Modern industrial society runs on oil and its derivative, gasoline.
All the plastic or synthetic items around us, from clothing and computers to appliances and tools, are made from oil. Almost all of them were manufactured with machines that either run on oil or on electricity that was produced by oil. Each one of these items was shipped to a store -- which we drove to -- in vehicles that run on oil.
Cheap oil and combustion engines drive our global society. They are what separate us from the person-powered, hand-hewn, land-centered life that our predecessors lived barely 100 years ago.
Although many of us believe our modern lifestyles will be maintained by alternative energy sources, many experts disagree.
At the Guelph Civic League "Amazing Possibilities" conference two years ago, James Howard Kunstler, author of "The Long Emergency" and "World Made By Hand," solemnly declared the raw, immediate power of the gasoline engine cannot be replaced by wind, solar, electricity or green fuels at the degree or volume required by our machine-driven society. In other words, we can only run at our present level with oil -- cheap oil -- and the days of cheap oil are over.
The cost of oil and gas will continue to rise because supply is limited and demand is increasing. As the price of oil goes up, the price of everything else connected to oil goes up as well. We are holding onto a balloon that is pulling us off the ground. There is only one thing to do -- let go before it's too late.
How do we let go of oil? Is it possible? How can we even consider such a life?
My son's grandmother, Theresa, grew up on Cape Breton Island. Her father was a dory fisherman and they lived in a wood-heated home without electricity and with a big garden out back.
They were "off the grid" long before it was hip. Virtually nothing in their lives was dependent on oil, complex machinery, or global trade. Theresa proudly told me the Great Depression never affected their family because they had more than enough food -- enough, in fact, to give to the "poor folk" in town.
Theresa's family had the essentials -- food, shelter, family, and community -- and a rich culture as fiddlers and artisans. They lived by hand not by machine. They lived locally not globally. If you live simply and don't move things over great distances, you don't need oil.
My own grandparents tended vegetable gardens and bought the rest of their food from market farmers and local vendors. Now, as gasoline goes up, these sensible traditions will come back. It's doable, active, cheaper, and provides healthy food that tastes much better than the prematurely picked, mass-produced, boxed-up, trucked-in items we pay more and more for.
Another solution is CSA, or Community Supported Agriculture. This is a system where consumers support a farmer and benefit in the harvest. You buy a share of the production in advance and receive a box of fresh, in-season vegetables every week. Community members get organic produce and local farmers are financially supported to start each season.
I have a small "kitchen garden" in my backyard and a larger plot with neighbours in the community gardens at the Ignatius Jesuit Centre. The bountiful fields of the Ignatius CSA are all around us. Information on this and other CSAs can be found online at csafarms.ca. Each farm is unique, and in addition to vegetables, some farmers offer eggs, poultry, meat, herbs, and honey. Scrumptious.
The price of gasoline is going up. I'll see you in the garden.
Sam Turton is a member of the Mercury's Community Editorial Board.
© Copyright 2008 Metroland Media Group Ltd
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
36 Comments so far
Show AllPicking up on Moondoggy's suggestion about indoor hydroponics, check out "vertical hydroponics" for skyscrapers:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/13/hydroponics-on-your-windo_n_107...
natti wrote:
"You could move them from Ohio to New York City by riverboat and horsecart -taking weeks- people did it for years."
Much of our bulk grain commodities are still transported by river barge. The Missippi, lower Missori, Ohio, Tenessee; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; in the west, the Columbia and Sacramento waterways.
And while it is always more energy efficient to ship shorter distances, there are energy savings with an large scale intetgrated distribution system. A whole refrigerated intermodal rail-car load of vegetables (yes, trains are used to ship a lot of produce) can be transported to supermarkets from Florida to the NE cities for less fuel a few 2 1/2 ton delivery trucks from CSA's making their rounds.
Most of the move to the country, back-to the earth, organic garden and compost-types end up incrasing their carbon footprints compared to living in the city.
Meanwhile, my carbon footprint greatly decreased moving to the city - My car use has dropped 700%.
People may want to move to a rural area as a personal lifestyle choice, but they are largely deluding themselves if they think thay are helping the earth doing it. As far as CSA's and the like, I like local organic food because it isfresher and tastes better - and reduces the load of persistent pesticides in the environment, but am I reducing my carbon footprint by doing so? I doubt it.
And moondoggy, people live in cities because of the diverse culture and food, tolerance of diversity, and, in many city neighborhoods a sense of community, solidarity, and mom-and-pop level economics that is missing in suburbia or rural areas. These days, rural and small town america - just like suburban america is a cultural wasteland of wal-mart, fast-food, fundamentalist mega-churches, bigotry and intolerance. God help any gay person out there.
And, ironically, it is largely city-slickers who are preserving the rural Applacian traditions in my area - old time and bluegrass music, quilting, labor-activism-folk music, etc. I haven't met a single rural West Virginian or Kentuckian who plays the fiddle or mandolin, or has even heard of, say Hazel Dickens. The people keeping this stuff alive generally live in the cities.
Regarding NYC, there's a reason New Jersey is called The Garden State. Long Island is also filled with farms, as is the Hudson Valley.
Hey NorthPark, do you live in the Big Apple? Jesus brah, you couldn't pay me enough to stay there. I have lots of friends FROM there. I think it's a great place to welcome immigrants from Europe, being so close to Ellis Island and all. A great temporary clearinghouse for new comers. But why on God's green earth would anyone want to stay there for any longer than they have to to put a few extra dollars in their pocket, buy a ticket and then get the hell out? But then some people evidently like it there and do stay. Well, it's your city. What are you gonna do with it? It can change. Historic old pics of Manhattan demonstrate that clearly. Wasn't it once a green island that the local indigenous chieftains traded to the Dutch for a few beads and trinkets? It's changed a lot over the years, it can and will continue to change. But what direction do we want to take it next? It seems to me NYC needs a major green revolution. Buildings can be remade, retrofitted and rebuilt. Yes, gardens on the roofs, community gardens on open space areas, gardens in window boxes, on porches, indoor hydroponics, in central park, over in Brooklyn and over in Jersey, Stanton Island. Obviously 12 million people can't and won't all go out and buy a pair of overalls and a pitchfork, but one million dedicated gardeners can easily grow enough to feed 12 million people. And don't forget all those dedicated farmers already in business up the Hudson and Upstate. Don't give up. Imagine.
HOYTDOUGLAS: Your oil-reduced-price-recipe would further insult THE God-dess. The calculus here must include the costs of rebuilding cities rendered their own version of "water-loos." Nature is fed up with the over-consumption of fossil fuels, added to the BURNING fields of war, added to the desecration of sacred forests, etc ad nauseum. People must learn to HONOR their lives and that means APPRECIATION for simple things.
That point takes me to BERRY PATCH. I have begun to learn to garden. Just published a book that represents a return TO the garden (for children); and recognize that in the consuming of one's daily bread/fruit/veggies, the change of mind you speak of is also an opening of HEART so that our very spoiled nation of a lot of persons who throw so much away and appreciate so little, might instead come into a realization of the SACREDNESS inherent to the gifts we've been given, gifts that sustain our lives.
GROW A LIFE! Great line, Moondoggy!
You want to bring down the price of gasoline?
Seize all the oil and gas wells on Federal and State controlled lands. Compel the oil companies to drill off Florida and in Alaska. Mandate that all oil produced here stays in the USA for our own consumption.
Charge for our oil only a price which will cover costs to get it to market in the USA and some level of taxes which will:
Change the way we use oil, and gas. Promote solar, wind, water and fuel cell technology to replace most oil and gas.
Bring fusion power into reality.
It is simple, the oil and gas on federal and state land belongs to the people of this nation, not to the oil companies to make a profit with it.
Very simplistic .... and their are 12 million people in NYC, where are the 12 million veggie gardens going to be, on the roof of the skyscrapers? and how many acres does each person need? I'm guessing NYC will have a wee bit of a land availability issue, as will 99% of the worlds city folk - aka most of the worlds population.
Grow your own. I do. I've been doing it since I was 5. I sold vege's out of my little red wagon as a kid. Now I grow a big garden out my door, participate in 3 farmers markets and supply several families in our valley as a CSA farm. And I do it without the use of machines. All work by hand in lovingly developed, black, velvetine soil on a rocky bench in short season northwest Montana. And by root cellaring we are able to eat from our garden year-round. I save many of the seeds and replant them year after year. It's not expensive to garden, it just takes dedication and perseverance. In fact, it can be quite profitable. If I can do it here in the northern Rockies, it can be done by almost anyone anywhere. Grow A Life!
Grow a Life!
Inch by inch, row by row…
Homegrown's alright with me…
Johnny Appleseed was a pothead…
And we've got to get ourselves back to the garden…
Life's a garden. Dig it!
See a movie called: The real dirt on Farmer John
Who's your Farmer?
Grow a Life!
Inch by inch, row by row...
Homegrown's alright with me...
Johnny Appleseed was a pothead...
And we've got to get ourselves back to the garden...
Life's a garden. Dig it!
See a movie called: The real dirt on Farmer John
Who's your Farmer?
USAn, I think another piece of the connection between locally/garden grown food, and fossil fuel use is this: getting closer to your sources of food creates a different consciousness. And this can lead to thinking differently about all kinds of ways we are living unsustainably, and can lead to smart new thinking about how to live differently. I don't have any documentation for this, just my own experience, and the experience of friends, that when you change your mind, you change your life. And when whole societies start changing their collective minds, things around them change.
...and all those plastic bags ...
Galen, thanks for all the references. Looks like I've got a lot of reading to do.
"Seven billion people on our planet is not sustainable."
Typical Malthusian bullshit. You forgot to discuss the fact that thanks to blind support for religious fundamentalists, mainly the Christo and Islamo FUNDIES, pushing for their population to increase at all costs which explains why most abusive men, usually Christian and Muslim, forced their wives to produce 4+ children most of whom would have virtually no real life anyway once born. And let's not forget the rise of accidents pregnancies due to out of wedlock marriages and cases where some women give birth to more than 4 children overall thanks to the rise in DIVORCE rates. Besides, the US uses up 25% of the planet's finite resources thanks to politics, religious fundamentialism, corporatism, etc ... and is only 3% of the world's population. Hey, once the human rights abuses subsides, the population will slowly taper off. If you don't believe, keep the neo-Malthusian bs going on and let there be more desperate wars for oil, "free" trade, forced/unexpected pregnancies, etc ... kill the planet.
Seven billion people on our planet is not sustainable.
Hemp or petroleum, we're already having to find ways to cut down "energy demand" and it's already becoming obvious that a great deal of this so-called "energy demand" was puffed up to create a market SUPER bubble now entering its SUPER bursting phase. I don't take into the "rising demand" the frivolous spending and guzzling of resources just to prop up those oily stocks. Cutting down wasteful spending and guzzling, we'll find out that of course hemp will meet the same demands that are actually important rather than frivolous "entitlements". If hemp forces us all to shut up and conserve, reuse, and recycle, then what's wrong with that? There's nothing to lose.
Go here. Read the latest news. Especially about Saudi Arabia and the airlines.http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/BreakingNews.html
Now then.
Read 'Powerdown'. Read 'The Party's Over'. Read 'The Long Emergency'. read 'The Last Generation'. Read 'Resource Wars'.
Wake the hell up.
We are screwed.
We only have the choice now of either a lubed condom, or a telephone pole.
I no longer cut my grass,,,, to hell with the neighbors
Coffee....
Crap, beat out.
And with a Pollan quote!
Damn my slow typing!
-to USAn-
The connection between vegetable gardening and fossil energy use lies in the transportation of the veggies from farm to eater.
Grain foods like corn or wheat or rice are a bit of a different story.
Once you get them down to what you want- seeds or flour- you can store them for quite a while, allowing them to become a "commodity".
You could move them from Ohio to New York City by riverboat and horsecart -taking weeks- people did it for years.
I would imagine most veggies wouldn't make it that long looking "market fresh".
Remember also the "seasonality" issue. Because our veg. comes from the supermarket not our backyards we have gotten away from eating seasonally, and therefore raise the farm to market miles by an order of magnitude.
While there's snow on the ground at my house, I can eat fruit grown on the other side of the world, picked unripe, trucked to the ocean, and then shipped 10,000 miles to the nearest port, stored in a refrigerated warehouse for a week or two, then trucked another hundred to 1000 miles in a refrigerated truck, maybe stored in another refrigerated warehouse closer to me and then trucked again, and finally put on display in a big (heated with gas) building 4 miles from my house that I must drive my car to.
It seems unlikely that all of this energy expenditure could be matched by me simply driving to the garden center a few times a season -which wouldn't even be required if my whole little town would get involved in the game, sombody who didn't feel like growing could handle the compost, for example.
Lastly veggies are -relatively- easy to grow and require very little land to produce a family's worth. So in addition to having an impact on the over-all use of fossil energy and the sustainability of our living system, vegetable gardens are an Achievable Goal for the majority of the People.
You are right, however, that most of the articles on the issue hear at CD don't do a very good job of spelling out connections like these -they kind of "jump past" the explaining on the way to suggesting action.
Oh, and LOVE the name!
I use it now in my everyday speech, and some of my friends have begun to do so as well.
-matti.
I've been saying exactly the same thing for the past five years.
Books to read: When Technology Fails, Readers Digest 'Back to Basics', Square Foot Gardening, Carrots Love Tomatoes, How things Work (Vol. I & II), Gardening When It Matters, Handy Farm Devices, the 'Foxfire' books...
The list goes on.
To:
ASAn, an answer to your question on the connection of food and energy.
AMY GOODMAN: What are the environmental effects of transporting food across the globe?
MICHAEL POLLAN: Well, the biggest is energy. I mean, it's a—people don't really think about food in terms of climate change, but in fact the food system contributes about a fifth of greenhouse gases. It is as important as the transportation sector, in terms of contributing to greenhouse gas. It's a very energy-intensive situation. What we did with the industrialization of food, essentially, is take food off of a solar system—it was basically based on photosynthesis and the sun—and put it on a fossil fuel system. We learned how to grow food with lots of synthetic fertilizers made from natural gas, pesticides made from petroleum, and then started moving it around the world. So now we take about ten calories of fossil fuel to produce one calorie of food energy. Very unsustainable system.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/13/in_defense_of_food_author_journali...
Yeah, cannabis will be important again in the future -mostly for its fibers.
Hempseed oil could also replace some kinds of lubricating oils derived from petroleum.
But as a direct fuel input to keep running a few hundred million cars and trucks? Nah, not gonna happen.
The technological problem that we face today IS NOT, at heart, one of fuel for our machines, it is a problem with our entire system of living. Our buildings, our roads, all of the physical structures of what we call the "American Way of Life" or "Suburbia" or whatever, all require a complete redesign and rebuild.
Even if all of our cars and all the commercial trucks could somehow be converted to electric, and all that electricity could be somehow generated by wind farms or solar collectors or cells- even nuke plants- none of that would change the underlying massive, stupid, horrible inefficiency of having to travel 10 miles to shop for groceries, or 40 miles to go to work.
For our society to continue at the level of complexity and cohesion (and relative peace) that we have become accustomed to we will need to utilise whatever sustainable non-fossil energy we can -this seems to be a given.
But the physical landscape that we have become accustomed to in this country MUST CHANGE -and all the stupid inefficiencies dropped- for those energy resources to have any realistic hope of meeting our needs.
It is vitally important for people to finally get this into their heads and begin the work that will be necessary.
-matti.
I hear itoften here in CD, but I really don't see the connect betweeen vegetable gardening and energy policy.
I prefer fresh local produce, enjoy vegatable gardening, and belong to a CSA, but I'm under no illusions that it is leading to less consumption of fossil fuel. I use less fossil fuel by avoiding car usage and minimizing electricity usage - which isn't conected to gardening in any way.
Most people will end up using more fuel tending to the vegatable garden through additional car trips to buy supplies. And the economies of scale that big supermarket chains use also include energy efficiencies.
FrederickJohnson June 17th, 2008 4:57 pm
The author is a DUMB FUCK for FAILING to mention one word that replaces petroleum 100%. Ever heard of the word HEMP? Do a google search on it. WARNING: You might end up hating your politicians on both sides all the way back to FDR who signed the high taxation act all the while giving Big Oil a somewhat "free" pass. Of course, restrictions against Cannabis got worse decade after decade and more empowerment to Big Oil kept growing. But hey? What does it matter because this country has become an "Entitlement Society" that cries "WAH ! WAH ! I WANT IT NOW ! WAH ! WAH ! WAH !!" Well ?!?!? You ain't gonna get it !! If you want something better, you'll get your butts off the seat and join me in fighting to SHUT DOWN THE PHONEY "WAR ON DRUGS" and allow hemp into the market and enjoy giving gasoline a real hard as hell run for its money.
I'm not an expert at this, Fred, but it is my opinion that even if we cover every single bit of arable land with cannabis, we couldn't come close to providing the amount of energy that we get from fossil fuels.
Cannabis would be an okay adjunct (albeit more dirty than solar, wind, wave, geothermal, etc.) but, don't fool yourselves into thinking that we can use anything that requires fossil fuels to jumpstart. The fact is that, there isn't a single clean technology that can bootstrap from nothing. If we don't take the current amount of fossil fuel and get started, we may not be able to do anything that doesn't require about 1 ton of oxen muscle and our own. Here's hoping we get wise before wise gets us.
Great article! It brings up a number of issues not talked about enough concerning "sustainability".
Sam's focus on using less energy rather than alternative sources, i.e. conservation. We've already seen the disaster of biofuels!
Having locally based economies will help us reconnect to our communities and fight the alienation and consumerism that is part and parcel of the Market driven economy (with its corporate media).
Community Supported Agriculture is not just a good, healthy and sustainable practice, it is a good model for other ways we interact. Our CSA farm was destroyed by flood this winter. The farmers said that they were going to give up, but they received so much help, CSA members digging out the muck, that they decided to try again. We expect our first delivery of vegetables soon. The CSA farm is not alone. They are part, along with their members, of a cycle of interdependent community. Just think of small,local businesses (and the jobs that go with them) being protected like this CSA. What if you knew that your community would help you out if you were in trouble and vis-a-versa? Hurricane Katrina has shown us that that our Government won't.
To: Stephen V. Riley
You took the words right out of my mouth!
CSA is one of those ideas that, while it sounds good, plays right into the whole capitalist, division-of-labor bullpukey that is at the center of all our ills.
Why does the farmer need to own the land he works? Why can't we contribute labor and effort for a share in the harvest, instead of wacked out, manipulated Federal Reserve Monopoly money? I consider CSAs to be, at best, a good start and, at worst, a nice diversion and dead end for what we need for ensuring food availability for ourselves.
It is a fact that, minus the input of fossil fuels, the vast majority of us will not be able to afford the 'luxury' of being specialists. We'll all have to have various abilities to plant, harvest, build and maintain food and local infrastructure. If you have a Doctorate in Business, how are you going to feed your family with that?
If CSAs are a good idea, then working the fields collectively and sharing in the produce has to be the end result or otherwise, we're just doing more of the same thing that put us in this predicament in the first place.
The author is a DUMB FUCK for FAILING to mention one word that replaces petroleum 100%. Ever heard of the word HEMP? Do a google search on it. WARNING: You might end up hating your politicians on both sides all the way back to FDR who signed the high taxation act all the while giving Big Oil a somewhat "free" pass. Of course, restrictions against Cannabis got worse decade after decade and more empowerment to Big Oil kept growing. But hey? What does it matter because this country has become an "Entitlement Society" that cries "WAH ! WAH ! I WANT IT NOW ! WAH ! WAH ! WAH !!" Well ?!?!? You ain't gonna get it !! If you want something better, you'll get your butts off the seat and join me in fighting to SHUT DOWN THE PHONEY "WAR ON DRUGS" and allow hemp into the market and enjoy giving gasoline a real hard as hell run for its money.
In our intentional community, we're growing big gardens, and developing ways to get our energy more sustainably, make our livings more humanely, and live more lightly on the Earth. More importantly, we're also realizing that the competitive culture we're embedded in is the major contributor to today's problems. Competitive thinking has made many material advances possible, but such thinking has now gone far beyond usefulness and become a liability to people and the environment. We're coming to understand that cooperative culture is the way forward into a more satisfying life for everyone in a world that is about to look very different. Gardens, alternative energy, green building, etc. are all parts of a puzzle that will come together synergistically as cooperative cultures develop.
The geography of the author's region west of Toronto lends itself well to CSAs and relocalization. The concept of Post Carbon Communities is something everybody ought to promote.
Western Industrial Capitalism is self-destructing because it is incapable of critiquing itself. In turn Western Corporate Capitalism has destroyed Western Democracy, the only counter-veiling force to the reckless greed of Capitalism.
"The cost of oil and gas will continue to rise because supply is limited and demand is increasing. As the price of oil goes up, the price of everything else connected to oil goes up as well. We are holding onto a balloon that is pulling us off the ground. There is only one thing to do — let go before it's too late."
This is priceless, beautiful!
www.StudentsForTheEarth.org
Dear Sam,
Mine or yours. Oh with the price of oil lets not bother. I'll just send pics.
Great article for those with ears to hear
Be careful where you get your seeds for the produce.
Even organic stuff has started to taste like rubber in this country.
If you install some solar, you can continue to live a modern lifestyle - Google is not making me stupid- I can finally find the sources of information - and a variety of them - because of the internet.
Sam,
You should get a copy of
Alcohol Can Be a Gas . It will make it all a lot easier to understand and gives you the knowledge to change your local area to be sustainable.
To understand why Iran refuses to accept Europe's "nuclear assistance package" one must realize:
1. The notion that "Iran does not need to go nuclear because the country is awash with oil" is abject nonsense. The Iranian oil fields are old and tottering and are only kept alive with huge injections of…..billions of cubic feet of natural gas! Iran needs to develop alternative sources of energy production.
2. A "nuclear assistance package" can always be used as blackmail to bring about "regime change".