Common Dreams NewsCenter

Summer Reading

 
     
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives
   
 
     
 

Discuss this story Discuss this story Print This Post Print This Post E-Mail This Article
 
 

Dick Cheney As Constitutionalist

by Christopher Brauchli
Th’ vice-preidincy is th’next highest an’ the’lowest. It isn’t a crime exactly. Ye can’t be sint to jail f’r it but it’s a kind iv a disgrace. It’s like writing’ anonymous letters.
-Finley Peter Dunne, Dissertations by Mr. Dooley

Although I am not normally one to spring to the defense of Dick Cheney I have to say that people are being really petty about the latest kerfuffle over his conduct. Mr. Cheney is not, after all, just any vice president. He was president of a big corporation before he picked himself to be Mr. Bush’s vice-president. He would not have made the switch from president of a big important company to a job described by John Nance Garner, one of its former occupants, as not worth more than a warm bucket of spit, unless he knew that the position he was accepting was more important than the job he was giving up. The reason it is more important is not just that he, being brighter than the president, sees himself as the real power behind the throne. It is because of the unique nature of the office of the vice-presidency as seen through Mr. Cheney’s constitutional eyes.

Mr. Cheney and other constitutional scholars know that what makes the Constitution of the United State a special document is that it is a living document that changes with the times, even if some of the changes can only be effected by torturing its meaning. (Torture, as Mr. Cheney knows, can work miracles).

According to Mr. Cheney’s interpretation of the Constitution, the vice-president is a member of the executive branch for purposes of being entitled to receive classified information that members of the legislative branch may not receive, but a member of the legislative branch when it comes to being accountable for what he does with that information. It is based on this creative interpretation of the Constitution that recent events unfolded.

In mid-June it was disclosed that beginning in 2003, Mr. Cheney’s office had refused to comply with Executive Order 12958. In a very nice letter to Mr. Cheney, Henry Waxman, the chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform explained to Mr. Cheney what that executive order was all about and to whom it applied. He explained to Mr. Cheney that: “Executive Order 12958 . . . directs the National Archives to oversee a uniform system for protecting classified information. A key component of the executive order directs the Information Security Oversight Office . . . to inspect . . . White House offices to ensure compliance with the security procedures required by the President.” The executive order applies to any “entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information.”

Before receiving the letter Mr. Cheney had informed the Oversight Committee that he was not subject to that Order because he was not an entity within the executive branch of government because he breaks ties in the senate thus being more legislator than executive officer.

Although some scholars might unfairly consider Mr. Cheney’s position palpable nonsense, Alberto Gonzales is not among them. In January J. William Leonard, the director of the oversight office wrote Mr. Gonzales asking him whether he thought the vice president was part of the executive branch of government. Mr. Gonzales has been studying the question for almost 6 months and has not yet been able to figure it out so it’s quite obvious that Mr. Cheney has put his finger on a fascinating constitutional issue.

Aside from constitutional issues, a practical reason for non-compliance exists. During 2001 and 2002 when Mr. Cheney’s office was complying with the Executive Order, the inspectors did not discover that Mr. Cheney had a genuine spy on his payroll. Leandro Aragoncillo, an aide in Mr. Cheney’s office, was sending classified information to Phillipine legislators interested in overthrowing that country’s president. On May 4, 2006, he pled guilty to a number of counts involving espionage. At his hearing it was disclosed that during 2001 and 2002 he sent the legislators classified “situation Reports” and documents classified “Top Secret” and “Secret”. Mr. Cheney can quite properly point out that if the inspections were such a big deal the inspectors should have discovered his in-house spy. Mr. Aragoncillo was not the only leaker in Mr. Cheney’s office. I. Lewis Libby who was convicted of perjury also leaked classified information.

In an effort to support the vice president’s claim of exemption from oversight Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said Mr. Bush considered the president’s and vice-president’s offices exempt from the executive order even though they would seem to both be White House offices, the term used in the executive order. Said Mr. Fratto: “This executive order was issued by the president and he knows what his intentions were.” That the words “White House” do not include the offices of either the president or the vice-president, said Mr. Fratto, is a conclusion that is arrived at by inference. He didn’t say what kind of inference. That’s probably classified. (On June 27 the White House abandoned Mr. Cheney’s argument that he was not part of the executive branch. Someone should let Mr. Gonzales know so he doesn’t spend any more time wondering about that.)

Christopher Brauchli
brauchli.56@post.harvard.edu
For political commentary see my web page http://humanraceandothersports.com

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
 

8 Comments so far

  1. Siouxrose June 30th, 2007 3:33 pm

    Mr. Brauchli: I so enjoy your understated sarcasm and use of fascinating introductory quotes. We all know that language is malleable, particularly in the hands of the decider and his “oh, so able” staff. As an attorney you’re far more aware of the legions of paperwork and documentation courts can run up in their interpretations of legal paragraphs. In these Orwellian times with power, the intended check-balancing three branches of this ingenious government, in the hands of the least conscionable, up is down, and down is up, fair is foul and foul is fair; and for those of us who look on to this tragi-comedy of legal errors, “How can thinking men think so wrongly?” Comes to mind.

  2. wcdevins June 30th, 2007 4:43 pm

    Cheney knew.

  3. fargokantrowitz June 30th, 2007 5:36 pm

    Will the world just say the words that it needs to say to make everything come into perspective? Dick Cheney is the first truly corporate president (he is not vice-president.) He is the mastermind behind everything bad that has come from the Bush administration. He became vice-president to start wars to enrich his former company Halliburton. He is a psychopath and a killer and should be dealt with through the criminal justice system. Let’s call a spade a spade.

  4. Soeharto June 30th, 2007 11:48 pm

    You Americans are relatively healthy, educated and wealthy. You have freedom or speech, association and movement. And there are 300 million of you. Richard Cheney gets to do what he wants to do because Americans are not sufficiently motivated to stop it. i.e he has de facto approval for his agenda. Talk about THAT instead of about Cheney’s transgressions. It’s the rampant Americanism of the people living in the USA that legitimizes and empowers Cheney. You should be talking about how to defeat Americanism and replace it with healthier and more positive values.

  5. Siouxrose July 1st, 2007 1:06 pm

    Soeharto: I appreciate your analysis and insights, and wish to say that MANY Of us who contribute to this forum are doing what we can in our own unique fashions. There is a MONSTROUS fascistic state underway with policing powers that would have made the nazis blush.

  6. canardtahiti July 1st, 2007 2:34 pm

    I’m with Soeharto.

    Not a day goes by that my european friends/aquaintances (I live in the Pyrénees mountain region) don’t confront me with the same astonished/incredulous observation:

    “But how on earth is it that Americans cannot STOP these cheneybush criminals? What kind of a system, what kind of a nation is America if such flagrant crimes against your own constitution and your own people (not to mention cheneybush Iraq war crimes) is permitted to continue, without recourse and without ACTION on the part of USA citizens!?!”

    It is mindbloggling. Beginning in 2000 I realized that I was living the same experience as did those “good Germans” during the 1930s, and it was only going to get worse (as it did). So I left the States, and I don’t consider that decision a cop-out; as a dual-national I had the luxury of going elsewhere.

    Moreover, I’m a realist (my european side). I don’t see Americans EVER rising up to dismantle the new American fascism — it’s way too late, things have gone too far. To those who disagree with my cynicism I say: show me, prove me wrong. It’s sad, but I’ve mostly washed my hands of America. The rest of the world will have to take concrete steps to shame and ostracise America from the civilized world. And USA citizens will have to come to grips with their own national pathology, just as the post-Nazi Germany had to come to grips with the national mental illness that resulted in Hitler.

  7. clyde paige July 1st, 2007 3:34 pm

    Right on fargokantrowitz> Cheney needs to be tried as the criminal he is.

  8. Dr. Zimmerman Robert July 1st, 2007 5:49 pm

    Nancy Pelosi will be denounced now and forever not for failing to impeach the President and Vice President, but for not having the courage to really try.
    For this reason alone she deserves not to be elected again. For this reason alone she deserves to be shunned by all Americans

Join the discussion:

You must be logged in to post a comment. If you haven't registered yet, click here to register. (It's quick, easy and free. And we won't give your email address to anyone.)

 
   FAIR USE NOTICE  
  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
 
 
Common Dreams NewsCenter
A non-profit news service providing breaking news & views for the progressive community.
Home | Newswire | Contacting Us | About Us | Donate | Sign-Up | Archives

© Copyrighted 1997-2008
www.commondreams.org