EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- The Downwinders: Fracking Ourselves to Death in America
Popular content
Today's Top News
Taser Advice: Don't Aim at Target's Chest
The maker of Taser stun guns is advising police officers to avoid shooting suspects in the chest with the 50,000-volt weapon, saying that it could pose an extremely low risk of an "adverse cardiac event."
Critics, including civil-rights lawyers and human-rights advocates, called the training bulletin an admission by Taser that its guns could cause cardiac arrest. They called it a stunning reversal for the company, which for years has maintained that the gun was incapable of inducing a cardiac arrest. (Image: Metro.co.uk) The advisory, issued in an Oct. 12 training bulletin, is the first time that Taser International has suggested there is any risk of a cardiac arrest related to the discharge of its stun gun.
But Taser officials said Tuesday that the bulletin does not state that Tasers can cause cardiac arrest. They said the advisory means only that law-enforcement agencies can avoid controversy over the subject if their officers aim at areas other than the chest.
The recommendation could raise questions about whether police officers will find it more difficult to accurately direct the probes emitted by a Taser gun at a recommended body area in order to subdue a suspect. Taser officials say the change won't hinder officers' ability to use Tasers.
In a memo accompanying the bulletin, Taser officials point out that officers can still shoot the guns at a suspect's chest, if needed.
Police departments across the United States and in Canada and Australia reacted immediately to the bulletin, with some ordering officers to follow Taser's instructions and begin aiming at the abdomen, legs or back of a suspect.
Officials with the Phoenix Police Department, one of the first in the country to arm all its officers with Tasers, said Tuesday that the new guidelines are being adopted by trainers who are reviewing departmental policy for possible changes.
Critics, including civil-rights lawyers and human-rights advocates, called the training bulletin an admission by Taser that its guns could cause cardiac arrest. They called it a stunning reversal for the company, which for years has maintained that the gun was incapable of inducing a cardiac arrest.
Scottsdale-based Taser insisted that the revision admitted no risk of cardiac arrest and served only as risk-management advice for law enforcement.
In the past, Taser has cautioned that use of its stun gun involves risk inherent in police-suspect conflicts, including the risk that suspects fall after being struck by a Taser.
"Taser has long stood by the fact that our technology is not risk-free and is often used during violent and dangerous confrontations," Taser Vice President Steve Tuttle said in an e-mail.
"We have not stated that the Taser causes (cardiac) events in this bulletin, only that the refined target zones avoid any potential controversy on this topic."
Taser's training bulletin states that "the risk of an adverse cardiac event related to a Taser. .. discharge is deemed to be extremely low." However, the bulletin says, it is impossible to predict human reactions when a combination of drug use or underlying cardiac or other medical conditions are involved.
"Should sudden cardiac arrest occur in a scenario involving a Taser discharge to the chest area, it would place the law-enforcement agency, the officer and Taser International in the difficult situation of trying to ascertain what role, if any, the Taser. .. could have played," the bulletin says.
The bulletin recommends that when aiming at the front of a suspect, the best target for officers is the major muscles of the pelvic area or thigh region. "Back shots remain the preferred area when practical," it says.
For years, Taser officials have said in interviews, court cases and government hearings that the stun gun is incapable of inducing ventricular fibrillation, the chaotic heart rhythm characteristic of a heart attack.
The guns are used by more than 12,000 police agencies across the country, including every major law-enforcement agency in the Valley. Many authorities credit the weapon with preventing deaths and injuries to officers and suspects.
Advocacy groups such as Amnesty International allege that Taser guns are often used by police as a compliance tool on unarmed individuals who pose no deadly threat, who are drunk or on drugs and simply quarrel with officers.
Mark Silverstein, legal director of the Colorado American Civil Liberties Union, who has tracked Taser issues for years, said the bulletin means that police departments should now be asking questions about liability and reconsider how the stun gun is used.
"This is further evidence that law-enforcement agencies need to stop and ask if they have been sold a bill of goods," he said. "This (training) bulletin confirms what critics have said for years: that Taser has overstated its safety claims.. .. (It) has to be read as if Tasers can cause cardiac arrest."
Since 2001, there have been more than 400 deaths following police Taser strikes in the United States and 26 in Canada. Medical examiners have ruled that a Taser was a cause, contributing factor or could not be ruled out in more than 30 of those deaths.
The training bulletin is drawing significant attention in Canada, where controversy erupted after the 2007 death of a Polish immigrant at Vancouver International Airport. The man stopped breathing after being shocked five times by Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers.
A Canadian government investigation in July concluded that Taser stun guns can cause death, spurring law-enforcement agencies across the country to put severe new restrictions on how and when police there can use the weapons.
In view of Taser's bulletin, the Mounties revised policies to urge officers to avoid firing at suspects' chests.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show All"The bulletin recommends that when aiming at the front of a suspect, the best target is the major muscles of the pelvic area or thigh region..... The recommendation could raise questions about whether police officers will find it more difficult to accurately direct the probes emitted by a Taser gun at a recommended body area in order to subdue a suspect."
Upon further review, I'm not so sure this products liability directive from Taser International is necessarily a step in the right direction.
I mean, 50,000 volts to my balls (whether accidentally or by design) would certainly send me into cardiac arrest.
Bill from Saginaw
Why, used properly, Tasers are as safe as a brand-new Ford Pinto!
· Yr Obd't Servant
I wrote to my state legislators wanting to get tazers banned or at least have serious restrictions on their use. Basically I got a 'no' & 'shut-up'.
I believe that because tazers are called 'non-lethal' they are used WAY too indiscriminately.
"Don't taze me, bro!" And, of course, he got tazed.
The reason police (and soldiers) shoot for the chest/torso is that that area is the largest part of the human body. When you need to shoot a weapon at a human, you do _not_ shoot for the hand, or the foot or the pelvic area, to do so is to increase the risk of missing and letting that human damage you with whatever weapon they have.
The taser is supposed to be a 'safe' alternative to using a pistol or a baton, and yet they've just issued a bulletin to tell the police that they should not rely on the taser to be able to stop an attacker. Bravo. The thing is - as many have said for years - useless, unless you want to torture the suspect.
No cop has ever pulled a taser when faced with a suspect who had a gun. Most, if not all, cops would also pull their guns when faced with a knife, or a crowbar or a baseball bat. For the same reason too, I'd pull a handgun out if faced with someone who's pulled a weapon on me.
The taser seems to be used against people who are unarmed (or armed with things like staplers) to punish them for questioning the authority of the cops, or for standing up for their own rights under the law.
They need to be banned.
Given the current state of police being held completely unaccountable for their actions the frequent and indiscriminate use of Tasers against unarmed people who do not pose a risk to themselves or anybody else is merely another symptom of the police being above the law.
The first time a police officer was charged, tried and convicted of felony assault for the improper use of a Taser use of Tasers would drop by 90%.
Very few professions are held to strict standards in the U.S. anymore unless it is profitable for one segment of society to hold another segment of society to account.
Here in Indiana an alarming case of medical malpractice unfolded over the past two and a half years. It seems an eye surgeon was performing unnecessary eye surgeries to inflate his income. Did this come to light due to medical malpractice lawsuits? Did this come to light due to complaints to the medical standards board? Did this come to light when others in the profession called it to the attention of authorities?
None of the above.
It appears that insurance companies and possibly Medicare and Medicaid were the whistle blowers. From what I have been able to gather from following the case in the media there were no medical malpractice suits filed against the doctor and no complaints to the medical oversight boards. The police with Medicare and Medicaid authorities raided his offices over two years ago before any charges were brought against the doctor.
A 15 count fraud indictment was filed on a Friday afternoon a couple of months ago and the doctor and his wife (who did the billing) were to turn themselves in the following Monday. Monday morning they both left suicide notes but were not dead yet when police arrived. Their deaths have been ruled a murder and suicide as the doctor shot his wife (who had taken a large dose of drugs but was not yet dead) then turned the gun on himself.
They had spent over 2.5 million dollars on attorney’s fees fighting the indictment.
Last week the corporation, which was wholly owned by the doctor, which was also indicted, plead guilty to performing unneeded surgeries.
"Dont Taze me in the balls, Bro!"
I thought Tazers were to be used in non-leathal self defense by Police, not as a punsihment of compliance tool..
So why are they recommending you Taze someone in the BACK?!
At the next inquest into the death of a tazer victim..."Honestly, your honour, he was about to back right over me !"
"The only means of strengthening one's intellect is to make up one's mind about nothing, to let the mind be a thoroughfare for all thoughts." - John Keats
In this sick culture, "pain compliance" and threats "take you to jail the long way" and well, "why would you be in this neighborhood?" are the only tools the Officer (officials) are taught.
In my town, the preferred pain compliance is face down spread eagle on 130degree asphalt in your prohibited white T shirt. Dress code profiling rent-a-cops.
25 "Officer" guns in my face, in my drive way, front lawn, sidewalk in the last 20 years.
Death by Beretta slug in the face is what we as white foak in South Central flirt with, my poor black neighbors get a shallow grave.
Fear and violence is the only politic, the only politic maintained by all of Hollywood, THE PRODUCT of Hollywood since the fake war between Troy and Greece 2500 years ago. Read Leon Issaly's Chalice And The Blade"
Google can't get it, Yahoo understands:
Riane Eisler The Chalice or the Blade
http://www.slideshare.net/AutoSurfRestarter/the-chalice-and-the-blade-our-history-our-future-by-riane-eisler
http://www.rianeeisler.com/chalice.htm
And this is, like, a surprise 'finding'?
"A low-voltage (110 or 230 V), 50 or 60-Hz AC current through the chest for a fraction of a second may induce ventricular fibrillation at currents as low as 60 mA."
The latest model sounds totally cool, though:
"The ADVANCED TASER M-Series are EMD weapons (Electro-Muscular Disruption,) specifically designed to stop even the most elite, aggressive, focused combatants. Rather than simply interfering with communication between the brain and muscles, the ADVANCED TASER EMD systems directly tell the muscles what to do: contract until the target is in the fetal position on the ground."
But what if you're facing an elite, aggressive, focused combatant on steroids and meth? "Z-FORCE Stun Gun! Chose from 100,000 or 300,000 volts! PERFECT FOR THOSE WITH SMALLER HANDS!"
Still not feeling safe? "The Telescopic Stun Baton - an explosive 800,000 volts of Stun Baton Power!"
A step forward, but a tiny one.
No controversy? I doubt that.
You can bet a fair number of the officers are working on how to get a fatality out of it.
"If you shoot one on your doorstep, finish his ---- off and drag it inside" they would tell me. "The last thing you want to do is leave an unfriendly witness, and once you shot the --- -- - -----, what you got is a very unfriendly witness."
Taser = Cattle-prod.
It's cruel and unusual punishment applied on the spot. Dare to Ask for a badge number or "your Watch Commander's phone number" and ZZZZZAAAAAAPPPPPPP!
No Judge. No Jury. No Investigation. At least in Singapore, you get a trial before they apply cruel and unusual punishment. THEN they give you the cruel "Rattan" Cane (splintered bamboo wacked across the ass.)
I won't live in a country which uses it.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Yup, can see it coming.... the return of the cattle prod used by police against hippies and blacks back in the 60's.... Just my opinion, but these torture devices have no place in law enforcement. It's getting to the point where the police are looking for an excuse to taze people
How about stopping this insane war on drugs? Far fewer people will need to be tortured and imprisoned.
This war on drugs is a war on US citizens, and like all wars, is designed to facilitate the flow of wealth from the poor to the rich.
There used to be a constitution which guaranteed me the right to the pursuit of happiness. If being stoned makes me happy who has the right to deny me my happiness?
I or mine ever get tortured under false pretenses, tasered repeatedly, w/o need; the m.o. of choice. Well, that would turn cop into torturer, badge and uniform meaningless. Ergo time would go by, and though I care not for firearms, I'd use a scoped long rifle and vaporize the torturers knees, or if I was pissed, groin and stomach.
Authority is 100% vanished when a cop becomes a hurter of people, I get along fine with them. Because I am so nice and polite to all officers always. But a few inviolable lines define right and wrong.
And this-if it takes half a decade I give as I get. For kindness my love, for predation my patient, planned, precise response
I don't understand why people brutalized horribly by thugs with badges take it like *******, lying down. This potentiates Fascism radically.
Two kids Simpson slashed to death
Why in the name of Jesus did that
gutless dad not shoot him in the
eyesocket at high-noon? Then carefully cut
his throat, toss a glove on him and do the time?
Our culture encourages victimization; if everyone knew that as they did, right quick they'd be done, they'd act right, mostly anyhow.
Instant Karma's gonna get you
I wish.