Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
10 Reasons to be Hopeful about 2009, and 3 Reasons to be Terrified
- Young people are stepping up. They know that they formed the backbone of Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and that their work infused the country with the “Yes, we can” spirit. Now that these young people know what success feels like, many will be in it for the long haul.
- Election protection is working. Grassroots vigilance, successful lawsuits, and media exposure are making voter suppression efforts less successful. More remains to be done, but the trends are in the right direction. (One terrifying note, though, is the death in a December 19 plane crash of GOP IT expert Michael Connell, who many believe was poised to reveal secrets related to vote stealing.)
- There is now overwhelming support for universal health care. This grassroots commitment coupled with Obama’s leadership could make this the year when we finally overcome the roadblocks big insurance and drug corporations have placed in the way of progress. A majority of Americans favor a tax-supported single-payer system like Canada’s. The Obama plan, while it’s not single-payer, is nonetheless a good plan—as long as it retains the option for all Americans to join a public health insurance plan.
- Corporate power is on the wane. Barack Obama ran for office without relying on corporate donations in a campaign that saw candidates competing to establish their tough-on-corporate-power bonafides. Even before the Wall Street meltdown, a majority of Americans thought corporations had too much power. The economic collapse is further eroding goodwill towards corporations and big finance, showing instead how both were instrumental in concentrating wealth, creating unsustainable bubbles, and putting our way of life at risk. After the trillions of taxpayer money paid out in corporate bailouts, the American people are looking for more fair and sustainable alternatives.
- The failing economy is giving us lots of reasons to be terrified (see below) but also reasons to be hopeful. That rip-roaring economy we’re all supposed to be trying to bring back was tearing through the world’s rainforests, mountaintops, aquifers, fisheries, soils, and other resources, driving thousands of species toward extinction, changing the climate, and leaving billions behind in the rush for “economic growth.” So, painful as it might be, this downturn represents a chance to build a different sort of economy—one that offers dignity, livelihoods, and a future for our children.
- We’re finally getting real about the urgency and scope of the climate challenge. The incoming Obama administration takes science seriously, which means taking climate change seriously, too. The nay-sayers have quit denying the existence of global warming, and have resorted to random delay tactics. Many now see the conversion to a climate-friendly economy as a major opportunity, with new jobs and investment needed to weatherize buildings, re-tool factories, develop renewal sources of energy, and rebuild transportation infrastructure (see below for the terrifying flip side).
- Social movements are building people power. Nonviolent civil disobedience is back. Climate organizers conduct “die-ins” and climate camps to shut down coal plants. Workers at Republic Windows & Doors occupied their factory when they were abruptly dismissed without severance and vacation pay. President-Elect Obama backed the Republic workers, implicitly inviting others to stand up for their rights. He also continues to organize people at the grassroots—right now through health care discussion groups. Thousands of these meetings being held across the country could build a health care reform movement with enough clout to overcome entrenched interests and move forward. (We may wind up calling Obama, Organizer-in-Chief.)
- DIY (do it yourself) communities are piloting the shift to a people-centered society. These folks understand that real security during tough times is found in the “social capital” of community. At the same time, they are creating experiments in green and just ways of life. They aren’t waiting for policy changes or bailouts, instead, they are helping each other now and getting on with the most extraordinary project of our time: building a better world.
- International cooperation is now possible, and it’s none too soon. The day of the lone wolf is over. Likewise, the day of the sole superpower that could bend the rest of the world to its will. Climate change, nuclear proliferation, failed states, the Israel-Palestine conflict, the collapse of ocean fisheries, outbreaks of genocide, environmental and human rights refugee crises, HIV/AIDS and other pandemics—all require international cooperation. That means everyone has a seat at the table, no one gets bullied, and the solutions have to be real ones.
- Obama! It’s true, he hasn’t lived up to all our hopes with his cabinet picks. On the left-right scale, he’s been pretty centrist, and especially his choices for foreign policy and agriculture posts suggest he may repeat the mistakes of the Clinton and Bush appointees he is surrounding himself with. But on the people-versus-big-money scale, he leans towards people and the common good, as the examples above illustrate. And he has elevated the national dialogue, setting a new standard for intelligent, inclusive, nuanced leadership.
- Runaway climate change. The biggest question of the 21st century may be whether policies can catch up to the dangerous realities of a rapidly changing climate in time to avoid disaster. Will we come together to stabilize the climate? Or are we be the last generation to live on a planet that can support complex civilization?
- Loose nukes. We are all in danger from loose nukes, the spread of nuclear materials around the world, and nuclear warfare between India and Pakistan or other nuclear-armed adversaries. Ridding the world of nuclear weapons may be the only way of avoiding a nuclear catastrophe; figures across the political spectrum support such proposals, including former Secretary of State George Shultz. Will we have the political will to rid ourselves of this danger?
- Mad Max world. Disruption of life-as-usual could come from economic collapse, runaway climate change, war, peak oil, pandemics, or some unforeseen combination of these and other factors. What makes these prospects especially terrifying are potential human responses to them. We could see either societal breakdown—in which each person turns on others in a battle for dominance or survival—or fascism, in which people allow all-powerful leaders to run things out of fear of chaos.
So which will it be? Are you hopeful or terrified by the coming year and by what we face in the coming decades? What I keep coming back to is this: we humans have the free will to make choices that assure our collective survival, or to do otherwise. We do have the creativity, compassion, and intelligence to build on the best possibilities while averting the worst. This historic moment will test everything we have built and everything our ancestors have passed down to us. The answers are readily available, embedded in all the world’s spiritual traditions, in all the mothers and fathers who have sacrificed to make a good life for their children, and in all the peacemakers who have worked to build a better world for everyone. Will we make the choices for a just and sustainable world? We know, as Obama says, that, indeed, Yes! we can. But will we?


138 Comments so far
Show AllYou have a different view point than mine. I do not have the faith in the system anymore and do not take any politician at their word. Obama has already changed some of his promises like the telecom issue and the bail out. No it is pretty much going to be the same song and dance. As far as a Mad Max world the governments of the world will now allow anything like that to happen. They will declare Marshall law and send all dissidents to work camps. 1984
laffingbear - Did you mean that the governments of the world will NOT allow anything like the Mad Max world to happen?
As for Obama (who hasn't rung my bells ever, although I did vote for him, and have high hopes) having already changed some of his promises, I can only say that anyone who has been a parent knows, you can't have everything set in stone. Circumstances arise that make compromise or change in direction the only way you can go. I'm sure Obama had every intention of doing as he promised. Then he was elected, and got an up close and personal look at overall job before him. I seriously doubt there's a person on the planet (except the one soon to be heading back to Texas for good) who could think a thing and not change his mind, come hell or hight water.
You are delusional to think that politicians like Mr. Obama had any intention of keeping his promises.
He showed before the election his intentions to do what is best for the ruling elite, corporate financial America, and the political leadership.
Those people have no "good intentions" toward anyone, except their "friends" and you ain't it.
Why are you still a fool, should be the question?
obama is same old same old
anybody thinking things are gonna change
because we voted in barack had better take a reality pill.
the u.s. will never change
war, greed, aggression is what defines the american century
big biz (big war) is the american way for ever and ever amen
Why are you still a fool, should be the question?
I suppose it comes from having been wrongly judged all my life by people who didn't know me, and obviously found it more interesting to believe the worst rather than learning for themselves if what someone else said was true. So until I see the proof of what the majority here seems to believe about Obama, I'll continue to be the fool who doesn't condemn based on what others say. I'll need to see the proof of his actions once he's in power.
.hee, I like your style.....Better to be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove any doubt. I am one with the skepticism about our coming administrations thrust and efforts, but you seem to withhold judgment for decent enough reason. I would only note that , if you are a so-called progressive, then it behooves you to ponder the several appointments to cabinet posts that engender a growing skepticism among many.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
thanks for your response ardee
I honestly have no idea where I fit in the political arena, but I do know it isn't with the dems, and definitly not with the repugs. Then again, at 72 I don't suppose it matters much.
As for Obama's appointments, while I don't much like some of them, I have a sense, if you will, of what his vision is with these appointments. I too tend to think not just out of the box, but sometimes nowhere near it, and so I'll wait and see.
.Fair enough indeed.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Wilmoor, our principles are timeless and worth passing on from generation to generation so we don't have to keep reinventing the wheel. You are in a strong position having rejected both political factions of the elite establishment. However, personally relating to the public chimp is perilous. In the social democracies, widely viewed as the models of successful societies, the people do not relate personally to the public chimps because the crucial factor is the job performance, not personal character. This is why many people view the Clintok chimp's maritial failing as irrelevant. We don't want them to bestow upon us a supercolossus manifestation of superhuman character. Instead we expect them to humbly adhere to their job description, to follow our orders. The people rule. The chimps administer the people's rule. The elites have no legitimate role.
"So which will it be? Are you hopeful or terrified by the coming year and by what we face in the coming decades?"
I'm a little of each: Both hopeful and while not terrified, am very worried that as pressure mounts on many fronts of the Perfect Storm, humans will act as we have.
My hope is that soon, the good will outweigh the bad. The universe bends toward the good, so sooner or later, it will have to.
"We know, as Obama says, that, indeed, Yes! we can. But will we?"
Ah, there's the question.
Yes.
We.
Can/Did!
Don't lose hope.
Don't lose faith.
The good already outweighs the bad.
joehope,
I'm sorry, I know you mean well (at least, I'd like to think you do), but you're really starting to sound more like a Hallmark TV special than a thinking individual.
I voted for Obama and hope he will be worthy of my vote, but you're already making me sorry that I did.
C'mon man, Obama doesn't need cheerleaders, he needs rational, discerning, thinking people on his side - somewhere between being cynics and Mouseketeers. Give it a try, huh?
"All Nature's difference keeps all Nature's peace." Alexander Pope
"C'mon man, Obama doesn't need cheerleaders, he needs rational, discerning, thinking people on his side - somewhere between being cynics and Mouseketeers. Give it a try, huh?"
It's just a campaign slogan, Ted. Has it been a rough week? I find your behavior very rude and offensive. Why do you feel the need to strangle my optimism with your cynicism?
I'm not a cheerleader for Obama. Even I have my disagreements with him. But It's been eight long years since I've been able to feel proud of my Country. And right now, I not only feel proud, but I feel we have this great opportunity in front of us. We must organize. We must think about what it means to be "Progressives". We must greet this new era with enthusiasm.
We have work to do. We must reform the Democratic Party to make sure it reflects the true face of America. I'd like to see more ordinary people get involved in politics. Young and old. White people and African-American people. We must all come together and unite for peace. We must let Obama know what we want. We'll have to act fast, while momentum is still on our side. And when we find our voice, when we come together, he will listen. Obama wants peace just like us. Obama is a good man. He will listen. This is how change happens. Step by step. One day at a time. This is our moment.
Obama's Presidency marks a turning point in American history. Plus, how can you not feel proud that we have elected the first African-American president in the history of the USA? I'm sorry, but isn't that worth something to you? It's that kind of cynicism that turns people off to politics. I prefer to focus my hope and faith on the belief that the future can be a better place.
Have you ever read Rhonda Byrne's "The Secret"? It is a powerful examination of the transformation power of positive thinking. It's based on a centuries-old technique called "the Law of Attraction". It makes a strong argument that positive thinking can change the world. Don't dismiss it until you've read it. It's worth checking out.
."A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen, philosophers and divines. With consistency a great mind has simply nothing to do." Ralph Waldo Emerson
"People are mostly afraid of reason. They should be afraid of stupidity. If only they knew what was really fearful." J.W. Goethe
"There are few things that are incapable of being represented by a fiction."
Hobbs, in Leviathon
Have a nice day, Joe. Nothing wrong with enthusiasm as long as it remains fixed in reality.....
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
joehope, it's a question of what we choose to be positive about. The elite want the people to be positive about elite rule. The people want to be positive about the people's rule. One may argue that the people should be positive about whatever scenario they find themselves in. But elite rule isn't good for the people so being positive about that while perpetually failing to fix it leads to a sick society. Eventually we have to stop being positive about elite rule, and reserve our positivity for our aspirations and progress toward self-rule.
Ted: The answer to your question is "NO", we will not. We don't have the wisdom or intelligennce to pull us out of the mess we're in. We are a spoiled, negligent civilization. If we're in for hard times, I think that, perhaps, we deserve it. I am, to further address your question, absolutely terrified. I'm appropriately armed and ready. I hope all my neighbors are the same.
"The answers are readily available, embedded in all the world’s spiritual traditions"
I'm hopeful to the extent that we realize the above statement is false.
How is it false...?
Have you studied comparative religion...?
Despite the regional cultural and historical differences,
amid the apparent contradictions and mistranslations,
there is universal wisdom in all spiritual traditions, if we take the time to look...
Yes, I have studied many religions, which is what's coded in "spiritual traditions". The fact is, there is no "universal wisdom". There's just a bunch of brute animals with a bigger brain trying to survive. Some things work, some don't. We just need to decide to focus on the things that work. The overhead or "spirituality/religion" just gets in the way of that.
I have found in my research that yes, there is a universal wisdom which is the essence or foundation of all spiritual traditions...
They all say the same thing, which is that we are all ONE... One big family of humans and animals and plants and we are all here to learn how to coexist with compassion and conscientiousness...
I agree with you that there are some of us who are more brutish than others...
and have used violence and coersion in an attempt to destroy the sacred books and temples of communities throughout the world...
Fortunately some books or fragments and indigenous oral traditions have survived the dark ages and crusades and inquisitions and missionaries and book burnings and cultural revolutions...
I would add that without a spiritual component in the equation, humans tend to ask the wrong questions and come to unhealthy conclusions, just look at what Stalin and Mao did to the peasants and buddhists in their territories...
They saw religion as a threat to the power of communism...
Love and compassion are the spiritual traditions of the Judeo-Christian faith.
Faith is the answer to the world's problems.
Considering the Judeo-Christian faith is, originally, several thousand years old, I fail to see how it is the answer to today's problems. Not to mention most faiths tend to discourage dissent and independent thinking.
Sorry, faith is the cause. And the so called Judeo-Christian faith has so much blood and hate and intolerance on it's hands that your statement is laughable. Jesus on the other hand had many admirable qualities, and said many wise things. My guess is he'd be utterly ashamed at the "faith" of Christians past and present.
And tell me this. If you believe in a god, and that she gave us the remarkable ability to reason, which at its best is self-correcting, why would she want us to relay on faith? Why would she want us to basically abandon her greatest gift?
Kane. You are totally correct. Judeo-Christian "faith" has a huge amount of blood,hate and intolerance on its hands. Since the Crusades, at least, Christianity has been one of greatest purveyors of violence and death in the world. No need to argue this fact...the figures tell the truth. Jesus established a faith based upon love and compassion. Rome and the Vatican state has hijacked the philosophy and "religion" of Jesus. Another example of people being fucked by an econommic, imperial enterprise. These many years later, have we not learned any better??? Seems not.
It's one thing to insult my political beliefs.
It's quite another to assault my religion.
I hope you understand that what you are doing is as ugly and offensive as the worst forms of racism.
"It's one thing to insult my political beliefs. It's quite another to assault my religion."
Question: why should religion and its products be exempt from critical examination? You are willing to let people examine, criticize, even shred your political beliefs, but they can't touch your religion?
Wrapping oneself in religion, as you have done here, is like a "patriot" wrapping himself in the flag of his country and thinking he or she has claimed the moral high ground. You may legitimately protest against being insulted, but religious traditions and faith itself must all be open to criticism. Otherwise, they're just hidey-holes where people retreat when they don't like opposing viewpoints, or worse, when they've committed atrocities and need to justify them.
Here's one example of a conclusion about religion based on critical examination: religions are necessary neither for spiritual development nor moral grounding. At their best, they provide a measure of both, leading to ecumenicalism and tolerance. My guess is that it puts the "hope" in joehope (at least in part).
At their worst... just look around the world. Unexamined personal faith, particularly when faith is proferred and misconstrued as "truth," is a gateway to fundamentalism. Fundamentalist violence is a pure product of warped and twisted religious teachings. It tops the list of "reasons to be terrified," since fundamentalist violence is most frequently expressed through acts of terrorism (i.e., terrorists are terrifying). Given this, religious faith must be "on the table" in any discussion of hope and terror.
"Question: why should religion and its products be exempt from critical examination?"
Thank you. The taboo of criticism of religious belief in this country seems to be a serious obstacle to actually fixing many of the country's problems, or the social ones at least. Joe Hope, you should watch Religulous and chill out a bit when it comes to religion. I do have my own independent thinking flaws when it comes to Israel, specifically when people call it more or less an abomination that should never have been, since I am Jewish. But I am trying to overcome them, you should too.
Attacking "belief" of any sort is more than fair game, so please don't try to convince me that religious beliefs are somehow sacrosanct. Human-fabricated beliefs have created the ugly world we have, and humanity's sordid history of relying on unsubstantiated religious beliefs have been a primary factor in the failure of people to live in respect of one another and the physical world that supports life. Racism is based upon skin color, a physical attribute, while political or religious beliefs are concepts, and not concepts supported, necessarily, by physical reality; comparing insults of religion to those of racism is nonsense. Just because you believe something doesn't make that so, and everyone else is entitled to mock, to question, to "attack" that which they cannot believe, for whatever reasons. So, along with others who can see through the lunacy of religion, I'll "assault" any "belief system" I so choose. The unfounded, imbecilic assumptions of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and other manipulative, faith-based theologies are long overdue to be questioned, examined, and tossed into the cesspool that is so much of Western human culture.
Mystical Judaism (AKA Kabala) has more in common with mystical Islam (aka Sufism) and mystical Christanity (Gnosticism) ...
Than their parent religions have with each other...
They are all rooted in universal wisdom, which has been preserved through their respective mysticism...
despite each of the parent religions being bastardized by small minded and closed hearted men and churches and empires...
That those churches have targeted mystical communities for destruction over the last three thousand years demonstrates just how powerful and meaningful the universal wisdom is for people... Power that the rulers saw as a threat to their authority over the masses...
Sioux Rose
GOLDEN MEAN: Very insightful posting.
Thanks & Praises...
Since you have the skills/gifts to apply astronomy to historical events...
May I ask you a question regarding the procession of the Ages?
How do the Mayan Tzoltkin and Hindu Yugas and Chinese and European Zodiac models compare and contrast in making sense of the 2000 and 26,000 year cosmic cycles?
Do these traditions focus on the planets, or do they acknowledge the influence that the center of our galaxy and other stellar systems exert on the consciousness of the inhabitants of this planet as well?
Putting a band-aid on the economy is not going to heal the continual gaping wounds; we have to address the core, the source of the disease.
The one MAJOR issue Obama has to tackle is the monetary system we use in this country (and the world, for that matter). That is, we need to have the government issue the currency---debt-free and interest-free---instead of allowing the privately-owned Federal Reserve to issue loans through physical and computer-entry accounting and charging usurious interest. This IS the current debt-based currency we are using. It's a tall order, indeed, but not impossible. We already have the infrastructure set up. Anyone want change? For more info, check out www.webofdebt.com.
Agreed, there was an article here on CD a few weeks ago discussing that topic.
All of these hopeful things can be summed up in one word: Obama. Finally, we will be allowed to think and discuss again after eight years under our soon to be gone dictator. I'm not worried about Obama's centrist position. I believe it is being sculpted to assure the people of the right (not the party) that we all live in one nation, that we are all Americans. I don't think Obama will foster "regressive" policies just to appease a party that happens to believe in them. He is, in a sense, embodying the fundamentalist Christian notion of "hate the sin but love the sinner." I have many friends who happen to be Republicans that I love dearly. Even the most adamant of them seem to be accepting that progressive ideas are not as bad as the corporations and their political henchmen have played them out to be. I think they are secretly hopeful. The Republican crimes will all come out in the wash and perhaps the people in the Republican party will come to understand that their party was pretty much co-opted by the worst among us. I await the day when they can actually contribute to the national discussion in a way that improves the country. Wouldn't it be great if half the country stopped working against solutions best for all the people?
Wouldn't it be funny if "O" turned out to be just another "decider"?
I also find it interesting how the term "global warming" has been utterly abandoned by its disciples, in favor of the term "climate change." Hello?! The earth's climate has been "changing" for 4.5 billion years. I'd be worried if it weren't changing!
And has anyone ever heard of "ice ages"? Were those and the subsequent thaws caused by humans?
Dave
http://daveeriqat.wordpress.com/
I think 'climate instability' is a more useful phrase, and instability isn't good, even denial-ists and rightwingnuts can agree on that (I think).
"global warming" has always been understood to include more extreme weather events in every direction.
Judging by the amount of high latitude ice loss in Greenland and the Arctic Ocean, yes things are warming up.
This might create really harsh conditions in Europe however as Greenland's meltwater turns off the Gulf Stream.
Europe is way far north. I had to literally look at a globe to believe that Rome, Italy is farther north than New York City, USA.
Yes we could experience dramatic global cooling. If for instance the Yellowstone supervolcano explodes. But what I don't understand is that the steps needed to mitigate "global warming" make excellent ecological sense and are necessary in any event, even if "global warming" is taken out of the equation. We still need to reduce our carbon footprint, etc. etc. That is just practicing good resource management. "Global warming" doesn't even need to factor into it.
Oh, just read that the Younger Dryas ice age might have been caused by meteors ! Exploding over North America !
billiam1, great comment.
Most Obama-bashers love to accuse him of supporting "regressive" policies. But they can never support their claims with evidence or a well-reasoned arguments.
They won't give him a chance - even though they voted for him! And he's not even president yet!:)
"hate the sin but love the sinner."
Very true.
End the Iraq War by 2011. Support the troops!
G*d bless.
Ursa I am guarded - We will know soon enough if our actions will require us to be supportive, or will we need to unite in protest and opposition.
We all agree that 2009 will require strong action from all of us!
I am neither hopeful nor terrified.
But then, I fon't live in a gringocentric universe.
Here in Mexico, however, it is true that most of our problems are rooted in the perversely close and yet perversely distant relationship between this country and the US: narcoviolence (turf battles between cartels who satisfy gringos' addictions), destroyed agricultural sector (NAFTA), economy in the toilet. The only one that probably is not 100% directly atributible to that relationship is the pocketing of Mexico's petroleum profits by its thieving politicians.
If one does not base one's security on material elements, situations are not terrifying.
But that does not make them hopeful.
Reality lies in multiple shades of grey in between the two poles.
Like it always does.
Serena: Basing one's life on materiality is a waste, to begin with. The petrogreed of the US is also a waste and will be the downfall of this great "empire". Thanks for your thoughts. Somehow, even though I don't converse well en Espanol, I wish I lived in Mexico.
Mexico is one of the most corrupt nation in the Americas. One might certainly blame the US for many things but not for every ill that exists. Your constant negativity and castigating of three hundred million marks you and not this nation's population.
When progress is achieved it will be despite such as you and certainly not because of those who act as you do.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
.Are you completely bereft of reason? I know that you are utterly consumed with hatred, perhaps that is why you label on of the most adamant opponents of Israeli policies towards the Palestinian people on this forum as you do.
Perhaps you simply keep a list of epithets to hand and pass them around indiscriminately ? Ohm, and my point was that your constant and stupid insulting of 300 million people is really, really ridiculous. Your point, on the other hand, is firmly on the top of your head..So, still wearing the ruby slippers? Watch out for houses.
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
.
You came in here with guns blasting, insulting and demeaning , not only the members of this forum, but the entire population of the USA as well. Those who first reacted to your (re)appearance noted that they remembered your tactless, hateful and distorted garbage from previous visits here. So dont give me your sick shit about my own medicine, obviously you own the pharmacy.
I cannot figure out how you expect any credibility but then I do not claim to understand the workings of a diseased mind like yours. You claim to live in Mexico so , as that nation is incredibly corrupt, why not waste their time instead of ours?
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Yes, it's pretty obvious that Mexico suffers greatly by its proximity to gringoland relative to its southern neighbors. It is the Mexicans who are losing their food self-sufficiency to the gringos. Probably the unspoken truth is that the Mexican elite's petro-profiiteering stems from their obligations of their membership in the secret petro-society, although during this past speculative petro-bonanza in gringoland, Mexican gasoline prices remained quite stable. It may be that the petro-profiteers in gringoland were simply joining in the economy-wide lawless free for all where profiteers took a grand total of over $5 trillion from the public, which elected them for their "family values".
Darn lovely to see Obama's name spoken positively in a CD article. Barack takes a lot of heat here, but gosh, he has not been sworn in yet!
.He takes heat for what he does, not for what he might do. 'Not yet sworn in' as an excuse to exempt him from criticisms seems a weak argument. If you are happy with the retention of Gates in Defense, the appointment of Holder to Justice so be it, but others, myself included are far from pleased and believe it points to a path we do not wish taken.
I see boundless enthusiasm in a poorer light than might others I suppose. Joe Hope, are you reading these words?
.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
I am not sure that I have a problem with Gates honestly. He seems competent, which is surely needed after the mess Rumsfeld left. He also does not seem to let his ideology dictate how he runs the military, but I do not know much about him. Do you not like hum just because Bush appointed him, or are there other reasons?
I don't like him for other reasons, such as: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11607
Thanks for the info, I wasn't aware of that. Is there anything that Reagan didn't fuck up in this country?