EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Heroes for the Beaten, Foreclosed on, Imprisoned Masses
The administration at Yale University, where Staughton taught after leaving Spelman because of conflicts with the college president over his and Zinn’s activism, was not amused. Yale dismissed him as a professor. Five other universities, which had offered Staughton teaching positions, abruptly rescinded their offers. He had become a pariah. No university would hire him, although his book “Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism” had become a minor classic. Staughton, like all incorrigible rebels, found a new route to defy authority. He put himself, with his wife’s help, through law school, graduated in 1976 and moved to Youngstown, Ohio, to fight the departing steel companies and defend workers tossed out of jobs.
Staughton faults the labor movement and 1960s civil rights organizers, including Saul Alinsky, for whom he worked in Chicago, for failing to see that moving temporarily into a community, organizing and then departing left the organized vulnerable to reprisal. It eroded the credibility and moral authority of radical activists. The Lynds embrace the idea of “accompaniment,” proposed by the assassinated Salvadoran Archbishop Oscar Romero. Accompaniment calls on professionally trained people, whether lawyers, doctors or teachers, to move into poor areas and remain there. This led the Lynds to move, once Staughton got his law degree, to Youngstown, where they have remained for 34 years.
Power, for the Lynds, must be fought in all its forms. While working for a law firm that represented unions, Staughton was asked to prepare a Supreme Court brief for a union that had failed to file a meritorious grievance for a member.
“I’d drop dead first,” Staughton snapped at the head of the firm.
He then published a book called “Labor Law for the Rank and Filer,” and the firm’s patience with their new hire ended. He was fired. It was another lesson, for all who seek the moral life, that the world does not reward virtue. Failure, at least as it is defined by the powerful, is the price to pay for moral autonomy and courage. Staughton had become a lawyer to help workers. If union bosses would not further workers’ rights, he would fight the unions too.
“The paradigmatic experience of my father, who as a student at Union Theological Seminary had taken a summer preaching assignment, which apparently was the practice between the first and second years, saw him end up at a Rockefeller oil camp in Elk Basin, Wyo.,” Staughton said. “When my father arrived in Elk Basin in the early 1920s by stagecoach he became aware on the very first evening at the table that the men who were working six days a week for Mr. Rockefeller were not thrilled to have this handsome young man from the East spending the week talking to their wives. So he got a job as a pick-and-shovel laborer, and preached in the schoolhouse Sunday evenings. It is the single thing about him of which I am most proud. I have made a way of life out of what my father experienced for a summer, to find a way to have a continuing relationship with the poor and the oppressed, with a working-class community quite different from the academic livelihood that both my parents ended up in.”
“Throughout my life with one or two exceptions, my closest friends have been persons who, like Howard Zinn, could be described as working-class intellectuals,” he said. “What it means for Marxist analysis and how we change the world, I guess I am still trying to figure out. Nowadays, Youngstown having closed all its steel mills and become a prison town, Alice and I have some of our closest relationships with people behind bars.”
I met Staughton and Alice, also a lawyer, a few days ago in Youngstown. The Lynds, now in their 80s, have soldiered on as the walls have collapsed around them. They practice what they call “prophetic litigation,” meaning that they often know they are likely to lose but believe that constantly battling issues of injustice and abuse, and keeping these issues before the public, is worth the likelihood of defeat.
Youngstown, like many postindustrial pockets in America, is a deserted wreck plagued by crime and the attendant psychological and criminal problems that come when communities physically break down. The city’s great steel mills have been leveled and replaced by America’s new growth industry—prisons, including a so-called supermax facility.
The Lynds worked for many years for Legal Services in Youngstown, specializing in employment law. Staughton, when the steel mills were shut down in the late 1970s, served as lead counsel to the Ecumenical Coalition of the Mahoning Valley, which sought to reopen the mills under worker-community ownership. The legal impediments, however, conspired to make the worker-community ownership impossible, a stark reminder that law in this country is usually designed to protect privilege.
“The hollowing out of the American economy, the absence of manufacturing jobs, is critical,” he said. “It means that this is not an ordinary recession. We are not going to bounce back the way we did in past recessions. Alice and I have had some contact with a school in inner-city Youngstown where they send kids who are thrown out of public school to give them one last chance before they put them behind bars. We have a pretty intense feeling for what it is like to grow up as an African-American in a place like Youngstown. Even if you make it through high school, where do you find a job? I don’t mean to say the problem is wholly economic. There is often a lack of love in the home that these kids experience. But if there were decent jobs which a hard-working young person could go on to, we would have a different world. Instead, some of these kids volunteer for the military and take their hatred and trauma overseas.”
As the collapse has taken its toll on the residents in and around Youngstown, the Lynds have focused on the plight of inmates, especially those who were involved in a prison uprising in Lucasville, Ohio, in April 1993. Five of the leaders of the uprising were sentenced to death for their part. They remain on death row.
Three of the five are black and two are white. The two whites were members of the Aryan Brotherhood. The blacks are Muslims. The men have refused to testify against each other. The Lynds, when they read the testimony of Ohio Highway Patrol Sgt. Howard Hudson in the trial of one of the white inmates, George Skatzes, were inspired by the inmates’ ability to overcome racial and religious divisions.
Once the prisoners surrendered and the Highway Patrol entered L block, which the prisoners had occupied, the officers found graffiti covering the walls. In the trial Hudson, the state’s principal investigator, identified a photograph taken in the L block corridor.
Question: On the wall on the right there appears to be something written?
Answer: Says, “Black and White Together.”
Q: Did you find that or similar slogans in many places in L block?
A: Yes, we did, throughout the corridor, in the L block.
The transcript goes on.
Q: [What is the photograph] 260?
A: 260, the words, “Convict Unity,” written on the walls of L corridor.
Q: Did you find the message of unity throughout L block?
A: Yes. …
Q: Next photo?
A: 261 is another photograph in L corridor that depicts the words, “Convict race.”
“ ‘Convict race,’ is my favorite,” Staughton said. “Evidently the cultural creation of racial identity can work in more than one way. Among the Lucasville rebels, the process didn’t separate the races, but overcame racism. Not since the early 1960s in the South have I experienced as much interracial solidarity as I have among convicted prisoners which the state of Ohio considers ‘the worst of the worst.’ ”
“The same solidarity took place among soldiers in Vietnam who protested the war,” he said. “This is instructive. People draw on their cultural resources, on their music, traditions and symbols in radical or revolutionary conflicts. It is natural that blacks and whites would initially organize separately. But in Vietnam, or a supermax prison, troops and inmates face a common danger and a common enemy. It is easier to overcome cultural barriers. The danger in the wider society is less defined. It is more diffuse. This is the reason it is harder to bring groups together. But this is what must happen. Too many movements are directed from the top down. They are not rooted in local communities. It is we who should be building local movements to tell those in power what to do, not the other way around.”
“My favorite book is Ignazio Silone’s novel ‘Bread and Wine,’ particularly the first edition before he started rewriting all his books.” he said. “The religious element in my childhood was very recessive, more in the background than upfront. We never went to church, although it has always been there for me. My parents sent me to schools run by the Ethical Cultural Society. It is a kind of reform, Reformed Judaism institution. What Pietro Spina, the protagonist of ‘Bread and Wine,’ struggles with is how to bring together the Christianity of his childhood and adolescence with his later Marxism. That has been my effort as well.”
The Lynds have requested that their ashes be buried along with those of indigent death row inmates at a cemetery run by the Jubilee Partners community in Georgia.
“We knew at once that this is where we belonged,” Staughton said.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


69 Comments so far
Show AllThanks, commondreams, for posting this article about the truly great Staughton and Alice Lynd.
In a society where almost every profession is dominated by money and more so year after year, the Staughton Lynds are a rare breed among lawyers. Then again, in the USA where worshiping the Mammon is the norm, putting quality before quantity is rare even in bad times.
P.S.: Thank you CD for bringing back Chris Hedges. :)
Jennifer: I agree -- thanks for the Staughton Lynds and thanks for Chris Hedges!
Absolutely. Staughton and Alice Lynd are jewels in this nation's crown. How indebted we are to them.
They rest in a stellar row with the brothers Berrigan, A.J. Muste, David Dellinger, Alice Herz, Norman Morison, Sojourner Truth, Harriet Beecher Stowe - and many many others.
Let there be peace on earth
And let it begin with me.
Let there be peace on earth
The peace that was meant to be.
With God as our father
Brothers all are we.
Let me walk with my brother
In perfect harmony.
Let peace begin with me
Let this be the moment now.
With every step I take
Let this be my solemn vow.
To take each moment
And live each moment
With peace eternally.
Let there be peace on earth,
And let it begin with me.
Thank you for this article.
Where will we find people to replace these aging heroes?
In prison.
Blessed be the Peacemakers.
French workers are currently staging a widespread rebellion.
Where is the CD coverage on what should be occurring here and elsewhere?
All Power to the People!
"French workers are currently staging a widespread rebellion." -- Glenn Ford
This morning, I heard that DeGaulle Airport will run out of fuel tonight. That shuts down the airline industry.
Vive la France!
"Something our society rarely recognizes is the intelligence of people who don't have an ivy league education or any formal education at all." -- Jill
I agree with you! This is an important issue. How do we begin to organize? How do we connect with people within our own communities? I don't think we can do all of this work by sitting behind our computer screens -- even though the Internet is a powerful tool.
Currently, I am reading the newly published Chris Hedges book, Death of the Liberal Class. I highly recommend the book. In the book, in Chapter 5, he describes a hypermasculinity that permeates our country, negating the feminine principle and all that encompasses the feminine.
Chapter 5 opens with a quote from Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies:
"But the secret of intellectual excellence is the spirit of criticism; it is intellectual independence. And this leads to difficulties which must prove insurmountable for any kind of authoritarianism. The authoritarian will in general select those who obey, who believe, who respond to his influence. But in doing so, he is bound to select mediocrities. For he excludes those who revolt, who doubt, who dare to resist his influence. Never can authority admit that the intellectually courageous, i.e. those who dare to defy his authority, may be the most valuable type. Of course, the authorities will always remain convinced of their ability to detect initiative. But what they mean by this is only a quick grasp of seeing the difference." -- Karl Popper, 1945
Within Chapter 5, Chris Hedges writes about patriarchy and the hypermasculinity that has been imposed on us by the power elite. From the book, Page 155:
"This hypermasculinity, the core of pornography, fuses violence and eroticism, as well as the physical and emotional degradation of women. It is the language employed by the corporate state. Human beings are reduced to commodities. Corporations, which are despotic, authoritarianism enclaves devoted to maximizing profit and insuring that all employees speak from the same prompt cards, have infected the wider society with their values. Hypermasculinity crushes the capacity for moral autonomy, difference, and diversity. It isolates us from one another. It has its logical fruition in Abu Ghraib prison, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with our lack of compassion for our homeless, our poor, our mentally ill, our unemployed, our sick, and our gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual citizens. It is the antithesis of liberalism.
"In his two-volume 1987 study entitled Male Fantasies, which draws on the bitter alienation of demobilized veterans in Germany following the end of World War I, Klaus Theweleit argues that a militarized culture attacks all that is culturally defined as the feminine, including love, gentleness, compassion, and acceptance of difference. It sees any sexual ambiguity as a threat to male 'hardness' and the clearly defined roles required by a militarized state. The elevation of military values as the highest good sustains the perverted ethic, rigid social roles and emotional numbness that Theweleit explored. It is a moral cancer that the liberal class once struggled against. The collapse of liberalism permits the hypermasculinity of a militarized society to redefine the nation. Several metaphors of abuse and rape are used to justify imperial and military power. And once the remnants of the liberal class adopt the heartless language of sexual violence, they assent, consciously, or not, to the rule of corporate greed and violence." -- Chris Hedges, 2010 -- Death of the Liberal Class
Jill, thanks for your response, and for reminding me to see The Social Network. I'm planning to see it tonight.
"Something has gone terribly wrong inside a person to watch another person tortured." -- Jill
I agree! But, in order to tamp down the violence, death and destruction, along with the pervasive torture -- the wars and the MIC need to end and be dismantled. And, a balance needs to find a place in our society -- between the masculine and the feminine. We should think about adopting the mantra -- "Mars Rules NO Longer!" -- since, now, we have connected the dots.
Jill: When I talk about the masculine and the feminine principles, I'm not talking about the male and female sex. I agree -- there are more than two sexes. It's the qualities that are embodied within these principles that I speak. Maybe, Marion Woodman says it best:
From the book, The Pregnant Virgin -- "In a technological civilization geared up for its own heady destruction, we are destined to become the victims of an outworn patriarchal consciousness so long as we collude in equating femininity with biological identity. That kind of consciousness is propelling not only individuals but the whole planet into an addiction to power and perfection which, viewed from the perspective of nature, can lead only to suicide. Feminine consciousness dare not be limited to unredeemed matter or unconscious mother. The realization that a neurosis has a creative purpose applies globally as well as personally, and surely, in an age addicted to power and the acquisition of material possessions, the creative purpose must have something to do with the one thing that can save us -- love for the earth, love for each other -- the wisdom of the Goddess. Responsibility belongs in the individual home, in the individual heart, in the energy that holds atoms together rather than blows them apart." -- Marion Woodman, 1985
Thank you, Kay (and Jill), for powerful psycho-social-spiritual insight---interesting stuff. Your thoughts describe the profound alienation within American culture that transcends reason, pointing to wisdom in another dimension that is more real than this limited material construct---that elusive unifying source of energy within all that is, beyond quantum calculus, that Einstein so deeply sensed and sought.
I'm not sure what Jill is on to beyond the duality of male/female, but what you describe is what Dan Brown points to in "The Da Vinci Code", that humanity is suffering profound schizophrenia due to the denial and violent suppression of the feminine aspect of ourselves---the blade without the chalice, so clearly manifest in 'Churchianity' today. Hence, in the egoism of exceptionalism, we blindly follow the disastrous rut of unbridled militarism and Ponzi financialization worn so deeply by all failed empires before us. Many Mayan scholars expect that it is the reintegration or reconciliation of masculine and feminine that will be the transformative passage (“apocalypse”) that humanity is destined to undergo at the threshold of winter 2012.
Thanks, Doug, for your response.
And, your ideas are in line with mine.
The comments by Jill and yourself remind me a lot of the discussion put forth by de Beauvoir's analysis of de Sade and his fellow Libertines.
Is it possible for a society to experience collective anomie regarding itself? That it then turns to distractions of all sorts so that the anomie can be swept under the rug temporarilly? Could American Exceptionalism be a response mechanism to collective anomie?
The achaic meaning for debauchery is seduction from duty. Citizens have duties, yet they have gone unfulfilled for decades, the good people who once performed them becoming seduced to the point where they are no longer citizens but slaves. Hedges writes about one couple refusing to become seduced, who are genuinely civilized. I hope they aren't unique.
"Citizens have duties, yet they have gone unfulfilled for decades, the good people who once performed them becoming seduced to the point where they are no longer citizens but slaves." -- karlof1
Your comment reminded me of a recent interview/discussion between Bruce Fein and Glenn Greenwald:
"Second, we have a degraded political culture that is easily frightened into accepting Empire, evisceration of freedom, and permanent global warfare in search of a risk-free life. We need 50,000 civics teach-ins throughout the nations in libraries, community colleges, auditoriums, etc to imbue citizens with the excitement and duty of self-government and an understanding that a nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. In addition, citizens must be taught a moral duty of active civic involvement in government because the politically idle or indolent invite government tyranny or overreaching. For every set of eyes and ears that are not watching and criticizing government wrongdoing or folly, to that extent the freedom or liberty of all is imperiled because it means a greater chance of government lawlessness with impunity." -- Bruce Fein, September 12, 2010
Living in NYC, I feel overwhelmed. Over the years, I have been involved with some groups here in the city, but for the most part, the organizations aren't necessarily democratic in nature, and also operate with a top-down strategy, instead of being bottom-up. In addition, through the "anybody but Bush" campaign, and with the election of a so-called Democrat, Barack Obama, everyone I meet when I attend rallies, or lectures, etc., seem somewhat dazed by the current state of the union. At one time, I attempted to get involved with the Green Party, but no one ever returned my calls, nor did they respond to my e-mails. Regardless, we have a lot of work to do.
I'm open to suggestions!
Comment deleted by Kim.
" I just went to see the film, "The Social Network" which I found a devastating examination of those we call our ruling elite. The brutal sexism it shows, for the most part docilely accepted by women of every privilege, is dead on." -- Jill
Last night, I went to see the film with a friend, and I agree with you -- except that Zuckerberg's ex-girlfriend took a clear stand, and refused to have anything to do with him after he blogged and projected his anger in revenge for her breaking up with him. Did he feel remorse for crossing the line? -- he attacked her body with his words, the only thing he knew how to do. If he did feel remorse, it was more about him, than it was about her. The young woman's mind was certainly intact, and she was right to leave him behind. Welcome to the world of the elite.
A few months ago, within a span of two or three weeks, I read several books focused on the Wall Street financial crisis. Finally, I read the Michael Lewis book, Liar's Poker, which I recommend to everyone, even though it was first published in 1990. The historical context is important. When I read Scott Patterson's book, The Quants, I kept running across the phrase, "The Big Swinging Dicks of Wall Street." However, even though I reread several passages, I still wasn't certain if this was a REAL club of men, or if he was using the phrase as a metaphor. Then I read the Michael Lewis book -- the phrase is NOT a metaphor. It's what the biggest money-makers on Wall Street call themselves -- it's a club, of sorts. Jill, even I was shocked at this information.
If you've ever read any of Pam Marten's writing, you already know about "The Boom-Boom Room," a room that was in the basement of a stock brokerage office (Shearson) in Garden City, NY, and other such antics practiced by the men who run the banks and other entities that comprise our financial industries in this country. Susan Antilla's book, Tales from the Boom-Boom Room: Women vs. Wall Street, relates the story.
This culture of hypermasculinity permeates our society. The men who work on Wall Street have multiple degrees and graduate from the so-called best schools -- Ivy League -- in this country. Larry Summers is the poster man for the culture, and there he was, President of Harvard, at the same time Zuckerberg was creating Facebook at Harvard, and currently, is about to leave the Obama administration to return to Harvard. The word arrogance doesn't begin to describe the people who work on Wall Street, and in other corporate industries. They are the sociopaths and psychopaths described in the book, Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, written by Paul Babiak and Robert D. Hare. It's very difficult for those of us who care deeply about humanity to wrap our brains around their lack of commitment to the social fabric of this country, and the criminality they embrace without even a thought to the havoc they wreak on "we the people," daily.
A few years ago, a friend of mine and I watched the DVD, A Patriot Act (2004), a Mark Crispin Miller production, and he talked about hypermasculinity, although I think he used a different word. Then, in the documentary, The Smartest Guys in the Room, in 2005, about the Enron collapse, it was also evident.
Thanks, Jill for reminding me to see The Social Network. The film, itself, is good, if viewed from the POV that this is NOT how people should treat each other. However, when Michael Lewis wrote his book, Liar's Poker, he meant to warn people. Instead, he received letters from aspiring students who wanted to be the men he described. In the book, Michael Lewis stated that he felt he had NOT contributed anything of worth to society while he worked in investment banking.
Thanks, Jill, for your very thoughtful response!! Believe me, I wonder the very same thing as you do -- "what makes them the type of human beings they are?"
I agree that some people are waking up from their badly-timed slumber and anesthetization. Now, we need to find a way to organize and mobilize people. The issues are all connected -- one to the next.
"We are in a dire emergency, yet the ruling elite sees this as an "opportunity", not a disaster." -- Jill
I couldn't agree more!
If anyone is interested in hearing the Chris Hedges talk on his new book, Death of the Liberal Class, here's the link:
http://www.mediasanctuary.org/movie/1953
Chris Hedges is speaking at the Sanctuary for Independent Media in Troy, NY.
These are great quotes--much appreciated, Kay. Most of Popper's work, as far as I know, was meant as a warning against totalitarian communism, mainly Stalinism, which he saw as the greatest danger confronting the "open society" of the West. Popper wasn't terribly conscious of the totalitarian tendencies of capitalism, or really state capitalism, under which the US suffers. But his warnings about the failure of intellectual independence are especially pertinent in today's fascistic climate. And Hedges' citing of Theweleit is very relevant here. The militarized culture he describes is ours alone. It reminds me of the way Sioux Rose writes about how "Mars rules" in the US. The Lynds have been valiant warriors against this self-destructive national character. May their spirit and work live on.
Thanks, Ephraim, for your response!
In the book, Chris Hedges also writes extensively about the sad and dire status of the arts in this country.
As usual, Chris Hedges is a thought-provoking writer.
Exactly as Sioux Rose describes -- "Mars rules!" in the U.S. And, we know she's right, too!
I must wonder what he means by "the arts"
Lots get done in every medium that goes on well below the threshold of "being noticed" due to the many levels of gatekeepers.
i wouldn't follow Popper if i were looking for critical thinking.
"intellectual independence" in the critical thinking doesn't mean "criticizing or doubting the authority" or "thinking without philosophical context".
given Popper's empiricist background, he probably means "thinking beyond personal identity-related agenda and in terms of facts with no need for philosophical context". Ayn Rand's ideas are some of the purest forms of "independence" or "objectivity" Popper envisions.
"intellectual independence" in the critical thinking should mean "thinking in the philosophical context in which facts can be connected".
many people, philosophically trained or not, feel the connection in their guts.
thanks so much for recommending the newly published Chris Hedges book, Death of the Liberal Class and your great synopsis as well.
~ ♥ ~
"Chapter 5, he describes a hypermasculinity that permeates our country, negating the feminine principle and all that encompasses the feminine."
~ ♥ ~
i've observed the same thing. when hillary vied for the nomination the question never considered is, "what needed perspective might a woman bring to the executive branch?" oh no, the only question asked was "could she be TOUGH enough?"
~ ♥ ~
"The legal impediments, however, conspired to make the worker-community ownership impossible, a stark reminder that law in this country is usually designed to protect privilege."--chris hedges
~ ♥ ~
i think that at some point people will have to come up with ways to support themselves, the big support system of the rich, the famous and the elect is cumbling beneath our feet. we truly need each other, reguarless of skin tone, gender and all that jazz, a whole lot more than we need the wall street gang.
Thanks, hummingbird, for your very thoughtful response!
"i've observed the same thing. when hillary vied for the nomination the question never considered is, "what needed perspective might a woman bring to the executive branch?" oh no, the only question asked was "could she be TOUGH enough?" -- hummingbird
I have never been a fan of the Clintons -- going way back into the early 90s, and it was then, in the 90s, that I began to vote 3rd Party whenever I could. However, I could NOT believe how horribly she was treated during her 2008 campaign -- sexist, as you described. I still remember the Hillary "nutcrackers." At that time, I wrote several letters to various media outlets confronting the sexism.
I hate to be a wet blanket but the acid test of =intellectuals= in American society was the Vietnam War. My hero, Ernest Gruening, M.D., rose in challenge on the Senate floor two months before the assassination of President Kennedy. He did so because 100 Americans had been killed. Enough was enough, get out! He wrote a book he called: "Vietnam Folly" which appeared close in time to that of Howard Zinn's book: "Vietnam: The Logic of Withdrawal". A mass of "intellectuals" rose nationwide to form the Teach-In movement. Protest leaders stepped forward. President Johnson FAKED an incident in the Gulf of Tonkin. The best minds of this country, working almost around the clock, could not apply a brake to war, let alone stop it.
What they did succeed in doing was to cause flight of the next generation of intellectuals to safety and haven in other nations. Few Americans know that it was not only draft age males that left. There was also a large migration of families with teenage males to Canada. Canadian newspapers commented upon legions of Helping Professionals arriving: physicians and other health care staff, social workers and therapists of many stripes. I joined a hospital's Amputee Clinic for recently injured. As many Yanks as possible continued educations.
Outside of this country, a burning bush discovery is this: Loyalty to humankind supersedes loyalty to nation. This remark was made by Canadian Prime Minister Lester (Mike) Pearson.
"Something our society rarely recognizes is the intelligence of people who don't have an ivy league education or any formal education at all."
Something our society rarely recognizes is the lack of intelligence of people who do have an ivy league education.
Elite Universities accept only the "cream". The thick and rich.
“Intellectual Origins of American Radicalism” is recommended reading, available in paperback.
Youngstown is the undeclared capital of the rust belt.
The problem with unions is that they don't stand behind other unions. Union power slipped away through their focus on self interest. Power is in numbers standing together, think Iroquois Confederation and a bundle of arrows.
Divide and conquer is page one of the capitalist playbook.
Don't be Bison on the plains, munching away as their brethren fall, one by one.
Kudos as always to Hedges. One of the very few writers on this site who maintains sight of the big picture.
No insult written or intended.
It was a warning.
Anyone could be next, caught unaware like the shaggy grazers.
Families are falling prey to capitalism daily,
one here, one there scattered about the landscape,
others in groups like Bison at the Buffalo jumps;
Youngstown, Detroit, St. Louis, Cleveland, Gary,
and smaller points between.
People have to decide;
are they the capitalist competition,
or friends, neighbors, brethren?
Great article by a great writer about GREAT people. Very uplifting.
I imagine that many of us, here on CD, might fantasize about leading lives of such dedication... except, as the article states, there is a cost to living by your convictions:
"He was fired. It was another lesson, for all who seek the moral life, that the world does not reward virtue. Failure, at least as it is defined by the powerful, is the price to pay for moral autonomy and courage."
=I imagine that many of us, here on CD, might fantasize about leading lives of such dedication... except, as the article states, there is a cost to living by your convictions=
Enemies accrue, and build like stalagmites. In my advocacy for disabled individuals and for Disability Rights in Canada, I went up against four wealthy men you can see on Wikipedia. I was fired, and I was blacklisted. The prolonged test of integrity reduced me to bupkes, but an Act was eventually passed.
I am humbled. I have paid a price many times in my nearly 60 years on this planet, including being fired, but my contributions and impact are negligible in comparison.
We surely don't need heroes, but we are parched for role models. I can think of none finer than Alice and Staughton Lynd.
"no gods, no masters" --m. sanger
thank you for the great spine-tingling story, Mr. Hedges.
"the world does not reward virtue."
Bears repeating.
"don't taser me bro"
ditto
Both Hedges and the Lynds are atypical Amerikan thinkers who radically pursue truth regardless of how inconvenient, ominous, or apocalyptic it may seem to timid, querulous Normals.
This homage to the Lynds is a refreshing alternative to standard pasteurized and homogenized punditry, the kind that stops short and inserts its cranium into its nether regions in order to remain ostensibly "civil", "moderate", "constructive", "realistic", "sensible", convivial, safe, and well-adjusted. Or perhaps to avoid the perilous, treacherous slippery slope of acerbic cynicism, negativity, and what they foolishly perceive as "nihilism".
Well done. I hope we see more of this kind of journalism here.
Isn't "atypical Amerikan thinkers" a redundancy?
Touché!
The [acquisitive] world does not reward virtue -
"...Instead, some of these kids volunteer for the military and take their hatred and trauma overseas.”
I add my kudos to the gratitude list - to both CD and Chris Hedges.
As a human rights translator, I have to constantly seek funding, constantly research background to understand. My love of the effect of justice is the greatest gift I could receive. As King said - the arc of history is long but it bends toward justice
I take the long view. Never being able to financially support this and so many other sites I am utterly dependent on, pray that deeper pockets will send it their way; rarely do people want to know why I do what I do and why I cannot do anything else.
The view one develops when serving those 'extracted/ externalized' by the system is the hard rain that falls. Once you've been in that storm, all the toxic cosmetics and rhetoric flow into a puddle and the ugliness is bare naked in front of you. You can't not do something about it.
What a great read today, including some exceptional comments and quotes.
Thank you, CD & CD-ers.
/cm
"I don't think we understand how destructive our easy familiarity with sadism is. I believe this is why our "elites" so readily believe in torture." –(Jill)
–Correct. But not only the 'elites.' American state terrorism as a military expression is a cultural extrapolation and expansion from the sadism and terror which is all pervasive in the very interstices and minutiae of American life in general. It is not an anomaly, but a generalized emanation of what constitutes 'the people' themselves. It persists, for there is joy there:
"It is not to be thought that the life of darkness is sunk in misery and lost as if in sorrowing. There is no sorrowing. For sorrow is a thing that is swallowed up in death, and death and dying are the very life of the darkness."
–(Jacob Boehme)
Everyone loves 'the death machine' for they are of it. Plausible denial is found out contradicted by the truth which leaks out where it is least expected.
Torture and sadism, are in truth, American 'moral' constructs at the meta level of American consciousness; they are the very lineaments, the cartilaginous neurons of the American psyche as historical accretions– revealing themselves as a liminality or subliminally– in a wide array of cultural products, and expressed, concomitantly, in aspects of daily life to the point they go unnoticed.To wit:
"What happened is that we forgot that capitalism even exists. It has become invisible because there is nothing else to see."
– (Sylvère Lotringer).
OK piece by Chris Hedges. He starts to go 'off trail' where the truth of things ominously lurks in play of hidden shadows. Little children, don't go near that house! Music provided by the American composer George Crumb. His threnody for the dead in the Vietnam war, "Black Angels."
They swarm all around still.
"Torture and sadism, are in truth, American 'moral' constructs at the meta level"
what do you mean by the above????? please enlighten me.
curiousteve,
We will leave it at that. To us, it is clear enough. We regret we failed in communicating an 'amplification' of what we found in Jill's original comment.
We feel that the blog form is best served by spontaneity and 'off the cuff' remarks, not so much extended, critical exegeses. Other people here do that sort of thing much better than we do.
The posting seems self contained enough, and we have said much the very same thing too many times before on this site.
As a suggestion, we recommend 'chewing on' the citation we have provided from Jacob Boehme and let that reverberate around some. It is a concise précis.
–(Kim & Vashkar)
the quote of yours communicates nothing to me as one of your readers.
what was your point in your original writing?
my questions are directly relevant to Hedges' piece.
We regret that it communicates nothing to you; or perhaps we don't regret it.
We do not see how 'your questions' are at all relevant to our reading of Hedges' piece. We are not familiar with your commentary on this site, so we have no prior 'understanding' of you; that is, of course, neither here nor there.
The confusion here is probably because we were commenting on Jill's comment, which is buried deep in this thread. And she was commenting on someone else's comment. The connection of a continued 'sense' is lost and was hence, decontextualized. No big deal either way.
–(Kim)
"confusion" and "pointlessness" are no big deal to you?
thank you for making my point.
Nor is your ignorance and stupidity much of a big deal to us. We don't get 'baited' by rank amateurs.
I hesitate to presume to much, but the gist is I think that brutality and violence are built into the DNA of American culture. Considering that we are a nation founded on genocide and built on human slavery, class exploitation and eventually the blood-drenched spoils of Empire- none of what we witness today should come as much of a surprise.
where is the "american-ness" in the violence and brutality you speak of?
what is the difference between american violence and non-american violence?
what is the origin of that difference?
If you have to ask, you will never know. Stick with arithmetic. You are not ready for trigonometry.
"See Dick run. See Jane eat."
You know, like remedial stuff.
Vashkarkim, IMO, your response to curiousteve was disrespectful, and the antithesis of what we have to learn from th Lynds'. curiousteve's questions are valid, and if you actually take the time to consder them, very profound.
" what is the difference between american violence and non-american violence?
what is the origin of that difference?"
curiousteve, I believe amer violence is often carefully calculated to maintain and expand control of our empire. The ridiculously exorbitant amount of resources that the US govt devotes to weaponry is focussed on maintaining this control.The US utilizes violence and the threat of violence as a ROUTINE part of the way we do 'business.'
In fact, violence seems to be so integrated into mainstream american culture that it is viewed as a normal, healthy human response. We worship warriors. Implements of war, such as guns. We seem willing to sacrifice our children in order to 'win.' We confuse security with 'winning.'
Violence doesn't seem to be so routinely integrated into the cultures of other nations. It would seem that their acts ofviolence are more defensive, more anomolous, more of a response to an acute situation.
These are a few differnces I can see, I'm certain there are many more.
I'd like to hear what you think on the topic, curiousteve, I sincerely hope you'll continue your contributions.