New US Embassy Inaugurated in Iraq
Under tight security in Baghdad, US Marines have raised their flag over the world's largest American embassy.
During an inauguration ceremony on Monday, US officials said the $700m state-of-the-art complex will usher in a new era of relations with Iraq, which it invaded nearly six years ago.
The ceremony was held a day after a suicide bomber killed at least 38 people at a Shia shrine just 6km north of the new embassy.
On Monday, four bombs went off in different parts of Baghdad just before noon, killing four people and injuring 19 others.
Last week, the Green Zone -- the walled-off swath of central Baghdad -- was formally turned over to the Iraqi government, whose authority the US military will now operate under, according to an agreement that took effect on January 1.
"Iraq has now assumed the lead for all security operations and our bilateral relationship going forward will be governed" by the agreements, Ryan Crocker, US ambassador to Iraq, said.
"Iraq is in a new era and so is the Iraqi-US relationship."
Although it will maintain its independent chain of command, the US will be subject to Iraqi laws under certain conditions.
The accord also allows US troops to play an advisory role to the Iraqi military as they prepare to pull out of Iraqi cities in June and before leaving entirely at the end of 2011.
US diplomats and military officials moved into the embassy, which at 42 hectares is the size of 80 football fields, on December 31 after vacating Saddam Hussein's Republican Palace, which they occupied after capturing Baghdad in April 2003.
'Fortress-like'
During Monday's ceremony, Jalal Talabani, Iraq's president, praised George Bush, the US president, for invading Iraq in 2003 and toppling the regime of Saddam, who was executed two years ago.
"The building of this site would not be possible without the courageous decision by President Bush to liberate Iraq," Talabani said. "This building is not only a compound for the embassy but a symbol of the deep friendship between the two peoples of Iraq and America."
The new embassy, which was originally slated to open in September 2007, has been criticised for shoddy building practices. Some have also questioned the fortress-like building's "bunker mentality".
"What kind of embassy is it when everybody lives inside and it's blast-proof, and people are running around with helmets and crouching behind sandbags?" Edward Peck, a former American diplomat in Iraq, asked in 2006.
One US official said the cost of running the new complex is expected to be so exorbitant that the US will be forced to rent out part of the space.
Twitter
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Delicious
Digg
Newsvine
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
7 Comments so far
Show All80 football fields. Most countries use the metric system, but our most common literary description of bigness is the football field. I think George Carlin would laugh.
It is an ugly complex to support an ugly idea.
Joe
So what? It's just an embassy. Yes, it's large. Huge even. But we obviously have a special role in Iraq. A huge role. If this was the Chilean embassy then it wouldn't make sense. But this is different, embassies are crucial instruments of diplomacy. Right now we need to support not just our military, but our civilian staff as well. The embassy will be building bridges with the Iraqi people, not bombing them.
""The building of this site would not be possible without the courageous decision by President Bush to liberate Iraq," Talabani said. "This building is not only a compound for the embassy but a symbol of the deep friendship between the two peoples of Iraq and America."
As insipid as his praise for Bush is, this at least represents that America is finally turning a corner in Iraq. If he should praise anyone it's Obama. Because it's Obama who is liberating Iraq from President Bush.
It isn't just an embassy -- that is the whole point. It is an outpost of U.S. imperialism, a place from which to spy, to intimidate, to bully, to disseminate disinformation and propaganda... There is no special role for the U.S. in Iraq, only the same old imperialist machinations conducted since at least the end of World War II.
What a fucking joke! We have homeless here in our homeland, returning troops go back to ghettos, Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and George Bush reside in McMansions, and we've been screwed again, folks...
The question is, how long will the Embassy stand, and how many bombs will it take to take it down?
Some facts about this so-called embassy:
Cost: about $ 592 million
Number of buildings making up the embassy: 21
Land surface occupied by said buildings: 104 acres
Articles of interest:
Warren Strobel and Jonathan Landay, "Criminal Probe into U.S. Embassy in Iraq Construction," October 18, 2007, McClatchy Newspapers
David Phinney, "Complaints Mount at US Fortress in Iraq," October 26, 2006, Inter Press Service
The first article reports that about 1,000 US officials are to reside in this outpost of US imperialism. Last night, the BBC reported that it will house 4,000 such officials.
At any rate, the question of the day is: why does the Iraq embassy need even 1,000 officials? What kind of business requires that many folks in a foreign land?
>>At any rate, the question of the day is: why does the Iraq embassy need even 1,000 officials? What kind of business requires that many folks in a foreign land?
You do realize that every embassy would have military attaches and 'miscellaneous' staff performing 'espionage' and 'intelligence gathering' activities in the host country, don't you? I guess in this case, they are not just going to be focusing on the 'country', but rather the whole region?
Apparently no one (except people like Ron Paul and Ralph Nader) is thinking of scaling down the empire - at least, not yet. And, probably there is no real plan to truly withdraw from Iraq, as of now. After having expended so much blood and treasure, why would you want to leave behind a vacuum only to be filled by any one of numerous interested parties? Or so seems the logic. This is meant to be more than an embassy, at any rate.
Highintel: Can we do better?