EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America
- Major Loss to Organic Farmers as Court Rules in Favor of Monsanto
- The Judicial Lynching of Bradley Manning
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Plowshares 8: Thirty Years On
While imprisoned after his 1967 Baltimore 4 action, Philip Berrigan, in his Prison Journals of a Priest Revolutionary, wrote:
When a people arbitrarily decides that this planet and its riches are to be divided unequally among equals, and that the only criterion for the division is the amount of naked power at its disposal, diplomacy tends to be essentially military, truth tends to be fiction, and the world tends to become a zoo without the benefit of cages. And war tends to be the ultimate rationality, because reason has been bankrupted of human alternatives (5).
Post-Vietnam, the American political, economic, and militaristic landscape described by Berrigan had worsened. The "naked power" of the United States now included an arsenal of 30,000 nuclear warheads and a first-strike policy. On September 9th, 1980, Berrigan and seven others said a decisive "NO!" to nuclear madness by entering the General Electric Re-entry Division in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Along with Philip, Fr. Daniel Berrigan (his brother), Sr. Anne Montgomery, Elmer Maas, Molly Rush, Dean Hammer, Fr. Carl Kabat, and John Schuchardt hammered on two nose cones of Mark 12A warheads, poured their own blood on warhead documents and order forms, and prayed for disarmament and peace. With this act, the first of over 75 Plowshares disarmament actions came into being. The "Plowshares disarmament movement" is now international in scope. Many of its activists, who understand that waging peace has its price, have served a substantial amount of time in prison.
Art Laffin, a lifelong Plowshares activist and community member of the Dorothy Day Catholic Worker House in Washington, DC, speaks to what Plowshares activists hope to communicate through their actions in his introduction to Swords Into Plowshares: A Chronology of Plowshares Disarmament Actions:
...[there is an] underlying faith that the power of nonviolent love can overcome the forces of violence; a reverence for the sacredness of all life and creation; a plea for justice for victims of poverty, the arms race and economic sanctions; and acceptance of personal responsibility for the dismantling and physical conversion of the weapons; and a spiritual conversion of the heart to the way of justice and reconciliation (3).
In this same introduction, he explains why hammers and blood are or have been used in Plowshares actions. Hammers are used to begin the literal dismantling of weapons that rounds of "peace" talks have failed to do. They are also used to symbolize the "building again" process, e.g., a hammer can be used to build homes and hospitals. Blood clearly points to the blood that is spilled so carelessly in war. It is also an essential component of life, which points to our need for one another and our unity as one people. In their nonviolent actions and their acceptance of responsibility for their actions, Plowshares activists are those who accept suffering rather than to impose it upon other people, as is done, for example, in the waging of armed conflict.
While commemorating thirty years of resistance to nuclear weapons at the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant in Oak Ridge, TN, this past July, John Schuchardt reflected upon the first days of the Plowshares 8, "We would never be thinking about starting a [Plowshares] movement," he said. "This was a humble, simple human action by a few people who met and prayed and studied the scripture together, spent time together for about nine months and, of course, talked about the practical, logistical aspects." Daniel Berrigan, in his foreword to Swords Into Plowshares: A Chronology of Plowshares Disarmament Actions, writes of how community members struggled to name themselves and their action:
We were locked in a dilemma, eight of us, as summer tipped into the fall of 1980. We had met for months of prayer and discussion. But try as we might, one matter escaped us. What to name our newborn resolve (or better, our not-quite born resolve?)
... According to our Bible, the ‘name' must go beyond itself, mean something, connect. It must evoke a tradition, a vocation, a task in the world - a gift (even a wildly difficult one!). It must hint at community desire, passion, hands-on conscience...
What most Americans took horridly for granted as ‘normal' - nuclear weapons studding the earth like the sores of Job, the Pentagon squatting monstrously on the land, brooding, hatching its hellish eggs, its invasions, bombings (add in the year 2002 a plague of depleted uranium, sanctions throttling the Iraqi children). Quite simply, these could not be taken as ‘normal' acts of a civilized people...
We knew it in our bones. That as yet unnamed ‘name' of our action must echo the primordial nay.
On that late summer day, 1980, a momentous breakthrough occurred. It came as I recall, through Molly Rush, grandmother [and] founder of the Thomas Merton Center in Pittsburgh. At her suggestion, we opened our Bibles and took a close look at Isaiah 2: ‘They shall beat their swords into plowshares' ... (ix-x).
Sr. Anne Montgomery, who at 83 years of age has recently been indicted for her participation in the 2009 Disarm Now action, her sixth Plowshares action, writes beautifully of the communal process that helps one to prepare for such an action. In "Divine Obedience," a chapter included in the book, Swords Into Plowshares: Nonviolent Direct Action for Disarmament, she notes:
...we begin our process with community prayers, reflection, and decision making; we try to reach a harmony, deeper than differences in philosophy and style, that will maintain our spirit through the trial and prison processes, which often require reaching consensus under difficult conditions. To make our prayer and action one, to reach out to the ‘other' in a personal way, requires that we emphasize depth and relationship rather than numbers and high-powered organization ... In such communities we can learn the true meaning of ‘conspiracy': ‘breathing together' the Spirit of life and beige formed by it into people faithful to the covenant of love - the law written in our hearts (27-28).
When Molly Rush walked into the GE nuclear weapons plant in September of 1980, she hammered on a warhead nose cone and "put a hole in one and a dent in another. And, I thought, these things are as vulnerable as we are, and we can undo what has been done. That was an amazing moment." For thirty years now, Plowshares activists have refused to accept the "nuclear way of life," a way of life that demands trillions of dollars and, potentially, millions of lives. With courage and conviction, daring and imagination, love and patience, they have risked everything to say, quite clearly, "another way of life is possible. We can undo what has been done."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



20 Comments so far
Show All"Sr. Anne Montgomery, who at 83 years of age has recently been indicted for her participation in the 2009 Disarm Now action..."
Is this a great country or what?
wouldn't it be wonderful if we lived in a world where this kind of thinking/protest actually worked?
The Plowshares have done wonderful work and Berrigan's words are as true as ever and very moving. We did similar work to close the nuclear weapons base at Greenham Common Berkshire, England and Seneca Army Depot, NY. Greenham has now returned to being an actual commons. We did this work without Catholicism, a Church that, in its brutal attitudes toward women, has fostered violence worldwide.
The most disheartening aspect of this movement has been the pro-war slant of its coverage in the mainstream media. I remember that Berrigan and the others were described in the news as militant fanatics determined to destroy the US.
With the corporate media in control, the emperor needs no clothes.
q
Why do some of the survivng ploughshares eight vehemently decry exactly the same sort of "violence" they did, when it is done by some young activists today?
What is the difference between destroying those million-dollar re-entry nose cones being built for the US military, and the far more minor (but more visible and effective) breaking of windows, or maybe just shouting angry words at the offices of a powerful and destructive corporations, and the heavily armed police that protect them, and for which those nuclear bombs were ultimately built to protect?
Was it bacasue they said prayers and recieved Holy Communion before they pounded away on those nose cones at King of Prussia, while young anarchists on the streets prefer to dispense with such formalities?
And so today, can't one of the ploughshares eight see how she has reduced the once prominent Merton Center in Pittsburgh to near-irrelavance because she and her elderly associates drove all the young activists and energy out of the center, (notably Tim Vining, the most brilliant organizer the center ever had) because of this hypocritical attitude toward the new tactics employed by young activists today?
And becasue they provided the children with piñata the shape of a police car at their picnic?
These are not rhetorical questions, and if you are reading this, Ms. Rush, a reply would be appreciated.
Dear Sabocat,
I cannot speak for any of the PS8, but I did come of age in the same neighborhood and was very “up with” their actions and philosophy throughout my life. I would like to share my thoughts to the questions you ask.
“Why do some of the survivng (sic) ploughshares eight vehemently decry exactly the same sort of "violence" they did, when it is done by some young activists today? What is the difference between destroying those million-dollar re-entry nose cones being built for the US military, and the far more minor (but more visible and effective) breaking of windows, …”
Breaking windows while more visible is not the same as hammering nose-cones. Hammering nose-cones is a very deliberate, symbolic act. Breaking windows on Main Street during a protest is a random act of violence with no directed message other than bald anger and destruction. I’m sure you’ll correct me if I misunderstand the message of window breaking. Hammering nose-cones directs anger at the object of hate (nuclear weapons). Hammering the nose-cones is not a personal assault an individual or against personal property. Nuclear weapons are owned collectively by the US Gov’t (you and me) Nose cones do not personally belong to any independent individual. Violence and destruction on the street is meant to intimidate and evoke fear and destroys personal property. Directed, symbolic, civil disobedience is mean to open hearts and minds and show the way to a better place. For example, if we start dismantling nukes (hammering) we can begin to build our plowshares.
"...or maybe just shouting angry words at the offices of a powerful and destructive corporations, and the heavily armed police that protect them, and for which those nuclear bombs were ultimately built to protect?"
“Sticks and stones”. Shouting angry words is less threatening than throwing rocks, breaking windows, overturning cars, garbage cans, etc… Violence begets violence. The core of non-violent protest is to be present and to state your grievances and demands as clearly as possible without crossing the line into violence. To influence through peaceful means, to be seen and to convey a message can be as effective as or more so than exerting force.
"Was it bacasue (sic) they said prayers and received (sic) Holy Communion before they pounded away on those nose cones at King of Prussia, while young anarchists on the streets prefer to dispense with such formalities? "
I can only comment on the value of contemplation and deliberation prior to action. “Measure twice, cut once.”, as they say in carpentry.
"And so today, can't one of the ploughshares eight see how she has reduced the once prominent Merton Center in Pittsburgh to near-irrelavance because she and her elderly associates drove all the young activists and energy out of the center, (notably Tim Vining, the most brilliant organizer the center ever had) because of this hypocritical attitude toward the new tactics employed by young activists today?"
I would encourage you to communicate directly with Ms Rush to understand her “attitude”. From what I know of what you are saying, I don’t think their attitude is “hypocritical”. Maybe the misunderstanding between you is just a case of youth and vigor vs. age and experience.
"And becasue they provided the children with piñata the shape of a police car at their picnic?"
I understand that the police have always had that corruptible side. But “on paper” police are peace officers and are charged with keeping the peace. It is up to the citizenry to demand police action accountability and remind them they’re public, not corporate, servants. This isn’t effectively accomplished by encouraging children to be disrespectful of law enforcement. A piñata in the form of a nuke would have been more appropriate. For these times maybe one in the shape of a prison cell.
"These are not rhetorical questions, and if you are reading this, Ms. Rush, a reply would be appreciated."
I do not speak for Ms. Rush in any way. I respect Frs P and D Berrigan tremendously. The PS8 are local legends and have had a great influence on my life and philosophy from a very young age.
"Breaking windows on Main Street during a protest is a random act of violence with no directed message other than bald anger and destruction."
It is not "random"! The targets for such action during the G20 protest were specific targets - specific large banks and corporate fast-food restaurants and the violent police. Please do not consider media or police accounts of these actions at all accurate.
How many today ever heard of the ploughshares actions today? Maybe the ploughshare actors feel good doing them, but the effect they have in furthering the cause has been zero.
Can you give some historical example where such pacifist tactics have worked? Please don't say India. there were many more actors in India's independence than just Gandhi - including armed factions. And at any rate, Today, Gandhi would have simply been put in prison, completely ignored and lived a life of complete obscurity. He would accomplish nothing.
And, at any rate, pacifism is largely rooted in bourgeois privilege - the comfortable and smug. Practice it if you like, but don't expect it to have any appeal to the down-trodden and brutalized.
Sabo,
This is an argument that comes up regularly - "Can you give some historical example where such pacifist tactics have worked?"
Can you give some historical example where smashing windows has worked?
This is not a rhetorical question.
It is easy to dismiss other people's tactics because they "have not worked" but when i look at the world continuing to unfold, i honestly don't see a superior tactical choice.
None of what any of us has done has "worked" in the sense of actually turning society in a revolutionary project to end oppression. We are still on the road to hell.
For me, such arguments of tactical utility fall apart when placed against the actual history of movements. Different tactics have "worked" in various circumstances, depending on what someone means by "worked".
Webwalk and sabocat,
Thanks to you both for your critical questions, they mirror ones that I have struggled with myself.
I feel as though we are at some sort of crossroad where people of 'conscience' need to make some sort of contribution to stave off this impending storm that I think we all sense is coming.
Maybe the dialogue as to effective strategy will inspire a creative breakthrough to new tactics that blend the best aspects of the historic struggle for peace with current conditions such as a corporate-controlled media and overwhelming political corruption.
Please keep questioning.
Rioting has frequently been effective in bringing change. I can give four examples right off the top of my head.
It was the riots in Watts, as much as anything Dr. King did, that brought about the Civil Rights Rct.
It was the Rodney King Riots that helped move many cities across the US to look closer at racist police brutlity and empanel citizen review boards.
And last year, it was the minor rioting and property damage, after peacfeul rallies got nowhere that got Mayor Dellums and city of Oakland to arrect the BART cop who killed Oscar Grant.
And, it was only the vandalism in Pittsburgh and Toronto that led to ANY media attention at all at the popular dissatisfaction at the the harsh totalitarian security methods at the G20 events, and the the global capitalist agenda furthered at these meetings. Yes, the media attention was extremely biased (less so in Toronto) but at least it wasn't completely ignored and memory-holed like ploughshares actions are in the US.
Then there was Greece last year, and France right now.
Oops, thats seven examples.
Meanwhile, ploughshares actions, whose primary purpose I believe, is not the self-absorbed actions themselves (Who even sees them while they are planting seeds on a missle silo in the vast emptyness of North Dakota?) but the hope that in the trial that follows, they can convince the jury to acquit the ploughsahres actors based in the immorality, or international illegality, of the military that the action is targeting, and establish a very powerful jury nullification precendent.
The lone instance in which it worked was the Pitstop Ploughshares action in Ireland, but it was done under conditions of political and legal democracy that we can only dream of in the US.
Thanks for all the relevant history Sabocat.
I myself graduated from a series of catholic universities (and I'm married to a disaffected catholic ex-seminarian) so I have considerable experience (and respect for) the american catholic left and peace movement.
But the deference to authority that is such a strong component to that history has always mystified me. It persists despite the strong streak of feminism among communities of catholic women, despite the obvious and hisoric curruption from the papacy on down to the level of parish priests.
I believe it is a tragic misreading of the word and actions of christ, who was a revolutionary agent of change. He didn't politely request that the moneychangers exit the temple. He removed them.
But on the other hand, wer need to engage in actions that are educational and will move public opinion our direction.
I think you're right in that 'riots' can be effective in moving policy ahead, but especially if there is a perception among the people that the agitation is reflective of larger opinion in the community.
In a rare moment of lucidity, Sen. Chuck Grassley once made a statement to the effect that "the average american is only seven meals away from revolution."
Ithink he meant that when people feel that their security is threatened, they will be open to change.
They are feeling threatened now, and we need to be prepared to struggle to see that that change moves in the right (left) direction. truly believe that a majority of people oppose corporate domination of our culture and economy, and I also think the people elected Obama as an anti-war statement.
I think we need to find strateges that escalate that existing momentum.
iowapinko,
As for the money changers in the Temple, JC threw them out of the Temple, he did not destroy their shops or throw them out of the marketplace.
“Rioting has frequently been effective in bringing change. I can give four examples right off the top of my head. It was the riots in Watts, as much as anything Dr. King did, that brought about the Civil Rights Rct(sic).”
It took the peaceful arm bending of Congress by Pres. Johnson to bring about passage of the Civil Rights Act. I would acknowledge he would have used the riots as a fear factor to nudge his colleagues to “Keep ‘them’ happy.”
And what did the riots bring to Watts? After the privileged, bourgeois “black flight” of the 1970’s, Watts became a gang infested area whose rivalries brought murderous confrontation. However, those gangs eventually, made their own cease fire, “peace” deal after years of death and crime.
“It was the Rodney King Riots that helped move many cities across the US to look closer at racist police brutlity(sic) and empanel citizen review boards. “
I would suggest it was the actual brutal beating of RK that elicited public scrutiny of police actions and not the riots, looting, destruction that were subsequent to the outcome of the trial of the police officers involved in the beating. Maybe it was Rodney’s own admonition to all get along that sparked citizen review boards. I’m very sure it was the peaceful organizing of the Korean-American community that created civil solutions to the indiscriminate, uncivil violence that they were subjected to during the RK riots.
“And last year, it was the minor rioting and property damage, after peacfeul rallies got nowhere that got Mayor Dellums and city of Oakland to arrect(sic) the BART cop who killed Oscar Grant.”
How are you so certain that it was the “minor rioting” that affected the arrest of the police officer and not the actual video footage of his actions, the evidence? As an aside, this is why it is important to not restrict the public recording of police actions as the ACLU is litigating in the courts currently. By the way it was less than 2 weeks after the Grant killing that the policeman was indicted.
“And, it was only the vandalism in Pittsburgh and Toronto that led to ANY media attention at all at the popular dissatisfaction at the the harsh totalitarian security methods at the G20 events, and the the global capitalist agenda furthered at these meetings. Yes, the media attention was extremely biased (less so in Toronto) but at least it wasn't completely ignored and memory-holed like ploughshares actions are in the US.”
I can only agree here that the concentration of media ownership in the hands of greedy corporatists is not conducive to an informed citizenry. I don’t agree the solution is escalated violence and more vandalism. The solution is more independent news media outlets and wider distribution of these outlets’s material.
“Then there was Greece last year, and France right now.”
Please detail exactly what, if anything, violence in these country’s protests has accomplished? In summary, the problem in Greece is that they have an ineffective tax collection system and cannot pay for the decent social services they have promised their citizens. As for France, it is the same as Greece, paying for established social contracts. But in France, they strike and protest every year. It’s a tradition. They don’t necessarily get violent, just disruptive. Oh, OOPS! They tend to affect change slowly and peacefully.
I am not totally against taking to the streets to affect change. Reinacting the draft would force young men and possibly women to take to the streets to demand change. I am not naive enough to think this would not provoke violence either from the protesters or the "establishment".
I may discuss "smug"-"bourgeois privilege" some other time-ya brat!-)
Anyway, SaboCat, you asked for an example of non-violence affecting change. Here is one and also an example of the depths of depravity that occur with breaking windows:
"Back in the 1700s, the British government paid sea captains to take felons to Australia. At first, it didn't work so well, Tabarrok says:
About a third of the males on one particularly horrific voyage died. The rest arrived beaten, starved, and sick. I mean, they were hobbling off, those who were lucky enough to survive.
This was a scandal back in England, so the government tried to fix it with all different kinds of rules. Force the captains to bring a doctor along. Require them to bring lemons to prevent scurvy. Have inspections. Raise captains’ salaries. None of it worked.
The clergy begged the captains, for humanity’s sake, to take better care of the prisoners. No dice.
Finally, an economist (who else?) had a new idea.
Instead of paying for each prisoner that walked on the ship in Great Britain, the government should only pay for each prisoner that walked off the ship in Australia. And in fact, this was the suggestion which in 1793 was adopted and implemented. And immediately, the survival rate shot up to 99%.
Here is the first, fundamental lesson of economics: Incentives matter.
Incentives are at the heart of all kinds of things. Everything in the tax code is an incentive — or a disincentive. When we change the regulatory rules for banks, credit card companies and mortgage lenders, we’re trying to change the incentives, to change their behavior.
But it can be tricky to get those incentives right.
Before the captains were paid to keep the convicts alive, they had different incentives — "like keep food from the prisoners, and then sell the food in Australia," Tabarrok says.
Reward the captains for keeping the passengers alive, and — voila! — they arrive alive.
A good social order, Tabarrok tells his class, aligns self-interest with social interest."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2010/09/09/129757852/pop-quiz-how-do-you-stop-sea-captains-from-killing-their-passengers
And now the breaking of windows(go to the link):
Middle Tennessee State University
http://frank.mtsu.edu/~baustin/knacht.html
"Kristallnacht"
“…, the origins of terms do not equal the historical meanings that they accumulate. To have criticized Goering's use of language in 1938 would have been appropriate; however, 1996 (and 2010) the term kristallnacht carries the significance and power it has acquired over the past fifty (plus) years.”
I also do not agree with breaking windows but not because it is someones' personal property, the myth of individualism brought to it's logical conclusion. Black Bloc tactics include an attack on some corporate structure, with their own beliefs in personal property ( for them only-the corps that is) Compared to the economic violence perpetrated on people everyday one would think smashing the window of a corporate structure would be welcomed in any capitalist society. Shouldn't one attack the corporate headquarters of G.S? No I guess not, petty bourgeois moralism gets in the way and turns off most working people who like yourself have been to indoctrinated into the system to appreciate such an action and do not understand that at the level of the social there is no such thing as personal property. All production is social-even the production of individuals. Without others one would not even be able to learn to speak-let alone accomplish anything in the social world. Private property is what has gotten us into all of this trouble to begin with. It is the last thing we need to protect.
Hi RR,
"..to(sic) indoctrinated"? "smug, bourgeois privilege"?
Oh, I am so sure y'all are "so above all that." Well, "Gag me with a spoon" with your hoi polloi Waaahh-ing. Personal property gives incentive to create a reasonable environment for living. Food, shelter, clothing and a stable environment to raise offspring. I see the collective common good and I see it clearly. I see it achieved within a stable community of peaceful co-existance and cooperation. I don't see it with a cut-throat, greedy capitalism. A regulated capitalism? Maybe. Socialism? Maybe, too, but with either democratic inputs and/or representative governance. I definitely see it in a regulated Federal system of the United States of America, by gummit!(hee, hee).
Again I state; violence begets violence. We have a system that allows for the redress of grievences, if you are willing to endure the slow grinding of the wheels of justice. ie, the women's sufferage movement, we can create an egailitarian, just society. We have come too far in this US experiment, in my view, to toss it aside. I am still of the mind to "mend it, don't end it."
Thanks for tryin' to "edumicate" me, but I feel differently than your post endeavours to sway.
Still, thanks for the conversation. I will ponder your POV.
What these people do and have done is wonderful. That their religious beliefs guided them in their decisions is fine. But if their god is real then he owes the world an apology.
Hoa binh
Here's a thought:
How about we put the war criminnals Cheney/Bush, whose lies are responsible for the gratuitous loss of hundreds of thousands of human lives be put on trial.
And we release the good sister with a sincere apology and a heartfelt expression of thanks.
People Who Get Academic Credit but
Remain Obscure to the General Public.
For half a century I've been an admirer of Dan & Phil Berrigan and their confreres in the Catholic Left. For example, on a shelf beside me as I type is a copy of =Essential Writings= by Dan. Across decades, the friends and families of these moral monitors and protest martyrs have been deservedly proud of them.
Well, I too am deservedly proud of =Arthur=, a family member who played an academic, but also deeply personal, role in the effort to turn nuclear science away from warfare and towards peace. In the course of this activity he established a scientific journal called =Swords and Ploughshares= which is still published by the University of Illinois's Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security.
And during the tenure of this activity Arthur extended a protective wing to me as a father surrogate, when my father died surprisingly young (a decade after defending Rachel Carson). Arthur gave me topical writing assignments in Canada, which I was glad to do and, apparently, these wound up as informal papers Arthur circulated among his ACDIS colleagues.
If you wish to meet a remarkable genius, gentleman, ethicist and humanitarian then follow the link below.
.
http://acdis.illinois.edu/aboutacdis/history.html
Thanks, TRYLON