Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Middle Class Must Not Be Forced to Bail Out Wall Street Greed
For years, as a member of the House Banking Committee and now as a member of the Senate Budget Committee, I have heard the Bush Administration tell us how "robust" our economy was and how strong the "fundamentals" were. That was until a few days ago. Now, we are being told that if Congress does not act immediately and approve the $700 billion Wall Street bailout proposal these "free marketers" have just written up, there will be an unprecedented economic meltdown in the United States and an unraveling of the global economy.
This proposal as presented is an unacceptable attempt to force middle income families (and our children) to pick up the cost of fixing the horrendous economic mess that is the product of the Bush Administration's deregulatory fever and Wall Street's insatiable greed. If the potential danger to our economy was not so dire, this blatant effort to essentially transfer $700 billion up the income ladder to those at the top would be laughable.
Let us be clear. If the economy is on the edge of collapse we need to act. But rescuing the economy does not mean we have to just give away $700 billion of taxpayer money to the banks. (In truth, it could be much more than $700 billion. The bill only says the government is limited to having $700 billion outstanding at any time. By selling the mortgage-backed assets it acquires - even at staggering losses - the government will be able to buy even more resulting is a virtually limitless financial exposure on the part of taxpayers.) Any proposal must protect middle income and working families from bearing the burden of this bailout.
I have proposed a four part plan to accomplish that goal which includes a five-year, 10% surtax on the income of individuals above $500,000 a year, and $1 million a year for couples; a requirement that the price the government pays for any mortgage assets are discounted appropriately so that government can recover the amount it paid for them; and, finally, the government should receive equity in the companies it bails out so that when the stock of these companies rises after the bailout, taxpayers also have the opportunity to share in the resulting windfall. Taken together, these measures would provide the best guarantee that at the end of five years, the government will have gotten back the money it put out.
Second, in addition to protecting the average American from being saddled with the cost, any serious proposal has to include reforms so that we end the type of behavior that led to this crisis in the first place. Much of this activity can be traced to specific legislation that broke down regulatory safety walls in the financial sector and allowed banks and others to engage in new types of risky transactions that are at the heart of this crisis. That deregulation needs to be repealed. Wall Street has shown it cannot be trusted to police itself. We need to reinstate a strong regulatory system that protects our economy.
Third, we need to address the needs of working families in this country who are today facing very difficult times. If we can bail out Wall Street, we need to respond with equal vigor to their plight. That means, for example, creating millions of jobs through major investments in rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure and creating a new renewable energy system. We must also make certain that the most vulnerable Americans don't freeze in the winter or die because they lack access to primary health care.
Finally, we need to protect ourselves from being at the mercy of giant companies that are "too big to fail," that is, companies who are so large that their failure would cause systemic harm to the economy. We need to assess which companies fall into this category and insist they are broken up. Otherwise, the American taxpayer will continue to be on the financial hook for the risky behavior, the mismanagement, and even the illegal conduct of these companies' executives.
These are the last days of the Bush Administration, the most dishonest and incompetent in modern American history. It is imperative that, at this important moment, Congress stand up for the middle class and for fiscal integrity. The future of our country is at stake.



68 Comments so far
Show AllListen to Sen. Sanders, he is one of the handful of national politicians you can trust to not speak out of the side of his mouth.
(Among other things) this "bailout" is a scam to keep the house of cards from fallíng until after the (s)election.
___________
There's a glory in the morning because the earth turns 'round and a promise in the evening when the sun goes down
Sanders is , as (almost) always, correct. I think he sets the income levels too high.
It would certainly be in the "capitalism lovers" best interests to accept these modest proposals, or get the hell out of the country (deport them) and revoke their US citizenship, for treason , during time of war . (But, hell we're always at war)
The entire world is sick to death (literally) of it.
Smokey H
Yes I agree with Sanders.
But how do we citizens get the Congress to stop and listen to this voice of reason when they seem so hell-bent on giving Bush, The Fed and all these fat CEO's a blank check at everyone else's expense?
If enough people would show up at the "hearing" ofr'debate" (enough that they couldnt throw out), then, at least most uS citizerns would be informed about why theyre so sore--from gettin g screwed
STOP putting your money (tax $$$) in their account. That's one way.
Please enlighten me here:
Is SENATOR Obama calling for massive re-regulation of the financial "industry" (some "industry": produces nothing but trouble.)? He and Biden could be introducing bills for this purpose. Are they? Or are they just going along with the "rich man's dream"?
What do you think you could do about that?
Oregoncharles
I get damned tired of hearing about the "middle class" disappearing! Doesn't anyone with a mouth called a "pundit" realize that below the middle is a freaking "BOTTOM" and that the bottom may COMPLETELY fall out from under them/us?!
"Crack open a cynic and you will find an angry idealist!"
The middle class, such as it is, is not the bottom. Talk to homeless people. Listen to homeless people.
You don't read very well: THAT was my point!
"Crack open a cynic and you will find an angry idealist!"
In Dayton , they have actually passed a law, that , if you want to ask for money (that includes playing music and leaving a guitar case oopen) , you have to apply for a "license" with a pic on it (!!), and pay $5--every day.
Sorry for being off topic but if you are inclined, please go to this PBS link and vote whether you believe Palin is qualified to run for VP. The right is storming the website:
http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html
Who would ever make a home loan to a middle class American tax payer? With this government imposed debt load no man is credit worthy. And so it goes, the American Dream and the usurious mortgage lenders all go together...
If our Congress had more folks the likes of Sanders, Ralph Nader would be winning big time and he would be more relevant today.
Don't forget, Sanders is an Independent. Wouldn't it be nice to put an Independent in the WH who might actually sign legislation such as Sanders proposes? Let's see now, who's running as an independent who might do that? Hmmm, what's that feller's name again? Oh yeah, some guy named Nader.
Bravo Bernie Sanders! A Voice of Sanity in our insane broken political system! I agree with the comments made here, and I also agree that instead of $500,000 it should be $250,000.
But why are the Democrats so spineless? What has happened to what is left of their brains? As others have said, WHY isn't SENATOR Obama offering something concrete RIGHT NOW??
"But why are the Democrats so spineless? What has happened to what is left of their brains? As others have said, WHY isn't SENATOR Obama offering something concrete RIGHT NOW??"
Simple, because Obama is in it up to his ears - http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contriball.php?cycle=2008
ala Obama=Rubin=Goldman Sachs
See http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080922/ap_on_bi_ge/financial_meltdown
"The fast-moving negotiations between the administration and Congress unfolded a day after the government approved a request by investment houses Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley to change their status to bank holding companies.
That change will allow the two venerable institutions to set up commercial banks that will be able to take deposits, significantly bolstering the resources of both institutions. It will also grant them permanent access to emergency loans supplied by the Fed rather than the temporary loan status they have had since last March when the Fed moved to prop up investment banks following the forced sale of Bear Stearns."
The blurb on a Reuter's video clip from today says "Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs gave up their status as investment banks TO PROTECT THEM from the storm that has seen THEIR RIVALS DESTROYED" (caps added) Strange that their rivals were not given that same option,now isn't it?
Until the Dems publicly and openly dump Rubin and Rubinomics, which is what Sanders suggested on DN today, don't believe a word Obama says on this subject. Even if they do, I think it is too late to prevent the stink of this whole thing from sticking to him. Obama now has his own, but much bigger, version of McCain's S&L Keating 5 mess. A pox on both their parties.
I really do think that when all this shakes out, Teapot-Dome will look like a teapot party.
They are not proposing just baling out wallstreet.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said Sunday "that foreign banks will be able to unload bad financial assets under a $700 billion U.S. proposal aimed at restoring order during a devastating financial crisis."
So, now the American taxpayer is also on the hook for foreign banks!
Thank you Senator Sanders for being rational and looking out for the interests of the citizens.
One question - when you have a chance, would you mind ordering the arrest of President Bush and VP Cheney for treason, theft of public funds, violating the constition, and mass murder?
Thanks a bunch, and have a great day.
There is an AG running in Vermont that wantrs to do just that.
I wish Vermont woudl secede--theyve talked of it. It's cold up therre, but at least I wont die inthe house with my heat turned off.
Thank you Bernie Sanders-
This idiot government wants us to fear Islamic terrorists and support the so-called "war on terror" [still not sure what that is] when the real threat is right here inside the beltway. I fear for the future of this country.
Honestly, fuck it all, let the economy collapse so we can start over with one based on sustainability, not capital accumulation.
Agreed!
AMEN!
Senator Sanders. Although I have applauded your efforts on a number of issues that matter deeply to me, I'm afraid that I have to point out something that I see as a basic truth.
You have bought into the bailout... your proposals just tweak it a bit... and your "safeguards and fair play" amendments can easily be circumvented with just a little inventiveness.
The contradiction of your "solution" just calls for cooking the books and creative accounting... a practice in which everyone belonging to "The Party" is fully trained to accomplish... when it serves their political purposes.
Meanwhile, not only do non-corporate entities (raise your hanup humans) get royally screwed, but under your guidance, are led to believe that it should make us feel good.
The answer is NO! Don't be fooled Bernie.
Thank you, Senator Sanders, a voice of reason and common sense who serves all Americans!
Bill in Dubuque
&YYY&
Ha! Ha! The best ploy for the Vampire States would be to ask for debt forgiveness from the World Bank, China, India and third world countries, since the debts are so obviously unpayable, and are going to be crippling the VS economy and public for generations to come, hindering the development and arising from the conditions of poverty, joblessness and soon to be starvation that the average VS person finds themselves in. He! He! He! And would the VS ever forgive third world debt.
I agree. If our country has to go through an IMF structural adjustment like so many developing countries have been subjected to, we will never be irresponsible with our money again.
Some broke states could do like Hemingway and Capt Tony---in Key West.
Secede from the uS, declare war on the US, surrender, and apply for financial reconstruction aid.
Or jsut spend like youre rich, and DC loves you.
Okay Bernie you had a chance to bang on your champion of the little people tom-tom, now how about getting serious by introducing a companion Senate bill for HR 476, Single payer healthcare--get some good progressives like Russ Feingold, Ted Kennedy, Sherrod Brown, and Barbara Boxer to co-sponser it with you.
We could pay for it by reducing the Pentragon budget 10%, withdrawing our troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, and taxing corporations at the same rate as real persons. Hello, Bernie! Bernie are you listening? Yo Bernieeeeee!!!
Poet
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/files/access-for-all-7-31-08.pdf
Sanders, Brown, Obama, Clinton et al are all co-sponsors on this one.
Ir is a step in the right direction. But, it could just prolonge the agony of 15 million uninsured.
We simply have to have single payer.
Bringing home the troops to live in poverty with most of the rest of us may cause a little problem in the streets.
AMEN! BRAVO! It's time to take up poetry again!
Bernie, let the class war aggressors gouge the taxslaves very very deeply, so that the taxslaves may feel the pain, so that they may gain the necessary motivation to join the progressive revolution that will bury forever Friedmanite "laissez-faire" capitalism next to its daddy.
Thank you Sen. Sanders
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/news/record.cfm?id=303279
He has some other good ideas. He supports single payer health care.
So does Senator Brown. Brown says that they are waiting for the House to pass HR 676 (Conyers Medicare for all), because the Senate would just fillibuster it to death. Maybe its an excuse to wait unti after the elections.
Besides, Sanders is a socialist and "Merka hates socialism." No, wait., ummm..never mind..
Tell Sen. Brown "Baloney!", there's nothing to keep any Sen from introducing a companion Senate bill - passing it in the House does nothing to make it filibuster proof. I like Brown, I think, overall, but with regard to this issue, he's blowing smoke. Call his bluff.
Before the democrates agree to this proposal they should insist on strict limits on the executive compensation for every firm that uses the federal (MY) loan!
I agree with ZachP, "let economy crash so we can start over with one based on sustainability--not capital accumulation". Take a look at our Declaration of Independence, "Whenever any Form Of Government becomes destuctive to these ends (to secure our rights to Life, Libery and the Pursuit of Happiness)It is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new governmnent laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."
My safety and happiness requires the impeachment of our 'leaders' and the formation of a new government. This new government shall be a democracy and act in the interests of the living people of the nation. There shall be no concept of 'corporate personhood', and our national interests shall end at the border.
Our present government must not be allowed to pay off the theives with the hard earned money of the working citizens or by our children and grandchildren in the future. Those that gambeled and lost shall weep at their loss but not be repaid by me or mine.
Perhaps you fail to understand the calamity you support with this 'let it crash' concept. It is not those who caused this mess who will suffer but millions upon millions of innocents. Those who bought and sold bundled and worthless paper will live on the many millions they have accumulated while we sell apples in the streets.
Sanders is correct in that those who profited must bear the burden. I doubt he will make any headway however.
We see things, not as they are, but as we are.
Anais Nin
Good ideas. Skip the bailout.
All of the above, plus: one per cent tax on all stock transactions, tax unearned income the same rate as earned income, limit pensions of all government employees to $200,00 a year, limit ALL government employee annual pay increases to the same schedule as social security, dock the pay of congressional people for days not doing the work they were hired to do, charge the administration for expenses incurred during their political travels and speeches.
I think we should tax unearned income at a HIGHER rate than earned income - after all, it is unearned.
Go Bernie!
"the horrendous economic mess that is the product of the Bush Administration's deregulatory fever and Wall Street's insatiable greed."
I agree with the bit about Wall Steet, but I don't think the rest of it can be blamed entirely on Bush (much as I would like to). Deregulation has been a steady process over a number of years -- much in the same way as a cattle stampede is a steady process.
Sioux Rose
At least Sanders is paying attention and not as bamboozled as the insider DC crowd, but... why is this article not published in a large newspaper, only by CD? That implies many are not hearing what he has to say, just buying the PR that the bailout MUST be done NOW! Brought to us by the same team that ruined New Orleans (cleanu-up, etc), lied about air quality in NY, tells us things are going just wonderfully in Iraq, can't account for a missing several trillion, did its no-bid contracts, sees no problem in paying the private army (Blackwater) many times the salaries of average military troops, has weakened the EPA, and tried to narrow the airwaves even more... these people have a blatant track record of all the reasons NOT to trust them (as for Bush, would you buy a used car from this man? style) and now they want the keys to what's left of our treasury? It IS absurd..................
Have you ever seen the ads about dealing with "Gambling addiction?" They run them on late night programs, and you'll find some in the casinos.
The greatest gambling addicts are the speculators that infest Wall Street! Day after day, they place their bets on what will rise and fall. They figure out schemes to beat the wheel. The bets go higher and they borrow to hedge their bets.
Then, one day, they lose. Do they walk out of the Wall Street Casino wearing a barrel? No, they go to Big Daddy Sam, who goes out at gunpoint and takes the money from the non-gambling workers and gives it to the addicts so they can go feed their habit some more.
This has happened so many times it has become routine. Big company in trouble through mismanagement and theft? Sam will make it good, he's got plenty of serfs to tax.
As we slowly go down the tubes, there are fewer and fewer working serfs to pay the bills. One of these days, our currency will be the Yuan, and we will all have to learn Mandarin. By then, those protected addicts will be gambling in Zurich or Dubai with the bail out money supplied by We the People.
The republican fascists have crashed the economy with their free-market deregulation bonanza, and they see the writing on the wall. So what do they do? They paint the democrats into a corner. Either they sign on to the bailout---which, to those with an ability to think critically, is theft---and they get tossed over the coals for capitulating once again. Or they don't sign on to the bailout, and get blamed for not acting to save the economy when they could---it's all their fault. They will take the blame either way. You got to give it to those fascists, they really know how to play the game...
Dear Madcow--
The Democrats have been complicit in the deregulation of the economy since Clinton's administration. We are now reaping the effects of a one-party system that is controlled by the big corporations. Even Obama says he is for Paulson's and Bush's bailout. Who is going to look after those of us who have to work for a living?
"fascists?" Maybe.
"corporatists?" Definitely:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism
Sanders is one of the few decent lawmakers in congress, but it's disappointing that he shows so little interest bolstering a progressive 3rd party like the Greens.
He certainly sees the hopeless corruption of the duopoly. And as a nationally known and respected senator who is nearing the end of his political career due to advanced age, he could give legitimacy and visibility to an alternate party --by joining one, and leading it in his last public days.
His proposed amendments to the legislative bailout may address the present economic meltdown dilemma with some limited cash accountability, but they don't sufficiently address the structural causes of the predicament. It's not phoney insider 're-regulation' that's needed: it's sweeping, democratically-determined structural regulation of financial markets plus public financing of federal elections that's needed, for starters.
On the long shot they are even adopted, Sanders' provisos are not much more than slaps to the wrists of robber barons and corrupt lawmakers who will in consequence remain free to continue abusing their political and financial power and blackmailing the rest of us to accept it all as 'inevitable.'