Email List
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
UK Issues New Guidance on Labelling of Food from Illegal Israeli Settlements
British government calls on supermarkets to tell customers when they are buying food from Israeli settlements in West Bank
The British government has for the first time called on all supermarkets to inform customers clearly when they are buying food produced by Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
A Palestinian farmer examines olives in the West Bank. The British government recommends such food be labelled 'Palestinian produce', while that produced by Israeli settlers in the territory be labelled 'Israeli settlement produce'. (Photograph: Abbas Momani/AFP/Getty Images) The new guidance on food labelling significantly increases UK pressure on Israeli settlements, which are illegal under international law, and increases the prospect of consumer boycotts. Israeli officials and settler leaders were tonight highly critical of the decision.
Until now, food has been simply labelled "Produce of the West Bank", but under the new, voluntary guidance issued by the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), labels should in future give more information. It suggested they say "Israeli settlement produce" or "Palestinian produce".
Nearly 500,000 Jewish settlers live in east Jerusalem and the West Bank. The British government and the European Union has repeatedly said Israel's settlement project is an "obstacle to peace" in the Middle East.
EU law already requires a distinction to be made between goods originating in Israel and those from the occupied territories, though pro-Palestinian campaigners say this is not always observed.
Separately, Defra said that traders would be committing an offence if they declared produce from the occupied Palestinian territories as "produce of Israel".
Produce grown in Israeli settlements include herbs sold in UK supermarkets, such as Waitrose, which chop them up, package them and label them as "West Bank" produce, making no distinction between Israelis and Palestinians. A total of 27 Israeli companies operating in settlements and exporting to the UK have been identified: their produce includes fruit, vegetables, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, plastic and metal items and textiles. Other retailers selling them include Tesco, Sainsbury's, Somerfield, John Lewis and B&Q.
Goods from inside Israel's 1967 borders are entitled to a preferential rate of import duty under an agreement with the EU. Palestinian goods from the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem also enjoy duty-free or reduced tariff treatment. Settlement products fall outside these two categories.
"This is emphatically not about calling for a boycott of Israel," a Foreign Office spokesman said. "We believe that would do nothing to advance the peace process. We oppose any such boycott of Israel. We believe consumers should be able to choose for themselves what produce they buy. We have been very clear both in public and in private that settlements are illegal and an obstacle to peace."
The Trades Union Congress general secretary, Brendan Barber, welcomed the public clarification that marking produce from illegal settlements on occupied territory as "produce of Israel" was against the law, but said the government should have gone further.
"Profiting from the goods produced in the illegal settlements is contrary to international law and they should be banned from sale in the European Union, as they are in Palestine. Trade in such goods undermines the viability of a sovereign Palestinian state and holds back the peace process."Barbara Stocking, Oxfam's chief executive, said: "We support the right of consumers to know the origin of the products they purchase. Trade with Israeli settlements - which are illegal under international law - contributes to their economic viability and serves to legitimise them. It is also clear from our development work in West Bank communities that settlements have led to the denial of rights and create poverty for many Palestinians."
Dani Dayan, the Argentinian-born leader of the Yesha Council, which represents Israeli settlers, said the decision was the "latest hostile step" from Britain. "Products from our communities in Judea and Samaria should be treated as any other Israeli product," he said, using an Israeli term for the West Bank.
Israeli officials said they feared this was a slide towards a broader boycott of Israeli goods. Yigal Palmor, Israel's foreign ministry spokesman, said his country's produce was being unfairly singled out.
"It looks like it is catering to the demands of those whose ultimate goal is the boycott of Israeli products," he said. "The message here will very likely be used by pro-boycott campaigners. It is a matter of concern."
He said the issue of different European customs tariffs should not extend to different labelling on supermarket shelves. "It is a totally different thing and not required by the EU."
Israel came under intense US pressure early this year to halt construction in settlements, but has only adopted a temporary, partial freeze. Palestinian leaders say they will not restart peace negotiations until there is a full settlement freeze in line with the US road map of 2003.
The Palestine Solidarity Campaign said it welcomed the new guidance but urged Defra to go further: "The government must seek prosecutions of companies which smuggle settlement goods in under false labels. We have received many calls from people who were distressed when they bought goods labelled "Produce of the West Bank" because they thought they were aiding the Palestinian economy, then realised they were economically aiding Israel's illegal occupation.
"Particularly following Israel's massacre in Gaza, consumers have been shocked at Israel's war crimes and want to take action. They do not want to feel complicit in Israel's occupation by buying stolen goods."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



24 Comments so far
Show AllIsrael built its wall to wall-in the Palestinian ghettos. But is getting angry because it's now realising that the wall-warfare politic is also walling-in Israel from the rest of the world. That's blowback!
Generally speaking, I prefer that a well informed public be the driving force behind boycotts but, in this case, Barber is right. This is an issue of legality and the British government - in fact the entire EU - should simply ban produce from the Israeli occupied territories. I include all of Israel in that category.
On the other hand, let's give the Brits credit for taking some action rather than none.
q
I was shocked to learn that under US "Antiboycott" law a company can be penalized for boycotting Israel, or even for identifying goods produced in Israel as that may assist others in boycotting Israel. So it's illegal for a US company to chose not to do business with this criminal country, or even to provide the information that might assist someone else in making an informed choice.
True Britain's suggestion may not go quite far enough, but at least they don't make it illegal for citizens to seek out information that will allow them to make an informed choice.
This does go far enough (although it could have been mandatory and not advisory) and is the best possible news. An informed citizenry should be the goal of any democracy. When the market for Israeli goods dry up they will have no way to complain against citizens in a democracy making an informed choice.
On an unrelated issue I have always thought it was a huge mistake that labelling laws were never introduced when GM foods hit the market.
I can't see any legitimate way to denounce the moral imperative to Boycott, Sanction and Divest from the terrorist state of Israel. If anyone out there can, please let this citizen know your argument.
This is a good sign from the British government, but it should add any products coming from the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, or East Jerusalem. All are illegally occupied Israeli settlements. It really would be better to have a complete boycott, divestiture, and sanctions of all Israeli apartheid products as happened with the South African apartheid state. To end apartheid will take strong action. Naomi Klein had already come out advocating this. What's the big deal? People either believe in the Palestinians as indigenous people have full equal rights or they don't. Sixty years is long enough to paraphrase a study body president of the college I went to.
Israel should have to respect the original 1947 UN partition plan which Israel clearly violated in 1948 by taking most of the land that would have been Palestine under that UN two state solution and did it through ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians, which I'm sure Albert Einstein would never gone along with, as he had expressed concern for the Arab indigenous population back when the Zionists were first pushing to create Israel as a state.
AD
Don't forgert Sheba'a Farms.
Also, at this time of year, it's customary to buy Nativity scenes, or creches, made of olive wood.
Guess from whose olive trees...
Obviously I should have said "paraphrase a student (not study) body president. . ."
AD
AD, perhaps you missed it since it was a busy news day but the Israelis pulled out of their Gaza settlements in August of 2005 shortly before the army reduced them to rubble.
Gaza is now like the Warsaw Ghetto of the early 1940's where 400,000 Jews were systematically starved. The 1.5 million Palestinians of Gaza Strip are now being likewise starved.
Would this same principal apply to the u.s.?
"But look at the bright side, some government bureaucrat will keep himself busy overseeing the labelling process and issuing fines to importers that do not comply with it. Oh, and the importers are gonna add the price of complying with the new process to their product and guess who's gonna pay for it?"
Ah yes. As usual, the free market uber alles right wingers such as you don't actually support the free market. You don't support peoples' right to make informed decisions. To right wingers, the "free market" is the freedom to lie and cheat.
If importers do not tell the truth, because they are afraid of the free market, then too bad, fine them till they go bankrupt. The food is ALREADY labeled. It is just that they will now have to be more truthful. But of course, information that prevents lying and cheating is such a horrible restriction on the free market.
I consider myself very pro-free market but if appropriate labeling makes a product too expensive for you then why do we bother with any labeling at all? Maybe we should get rid of safety inspections while we're at it?
Above and beyond free-market capitalism I choose democracy. If I need to spend an extra 5 cents per 1000 units of product in order to be more fully informed of the choices I make then I welcome that.
You may add "but where does the expense of unnecessary bureaucracy end"? And that is a valid question and largely dependent on your definition of 'unnecessary'. It's a balancing act between a gov't that's too intrusive and over reaching; and a wild-west, sink-or-swim free-for-all.
I love the concept of free-market capitalism that brings low prices, large-scale employment, and prosperity to all but I love democracy and informed choice more. Even if it costs me a little bit more.
"How how far are you willing to go with the labelling. Maybe fruit was grown in occupied Territory but picked by palestinian workers or the other way around. Does the place of orchard matter or who picked it? Or maybe by whom it was packaged. what if a packing facility gets products from several places and mixes them up? "
We go as far with the labeling as necessary. Tell the truth. If the fruit was grown on an Israeli settlement, it should be labeled as such. Afterall, doesn't Israel claim that land as Judea and Samaria? So, why don't dare to say that the fruit comes from Judea and Samaria? Have some pride in Judea and Samaria. Who picked it doesn't matter. WHERE in was grown mattered. Just as fruit grown in the US should be labeled as fruit grown in the US, not Canada. Why are you afraid of telling the truth?
"Gonha have some slave workers sticking Stars of David or Crescents on each fruit so bigots can select the ones they agree with? Remember the scene in "American History X" where the fat guy was eating candy, discarding the black ones? Nice image, right?"
Yes of course. Boycotting fruits grown in illegal settlements is "bigotry".
"I understand progressivism but stop falling for every scheme some busybody comes up with. You don't agree with Israel's policies, don'r buy israeli products. Don't make me pay extra just to satisfy your whims."
Spare me. The items are already labeled. They won't cost extra to be labeled. And it is clear that your objection is based on fear of boycotts of Israeli products, not paying more for labeling.
"How many people do you know that actually read all the labels. In the real world, aside from a fringe minority, labels are just another extra thing we gotta peel off."
As I said, to the right wingers such as you, the free market is simply the freedom to lie and cheat. To the right wingers such as you, in the "real world" it would be perfectly fine that people sell rat poison as food.
Grown with stolen water in occupied Palestine.
>>The British government has for the first time called on all supermarkets to inform customers clearly when they are buying food produced by Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank.
>>Israeli officials said they feared this was a slide towards a broader boycott of Israeli goods. Yigal Palmor, Israel's foreign ministry spokesman, said his country's produce was being unfairly singled out.
So let me get this straight. The British Governmnet is asking that products that come from Israeli Settlements on the West Bank be CLEARLY marked as products of Israel so that the consumer can make a choice as to whether or not they will buy the same.
Israeli Officials and settlers are offended.
OK so if the west bank is NOT part of Israel and this is not Israeli produce then just what the heck are the soldiers of the IDF doing on the west bank and what business do Israelis have settling there?
It seems to me these settlers want to claim the lands their by RIGHT because God gave it to them while at the same time are claiming they are not Israeli.
This is an article about the situation that you will not find on CommonDreams:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107104574571491401847518.html
The reality is that Palestinian products are available in Europe because Israel encourages Palestinian nation-building and supports Palestinian economic development.
OB, Ha,ha,ha!
"In Gaza too, the shops and markets are crammed with food and goods".
Move along folks, nothing to see here, everything is rosy in Gaza. No need for tunnels -shops are crammed with food and goods. See the kids have jam on their faces and everyone is smiling and happy. Aren't we nice people, building a new Palestine just for them?
What a complete and utter crock!
The standard of living in Gaza is higher than in Egypt. When Egypt opened its border a few month ago, many Palestinian men were taking additional Egyptian wives, who were very much willing to merry them.
Also, there were recently reports of a Ponzi scheme run by Hamas people. Many Palestinians invested and lost. The point is - the investments ranged from $1,000 to $70,000. Starving people don't have that kind of money. I bet that YOU don't have that kind of money to invest.
Cut the BS; you are on the wrong board - try the NY Times.
It's amazing that the USA and its allies have bombed and occupied two countries in the Middle East, and that neither one of them was Israel.
How many settlements did Afghanistan or Iraq grab from their own neighbors?
In the meantime, it's sad to see Western elites proposing economic sanctions on Israel. As if these could ever do anything in a world where Israel can count on billions from "donors."