Common Dreams NewsCenter
National Conference for Media Reform
 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

San Francisco First City to Ban Plastic Shopping Bags

by Charlie Goodyear

SAN FRANCISCO - Paper or plastic? Not anymore in San Francisco.

The city’s Board of Supervisors approved groundbreaking legislation Tuesday to outlaw plastic checkout bags at large supermarkets in about six months and large chain pharmacies in about a year.

The ordinance, sponsored by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, is the first such law in any city in the United States and has been drawing global scrutiny this week.0328 02

“I am astounded and surprised by the worldwide attention,” Mirkarimi said. “Hopefully, other cities and other states will follow suit.”

Fifty years ago, plastic bags — starting first with the sandwich bag — were seen in the United States as a more sanitary and environmentally friendly alternative to the deforesting paper bag. Now an estimated 180 million plastic bags are distributed to shoppers each year in San Francisco. Made of filmy plastic, they are hard to recycle and easily blow into trees and waterways, where they are blamed for killing marine life. They also occupy much-needed landfill space.

Two years ago, San Francisco officials considered imposing a 17-cent tax on petroleum-based plastic bags before reaching a deal with the California Grocers Association. The agreement called for large supermarkets to reduce by 10 million the number of bags given to shoppers in 2006. The grocers association said it cut back by 7.6 million, but city officials called that figure unreliable and unverifiable because of poor data supplied by markets.

The dispute led to a renewed interest in outlawing the standard plastic bag, which Mirkarimi said Tuesday was a “relic of the past.” Under the legislation, which passed 10-1 in the first of two votes, large markets and pharmacies will have the option of using compostable bags made of corn starch or bags made of recyclable paper. San Francisco will join a number of countries, such as Ireland, that already have outlawed plastic bags or have levied a tax on them. Final passage of the legislation is expected at the board’s next scheduled meeting, and the mayor is expected to sign it.

The grocers association has warned that the new law will lead to higher prices for San Francisco shoppers.

“We’re disappointed that the Board of Supervisors is going down this path,” said Kristin Power, the association’s vice president for government relations. “It will frustrate recycling efforts and will increase both consumer and retailer costs. There’s also a real concern about the availability and quality of compostable bags.”

Power said most of the group’s members operating in San Francisco are likely to switch to paper bags “simply because of the affordability and availability issues.”

Mirkarimi’s legislation is one in a string of environmentally sensitive measures — such as outlawing Styrofoam food containers and encouraging clean-fuel construction vehicles at city job sites — adopted by the city in recent months.

“It’s really exciting,” Jared Blumenfeld, director of the city’s Department of the Environment, said after the vote on Tuesday. “We’re thrilled. It’s been a long time in the making.”

Blumenfeld said it takes 430,000 gallons of oil to manufacture 100 million bags. Compostable bags can be recycled in the city’s green garbage bins and will make it more convenient for residents to recycle food scraps, he said.

Recycling of paper bags also is far more active today than it was when the plastic bag was first introduced to U.S. consumers.

The lone dissenting voice in the board chamber on Tuesday was Supervisor Ed Jew, who noted that 95,000 small businesses in San Francisco will continue to use plastic bags. Jew, who in his third month in office has taken to critiquing his colleagues for being too quick to burden residents and businesses with new mandates, complained that Mirkarimi’s legislation has taken too much of the board’s time.

“We need to move on to address the larger issues in San Francisco,” Jew said shortly before he voted against the ordinance.

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier, who introduced amendments this month that will subject pharmacy chains to the legislation, said many large businesses in San Francisco already participate in recycling programs.

“The target of this legislation is the bags themselves and improving the environment,” she said.


Plastic bags by the numbers180 million

Roughly the number of plastic shopping bags distributed in San Francisco each year.2 to 3 centsAmount each bag costs markets, compared with anywhere from 5 to 10 cents for a biodegradable bag.

4 trillion to 5 trillion

Number of nondegradable plastic bags used worldwide annually.

430,000 gallons

Amount of oil needed to produce 100 million nondegradable plastic bags.

Source: S.F. Department of the Environment; Worldwatch Institute

Copyright 2007 San Francisco Chronicle

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

7 Comments so far

  1. Brown March 28th, 2007 3:30 pm

    Seems to me to be putting a band-aid on a problem and creating another: paper comes from trees. Cloth shopping bags seems to be the only long-ranged answer. I shop at a health food grocery store that rewards the shopper for bringing their cloth bgs to fill. I wonder how far down the road this taking off is?

  2. armybrat March 28th, 2007 4:03 pm

    I saw the writing on the wall in Spain and Italy 20-odd years ago, with every gulley and waterway (even ocean ports) clogged with plastic bags. In northern Europe, people used cloth bags (that look just like paper bags) that are reusable, or those ‘fish-net’ kind that fit easily into a small pocket. I used to buy them here in the US, but don’t see them on the market anymore. Why doesn’t anyone bring up this obvious solution? Cloth bags don’t break and have a water-proof lining, so don’t leak and can be washed - besides, I still use the ones I bought 20 years ago - now that’s conservation.

  3. pennerblu March 28th, 2007 4:17 pm

    Yes, lets get rid of our dependence on ‘petroleum’ based plastic bags. They are NOT biodegradable and are not recyclable in most communities. At least paper is biodegradable and better yet, paper is Recyclable. I am currently using a biodegradable plastic garbage bag that decomposes in 30-45 days in a compost/soil environment. Of course it is mostly made of corn starch. Petroleum based plastic has been bad news for decades.. ask any landfill operation. I am glad this article got posted.

  4. bildad March 28th, 2007 5:54 pm

    The Los Angeles Times did a multimedia series called Altered Oceans that included a section on the two giant, floating trash dumps in the oceans. One is twice the size of Texas and is made up primarily of plastic. To see the series, go to:

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans-series,0,7842752.special

    I guarantee you will be amazed and infuriated.

  5. Viper March 28th, 2007 6:28 pm

    This whole issue is a little silly if you ask me. Again, we have San Francisco taking the lead in being environmentally overzealous on a really non-issue. Has anybody here actually ever dug up an old plastic bag that has been buried for many years? I have and the plastic bags are so thin that they are usually full of holes and have been disintegrated by weather or other environmental forces after only a few years. I used to work in construction so I have seen many examples of what is “biodegradable” and what isn’t according to years of experience working on all kinds of terrain. A plastic bag may not be ‘biodgradable’ but it does disintegrate. Not just that, ‘recycled’ or ‘biodegradable’ paper comes at a cost to environment just as much as petroleum based products. Recycled wood/paper usually comes from industries that don’t recycle and who regularly cut down forests to build homes, funiture, and many other products without question. We need to just have a mindset that everything we produce comes at a cost to our environment on some level and that politicans will exploit those circumstances to make themselves appear environmentally conscience when they really are not.

  6. PuffinThrush March 28th, 2007 10:24 pm

    bildad,

    Thank you for the link:

    www.latimes.com/news/local/oceans/la-oceans-series,0,7842752.special

    Amazing and disgusting!

  7. Nanoo March 29th, 2007 9:59 am

    Cheers, now ban plastic water bottles and we’ll really see some progress.

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org