EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- The Downwinders: Fracking Ourselves to Death in America
Popular content
Today's Top News
King Coal Says, 'Live Free or Die'
By gollies, one group in our country has what it takes! One group has done more than just strut around at teabag rallies, barking loudly about nullification, secession, militias and other big-talk threats to stop federal intrusion into our lives and businesses.
This group has put the walk to the talk, acting again and again in recent years to restrain the reach of government so people can prosper. And last week, the fates delivered a fresh and forceful example of the benefits that our society receives from this group's all-out devotion to its "live free or die" ethic.
Of course, 29 West Virginia coal miners did actually have to die because of the group's success at hogtying the feds — but hey, the freedom to prosper comes at a price.
Those 29 miners suffered a terrible and unnecessary death when methane gas was illegally allowed to accumulate in the Upper Big Branch mine ... and then exploded. "A tragedy," wrote the media. "A horrible accident," decried politicians.
B.S. The fates did not blow up these 29 people. They are dead because self-serving profiteers in the coal industry have routinely used their enormous political clout to fend off commonsense safety regulations by the big, bad government, thus making these "accidents" inevitable. In the case of Upper Big Branch, the profiteer is one of America's biggest coal corporations, Massey Energy Co., along with its right-wing, multimillionaire CEO, Don Blankenship.
King Coal, as the industry is known both in Appalachia and on Capitol Hill, deploys more than 100 Washington lobbyists and doles out millions of dollars in campaign donations. All of this political firepower is used to sidetrack the simplest safety measures and muzzle the federal mine safety watchdog. How tight is the muzzle? Deliberate violations of safety rules that lead to deaths are treated as misdemeanors!
Upper Big Branch has been cited by the feds for more than 3,000 worker safety violations since 1995, and its record of dangerous disregard has gotten worse in recent years.
Last year it had nearly 500 violations, roughly double the number in 2008, including ones that create life-threatening conditions for miners. Yet its "punishment" was $168,393 in fines, with no effective requirement to improve conditions. This is chump change to Massey, which had $56 million in profits last year.
In 2003, CEO Blankenship blithely declared, "We don't pay much attention to the violation count." Indeed, Upper Big Branch received 53 fresh citations last month alone, including problems with its mine ventilation system, which is supposed to prevent methane explosions. On Monday morning, April 5, federal inspectors issued two more citations at Upper Big Branch, then left. That afternoon, the mine exploded.
In a radio interview, Blankenship expressed his bottom-line compassion for the dead in these words: "Violations are unfortunately a normal part of the mining process."
Such callousness is King Coal's calling card. After a series of mine fatalities in 2006, for example, federal regulators considered requiring better seals to keep methane from seeping from one mining area to another. The New York Times reports that, at a 2007 hearing on the proposal, the president of the Kentucky Coal Association demanded that officials ignore the pleas by victims' widows for new safety seals. He accused the government of reacting hysterically to the deaths: "Did you know that 750 people die each year in the U.S. from eating bad or ruined potato salad?" he asked.
Astonishingly, federal regulators under the George W. Bush regime swallowed the "bad potato salad" defense, sparing this multibillion-dollar-a-year industry the minor expense of installing better safety seals.
Less than a week after such lax safety enforcement killed the 29 West Virginia miners, coal company lobbyists were again swarming Washington. They expressed the industry's usual "deep concern" for workers, but warned against rushing to impose any new safety regulations. After all, the government has no business intruding into people's lives, right?
As Blankenship put it in 2009, "Politicians get emotional" about disasters, then try to enact rules that are "as silly as global warming." Live free or die.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


30 Comments so far
Show AllRight. And in his speech following the crime, Obama noted the following: "Coal mining is dangerous" Note that he did not condemn lackluster regulation, or criminal culpability, but instead affirmed the onus on the miners profession and not on the company.
Just another Obama apologetic ad nausea.
This is the first thing Obomber said that I agree with. Loggers, farmers, garbage collectors etc. do hard dirty dangerous work. This is why we need to take a moment to think that maybe these guy are hero,s bringing us our daily needs.
flunkdaddy said "This is why we need to take a moment to think that maybe these guy are hero,s bringing us our daily needs."
I'd rather we tried to protect them and then prosecute the owners and CEO.
If they're heroes, why not protect them with regulation? I work in forestry, and it would be a lot more 'hard dirty dangerous' as you put it, without what regulation already exists.
As it stands corporate-controlled republicans are letting big companies get away with owner (and now they want to let them loose in space). Only a neanderthal would miss that one.
The trouble is, however, that the Democrats at large, including our present Administration in Washington, have made little or no effort to strengthen regulations or to re-instate the regulations, etc. that were nixed by Reagan.
Obama is a self proclaimed "free market kind of guy". I, however, am a "let's kick this turncoat son of a bitch Clarence Thomas clone out of office" kind of guy.
The sage from Texas; not to many from there these days. Hightower tells it like it is, unfortunately, nobody is listening.
I'm listening!
Regulations become "silly" when put through the ringer of perverse corporate interests -- a pure response to public outcry, free from lobbyist influence, is in order.
Hightower: "King Coal... deploys more than 100 Washington lobbyists and doles out millions of dollars in campaign donations. All of this political firepower is used to sidetrack the simplest safety measures and muzzle the federal mine safety watchdog."
Once again: campaign finance reform would help fix this: fixcongressfirst.org Its not a perfect solution, but its a start.
One thing we could do is to get rid of lobbyists; or, require the government provide the people with one lobbyist for each lobbyist hired by the private corporations!
I say keep the lobbyists, but make it illegal for corporations to pay into campaigns (or otherwise reward legislators for voting against their constituents)
Can't we license coal mine owners and then revoke the licenses of those who violate basic safety procedures?
Clearly in order to enforce regulations on mining, let alone improve safety for miners, we must first improve regulations governing potato salad.
How big is the potato lobby?
So, which of the two mutually exclusive positions are you taking, Jim Hightower?
Improving safety legislation to protect coal miners...or the closing down of coal fired power plants ("The Dirty Truth about Clean Coal")
Seems like you are proposing, "having your coal, and eating it, too."
Shouldn't he be saying live free (from meaningful regulations) AND die? I do not get the 'live free or die' line.
Without getting into a discussion of its merits, IMO Hightower is using the phrase ironically and saying that the "King(s) (of) Coal" like Blankenship prosper because they are "free" from troublesome regulations, or at least troublesome regulation-ENFORCEMENT, so that the workers die.
"Or" is exclusive here: either one is a prosperous and free King OR a doomed miner.
Yes, this could be rephrased as a conjunctive "and" statement.
And they are even more literal about it than that.
Blankenship's argument aganist regulation is that it that it takes his freedom to do whatever he wants with his property - and the miner's sweat and blood are most decisdedly his and Massey shareholders' private prpoerty. The miners? They are free to go in the mine, they are fully free to quit at any time (and free to thereby be unable to house and feed themselves and their family - but that not Massey's problem). Also the businessmen (and they are, most decidedly all men) must be allowed the freedom free to fire and blacklist any troublemakers and union organizers. God Bless America and the F'renterprise System!!!
Look, AVE, there is nothing "mutually exclusive" about production of coal and mine safety. No one should have to work without safety regulations...that's why we have OSHA. Every industry has safety guidelines and regulations, but if they have no teeth, what good are they? Seems like you're just another Ayn Rand groupie. Gee, the miners should be so glad to have jobs! Get a clue.
Floridatexan--how is "shutting down coal-fired power plants" which Mr. Hightower (and I, as well) SUPPORT, compatible with the performing mining under ANY CONDITIONS clean, safe or otherwise?
In other words, if you are FOR the first, then the mining of coal UNDER ANY REGIMEN OF LABOR CONDITIONS, safe or not, would not, and should not be allowed.
I'm not for the abandoning of miners, however. They should be paid five years severance pay out of company coffers, while building in coal country and then learning to operate and maintain "Atmospheric Vortex Engines." Ref. http://vortexengine.ca = Plan B.
There would be little or no environmental downside to this technology-just clean, free-flowing electricity produced for local use and export.
FYI, IMO, Ayn Rand Sux.
You seem to be under the impression that if you advocate for something, then that something is done! Mr. Hightower advocates closing coal-fired power plants, but (and here’s the point) they are still up and running! So, is it contradictory to advocate for miner safety until the happy day when we no longer use coal?
I have one unpaid parking ticket - ONE - and it's cost me my driver's license, my car, and my way of life.
Until I pay what is now up to over $1,800 - did I mention this is for ONE parking ticket? - I cannot get a license to operate any motor vehicle in any state in the country.
But the motherf**king habitual felon who is now guilty of 29 counts of Criminal Negligent Homicide is walking the streets free and wealthier than ever.
Yup - the system is working perfectly...
Yep your right frank. it's always the little guy who winds up eating dirt. Just like the many of us who no longer have jobs, lost homes, gone bankrupt and so on. and those who destroyed it all for the rest of us just keep sitting back and having someone hand them money. and the world is just fine for them.
justice,HA, in this country only if you can afford it.
Live free (purchased freedom) or die (in slavery).
If only we could make the mine owners and lobbyists work in the those same mines.
Any miner who doesn't like his job can quit. There are 29 more who are willing to die for the chance to feed their families.
Twenty-nine dead men is far more significant than the next 29 new job openings. Losing one’s life for their job, not in the contract. What was in the contract were laws to protect the safety of their lives. We know how that turned out.
If you want a dangerous job where you can legally risk your life and make enough to "feed your family", I suggest the military.
Putting one’s employees in imminent danger for a job is a serious violation in this country. When twenty-nine men die, needlessly, on the job, the word’s “serious violation” becomes a serious understatement, particularly for a multi billion dollar industry, with a long, long list of outstanding violations.
No one’s stopping you from putting your application in for a chance to work in the mines. But I can't imagine who's going to want to work with someone who seems to not care if they live or die. How are you going to feed your family if you're dead?
The devastation of these mountain top removals is causing, is far more reaching than the loss of those mountaintops. I know you see the devastation, you know about the water, the air, the soil, and the sick and prematurely dying people, including children. I bet you know all about that mine next to that large body of water and how quickly everyone will die if that thin wall of rock fractures.
"Violations are unfortunately a normal part of the mining process."
In a saner place/time one might have heard that accidents are unfortunately a normal part of the mining process, not regulations. But in 21st century Oceania, Big Brother uses every available opportunity to drive home the point that corporate violations of the people's will are a normal part of life.
Interesting that a human life is compare to egg salad!
500 violations, yet its "punishment" was $168,393 in fines, with no effective requirement to improve conditions. This is chump change to Massey, which had $56 million in profits last year.
The Reichwing wonders why there are so many regulations, do these people such as Mr. Massey do anything out of the goodness of their heart?
Profit is more important than a human life...interesting, and the Reichwing talks about moral values....well, they failed the test!!!
This m0r0n spends 168 thousand dollars in fines, jee, ya think that cuts into his profit?...obviously not!
If I was a coalminers wife I would tell this m0r0n take his settlement and shove it, and then nail his butt to the wall and take him for everything he has....hell, I be owning the company after I got through with him!
He should be charged with murder!