EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- The Bill of Rights Exists: An Open Letter to Dianne Feinstein
- 'Beyond Orwellian': Outrage Follows Revelations of Vast Domestic Spying Program
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
Popular content
Today's Top News
Beyond Bradley Manning: The Lonely Battle Against Solitary Confinement
For the past few weeks, progressive commentators have been burning with outrage over the prison conditions endured by accused WikiLeaks source, Private Bradley Manning. For more than seven months, Manning has been held in 23-hour-a-day solitary confinement at a Marine brig in Quantico, Virginia, denied sunlight, exercise, possessions, and all but the most limited contact with family and friends. The conditions of his detention are being discussed, lamented and protested throughout the left-leaning blogosphere, and few of those taking part in the conversation hesitate to describe Manning's situation as "torture".
Bradley Manning's treatment undeniably deserves this attention. But while Manning's punishment is cruel, it is far from unusual. According to available data, there are some 25,000 inmates in long-term isolation in America's supermax prisons, and as many as 80,000 more in solitary confinement in other facilities. Where is the outrage – even among progressives – for these forgotten souls? Where, for that matter, is some acknowledgment of their existence?
To be fair, a few of the writers who champion Manning have mentioned in passing the widespread use of solitary confinement in the United States. But more often, these writers – and their readers, if comments are any measure – have gone to some lengths to distinguish Bradley Manning from the masses of other prisoners being held in similar conditions. Whether explicitly or implicitly, they depict Manning as exceptional – and therefore, as less deserving of his treatment and more worthy of our concern.
Frequently, writers and readers make the point that Manning is being subjected to these conditions while he is merely accused, rather than convicted, of a crime. Perhaps they need to be introduced to the 15-year-old boy who, along with several dozen other juveniles, is in isolation in a jail in Harris County, Texas, while he awaits trial on a robbery charge. He is one of hundreds – if not thousands – of prisoners being held in pre-trial solitary confinement, for one reason or another, on any given day in America. Most of them lack decent legal representation, or are simply too poor to make bail.
We have also seen articles suggesting that Manning's treatment is worse than the standard for solitary confinement, since he is deprived even of a pillow or sheets for his bed. Their authors should review the case of the prisoners held in the St Tammany parish jail, in rural Louisiana. According to a brief by the Louisiana ACLU:
"After the jail determines a prisoner is suicidal, the prisoner is stripped half-naked and placed in a 3′ x 3′ metal cage with no shoes, bed, blanket or toilet … Prisoners report they must curl up on the floor to sleep because the cages are too small to let them lie down."
The cells are one-fourth the size mandated by local law for caged dogs.
There is, rightly, concern over the damage being done to Manning's mental health by seven months in solitary. Seldom mentioned is the fact that an estimated one third to one half of the residents of America's isolation units suffer from mental illness. They include a 17-year-old inmate who, according to the ACLU, "was so traumatised by his deplorable treatment in the Montana state prison that he twice attempted to kill himself by biting through the skin on his wrist to puncture a vein." During his ten months in solitary confinement, the teenager was Taser-ed, pepper-sprayed, and stripped naked in view of other inmates; "his mental health treatment consisted of a prison staff member knocking on his door once a week and asking if he had any concerns."
Finally, many have argued that the nature of Manning's alleged crimes renders him a heroic political prisoner, rather than a "common criminal" like most others. Those who take this line might want to look into the Communications Management Units at two federal prisons, where, according to a lawsuit filed last year by the Center for Constitutional Rights, prisoners are placed in extreme isolation "for their constitutionally protected religious beliefs, unpopular political views, or in retaliation for challenging poor treatment or other rights violations in the federal prison system".
All of these cases are "exceptional" – but only in that they earned the attention of some journalist or advocate. Most prisoners held in solitary confinement are, by design, silent and silenced. Most of their stories – tens of thousands of them – are never told at all. Since solitary confinement is now used as a disciplinary measure of first resort in prisons and jails throughout the country, it is anything but exceptional. Inmates are placed in isolation for months or years not only for fighting with other inmates or guards, but for being "disruptive" or disobeying orders, or for having contraband (which can be a joint, a cellphone, or too many postage stamps). In many prisons, juveniles and rape victims are isolated "for their own protection" in conditions identical to those used for punishment.
In fact, if solitary confinement is "torture" – or at the very least, cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment – then it shouldn't matter what a prisoner has done to end up there. The treatment of Bradley Manning, which has introduced many on the left to the torment of solitary confinement, may present an opportunity for them to measure their own tolerance for torture. They might begin by asking themselves whether solitary confinement is wrong, and worthy of their attention and outrage, only when it is suffered by people whose actions they admire.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


19 Comments so far
Show AllYes, the American Gulag thrives.
Why isn't the mental health community responding? Mental health officials know solitary confinement is tantamount to torture--then why aren't they speaking out? Doesn't the American Psychological Association take a stand? I am reminded of how psychiatry joined hand in hand with the Soviet state to declare political dissidents "insane" and had them subjected to detrimental drugs, harsh confinement, restraints, and other forms of "therapy." Why is the professional community silent on this issue?
The American Psychological Association works hand-in-glove with the U.S. government in facilitating torture, so they will have no problem with the torture of solitary confinement.
You can read Dr. Jeffrey S. Kaye's excellent letter of resignation from the APA, "Why Torture Made Me Leave the APA," at http://www.alternet.org/rights/78909/
Thanks for the link. It was mainly about governmental interrogation and torture, but still is relevant to the topic at hand. The article was about the inhumanity of isolation for all prisoners, political or not. The APA certainly is an embarrassment to its members. What about the equivalent to the medical principle, "First, do no harm." Guess it doesn't exist for the APA.
The US mental health community is not the benevolent system you imagine, nor has it ever been. Look at the psychiatrists working with the CIA in their torture endeavors, not a new phenomenon. Ever heard of MKULTRA and the work of US psychiatrist Donald Ewen Cameron? He was once president of the American Psychiatric Association.
This from http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Donald_Ewen_Cameron
"Naomi Klein states in her book "The Shock Doctrine" that Dr Cameron's research and his contribution to the MKUltra project was actually not about mind control and brainwashing, but about "to design a scientifically based system for extracting information from 'resistant sources.' In other words, torture," and citing a book from Alfred W. McCoy. it further says that "Stripped of its bizarre excesses, Dr. Cameron's experiments, building upon Dr. Donald O. Hebb earlier breakthrough, laid the scientific foundation for the CIA's two-stage psychological torture method."
"Donald Ewen Cameron was the author of the psychic driving concept which the CIA found particularly interesting. In it he described his theory on correcting madness, which consisted of erasing existing memories and rebuilding the psyche completely. After being recruited by the CIA, he commuted to Montreal every week to work at the Allan Memorial InstituteAllan Memorial Institute of the McGill University, and was paid $69,000 from 1957 to 1964 to carry out MKULTRA experiments there. The CIA appears to have given him the potentially deadly experiments to carry out, as they would be tried on non-US citizens. However, documents released in 1977 revealed that thousands of unwitting, as well as voluntary subjects, were tested on during that time period. These included United States citizens.
"In addition to LSD and PCP (Phencyclidine), Cameron also experimented with various paralytic drugs, as well as electroconvulsive therapy at 30 to 40 times the normal power. His "driving" experiments consisted of putting subjects into drug-induced coma for months on end (up to three in one case) while playing tape loops of noise or simple repetitive statements. His experiments were typically carried out on patients who had entered the institute for minor problems such as anxiety disorders and post-partum depression, many of whom suffered permanently from his actions. His work in this field was inspired and paralleled by the British psychiatrist Dr William Sargant, who carried out virtually identical experiments at St Thomas' HospitalSt Thomas' Hospital, London and Belmont Hospital, Surrey, also without his patients' consent.
"It was during this era that Cameron became known worldwide, serving as the second President of the World Psychiatric Association, as well as president of the American and Canadian psychiatric associations. He was also a member of the Nuremberg medical tribunal a decade earlier, where he accused German medics of things he himself did between 1934–60 or later, though his scientific work during World War II for the OSS has never been a secret."
Appalling! I cannot believe members of the various associations did not protest Cameron's presidencies. Is it the attraction of money that causes psychologists and psychiatrists to abandon ethical behavior? Or are they political stooges? Either way, it's disgusting.
The US imprisons more people per capita than anywhere else on this earth. Then we call ourselves, "the land of the free," curious at best.
The use of incarceration and "enhanced incarceration" should most definately be an issue in the public eye. Maybe the Manning case can be an entry point to this discussion.
That said, Manning's contribution cannot be minimized.
Canada's Supreme Court, on Dec. 23, 2010, unanimously ruled that solitary confinement constituted "cruel and unusual punishment". That also happens to be the exact wording of the 8th Amendment of the US Constitution. The full, formal ruling is available online at:
http://www.lexisnexis.ca/documents/2010scc63.pdf
Both Canada and the USA follow common-law traditions, in which court rulings have the force of law. Rulings in one common law jurisdiction can be used as legal arguments in another common law jurisdiction.
Furthermore, Article VI of the US Constitution declares that treaties are "the supreme law of the land". The Geneva Conventions are treaties that the US has ratified, making them the supreme law of the USA. Common Article Three of the Geneva Conventions prohibits solitary confinement because it is cruel and inhuman.
President Obama and all US Marine Corps officers have sworn oaths that they will honor and defend the US Constitution.
They are thus bound by law, by duty, and by honor to comply with the US Constitution's Article VI and 8th Amendment and must stop the solitary confinement of Bradley Manning.
Winning this high profile case would be a step towards stopping solitary confinement in all federal and state prisons in the USA.
Serious Citizen has done good work here, giving us the legal essentials that are easy to understand and convey. Thank you, Serious Citizen.
And which Democrat is too tentative to go to New Hampshire and oppose Obama in its 2012 presidential primary? Feingold, Grayson, Olbermann, Kucinich, Sanders, and I guess the rest of the fence straddlers as well.
And we H. sapiens are The Chosen, to break the bounds of gravity, enter Space, and colonize the Milky Way.
"Greetings. We're from Earth. Take us to see your prisons."
When, periodically, I remark on CD that H. sapiens is a totally failed experiment, readers either don't listen or get pissed. They point at human STUFF, like, this is better than the nest of the Bower Bird. And while they point at their flimsy evidence, somewhere a prepubescent H. sapien is screaming in pain and fear while an adult is fucking it.
Nihilism is a pass-fail intelligence test of the ability to perceive the Reality of this highly-evolved human condition.
Bless the hearts of brave persons trying to save the Experiment (Julian Assange, Bradley Manning, Howard Zinn et al) but my wager is that it's too little, too late. I'd like time to prove me wrong, but I doubt that it will or CAN. And dismissal of that position as mere pessimism proves my point.
Trylon
Imperial, authoritarian-state Amerika's metastasizing prison system is predicated on an iron-clad aphorism.
"If you can't do the time, don't do the crime?"
No, "Out of sight, out of mind."
The wretched circumstance of entire professions going along for the ride is one of the ripple effects of a culture of institutional incarceration.
Its tentacles insinuate themselves in every class and walk of life. How many impoverished or economically deteriorating communites stripped of (relatively) honest manufacturing jobs and ancillary employment opportunities are "rescued" by a new correctional facility?
Put the other way around, how often do communities reject new prisons and the demagogic Elected Misrepresentatives who sponsor them as "part of the (economic) solution"? It does happen, but not often.
The harsh, unremitting, coercive methods and conditions inside these behavioral sinks sooner or later dehumanize and brutalize those who administer and service them-- and the cowed, fearful citizens who, reluctantly or enthusiastically, support them as useful and in any case necessary.
Once one buys into the necessity and justice of "No More Mister Nice Guy" punitive incarceration, the logical consequence is to wink at, or turn away from, the dirty details. Better to trust to the professionals obliged to deal with the horrors!
It's a lonely battle indeed. Movements to redress and reform egregious wrongs and horrors within this dreadful enterprise are correspondingly marginalized and scorned-- a candle in the wind, or the liquid version of the metaphor.
i am with you trylon, we are a failed experiment. have you ever seen "destination mars" must be from the 50's? it was hidden by the gov. untill recently. it is about the people from mars, coming to the earth in peace. and due to our corrupt nature we decide to destroy mars with a super ray cannon. the ray bounces back at earth and destroys earth. 2 martians are shown talking and one says to the other " well, the universe is better off without them anyway". i know there is no hope for h. sapian. it is to late. every thing that was good is gone, everyone lives in a shell of nothingness, excepting very few brave souls, at least in the united states of barnum and baily. i have no knowlege of other countrys. europe does seem to have something coming to the surface. h. sapian in the us are doomed. i cry at night looking at the way we are. i ask the great spirit what is happening. i say "what can be done?". all that i hear is " YOU walk upright with honor and dignity. show the way a human should be, whether anyone gets it. at least there will be one experiment that passed the test!". come to find out, if there are others like me, maybe we are not a failed experiment after all.
My 27-year-old son is in solitary confinement for slipping out of his cell and into another to retrieve his radio and slipping back into his cell. At the housing review, they gave him 30 days in the hole for it. Then, a couple of days later, he had a disciplinary review, in which they determined that several locks in the unit were broken, and that he had not broken it, and they decided to fix the locks as a result. He's still in the hole for 30 days, as that's when his next housing review comes up, so he's being punished for something their own people said he didn't do. When he was in another prison a couple of years ago, he was shipped to another prison in the state, and held in solitary confinement for three months for an "administrative decision" that turned out later to be a mistake. He was not allowed to talk to anyone, including his attorney, or his family. Nobody apologized, and nobody was reprimanded for the "mistake." They brought him back and acted as if nothing happened.
There are inmates who've spent decades in solitary confinement, right here in the land of the free. This morning, when I heard Obama call the Chinese president on China's human rights abuses, I wanted to puke. He had the audacity to chide China while presiding over a nation that allows beatings, rape, torture, solitary confinement for decades, as a matter of policy!! The hypocrisy is positively mind-boggling! I, for one, am glad the Bradley Manning case is causing Americans to question our heinous policies regarding the inhumane treatment of our citizens, but I'm not holding my breath that the average American will care any more than they do about our slaughtering hundreds of thousands of people for control of their resources. Thanks SO much for this article though. I really appreciate the effort.
And in case anybody needs more heart-harrowing news on the subject:
With guards watching and a video camera rolling, Ashley Smith slowly choked herself to death in a federal prison on Oct. 19, 2007.*
* http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2010-2011/behindthewall/
This is a job for Amnesty International and for every American citizen.
I don't think it's fair to say progressives do not connect Bradley Manning's torture to the US corrections industry. I think we find it a rallying touchstone for the issue. Unfortunately, like so many issues, the MSM ignores us. And the dysfunctional congress creates barriers against aligning our policies with the rest of the world, seemingly without reason, just because they can. The House of Representatives has a Justice committee that should be holding hearings on solitary confinement right now, but I wouldn't hold my breath. In 2009, Senator Jim Webb (D-VA) introduced legislation to initiate a thorough examination of the entire US justice system, but the bill was waylaid, despite having support from some Republicans. If Obama is too weak to order up an examination of the whole corrections system, surely he could focus on solitary confinement and move the system a centimeter toward what the rest of the world considers humane.
This is a very informative story.
Thanks CD.
tiddas - Obama is the one responsible for holding Bradley Manning in solitary confinement, and is after Julian Assange for telling the truth, and would put him Guantanamo or kill him in a heartbeat if he could. I have zero hope for any change from this liar of a president. "Change we can believe in." He changed on single payer. He changed on tax cuts for the wealthiest and tax hikes for the poorest. He changed on Guantanamo. He changed on Iraq. He changed on the Patriot Act. He changed on ordering assassinations of American citizens. And he changed on sending predator drones into nations we're not even at war with. Yeah baby, that's some change we can believe in. Obama isn't going to do a thing regarding prisons because the corrections system has been privatized. There's too much money for too many people for it to go back now. The drug war on Americans is bigger than ever. We spent $50 billion last year to arrest a million and a half people for drug offenses, 90,000 of which were for marijuana alone. This is intolerable and absolutely insane, and it's happening under Mr. Constitutional Scholar's watch. We the People have been sold down the corporate river by both parties, and there's really not a thing We can do. The Supreme Court saw to that last on 1-21-2010 when they handed our elections to corporations on a silver platter. That was the day we officially changed from America to Amerika, Incorporated. You can believe in THAT change, that's for sure.
Let's not forget the torture he is experiencing via the drugging he is undergoing at the hands of his captors. Chemical waterboarding. What I find unique about this situation is the fact that he is the first active military to publicly undergo such torture. We all knew the depravity in terms of inflicting this pain upon their perceived enemies, now they have turned upon themselves. Anyone active military or engaged in "law enforcement" should take notice.
As for our prisons and jails, the situation is clearly out of control. As we head down the road to privatization of these great American institutions, look for them to become more brazen in their abuse.