EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
It's Easy to Mock, but This Is How Real Change Begins
"This isn't just about America," reads one hand-painted sign among the carpet of placards at the Occupy Wall Street protest. "It's about the whole world." The sit-ins and occupations currently springing up across the United States in response to an initial call-out by Adbusters magazine claim to be part of a "global revolution". And the first part at least is hard to argue with. Wandering through the protest camp that has now been set up for over a fortnight in Liberty Plaza in the shadow of Manhattan's financial district, at the symbolic nerve-center of world capitalism, I am struck by how similar it is in spirit and in format to the occupied spaces I joined as part of the anti-cuts movement in London earlier this year.
Like in London and Madrid, not everyone agrees on how to change the world, but everyone agrees that the current economic consensus is untenable – and for now, at least,that's enough. (photo: La Plaza del Sol, Madrid. Daniel Dionne)
The differences are cultural rather than substantive. There are the same serious young activists necking coffee over tangles of laptops and cables as they put out their messaging on social media, the same makeshift nests of sleeping bags and blankets, the same atmosphere of frenzied excitement as people from across the country arrive to swell the numbers and join the debate. Activists I meet here from the Spanish arm of what members are calling simply "the movement" tell me that this is the same explosion of popular energy that they saw in Madrid, too. It has different faces and different in-jokes but the same horizontal structure, empowered by technology, clustered with individuals sharing their own stories of hardship and struggle, and driven by the growing global demographic that commentators have identified as "unemployed graduates with no future".
In America, this is the generation that organized and voted for the Democrats in 2008. It is a generation that used to believe that "change" could be delivered through the party system, but which has had its faith shattered by circumstance. In a pile of cast-off jumpers, donated by supporters to keep the protesters warm in the chill October nights – no tents are allowed – I find a faded sweater reading "Obama '08". Now the Obama generation is beginning to understand that substantive change does not tend to happen if you ask nicely and play by the rules.
Of course, it is fairly unlikely that a few thousand soggy activists are going to be able to topple Manhattan's financial district on their own – as I write, they've got enough on their hands trying to keep the rain off their laptops. The scores of press outlets who have been asking just what this occupation stands for, however, have rather missed the point: the occupation stands for itself.
"For the first time in my life, I feel at home," reads one placard, hoisted into a tree in this impromptu peace village underneath the sparkling glass towers of Wall Street. The temporary society that has been built here is a mini-utopia of inclusivity and delicious vegan snacks, welcoming in the disenfranchised and disaffected. There's a free kitchen, library and crèche, young people wrapped in sleeping bags listening to outdoor lectures on radical economics, and a diverse cast of characters, from glassy-eyed students and excited inner-city teenagers to middle-aged union members doling out the expertise. "I feel bad for you young people," one of them tells me, "you have the same bullshit to deal with as us, and you didn't even get Woodstock." Like in London and Madrid, not everyone agrees on how to change the world, but everyone agrees that the current economic consensus is untenable – and for now, at least,that's enough.
What the protests have in common more than anything else is disillusionment with traditional politics, which are seen to be set up to protect the interests of the wealthy few. From the streets of New York to the squares of Greece and Portugal to the rain-sodden protesters currently camped outside the Conservative Party conference in Manchester, public anger is mobilizing around the impression that no mainstream party, whether on the center-left or the notional right, has the wherewithal to represent the real concerns of citizens living on or just above the breadline: the "99 per cent," as the Wall Street occupiers put it, as opposed to the "1 per cent" who own the wealth and set the agenda. Party politics is felt, rightly or wrongly, to be bloated with corporate money, poisoned by the interests of profit, and utterly unable to deal with the effects of economic meltdown on the electorate.
These protests, opening up like windows all over the world, are not a revolution, nor are they supposed to be. They are, instead, the space where revolutions can begin. They are nodes in a network of possibility where, with enough purpose and popular anger and the wind blowing in the right direction, any possible future could be imagined. They are, in short, monstrously easy to make fun of. The press, inevitably, has begun in every case by doing exactly that, dismissing the protesters as a delusional, childish, workshy bunch of "goddamn hippies", as one American tabloid put it this week.
There are certainly times when it's hard to bite back my skepticism. On a pile of blankets behind the drum circle, I meet a young man in a tie-dye shirt who tells me he's here to "ground the good energy" of Wall Street, as gusts of sandalwood incense blow over from the dodgy-looking amateur acupuncture sessions. If you think that's kooky, though, the offices towering above us are full of people who still believe the solution to aggressive free-market finance is more aggressive free-market finance. This is more than just a great big global 1968 historical re-enactment party.
It's part of what one Spanish protester, who was part of the Campa Del Sol occupation in Madrid, described as "the very redefinition of politics". There are times when the economic consensus is so overwhelming that questioning it in any way becomes a radical act, and just as they did in Europe, the US authorities are beginning to get nervous. The New York police moved on Saturday with one of the largest mass arrests in US history on Brooklyn Bridge, a stunt that seemed designed to deter activists from further dissent. But the occupiers of Wall Street have so far refused to be intimidated. For now, in a country that is beginning to reconsider what freedom actually means for ordinary people, that collective courage is enough. For now, it's more than enough.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


25 Comments so far
Show AllThanks so much, Laurie Penny. Yes, ridicule is easy, especially for those who feel threatened by change.
Ridicule is a powerful weapon, as we see by the obscene examples of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, et al. People think insulting others passes as "truth." Difficult to counter, but counter it we must.
Good analysis here.
Laurie's analysis really captures the spirit of the movement and emphasizes that since the US is the only superpower, whatever happens in the US affects the rest of the world.
Advice to Laurie and others who are trying to get control of tobacco addiction: When I was kicking the habit I found it very helpful to keep reminding myself that global corporations formulate tobacco products to hook users and keep them hooked, and that by quitting, I would be one less customer poviding money for those corporations to sustain their antisocial actions.
Very promising. All the more reason for Common Dreams to stop putting articles about "Tea Party Wing-Nuts" on its home page. Some of those folks are starting to see that they're part of the 99%, too.
Or would we rather run them off, and change all of our slogans to say we're the 85% (or whatever)?
Agreed, the movement needs to be inclusive...that is the only way it will attract energy from the "swing voters" that is needed to attain critical mass.
Seeing what it cost to win any election today, and how Obama is amassing a billion dollar 2012 campaign war chest, you can be more unequivocal on the subject of corporate money in politics, Laurie. It is not a question of "right or wrong", it IS WRONG. .
Yes, inclusivity is all important. But the beliefs of a substantial number of Tea Partiers set them sharply at odds with many of the issues fueling OWS. The racism and anti-immigrant rights positions of Tea Partiers is the opposite of inclusivity.
Ridicule, snark, "irony", are the intellectual weapons of the current idiocracy. Deep thinking, detailed arguments, earnestness, commitment to truth are all so 20th century. It's better to find one wedge issue that can be used to discredit an entire group of people in general than to find out the truth or to make fun of someone because they look like a hippie than to listen to what they're saying.
It's the typical malevolent predatory behavior that's behind corporate thinking - immediate technical (rhetorical in this case) victories are valued as the ultimate goal of any discussion. Which is the main reason it is futile trying to engage in conversation with big media - their goal is not understanding but finding a weakness to exploit, nothing else.
Very good article by Ms. Penny. One does hope that she will successfully kick her nicotine habit. She is too good of a writer to succumb to, for the most part, a preventable disease such as lung cancer.
The line about not having Woodstock is right on point. Remember, though, that during the '60s/'70s there was the mass of "young people" who supported and participated in the "Movement." But there was also on the sidelines looking in and mocking them the "Me Generation" types, who went on to become the Limgbaughs, Hannitys, and the very Wall Street guys the current Wall Street Occupiers are protesting.
I like the unnamed middle aged union member's crack, "I feel bad for you young people...... You have the same bullshit to deal with as us, but you didn't even get Woodstock."
Even with snide cracks in the mainstream US press about goddamn hippie protestors, Laurie Penny is right: this is more than just a great big global 1968 historical reenactment party. Her observations about the disillusioned transition from Obama 2008 to total rejection of two party politics by the fall of 2011 is what I think are particularly noteworthy. Nobody in either major political party, nor the mainstream US media, wants to report on that phenomenon at all.
In '68, if in complete despair, you could always turn off and "drop out" into the counter-culture that Woodstock symbolized. Today, the alternative counter-culture appears to exist primarily in cyberspace. Bummer.
Not nearly as threatening to those holding positions of status quo power, nor nearly as nurturing for those who are must cope with living in a violent, hostile and very real world.
Bill from Saginaw
Having come of age during the 60s in San Francisco let me assure you that there is little to compare between 1968 and today. Shifting resources from the Main Street economy to the Wall Street economy is the reason.
In 1968 Wall Street was still a decade away from starting to decriminalize (euphemistically called deregulate) FDR's New Deal regulations that had kept the financial sector under control since 1935 and created the strongest middle class the world had ever seen.. Financial industry professionals' incomes were comparable to incomes in other industries. By the turn of the 21st century financial industry decriminalization reached the point that financial industry professionals' ANNUAL incomes exceeded the LIFETIME incomes of their counterparts in other industries. This enabled the financial industry to own Washington DC politicians, as Senator Dick Durbin told us in 2010.
In 1968 government programs benefited the Main Street economy. For the past decade, government programs have benfited the Wall Street economy.
The Occupy Movement is the most exciting thing since the sixties. By progressive sites at least, it looks as if the people are waking up from their corporate media induced stupor at long last.
It is exciting to see more and more organizations recognizing that there is little difference between the plight of the young folks who started the occupation and the rest of the 99%. If corporate control of government doesn't get turned around we will all end up living under bridges.
The stakes are much higher today. In the sixties we were pushing to end the Viet Nam occupation and expand civil rights, things that negatively impacted less than 10% of the world's population.
Today we are pushing to end corporate control of government that negatively impacts more than 90% of the world's population.
Spot on
These people are finding their voice, and possibly a greater meaning to their lives, by engaging in this protest/sit-in/movement/statement to the Oligarchs. They are reminding me and many of us what it is like to begin a true "democratic" movement. This is about stepping way outside of your comfort zone, putting your needs aside, and taking the risks and the steps to say, "We are fed up with this outrage". My hope is that there is some next step that will move them from the streets into the offices of Wall Street, and will further enable real change to take a foothold. Protests are just a start-but they are necessary, no doubt about it.
This truly is how great change starts, and they are to be commended. They are what this nation truly is about.
Penny sez: "Party politics is felt, rightly or wrongly, to be bloated with corporate money ..."
***
One does not have to "feel" or "sense" or "imagine" corporate money sloshing through the system. Empirical dollar figures and personalities -- and their intersections -- are readily accessible.
I remember marching against the Vietnam War in SF; civil rights marches also. One thing we did was to put a big white sign on the BoA expensive black sculpture in their plaza; it read "Bankers Heart". BofA really hated it according to a friend who worked in the corporate offices. Might try it in Boston.
The 19th-century German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer declared: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident." May it be so.
Although this was probably the least idiotic thing he said :-D
Ridiculing these protests is what I call low-hanging fruit. Of course the RW media goes for it. Let us recognize that for the cheap shot it is. It takes a little more thought power and humanity to learn to see the issue from the other guy's eyes, to understand what motivates this kind of commitment. Easy to parrot some talking head's insults, but that's intellectually dishonest. Part of the question is, and this could make a big difference: are we collectively so brainwashed that laughing along with the laugh tracks on sitcoms is the same as saying Amen to whatever the bought-and-paid-for TV anchor says? That's kind of scary in a surreal, sci-fi kind of way.
Or do we still have the discernment to say, Hey wait a sec...that's not funny--it's not even true. Hey, you're full of crap! Shut it off!
I guess that's partly why I get upset when posters here go on the attack against certain groups instead of building bridges: It's easier to ridicule than to try to understand. But Progressives need to get beyond that, take the time to be better-informed and less knee-jerk than the, well, the jerks.
To the Author.
Keep on writing, Keep on telling the truth. Tell the Truth Whenever and Wherever you can...Try harder on the smoking you are needed. This is the first act in a show called "revolution". The "Night" is coming, try to live to see the "Morning".
Use the system we have, to fix the system we have... and demand one simple law: make it a misdemeanor NOT to vote in federal elections.
Vote for what, hypergrove? We have a one-party system with two faces. The corporations own all three branches of government, with the exception of Social Security and the Post Office (and we know what's in store for them), the media, public education (including higher education), and textbook publishers. One man, Arthur Pope, has bought the entire state of North Carolina (see link below). Our only choice is to take to the streets and refuse to vote for Democrats or Republicans.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/10/10/111010fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all
I sure hope you don't think democracy itself is as bankrupt as capitalism. There IS a difference you know. And you just want to stop voting? Not trying to be offensive to you personally, but really, let's use our brains and figure out a strategy that is concrete, that will work, that is simple, that has a g-d chance of actually happening.... otherwise the rants are just political pornography,
On the smoking thing use nutritional support. Calcium and B-vitamins are depleted and the actual cause of some of the withdrawal symptoms. Frequent protein snacks to keep your blood sugar level (no spikes). And breath, purse your lips together like you are smoking only use good fresh air. It causes a carotid artery reflex, deeper lung use and more oxygen to your brain. (part of the reason people like to smoke). Get help if you need it and take good care of yourself. Check with your doctor if you find any of this advice a concern.
Great article!!!!
"...substantive change does not tend to happen if you ask nicely and play by the rules."
Well, no.
The "rules" are made by the people who have the power to make the rules, and they don't WANT anything to change because don't want to relinquish any of the privilege that comes with that power.
"Following the rules" for making changes is guaranteed failure. It's a scam along with "change takes time." How come only GOOD changes take so much damn time? How come we can get INTO a war practically overnight, but pulling OUT of one requires such a carefully-planned gradual withdrawal over months or years?
People generally change only when it becomes too painful NOT to change.
Same holds true for cultures and societies, I believe.
liberty & justice,
sj