Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
You Are Now Paying for the Next 3 Mile Island
As radiation poured from 3 Mile Island 31 years ago this weekend, utility executives rested easy.
They knew that no
matter how many people their errant nuke killed, and no matter how much
property it destroyed, they would not be held liable.
Today this same class of executives demands untold taxpayer billions to build still more TMIs. No
matter how many meltdowns they cause, and how much havoc they visit
down on the public, they still believe they're above the law.
Fueled with more than $600 million public relations slush money, they demand a risk-free "renaissance" financed by you and yours.
As if!
In 1980 I reported from central Pennsylvania on the dead and dying one year after.
Dozens of interviews documented a horrifying range of radiation-related diseases including cancer, leukemia, birth defects, still births, malformations, sterility, heart attacks, strokes, emphysema, skin lesions, hair loss, a metallic taste and much more. As reported by the Baltimore News-American among others, such ailments also ripped through the animal population.
To this day no one knows how much radiation was released at the 1979 TMI accident, where it went or whom it harmed. The official line that "no one was killed" is arguably the biggest lie ever told in US industrial history.
It parallels Soviet lies about the 1986 catastrophe at Chernobyl, whose health effects continue to skyrocket. A devastating summary report issued by the New York Academy of Sciences (Yablokov, Nesterenko & Nesterenko: Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People & the Environment) says at least 980,000 people are likely to die from the fallout.
That would be a small fraction of the casualties had 9/11 terrorists dived into the two reactors at New York's Indian Point instead of hitting the World Trade Center.
In a time of deep financial stress, it also counts that the TMI accident turned a $900 million asset into a $2 billion liability in a matter of minutes. Chernobyl has cost Belarus and Ukraine at least $500 billion and counting. And the price tag on a major meltdown anywhere in the US is virtually beyond calculation.
Thus those who think a flood of new nukes will flow unimpeded into the American pocketbook haven't been paying attention:
1) Four northeastern nukes---in Vermont, New Jersey and the two at Indian Point--- are under intense public pressure to shut within the next two years. Numerous other elderly reactors are likely to go down long before any new nukes could come on line.
2) French President Sarkozy is demanding that world financial institutions buy a bevy of new French-built reactors. But huge delays and cost-overruns at French projects in Finland and France itself have made the investment community wary to say the least, thus prompting his foot-stomping.
3) Documents leaked from inside France's national utility EDF indicate cost-cutting has made the new French reactor design exceedingly prone to explosion, further unsettling potential investors.
4) The future of new US reactor construction hinges on massive loan guarantees and handouts. The public number is $54 billion, but the Nuclear Information & Resource Service says the real bill could top a trillion.
5) In the polarized, cost-conscious wake of the health care bill, and the apparent demise of cap and trade as a centerpiece of climate legislation, the idea of such huge sums flowing to a deeply polarizing energy source has become increasingly problematic. Without a clear trade-off for fossil/nuclear giveaways, and with stiffening resistance from the rightist National Taxpayers Union, Cato Institute and Heritage Foundation, the nuke bonanza is anything but certain.
6) An attempt by Entergy to shift six reactors into an asset-free corporate shell has been nixed by New York authorities, leaving liability for Vermont Yankee, Indian Point and other northeastern nukes in limbo.
7) As elderly nukes stumble toward oblivion, various funds allegedly set aside for decommissioning may be significantly under-funded, deeply exacerbating the financial battles that now the industry.
8) As a lame duck, George W. Bush signed agreements apparently obligating the feds to assume responsibility for enough radioactive waste to fill two of the cancelled Yuccas. The complete lack of even one such facility means the potential taxpayer bill is beyond meaningful calculation.
9) Above all the exemption from liability for a major accident fed the industry by federal law in the case of terror or error remains the largest potential cost to us all. Renewed in 2005, some believe the statute is clearly unconstitutional.
To this day the families of those harmed by radiation at Three Mile Island have been denied the right to make their case in federal court.
But now the shoe is on the other foot.
Desperate for cash, the nuclear industry wants us all to pay hundreds of billions for the joy of living downwind from still more 3 Mile Islands for which they intend to assume NO liability.
They want our money and our lives.
From central Pennsylvania after 31 years, the message is clear: Just Say NO!




31 Comments so far
Show AllIn Alaska, under the cloud of 1986 Chernobyl fallout, I contracted diabetes in 1987, my wife and daughter thyroid disease shortly thereafter, with a pandemic of songbird deaths following down the entire US west coast. Now, in Florida, the nucular power and "progress" industry wants a Three Mile Inglis and Turkey pointless expansion. Just say, NUKING FUTS!
With TARP, Obamcare, nuclear industry subsidies, etc., Obama will set a record for doling out corporate welfare during his first term.
Many Obamabots, who would have been screaming loud if Dubya had pushed this record corporate welfare, are supporting their rock star president every step of the way.
Over at dailyos the Obama lackeys are going nuts over this article.
The belief bias there is truly stunning to observe.
Mr. Wasserman makes some excellent points about how this kind of energy is just more corporate welfare.
Nukes are subsidized robbery, environmental destruction, torture, and massacre of billions now and forever. This is the modern conservative's gift to the world.
As a nuclear veteran who suffered from radiation poisoning at Bikini in 1956, and came under Chernobyl fallout in San Francisco, over half a world away, all I can say is,
"NO NUKES IS GOOD NUKES!"
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Seriously folks, if you want a break from life here in DUH-MERICA, go to the PBS World Focus site and look at yesterday's special show entirely devoted to renewable energy in Denmark. Guaranteed to raise almost anyone's IQ 30 points:
http://worldfocus.org/blog/2010/03/26/worldfocus-special-edition-on-renewable-energy-in-denmark/10119/
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
The Danish island economy shown on World Focus uses NO nuclear power. What's your source on the nuclear power and how big is the nuclear slice in Denmark's overall electricity grid pie?
Yes, that's how we roll here in the USA: the public subsidizes private companies. The private companies then turn around and pillage the public by gouging them. Public subsidies and privatized profit. It is the biggest form of legal theft in the world.
The taxpayer subsdizes the Five Families of The Corporate Mafia:
Big Oil: billions in subsidies and tax breaks every year
The MIC: you betcha! and how! war war war forever!
Big Pharma: ditto, the most expensive medicine in the world
Big Industrial Agriculture: ditto
The Banksters; "too big to fail" the biggest reciepients?
So what we have here is monoply state-subsidized capitalism. We can call it a form of neo-Fascism, Monopoly Capitalism that is state supported, Kleptocracy or whatever. But free market it is not. At this point, the best you can hope for is a free market, socialism is just another meaningless dirty word.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
The governments of Denmark and Germany modernized their national electrical grid to allow for efficient purchases of electricity from small land owners who generate surpluses from their wind power turbines and solar power arrays. They then subsidized the purchase of wind turbines and solar power cells and solar water heating systems by the private land owners.
Germany is well on the way towards its goal of 30% of its electricity coming from clean renewables by 2020. The U.S. is at a fraction of 1% of its electricity coming from renewables and going nowhere. The government of Denmark recently agreed to subsidize an American entrepreneurial firm (who got ZERO help from the U.S. fossil fool government) to build a nationwide network of wind powered electrical refueling stations for electric vehicles. The U.S.? It's collective head buried firmly up its New Dark Ages ass.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
I was referring to wind, solar and geo-thermal, not pre-existing old-tech hydro-electric.
As for North Carolina, it's always been a pretty backwards place.
It's all about the money.
Now that we have the means to build effective orbital Solar power and bring it down by means of carbon superconductors, nobody want's to spend the money. Mainly because the first orbital tethers have to landed on the equator, and it's the northern countries that have the money and means of space constriction. This could solve not only our energy problems but also access to space where 98% of the solar systems resourses are.
Imagine if you will heavy industries on the back side of the moon where nobody has to see them, or just in high orbit. Mines in the asteroid belt and the moons of Jupiter or Saturn.
Resourses! such no one has to want for anything! endless power endless elbowroom! Space Stations the size or cities, the size of the moon. Eventually move everything out of the way and build a ring around the sun at the orbit if earth. start out 10000 miles across.. room for everyone who has ever or will ever live. All this could be ours and our childrens, untill the sun dimms in a billion years then they can go find a new sun, or find a way to renew this one.
All we have to do is reach out our hands! this dinky rock made an ok cradle but it's time to go out into the neigbhorhood. and grow up!
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
Why is it your posts always read as if you are a little drunk or somewhat high?
What is your source on super-conducting carbon tethers to orbital solar power stations?
Heavy industries on the moon or in high orbit, & mines in the asteroid belt or on the moons of Jupiter or Saturn have to be either cost-ineffectively lifted up the terrestrial gravity well or the systems to construct what is needed in space must be cost-ineffectively lifted up that well. A ring-world like the one posited decades ago by Larry Niven based on one equatorial strip of a Dyson Sphere is astronomically beyond either our economic or technological capability at this point.
We would save considerably energy planet-wide just by properly conserving energy and moving to more advanced energy saving HVAC systems, wind turbine recharged electric cars, green commercial & residential construction and landscaping plans and solar water heaters, creating a bio-degradable all-purpose packaging material and severely reducing the manufacturing of plastics only to plastic-critical applications. There is supposedly enough potential geo-thermal power accessible in the U.S. alone to power all our electrical needs in this country for the next 36,000 years. As in so many things in the capitalist regressive U.S., we just lack the public intelligence and political will to move forward.
If the super-conductive carbon tethered solar power station idea is for real, that would be safer than beaming microwaves collected from orbital solar arrays through the various layers of the atmosphere with unforeseeable consequences.
Sioux Rose
SOCIALIST: Excellent post. Either you're REALLY ON your game lately, or the number of outrages places your clear, concise, fair and balanced views and analyses front and center. Thank you for your contributions to this site.
Thanks Sioux Rose, the latest outrages are even more outrageous than ever. Paul Loeb's response to my question yesterday was indicative of the views of so many so-called progressives, it still disappoints me; not surprising but disappointing all the same.
Moved to avoid Diablo Canyon Nuclear power built near a fault. The fault was ignored as was this method of boiling water. Too bad we cannot solve aging and find the means to travel to another earth-type planet. Are human civilizations starting to implode in on themselves?
Pity most of you can't do types who sit behind their computers and neglect the MegaWatts that it takes to run an internet. Why don't you move to the woods like Timothy McVey? no electric, no oil, no excuses. If you belive it do it!
Me I'm going to drive my car home and turn up the heat. Watch my TV feed som canned food to the cats, and crawl into my warm heated bed. and live like a Human; no abologies to the rats I had to evict to have my home the way I like it.
Cicero: "Freedom is participation in power."
I've no doubt Daniel Boone lived more like a human than you do.
nor to the Palestinians requiring displacement or eradication. Being proud to be a pig. Now that's classy.
I appreciate you trying to set the record straight on these issues.
Of the many foolish thing devised by mankind, without a doubt, nuclear power and weapons are the worst.
I write this because the half-life of nuclear radiation is equal to four stages of human evolution (Homo Heidelbergensis). Who knows what sort of evolutionary long-term damage nuclear radiation can do as our species continues along?
As for the problem of decommissioning, it requires that former plants be sealed up from the outside world for 50,000 years. Anyone with the slightest knowledge of history knows how completely ludicrous that is; as that presupposes that civilization will remain organized enough to maintain structures that will have to stand intact ten times longer than the Pyramids of Giza. Considering how the plant operators are trying to wiggle out of properly decommissioning them now, it is highly unlikely than any decommissioned plant will be secure for 50 years, let alone 50,000.
If future generations are fortunate enough to survive the follies foisted upon them by the short-sighted and greedy scum who brought this about, expect the names of said scum to replace Satan as a name of derision and dread.
Supposedly, Indian Point was an original target of the 9/11 terrorists, only to be nixed by Osama Bin Ladin. He figured that because, Indian Point was a nuclear power facility it would be guarded by anti aircraft batteries and surface to air missles.
Boy the people of New York lucked out on that one.
harvey wasserman
the utter idiocy of this comment is hard to imagine. the assertion that the ip containments could withstand a jet crash is utterly unfounded and (thankfully) untested. those domes were specifically exempted from needing to withstand a jet crash more than 30 years ago, when they were built. imagine if they had to meet specs on today's aircraft.
furthermore, it is not necessary for the containment to be breached to cause a catastrophe. untold quantities of radiation escaped from three mile island through stacks and other gaps without an apparent crack in the dome.
furthermore, who will actually operate a reactor in the midst of a jet fuel fire? and who will guarantee that the cooling & other systems will continue to work?
Like Chernobyl, I presume?
Harvey Wasserman is right on the mark here.
AD