Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Is Our Democracy Becoming a Joke?
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce held a dramatic press conference in October. The group promised to stop lobbying against pending climate legislation, and pledged to help make it even stronger. A few minutes later, the jig was up when an authentic Chamber representative barged in, sputtering, aghast.
The Yes Men had struck again. A lawsuit ensued, with the Chamber accusing the humorous anti-corporate activists of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising.
Established a century ago, the Chamber was originally intended to help state and local business leaders advise lawmakers on how best to meet American business needs. Together with its national subsidiaries, the Chamber spent $144.5 million last year on lobbying, grassroots efforts, and advertising—often aimed at defeating health care, climate change, and financial reform legislation.
America’s most profitable corporations tend to be oil companies. Even after a steep decline in profits from the year before, Exxon Mobil earned profits totaling nearly $20 billion in 2009. Not coincidentally, the Chamber has increasingly urged skepticism on action on climate change. The Chamber’s leaders have gone so far as to equate climate legislation with “suicide bombing the American economy for the promise of green jobs in heaven.”
A handful of major companies, including Pacific Gas & Electric Corp. and Apple Inc., have left the Chamber to protest its climate change positions. The Yes Men’s stunt drew attention to the outrageous propositions the Chamber of Commerce was putting forward while bankrolling a campaign so out of step with climate science.
Many newspapers around the country are slashing reporters' budgets and growing ever more reliant on powerful interests, including oil companies. As a result, the chances a local paper will track the insidiousness of the fossil fuel industry and its handmaidens at the Chamber of Commerce are pretty remote.
Opinion polls suggest the public has been lulled back to sleep on the issue of climate change, putting it last on our list of priorities. As a result, we may see little or no U.S. action on climate change any time soon. And a recent Supreme Court decision has made that slim chance slimmer.
With a 5–4 vote, the Court ruled last month in Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission that corporations like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and others can now spend as much money as they wish promoting political candidates.
This virtually ensures that politicians will be increasingly beholden to oil interests. We’ll soon have in place a situation where “Citizen” Exxon will be lobbying “Politician” Chevron, with no evidence of their corporate sponsorship.
So, where do we go from here? The Yes Men have tried to wake us up to this crisis of democracy—one that affects the planet’s fate. But things seem to have only gotten worse since they pulled this stunt.
Here are three suggestions on how we can disentangle the fossil-fuel lobby from our democracy:
First we’ve got to revisit what it means to be a nonprofit, and ensure that nonprofits are in fact serving public interests, not corporate interests. All nonprofits should be required to disclose their corporate sponsors. If they're primarily serving those private interests, they should lose their nonprofit status.
For example, why is it that newspapers, which provide a vital public service—informing the public on issues vital to our democracy—must appeal to the corporations to survive, but a massively profitable corporation can secretly bankroll a non-profit, like the Chamber of Commerce, and take tax write-offs for activity that’s clearly in the private interest?
Second, we must amend our Constitution to make it clear, once and for all, that corporations aren’t people and don’t have the same rights as people in upholding our democracy.
And third, we must ensure all elected offices are supported with free coverage by nonprofit media in their race for office or by free advertising in for-profit media.
The Yes Men tried to wake us up with humor. But the fate of our democracy and our planet is anything but a joke.
- Posted in


205 Comments so far
Show AllThere's nothing to stop you from speaking out. You may need some money and you may need to stop getting into trouble with the law but the US is still a top-notch democracy compared to other nations.
What's your definition of democracy, taking away people's hard earned money and giving it to lazy brats? It's a free market so stop complaining about it. Big corporations won because they knew how to win against mom and pop. Mom and pop were too protectionist while businesses that were open to the free market won. To win, you got to learn to be a cutthroat business man. You snooze, you lose.
>>Mom and pop were too protectionist while businesses that were open to the free market won. To win, you got to learn to be a cutthroat business man. You snooze, you lose.<<
If by cutthroat you mean scamming the system of the market you are right -- if you mean playing on an equal field of the market then you are full of horse manure. Big corporations simply don't play by the "rules." or haven't you been paying attention?
Gary
“Each man takes care that his neighbor shall not cheat him. But a day comes when he begins to care that he does not cheat his neighbor. Then all goes well -- he has changed his market-cart into a chariot of the sun.”
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Corporations are playing by the rules. Government had to deregulate to allow for competition. Too much regulation is bad for business. I was cut throat my entire career life and I'm proud of it. Survival of the fittest !
Another reaganite stooge.
"Corporations are playing by the rules."
Yes, they're playing by "rules" which their lobbyists wrote.
Too little regulation of business is bad for people.
You don't mean "fittest"; you mean "most corrupt."
q
Let's go back to overregulating businesses and raising their taxes to 1950s levels and see what happens. Prices will go up, employees will get laid off and companies will have to hire in other countries, taxes will have to be raised for unemployment compensation, and competition is out.
We have the most deregulated business environment in decades and hundreds of thousands of US workers are losing their jobs every month.
As prices go up, so does employment.
All of your claims are lies but you know that they are. You're just some flack paid to pollute this board with friedmanesque nonsense.
q
If I'm being paid to speak, I should have been getting my paychecks.
Well Free speech is money so what are you complaining about?
Encino, you have cop hair but your mind is far too wasted for the average cop.
You are proud to cut Mom and Pop's throat because they want protection...
When you get yours cut, who will care?
Anyone you know that will give a damn?
I never said that I was proud to see Mom and Pop go. People switched and the markets spoke for themselves. I was prepared for whatever changes were coming. I still have my guns and swords to defend myself. Nobody has to give a damn because I know how to exploit the system and I always go on the offensive without getting into trouble with the law.
You are a very sad and very little man, full of bluster and spite. Content to be a bully, an exploiter, and ignorant. Why the hell are you here -- unless you are just pulling our chains and putting one over on us? You cannot possibly be this stupid and still be capable of working a computer. So IF you ARE real, something is blocking your selfish little braincells from working properly. Perhaps all that beer and fast food?
Whatever your problem is -- I feel great pity for you. Such a mean and cold world you seem to live in. Come away and join us in the sunshine...
Gary
"If it weren't for electricity we'd all be watching television by candlelight." ~ -- -- George Gobel.
Not after what you say... you embarrass even the corporate world.
You have already been fired.
Now you love the corporate world after what I just said? I already retired and am kicking in some more bucks. I enjoy giving free advice to business managers.
Everyone can read your words now.
You are the one who loves the "survival of the fittest" corporate world and are "Proud" of it.
You have to give "free" advise because it is worth nothing.
You just made my point... so you are fired again but you are free to make a fool of yourself.
>>Let's go back to overregulating businesses and raising their taxes to 1950s levels and see what happens. Prices will go up, employees will get laid off and companies will have to hire in other countries, taxes will have to be raised for unemployment compensation, and competition is out.
Bullshit. Inflation and unemployment were much, much lower during the 50's than they are now in today's unregulated environment (a 2-5% unemployment rate compared to todays 10+ percent). Outsourcing to other countries was practically unknown during the 50's. And taxes? Much, much lower for the middle class and poor.
http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?Data_Set_Group_Id=248
In short, not a single one of your assertions has any validity. You spout nothing but made up piles of crap. Please stop it, or at least have the decency to check some facts/data before you post here.
If the 1950s were a lot better, then why isn't the public ready for it?
What the hell are you talking about?
Do you know?
Your comments make NO sense.
Public ready for the Fifties? What is that supposed to signify?
Except for the Cold War paranoia and the Greatest Generation's enormous conformity -- the Fifties were as close to the Good Old Days as we probably ever got. The divorce rate had increased but that was partly because women were beginning to ease out of their "happy homemaker" roles. Economically we were never better off than the Fifties and Sixties. People even had money for elaborate fall-out shelters in the back yard. How is your's progressing?
Gary
"When I first started driving, who would have thought gas would someday cost 50 cents a gallon. Guess we'd be better off leaving the car in the garage."
-- unknown Fifties quote
Ha. You are a fool. The large corporations rewrote the rules of the market for their own benefit. Tax breaks and other corporate welfare goodies -- such as the bailouts -- surely even you heard of those?
It is hardly a "free" market, let alone a fair one. And survival of the fittest is not actually how either evolution or the markets operate. Do some studying.
How dense can one person be I wonder?
Gary
"Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped."
-- Elbert Hubbard
"taking away people's hard earned money and giving it to lazy brats?" If you think someone who was severely injured on the job, and someone whose job was outsourced and can't find another one, are lazy brats and don't deserve help from the government, then you are a heartless bastard and I have nothing more to say to you.
Most people will find another job as soon as they lose one. They have unemployment compensation to help while they're looking.
You sir are living in a fool's paradise -- most workers today either cannot find a job once they lose one or have to settle for one that pays a fraction of what they were once earning.
Check me out on this -- I dare you.
Gary
Haven't time for a quote right now -- sorry.
The unemployment rate is only 10% and the economy is turning around. Be patient.
Wrong again, the real rate does not count those who can't find work after unemployment runs out.
The real rate counting those who can't find work and are discouraged is 17 percent.
Oh boo hoo hoo. Jobs are out there but if they're not trying hard enough, it's their problem. Nobody told them to wait for a free welfare check. It can be tough to settle for less but either they take it or leave it. They'll just have to learn to be practical about it.
The real number of unemployed is 17 percent not 10.
So now you advise them to be practical about it with your "boo hoo hoo".
More free "cut throat" advise from Encino.
You are gonna need your swords and guns sooner than you think.
You know how very well prepared I am.
Mentally? LOL
"Jobs are out there"? Where exactly? Where is one supposed to look when your industry moves jobs overseas or brings in foreign guest workers willing to work for a fraction of what Americans can afford to live on to replace Americans, just so the CEO can get another bonus or pay raise, only to crash and burn their companies and then beg us taxpayers to bail their sorry asses out of the shit that they themselves created? Oh I get it- we're supposed to all happy and content working at a McDonald's, WalMart, or Motel 6 somewhere, where our education and skills won't be put to use and we won't be paid a decent, liveable wage. Shit jobs like that are good enough for us, but not for you, eh?
Benito Mussolini agreed with you 100%. He wrote that corporations should merge with government to control the people and the news media. He also said a perpetual war, like one on "terror" is essential to promote economic growth. Your suggestion that ethics are unimportant to a culture seems to me as if you are more of an anarchist than a republican. Without some form of checks and balances on business growth all the small businesses which drive our economy will be shut down and replaced by a handful of corporations. To say that corporations should be our government while the workers die off from lack of support causes the development of a fascist state. Actually in our case it has caused the development of this fascist state.
"There's nothing stopping you from speaking out. You may need some money and you may need to stop getting into trouble with the law but the US is still a top notch democracy compared to other nations"
So if you have enough money you can speak out. If you do not there is no way to be heard. So in one sentence you set up contradictions. "Nothing stopping you.." except access to media and funding. "You may need to stop getting into trouble..." I can't fathom what you mean by this; are prisoners not able to speak out? I note that Congress has a number of wealthy men and women who have been in trouble recently with the law, yet they chatter on. And on that last piece of nonsense you assert we live not just in a democracy, but the best one in the world. So, take your computer upon which you have just sent a comment and Google up a copy of the Constitution and down load it into a word processor. Now do a word search for "democracy". I'll wait. What? NO such word? You mean the founders didn't create a democracy? NO THEY DID NOT! They pointedly created a republic headed by a handful of wealthy white landowners and slave holders. They wrote often of their distrust of the common masses and how important it was for the wealthy to rule over the poor. This is our current state: a government of, by and for the wealthy businessmen. However, as we have noted, rich businessmen screw everybody over in search of unlimited wealth. So here in the 21st century there are those Americans who are willing to set aside those 18th century concepts of class warfare and set up a true democracy in this world wherein everybody is served by the government, not just the rich. Everybody votes, everybody is literate, everybody pays a fair share of taxes. These taxes should be used to heal the sick, build the roads and maintain the infrastructure so commerce may exist in a safe and well regulated society. It should be a human right to have a safe place to live, a home that works. It should be a solid policy that those who prosper should share their gains with the society in which their profits were possible. That's called ethics, not socialism. You might want to Google up an article on "ethics" so you understand just how important it is in a civilized society.
Will Shirley: Thank you for your post, and for taking the time to write it!
BTW, yesterday, I listened to an interview with Michael Hudson, economist and historian, on KPFA -- a show titled, Guns and Butter. I learned about the interview from someone who posted on one of yesterday's threads. Bonnie Faulkner is the host of the program. Dr. Hudson talks about the re-appointment of Bernanke, among other economic issues.
To listen, if anyone is interested, go to:
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/58530
I never said that corporations and government must merge. Quite the contrary. Let businesses compete and whoever wins wins. What do you want? Return to protectionism, no competition, and higher prices?
Government isn't doing anything right and corporations are taking over their operations because they want to help, create jobs, and earn profits. Corporations and rich people pay most of the taxes the government collects and they donate to charities. The Constitution does not forbid anyone or company from making profits.
"Corporations and rich people pay most of the taxes the government collects and they donate to charities."
This statement is simply untrue.
q
quickstepper: you can't argue with someone who believes what they see on TV
What exactly do you call giving public money to private corporations to keep them afloat? Remember Encino, it started under Bush. Sure doesn't sound like your hallowed "free market" more like the "lazy brats" on Wall St. were too stupid to run a profitable business so they lied, cheated, and stole until thier fiscal malfeasance blew up in their faces then they cried boo hoo hoo right to the US treasury. Best Democracy "money can buy" in the world, eh Encino? Get a clue my friend.
Um, sorry, but giving money to corporations is almost as old as the country. Not first, but perhaps the best documented historicly, are the railroads.
"....corporations are taking over their operations because they want to help, create jobs, and earn profits." You are just so full of crap it is truly unbelievable. Corporations only exist to make money for their shareholders; they certainly don't want to help! Small, locally owned businesses are the ones which create jobs for people. Why don't you return to the Free Republic website where you obviously escaped from. You make my stomach turn.
Will Shirley says... "Your suggestion that ethics are unimportant to a culture seems to me as if you are more of an anarchist than a republican."
--- Which type of anarchist are you speaking of? Are you speaking of the anarcho-capitalists (libertarians) here in America? Or, are you speaking about the socialist-libertarian anarchists (the Kropotkin, Proudhon, Bakunin, Goldman, Chomsky and Zinn's)?
The socialist-libertarians are fighting against the very same fascist forces that you also want to see held in check. And they strive to create a society that is similar to the one you wrote about in your last paragraph. Solidarity, mutual aid, equality, liberty, and co-operation amongst individuals are among their highest ideals!
"Anarchy as a social philosophy has never meant "chaos" -- in fact, anarchists have typically believed in a highly organized society, just one that is organized democratically from below." --Noam Chomsky
Maybe you already knew these differences... but, I just think it is important to distinguish between the faux anarchists and the real anarchists who have been resisting and fighting against hierarchical authority structures since the 1850's.
CDers...the film Encino Man was a comedy about the digging up and bringing back to life a primitive, Neanderthal-like human who is bewildered by modern life.
As a nom de guerre for this guy it sounds about right to me.
Fool or paid troll? Does it matter?
I think he chose "Encino Man" as part of his comedy act. I believe his comments are intended as parody.
Free speech is not just the right to speak out, it is also by implication the right to be heard by your representatives. Without that, any free speech is useless.
-"it is also by implication the right to be heard by your representatives. Without that, any free speech is useless."
Case in point: the "free speech zones" the US government sets up at public events that are out of sight and out of earshot.
I thought the whole country was supposed to be a "free speech zone".
But it's still free because it's allowed. If you don't like your representatives for not hearing you, then hire some new ones.
Thats humor, isnt it?
Are you for real, naive, just being sarcastic or just trollin?
The "free market" is a figmint of your bizzare imagination.
EncinoM
If it were truly a "free market" system" those big banks, and the car companies would not have been bailed out. The free market would have spoken and they would have failed.
If it were truly a "free market" Big Pharma would have had to negotiate drug prices with .gov which is their biggest customer. For example do you think that a huge company like WalMart does not negotiate for the best prices from their suppliers?
If it were truly a "free market" huge mega farms would not be getting . gov subsidies. They would have to compete on their own merits.
If it were truly a "free market" Haliburton and all the others would not have been awarded "No Bid Contracts. They would have had to compete for .govs business.
And I could go on, and on, and on...
As far as I can see, in this country we have socialism for the rich and powerful, and free markets for the little guys like our "Moms & Pops".
A "free market"? With subsidies, lobbying, junkets, tax breaks, offshore tax havens?
What planet do you live on?
The corporate world is full of people like you. Most people do what they are payed to do to the best of their ability. But not people like you.
Your first priority is self promotion. Therefore the first thing you think of is how to get other people to do your job while you devote most of your time to banging your own drum. The people farther up the ladder got there by being like you. They recognize you as one of them so you get promoted into a job where you can take credit for the efforts of the people who do the work (You know. What you were hired to do.)
Then you cop an attitude that says, "Everybody is like me. I'm just better at it than they are. I deserve to make more money than they do."
But everybody isn't like you. I know it's hard to believe but there are people who take pride in doing good work. I know you think they're chumps but that is how things get done. You come around with your attitude and your air of superiority and go on about the latest management fad and gossip about the top brass. People have to stop what they're doing and listen to you since you're wearing a suit but when you leave they roll their eyes and go back to work.
You and your ilk have run this country for the last 30 years. That's why things are in such a sorry state now.
“suicide bombing the American economy for the promise of green jobs in heaven.”
Or to put another spin on it, "Taking the economy out of its ongoing and inevitable death spiral and jump-starting the clean, energy-independent economy of the next generation."