Hey Reagan Democrats: Now Do You Get It?
"And now, ladies and gentlemen, if you'll just follow me over in this direction, I'd like to show you one of our rarest and most reviled species here at The Human Zoo - it's the proverbial ‘Reagan Democrat'.
"Most of your younger visitors here at the Zoo have no idea what a Reagan Democrat could be, so I always like to take the time to explain it to them. Indeed, most of them don't even know what Reagan was, except that they keep hearing the people who wrecked Old America talk about this wrinkled prune faced guy with the Gumby hair as if he were some sort of deity. I get a lot of questions about how someone could actually have done things that don't sound even remotely plausible, but I generally leave that for the historians to explain, other than to remind people that injecting religious dogma into politics doesn't just mean stupidity only when it comes to policies related to sexuality, war, taxation, the economy or the environment.
"But already I digress... The Reagan Democrat (technically, Imbecelicus politici) was always the strangest and most contemptuous of species from the habitat of American politics, as you've perhaps already heard. Try to imagine another example from the animal kingdom that could be so readily counted upon to bring harm upon itself and others. There are some of course, but usually they are simply ignorant animals, often with very limited cranial capacity.
"The Reagan Democrat, on the other hand, was simply obnoxiously greedy, and took great pains to aggregate to itself as much stuff as was possible, including even meaningless psychological affirmations of its existential worth. It wasn't very long, of course, before another animal in the jungle noticed this tendency, and established a parasitic relationship with the Reagan Democrat. These others were known as The Wealthy (Plutocratus illegitimi), and they got very rich - though they could still never seem to achieve happiness - by exploiting the opportunities provided to them by the Reagan Democrat. A very mean-spirited and deceitful group of marketing gurus like Lee Atwater and Karl Rove were generally the weapon of choice for accomplishing this.
"Anyhow, before we enter the exhibit, perhaps I should stop now and take any questions. Yes, you, young lady, what can I tell you?"
"Well, sir, you've never quite defined what a Reagan Democrat is. And, especially, why someone associated with Mr. Reagan would be a Democrat. Wasn't he from that other party, the, uh..., the... Regressocans? ...the Degenocrats?"
"Ah, fine questions, indeed, and you're quite right that I've been remiss in not explaining those fundamentals so far. It's an occupational hazard, I suppose. We zoo curators get so caught up in admiring our own erudition that we sometimes we forget to do our jobs properly!
"Speaking of which, where were we...? Oh, yes, I was going to answer your questions about the meaning of this term. First of all, let's get that political party name straight. Reagan was a Republican. That's what makes the creature we're about to see so interesting. It came from working class roots, often recently arrived just a generation earlier from some very poor Eastern European country or such. Its local social unit had only recently been elevated to the middle class, and this achievement had everything to do with the progressive policies the Democratic Party. For the first time ever, and because of these policies, it had a good job, a house in the suburbs, two cars, and it could send its offspring to institutions of higher education which had previously been reserved exclusively for elites, as represented by Mr. Reagan's party.
"But it was very, very greedy, and thus differentiated itself off into a new species which was marked by the fact that it could have its underdeveloped psychology readily appealed to for purposes of exploitation by Republican operatives, representing the economic elite species. In fact, it was actually pretty easy to do. All they had to do was throw some line about an evil foreign bogeyman down to the Reagan Democrat, or perhaps a story about uppity darker skinned members of the genus, or some televised ruse about how very, very bad people were out to destroy Christmas, the silly religious holiday of yore... Anything like that would generally work.
"It really didn't matter very much what ploy was chosen, though the more naked the appeal to greed or vanity, the better. For instance, a handful of elites could carve out for themselves massive chunks of the commonwealth's (formerly) common wealth, but as long as they tossed a few pennies in the direction of the Reagan Democrat at the same time, the latter was sure to support what amounted to his or her own financial undoing, every time. Likewise, since the Reagan Democrat tended to be the most fearful and the most self-loathing of animals in the human sphere, the basest appeals to its vanity could also buy votes en masse, and on the cheap, too. You just had to make him feel a little bigger than someone else - women, foreigners, brown people, homosexuals - it didn't really matter. Then you could get his vote and pick his pocket."
"Excuse me, sir, but what do you mean by pick his pocket?"
"Ah, yes, well that means that you could go to Washington and make policies that actually hurt the Reagan Democrat, but he would nevertheless support them, because you had fooled him with some sort of ruse, such as those I just mentioned. Does that make sense?"
"Well, not entirely. But perhaps if we could actually see one now, it would all become more clear."
"I thought you'd never ask! If you'll just follow me around this corner... and just down this hall a bit... turn right here... no, no - hard right... once more, please... And there he is! We've preserved his natural habitat, and you can actually see him in his normal condition right now. As you may observe first-hand, he is now sound asleep. One might well note that this is both a literal and metaphorical condition. See what I mean about curator erudition! In any case, note the Reagan Democrat in his prime. He's about sixty or so, sitting in his comfortable suburban home, leaning back in his recliner chair. On the side stand are several empty beer cans - nothing fancy, of Coors. Note also the remains of his meal of chicken wings and potato chips on a plate, sitting next to an array of primitive remote control devices. He has a football game on the wide-screen television - it appears to be the Pittsburgh Steelers versus the Dallas Cowboys - and he is as pleasantly divorced from reality as any drunken afternoon of passive entertainment provided by organized violence could possibly offer. Check out the drool oozing down his chin."
"But is he happy, sir?"
"Well, no, of course not. I would have thought that would be obvious by the bloated belly, the need to stay drunk, the passive entertainment of the televison set as his best friend, the reveling in organized violence all day long, and the general narcosis of the specimen. But, in fact, there is more. He is greedy and selfish and jealous and narcissistic and bitter. He is a walking demographic for political operatives who see him coming from ten miles away and cater to his every resentment with lies about the reasons for his unhappiness, lies about how to solve his problems, and lies about their actual motivation in seeking his vote. And, what is more, it works - just about every time. The Reagan Democrat, in short, is a pathetic sight. Unfit, unhealthy, unhappy, uncaring, unintelligent and highly unappealing. Worst of all, a hypocrite. After decades of being the direct beneficiary of progressive policies made in Washington, he seeks to pull up the ladder behind him, so no one else can use it. Really, I think we'd all have to agree, this is clearly one of the most disgusting and parasitic creatures of the animal kingdom. ‘Leeches with legs', as I like to call them! Though, really, even that's far too generous, since leeches don't have much in the way of other options."
"Well, what happened to them? I thought they were extinct...?"
"Almost, but as you can see for yourself, a few rare specimens survive to this day, carefully preserved under highly controlled conditions. But most of them are long gone now, the victims of natural selection. That was especially ironic, of course, since one of the fairly tales they were sold - and happily bought - was the dogmatic religious bit about evolutionary theory being false. Oops! In any case, they were essentially full participants in their own fleecing, until there was just nothing left anymore. For three decades they sucked down the mantras of right-wing political propaganda, just as they sucked down their anesthetizing carbonated alcoholic preparations. For three decades they belched their way into the voting booth to choose Republican candidates who advocated attacking some third world country, or ending affirmative action, or fighting against the secular war on Christmas, or denying food benefits to some poor kid living just two blocks away, or keeping women in their place, or - especially - cutting taxes.
"And for three decades these victorious Republican politicians marched off to Washington, whereupon they played a little at tokenist fulfillment of these campaign promises, but meanwhile set about in great earnestness and energy to do what they had really come to do. Namely, to fleece the people who had put them there, the Reagan Democrats. And so they did. Massively, and continuously. Until there was nothing left to fleece anymore.
"And thus ends our story, my young friends, and I thank you so much for coming to the Human Zoo today. I hope you've enjoyed your visit!"
"But, excuse me, sir. One last question, please. Could they really have been that dumb? Even after three decades of being ripped-off, did they not ever wise up?"
"Well, I say, you really are quite a smart little whippersnapper, aren't you, young lady?! Another very good question. As a matter of fact, yes, some of them are reported to have begun to figure this out toward the end of the first decade of the twenty-first century. After all their selfishness, after all their aggressiveness, after all their self-loathing, and even after all their beloved tax cuts, they began to notice that they had not gained an inch in their standard of living from where they had been three decades earlier, when they abandoned the progressive politics that had helped put them in the middle class to begin with, and in fact they discovered that they had lost ground enormously. Moreover, they noticed that the plutocratic class had become fantastically wealthier during that same time period. Indeed, in three decades, the richest ten percent of Americans had gone from bringing home about a third of all national income to about half, just like it had been in 1929.
"Oh, and speaking of which, it was a nearly letter-perfect repeat of the Great Depression - complete with Republican governments, massive tax favors for the rich, deregulation, Gilded Age style polarization of wealth, and a devastating global economic implosion - that finally began to awaken many Reagan Democrats from their slumber. The capper was what the Republicans did in an attempt to ‘bail-out' the sinking economy. The very people who had failed to regulate the folks causing the Even Greater Depression of the early twenty-first century now took $700 billion worth of taxpayer money and handed it to those same financial ‘industry' crooks, without any requirements at all on what they could do with the money, not even restrictions against bonuses or getaways to five-star resorts. But when the blue collar auto industry wanted just $15 billion to keep millions of middle class jobs afloat, the Republicans wouldn't give it to them.
"This was altogether just too much, and by this time even acephalic Reagan Democrats began to figure out they'd been duped. And while many could never admit their stupidity and their greed, some quietly returned to being just regular old Democrats again.
"Indeed, in 2008, not only did many of them vote for a Democrat for president, they even voted for a black Democrat. Amazing!
"Of course, he did promise them tax cuts...
"Well, anyhow, thank you once again for joining us on the tour here at the Human Zoo. I hope you've enjoyed your stay.
"Please do be careful as you exit. As always, the way out is to the left."
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
33 Comments so far
Show Allthis week... i work for a state agency... and one of the lesser funded ones... i.e., low salaries... so the gals downstairs say... come down for bagels... so i do... and what do i find... 5 types of cream cheese "shmear"...
this is what's wrong... folks barely able to put gas... even at <$40 barrel into their 12 year old cars... buying "schmear"...
everybody's trying to live the aristocratic lifestyle... and now that it's "available" at walmart... everyone can "afford" it...
i thought it was bush sr. who brought the racist bigoted "southern" democrats into the republican fold... at one point he faced near politcal extinction for voting with the pre-cursor to the civil rights legislation...
go and see "bogeyman:the lee atwater story" - independent film... "reagan" democrats... whatever... they're racists... bigots... misogynists... homophobes... and that picture of the fat slob on sunday watching football is perfect...
fuck 'em... they're a dying breed... overburdening the health care system... fat... dumb... lazy...
one thing... obama is the first of the post baby boomers... times will change... but it's now the nex gen's turn to call the shots...
A Reagan Demok loves his material convenience/luxury as much as his redneck chevy drivin southun Repuk peer. The only difference is he is union instead of confederate. All the Demoks/Repuks toe the same elite establishment line. They all enjoy the ten million different pastry flavors that America, Inc has to offer. God Bless the United Convenience/Luxury Addicts of America! To hell with habeas corpus! The Repuks/Demoks want their cheesecake!
Lol at this great article. Europeans do not often fall for cheap political tricks. And they have been rewarded for this by having a better quality of life.
There is no party (that gets a large number of votes) as far to the right as the American Republican party in any other developed country. The whole world has come to realize that this party is a menace and a plague.
And, as so many are fond of pointing out at this site, many Democrats in recent decades have become Republicans in disguise.
As a result of right wing extremism, America would seem to be on track for more or less total destruction, sort of like Germany some decades ago, unless it could just somehow get rid of the Republicans and the Democrat-Republicans. Too bad Walmart doesn't have a spray for this, lol.
So that's alot easier said than done. Yet on the other hand, there have been revolutions where very few or no shots were fired. So who knows what will happen if the economy does in fact collapse and not recover much at all.
Now is the time in America for a third party, a centrist European style party, because there is literally nothing to lose anymore. The country is about as wrecked as it can get. I'm sure Europeans would help with the development of such a party.
Hey Mr. Green! What about all the democrats that went along with the Taft-Hartley act? At that time reagan was just some b-movie bum that liked pointing fingers at "communists" for the HUAC.
And Robert Kennedy worked for Senator Joe McCarthy!
There are no "Reagan Democrats". Those so named were just fools.
Well, ya, the Republicans and Reagan Democrats do tend to identify (I'm not sure why) more with owners than workers. I think they're confused by right wing free-market mumbo jumbo. They forget that they would all be lower class if not for labor unions and administrations who legitimated them.
On the other hand, will "democrat" Obama reindustrialize the USA and revive the American worker? We were told Clinton identified with the American worker and now his globalist policies -- continued by Bush -- are being seen for what they really are: pro-Globo-Business (and unfavorable to the majority of American workers).
www.sillyConValley.net
It seems that Mr. Green was trying to be witty, he missed the mark. The inadequacies in his thinking have been aptly pointed out by others above.
"Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
Green does occasionally write some witty, informative pieces, but this one is overly simplistic, cartoonish and rather insulting. It also reveals how much of a Democratic party hack he is, since it is wrong in so many ways(and I'm no Republican or conservative). There is so much more blame to go around than just blaming Bush and Reagan and the Republicans for everything. Bush may very well go down as one of the worst presidents in U.S history, but the Democrats also played an important role in this mess.
I agree with the previous poster on why America was so prosperous after WW II, to the point that the working class was raised into the middle class for a few decades: Every other major economy in the world after the war was in ruins or severely strained by the war. The ruling class could afford to be generous and the Democratic party doesn't deserve so much credit. Green would have you believe the Democrats waved a magic wand and voila! The working class magically became middle class!
That said, I loathe with all my heart the neoconservatives. Their philosophy is a combination of the worst elements of liberalism and conservatism, which is why it is so dangerous. The core group of "conservatives" in the movement are perfectly at ease with liberals who support their war-mongering, like Joe Lieberman for example. Indeed, so many of the so-called "conservatives" who founded the movement were long-time liberals or Trotskyites who became conservatives. I hope they fall and never rise again.
How about a description for a DLC Democrat, aka, the Clintons, Obama, Rahm Emanuel, Joe Biden etc etc.
Those DLC Democrat are worse than Reagan Democrats. They are in the ruling
class and are worse tha Reagan. They are following both the Domestic and foreign
policies of the neo-cons.
Don't worry, be happy, Reaganomics is dead and dying.
Prof Green explains what a Reagan Democrat is in this passage: "...Its local social unit had only recently been elevated to the middle class, and this achievement had everything to do with the progressive policies (of) the Democratic Party..."
- This explanation is misleading & completely inadequate. It gives the Democratic Party far too much credit for the ascent of workers into the middle class, & wholly ignores the reason why the DP seemed to adopt "progressive policies" in the first place (from about 1934 to about 1968).
American workers were elevated into the middle class in the postwar era mainly as a result of the great WWII victory, which was followed by an unprecedented prosperity wave. In the USA's glory years, all its rivals & enemies had been knocked flat on their backs by the great conflagration, so the US was the only great power left standing. For a while, therefore, there was so much prosperity that the ruling class could afford to be "generous."
The reason the DP seemed "progressive" starting in 1934 or so was not because it was committed to protecting the working class. It was because under conditions of economic collapse, ruling circles rightly feared spreading social disorder, or even revolution, if the working class weren't offered a better, fairer deal. Therefore, the DP was willing to make certain limited class concessions. They were willing to give up a little, to preserve a lot. They understood that it was either this, or lose the whole ballgame.
As Scott Knight rightly points out above, the article "conveniently forgets to point how the Democrats were complicit in very injustice committed by Reagan, Clinton, Bush and Bush." All in all, Prof Green is far too impressed with himself as a commentator. He's really just a Dem Party Apologist, when push comes to shove, just like people at The Nation magazine, or the editors of CD, for that matter (who ban posters for rightly criticizing the stinking Democrats).
Sioux Rose
DAVID BRONSTEIN: Well-said. I do think party loyalties mar the thinking process of some our better thinkers, writers & educators.
You may be right, but, it seems to me that political discourse in the U.S. can only be Democrat or Republican.
The flaw is not in loyalties but in venues for expression.
Congratulations Prof. Green, great article.
My father who was a lifetime Reug AND career FBI agent resigned from the Repugs with malice like raydelcamino due to the hate, lies and corruption that his governorship brought to California. He resigned from the FBI early because the Feds would not prosecute Reagan appointees.
But I could be wrong !
I love the way you end all your posts: "But I could be wrong." I've been using it a lot lately. Also, kudos to Dr. Wu, Last of the Big Time Thinkers.
Along those same lines, here's a potent stanza from a Leonard Cohen song ("Tower of Song") --
"The rich have got their channels in the bedrooms of the poor;
And there's a mighty judgement coming -- But I may be wrong!..."
Unfortunately this article conveniently forgets to point how the democrats were complicit in very injustice committed by Reagan, Clinton, Bush and Bush. I guess my hope is that all wake up including Reagan democrats and realize neither party gives a flying fuck about them or their well being. But being the good sheeple they are,combined with this author's and many others obfuscations we know that will never happen.
I campaigned for Ronny Raygun when he first ran for governor of CA in 1966. By mid-1967 it was apparent that I was mistaken and I have never voted for a Republican.
When Reagan won the 1980 presidential election, I determined that the future of the US working class was in danger and I questioned whether I should have children because the US was rapidly becoming a nation unfit for human habitation. When Reagan won the 1984 election by an even bigger margin, there was no doubt that the US electorate was permanently delusional and I was in the urologist chair the following week to get a vasectomy.
As much as I would have loved to have children, the 1986 income tax overhaul, ever expanding financial industry deregulation and other actions favoring the 2% at the expense of the 98%, have validated my decision.
After working for forty years I would love to retire so that my family wage job could be taken by a young person. Retirement, however, is not likely. The cost of medical insurance would be more than I would get from my meager social security (my wife and I have no pre-existing conditions - that we are aware of). There are no caps on how high insurance premiums and property taxes can climb for retirees. Heaven forbid if we ever need to buy drugs.
Thanks to the "Reagan Democrats" who later became the "swing voters" that the media love to discuss, the systematic destruction of the working class is now complete.
I never had any children for precisely the same reason and it was one of the wisest decisions I ever made.
Why middle class people who work for a living and draw a salary voted to destroy their own way of life will remain one of the greatest mysteries of American history. Many of the explanations make perfect sense up to a point. But there always seems to be something missing.
That thing that's missing is the fact that we are being fiercely lied to and robbed, drained of our moral fiber, and corrupted by stress and untruths. The evil in this world is so dominant, we have to fight it! Fight harder!!! Help each other, say hi to each other! Shovel a neighbor's sidewalk for them before they get home if you can, take a bag of rice or some beans or high quality, healthy nonperishable food to a food bank if you can. Finally donate those clothes that you have but don't ever wear, and never will to a charity that gives them away to people in need, if you make a huge pot of soup, take some over for an elderly neighbor to eat...GROW SOME VEGETABLES AND GIVE THE SURPLUS AWAY!! Kindness and cooperation can help us. Compassion and wisdom and love and persistence and a lot of hard work, and a lot of temporary suffering can take us farther than our government will ever be able to take us, because yes, that is right,Rich people will never regard us. We have to stop being afraid to regard each other. WE HAVE TO STOP LETTING THEM ROB US! THE TOP TEN PERCENT OF THE COUNTRY IS ROBBING THE OTHER 90 PERCENT. THEY ARE REALLY OUTNUMBERED, RIGHT? WE COULD STOP THEM, EH? FEAR AND LIES HAVE TO STOP DOMINATING EVERYONE'S PERCEPTION, AND WE NEED TO GROW INTERNALLY TOGETHER AS A CULTURE.
I think the image of a humble down-to-earth simple and neighborly life, while probably equating to the best of human nature, is the very thing that has undone the democrats. The republicans have successfully linked this image with the perception of a do-nothing have-nothing bleeding heart who expects the government and society to continually do more and more for them. Of course these well-intentioned folk can and do volunteer for just causes, and donate their old coats, games, stuffed animals, food or the like, but when it comes to understanding the power and money that makes the world go 'round, they remain blissfully and humongously ignorant. How many times do these plain and simple-minded folk say, "If I can help just one person...?"
The Reagan Democrat is a person that cannot resolve their internal conflict, thus making them all the more susceptible to outside influences. They buy into Madison & Fifth Avenue consumer hype, the fear of unknown enemies and the false idea that people of power and influence, CEOs and politicians, are basically good human beings doing what's best for everyone. These disillusioned souls believe if they are law-abiding and don't rock the boat, at work or in the community, that they too can have the "good life." They are not the question-authority or think-for-themselves independent types, but rather are the play-along get-along types. These are the real sheeple afraid of the wolves and of straying very far from the herd. They didn't get detentions in school but then neither did they excel at much. They are the ones with the my child is an honor roll student bumper sticker on their buy-american chevy.
They, and all the mass-produced drones of the American 20th Century, can easily act against their own best interests because they just simply cannot make the connection between what is going on in the world and what happens with them. Political, economic, environmental, social and religious issues are abstract notions that have no direct bearing on them, leastwasy until their children develop cancer from the nearby dumped toxins, or the like. Trying to have a deep and meaningful conversation with them will likely result in a comment like, "I don't know about that, but I know if I don't get to work tomorrow I won't have a job, so none of 'that' matters."
The truth is, even amongst those with much greater knowledge and conscious, that the connections between the influences of power and the affects of those influences remain mysterious. The only real differences amongst people are that those on the right know they have the answers, those on the left never stop questioning, and everyone else in the middle simply don't want to think about it.
Since first discovering this forum I've been amazed by the dichotomy that exists here. On one hand there is a great deal of knowledge and opinion regarding a wide range of issues. On the other hand there is an almost complete lack of comprehension for the core assumptions and basic human nature that underly and gives substance to those issues. It is at once both very simple and very complex.
Until we learn to focus on what we all share in common, and implement accordingly, then we are fated to contend with one another - democrats against democrats even. Yes, the Reagan Democrats seemed not to get it, but how could you not expect that? Given the larger system and its influence, its priorities and psychology, the Reagan Democrat was a completely understandable and even predictable phenomena.
And the continued use of political labels only muddies the discussions. These labels convey assumptions and ideas that frame issues in context of the past not the future. Every democrat, liberal and independent should want to have a conversation that frames issues in terms of where we are going, of what is best for our posterity and what that looks like, instead of hashing over the endless mind-numbing semiology of society done wrong.
Does the right really have all the answers and the left has nothing but questions? No, it's more like this: The right's answer is class hierarchy, and the left's answer is universal equity/justice. How would you like to repeat the left's answer? Too controversial? I hope not. Pick it up. I'll say it again. The left's answer is universal equity/justice. Do you think this topic is worth discussing? I guess the natural laws are worth discussing. The only way to maximize human happiness is universal equity/justice. Are we going to have it? Or will we forget about it and instead have yet another of the 10 million pastry flavors? Ho hum, let's try the blueberry next! Yum!
let me repeat that:
Every democrat, liberal and independent should want to have a conversation that frames issues in terms of where we are going, of what is best for our posterity and what that looks like, instead of hashing over the endless mind-numbing semiology of society done wrong.
my governor talks about whether we're focusing on the rear view mirror or the future. i'm all for taking this crisis as an opportunity to reinvent our economy in a much greener and socially just fashion.
for peace and sustainability
I assume that the line at the end, "But he did promise them tax cuts", said about Obama, was a hint that we can expect what we're already seeing: more of the same Reagan era behavior. Obama himself has praised Reagan and looks primed to continue the massive changes brought in by Reagan ... yes, changes; Reagan represented an abrupt and destructive break with the post-WWII administrations that had proceeded him. His claims to be returning to "traditional values" and the "mainstream" were hogwash. He just wanted to destroy both the social programs of the 60s and the ones from the 30s, which had been overwhelmingly beneficial to the nation. His administration wasn't at all "conservative" and had nothing to do with "traditional values". It's unfortunate, to say the least, that his rhetoric is now accepted as reality and emulated by all who've followed.
I take issue with the insinuation of many that Democrats who adopt damaging Republican ways of doing things are worse than the actual Republicans themselves. The Democrats are wrongheaded and damaging, yes, but the Republicans instigated the criminality, overwhelmingly leading the way. They are more at fault. And Rush Limbaugh-style caricatures of Democrats and other progressives, as referenced by kivals above, don't hold up to scrutiny.
One of the legacies of the Reagan years affects the believability of this very piece: cuts in education spending and the encouragement of anti-intellectual attitudes in the population, trends that have also only gotten worse since Reagan set them in motion. I find it very unlikely, given current levels of discourse in this undereducated country, that a young person will even be able to talk with as much clarity and with as great a vocabulary as the fictional museum visitor in this satire set in the near future.
"Obama himself has praised Reagan and looks primed to continue the massive changes brought in by Reagan ..."
Don't worry deang it is all part of his "grand plan" trust the one he is secretly an ultra progressive who will save us if we just have faith.
Boy that was good, I almost convinced myself!
"Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
The only difference between our two main political parties is the name they take. An out-of-the-box-view would show you that there is but one political party today. Dems and Repubs are more like branches of the real political power in America - Corporate America and its media.
Hoa binh
I agree with you 100%.
I agree with yoy 100%.
Two sides of the same bad penny!
"Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups."
- John Kenneth Galbraith
Ah. Ralph Nader was right all along.
Professor Green for some reason completely ignores any fault of the Democrats in losing the votes of the "Reagan Democrats." As the Democratic politicians became increasingly pro-corporate, and depended to an ever greater extent on "identity politics" which was easily portrayed as reeking of cultural elitism, it was not that surprising that the working class Democrats would choose the corporatist party that claimed to support traditional values and mainstream culture over the corporatist party that supported cultural and social changes that millions in fly-over country were not comfortable with.