent Unparalleled Destruction
Fears Grow over Oil Spill off US Coast
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana – US officials may attempt a controlled burn of a spreading oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico Wednesday to protect coastlines, as the coast guard warned the deadly disaster could become one of the worst spills in US history.
A worker looks over an oil boom as oil is collected from the Deepwater Horizon's leaking pipeline off the Louisiana coast. (Photograph: Patrick Semansky/AP) Southern states along the Gulf Coast were
bracing for the possibility that beaches and fisheries, crucial to the
region's economy, could be gunked up as early as this weekend by oily
ooze from a huge slick with a 600-mile (965-kilometer) circumference
that has moved within 21 miles of the ecologically fragile Louisiana
coast.
Efforts by BP, which leases the Deepwater Horizon platform that sank into the ocean last week, failed Tuesday to cap two leaks in a riser pipe that had connected the rig to the wellhead, despite the operation of four robotic submarines some 1,500 meters (5,000 feet) down on the seabed.
As a back-up, engineers are frantically constructing a giant dome -- the first of its kind -- that could be placed over the leaks to try and stop the oil from spreading as some 1,000 barrels of oil per day pours from the ruptured pipe.
Officials said they were considering a controlled burn of oil captured in inflatable containment booms to protect shorelines -- although such a burn-off and the accompanying air pollution would present its own environmental problems.
"I am going to say right up front: the BP efforts to secure the blowout preventer have not yet been successful," Rear Admiral Mary Landry told a press conference Tuesday, referring to a 450-tonne machine that could seal the well.
Asked to compare the accident to the notorious 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker disaster, Landry declined but said: "If we don't secure the well, yes, this will be one of the most significant oil spills in US history."
The US government promised a "comprehensive and thorough investigation" into the explosion that sank the platform and pledged "every resource" to help stave off an environmental disaster.
The rig, which BP leases from Houston-based contractor Transocean, went down last Thursday 130 miles southeast of New Orleans, still burning off crude two days after a blast that killed 11 workers.
The widow of one of the dead has filed a lawsuit accusing the companies that operated the rig -- BP, Transocean and US oil services behemoth Halliburton -- of negligence.
The slick could now reach Louisiana's wetlands -- which are a paradise for rare waterfowl and other wildlife -- within days if the winds change.
"It is the closest it's been to shore through this response," said Landry.
BP has sent a flotilla of 49 skimmers, tugs, barges, and recovery boats to mop up the spill, but their efforts were hampered at the weekend by strong winds and high seas.
Northwest winds blowing the oil away from Louisiana were predicted to keep the slick from reaching shore through Thursday at least.
A rig is on stand-by to start drilling two relief wells that could divert the oil flow to new pipes and storage vessels.
But BP officials say the relief wells will take up to three months to drill, and with oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico at the rate of 42,000 gallons a day, the dome is seen as a better interim bet.
US Coast Guard spokesman Prentice Danner told AFP the dome will take two to four weeks to build.
"This is the first time this has ever been done. This idea didn't exist until now. It has never been fabricated before," he said.
The exact dimensions and design of the dome were still being worked out, but officials said it would be similar to welded steel containment structures called cofferdams that are already used in oil rig construction.
"If you could picture a half dome on top of the leak and the oil collects inside of this dome and is pumped out from there, that is the idea behind it," explained Danner.
BP chief executive Tony Hayward expressed confidence an environmental disaster would be averted as he acknowledged that strong first-quarter results Tuesday had been overshadowed by the "tragic accident."
Landry noted that the deadly rig accident has not disrupted offshore gulf oil production -- which accounts for one third of the US energy supply.
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, meanwhile, ordered all flags over state buildings to fly at half-staff as a token of respect for the 11 workers who are missing and presumed dead.

25 Comments so far
Show AllIt's a horrible mess. The system that was supposed to prevent the explosion and further leakage of oil failed, and now the blowback needs to be dealt with.
About a month ago I posted that Obama's plans form more oil rigs off the east coast may be necessary in the near term. And now, the governor of Florida has stated that oil drilling off the coast is bad (I'm sure he didn't say that before this incident).
Bad things happen. We take chances and try to avert catastrophe, but sometimes it comes anyway.
I'm not sure where I come down with this issue now. I hate that the environment is taking it on the chin once again because of our shortsightedness. Had we been pursuing alternatives for the last 30 years, we would not be in the bind we're in. But, that is not the case. As an American, a consumer (god, how I hate that term), a commuter, I realize my role in all this. I also know that I can, and will, cut back my consumption which adds to the load on the system and the need for oil wells. And, I realize how broken the system is for us, which is nothing new.
I will keep doing what I can to cut back. And, I will increase the little pressure I can exert on those in power, knowing that they will not give up willingly. This fight is not easy, nor is it ever over. Hopefully, we can avert a full-blown catastrophe. It's looking more doubtful with each new event, but I won't give in to despair.
Yup, prevent one environmental catastrophe by creating another.
This might prompt a rethink in the WhiteHouse about opening the EastCoast to Offshore drilling. Not that that was likely to happen anytime soon, the vast majority of domestic leases are not exploited, but this probably set that whole process back. That's a good thing.
The deal that included the EastCoast opening also included raising the CAFE standard and that won't be rethought.
One way or another, we must reduce our dependence on fossil fuel and disasters like this point that up.
I have real problems with the idea of burning this off, talk about carbon footprint! But that has to balance against the destruction of habitat all along the Gulf Coast if it blows landward. Probably, the atmosphere will recover faster and better than the coastal wetlands.
Prompt a rethink? Probably not. Obama's press secretary is already laughing it off, and as long as the media keep burying the matter, Obama won't have to address it anyway. Besides, we already know where his loyalties lie -- with Big Oil -- and Rethugs will laugh him off the stage if President Drill Baby Drill now starts talking green.
If we can delay the vote until after the impact of this disaster is fully realized, yes, I believe we can kill the part of the energy bill that allows more offshore drilling.
Here we are again... watching a terrible disaster unfold... a 200-mile wide mass in the Gulf of Mexico gaining strength and getting ready to make landfall in Louisiana...
This might prompt a rethink in the WhiteHouse about opening the EastCoast to Offshore drilling. Not that that was likely to happen anytime soon, the vast majority of domestic leases are not exploited, but this probably set that whole process back. That's a good thing.
The deal that included the EastCoast opening also included raising the CAFE standard and that won't be rethought.
One way or another, we must reduce our dependence on fossil fuel and disasters like this point that up.
I have real problems with the idea of burning this off, talk about carbon footprint! But that has to balance against the destruction of habitat all along the Gulf Coast if it blows landward. Probably, the atmosphere will recover faster and better than the coastal wetlands.
burn the ocean...huh...
perhaps it is our destiny to become a little sun of our own, running 'round and 'round at the knees of our parent sun...a 'mini-me'...burning, radiating...
perhaps this works in mars' favor?
sorry. this is insanity bared...it all has to stop...
Global Start Date: September 22, 2012...unanimous, planetwide rejection of the modern world...cessation of industry, energy and private property...local living, acoustic, agrarian...individual engagement in sustenance, resource management, governance and defense...
let's get those gardens growing...we're running out of time and working material...
Gardening season starts in the Spring. I'm just sayin'
(accidently clicked twice... WP issue I guess)
uhhh, in this hemisphere...
My peas, sunflowers, onions and lettuce are poking up, but I'm still waiting for an anonymous package in the mail. If the oceans keep burning will we be able to garden year round?
good on ya, brother buck!
we got our stuff in 2-3 weeks back, and are seeing little things all over, even some stuff coming back from last year that we thought we'd pulled...we had carrots all winter! we have great southern exposure along a pretty busy street, so we get some good exhaust in our thriving veggies...
we added a 5-kind apple tree and nectarine tree last year, but won't probably see any nectarines yet...might get some nice apples though, and we're adding blueberries...
well, gotta do chores...
I sent you a package...mighta gone to the wrong Buck...lucky guy...wherever...
Try again. I'm at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Fresh blueberries, whoo hoo!
not the Lincoln bedroom again?! you promised you'd get help...
Yes it will be an enviromental disaster if it reaches the shoreline.
But is it already NOT a disaster? Is it ok if it "just the ocean" ? Would it be "ok" if the wind shifter and it ended up on Cubas or Mexicos coastlines?
Perhaps an initiative like the one to protect Ecuadors forests in order? Leave it in the ground.
Fisheries that are critical to the ECONOMY might suffer. Can we not look at a natural disaster and measure the impact it will have on seabirds, Fish and lobster, shrimp and the myriad of other lifeforms WITHOUT having to do so under the context of "how much MONEY is in it for US or how much MONEY we will lose?"
Yea, that seems to be the concern according to the news, "will it affect us?". (not even thinking about other countries) The question is, how bad is it for life living in the Ocean? Killing the Ocean could be bad for "OUR" health after all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Burn It! They should of done that a long time ago. Remaining as a slick in the water is worse than burning it in the atmosphere, it's a trade off after the disaster. We were going to burn it anyway and we do burn way more everyday in vehicles. The soot will settle that what looks bad.
In fact I believe they haven't burned it because it looks bad. (media ya'know)
What ever happened to the Ionized water technology that turnes oil into a biodegradable fish food in a matter of minutes. I saw the video myself. The guy drops 3 drops of this ionized water into a can of motor oil and in 15 minutes pored out this yellowish gue that he claimed was biodegradable and food for fish. There were representatives from the military and federal government in the audience. During the course of the lecture, it was mentioned that this water could be used on oil spills, so why isn't it? I haven't heard anthing about this water since. Am I the only one who remembers this science?
Drill baby drill!
This is getting quite hilarious.
First there was no spill--just a fire and some people killed (not to worry).
Then just a little gasoline and diesel.
Then oil coming up from a "crack" in the sea bed (hmmm).
Then potential ecological disaster. Cough cough.
One gallon of gasoline contaminates one million gallons of water. There goes the gulf.
The Gulf is already "gone".
Dead Zone.
Controlled burning to get rid of an oil slick? Or to prevent oil spills?
This is the stupidest, most vicious thing I've ever heard of, in terms of environmental remedies.
Well, interesting how this disaster happened just shortly after Obomber's announcement to open up the eastern seaboard to off shore drilling.
Obomber's coddling of the Oil Barrons™ won't fly all that well now that this disaster has happened, and it is pitiful that this has to happen to demonstrate the idoicy of offshore drilling.
The amount of oil to be gotten out off the coast does not benefit the U.S. econimically in any way with the small yield of oil it will provide aside from the fact that I find any rationale to drill off the coast unacceptable.
But the Stupid D-Crapper Party™ is going along with coddling the Oil Barrons™
I have read that one of the best ways to absorb contaminants from oil spills is to use mats made of human hair.
This might be the appropriate time to SCALP those responsible.
Burning floods of oil; just what the world needs; an Icelandic volcano to the north and now , to the south more dead Americans at sea to go along with those buried under what used to be mountains. BP must pay for this disaster, because the taxpayers are tired and broke. If this becomes another lawyer- ladened lawsuit of no consequences, like Exxon Valdez, then the taxpayers will morph into a hurricane sized Katrina and blow through the halls of congress.
NO MORE OFF SHORE DRILLING, ANYWHERE!
When are the 'We Can©' Obomber supporters going to realize that Obomber is dedicated to the enemies of the environment, the Texas Tea corparations & the Noo-Klee-Ear Industry.
Obomber is dedicated to the useless driling of oil off the coastlines for yields of oil that use up & destroy more resources then it helps anything at all.
The Nuclear Industry trying to raise itself up from the ashes of Chernobyl as a 'clean, green' source of energy is being coddled by Obomber for federal funds because no insurance companies will risk any money on them & neither will utilities so the tax payers are being lined up for a ream job on this matter. Nuclear energy is a dangerous and inefficient technology.
Wake Up 'We Can©' Democrappers™, Obomber is NOT Sir Galahad from Camelot. Obomber is a flim flam man carrying the water pail for PNAC™. Obomber is not a progressive, he is a regressive stooge of PNAC™. So Democrappers™, get your Democrapic™ blinders off and do not subsidize the Democratic™ party anymore.