Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Beyond the Darkest Hours, Grassroots Rising
Winter in America 2009. Passing through the darkest period of the winter solstice, shrouded by the gloom and doom of climate destruction, war, and economic depression, making our way around the broken promises of "change we can believe in," we nonetheless find ourselves celebrating life and the redemptive power of a global grassroots revolution. In the wake of the failure of the Copenhagen Climate conference, and the "business as usual" insanity of Obama and the governing elite, millions of us are terminally fed up and fired up for action.
A critical mass of food and farm activists, North and South, are becoming aware that the second decade of the 21st Century likely marks the end of the road for chemical, energy, and water-intensive food and agriculture. And, as the energy, climate, and economic crises converge, a growing corps of climate activists understand that we are witnessing the beginning of the end for fossil fuel-based industry and transportation, energy-intensive housing and suburban sprawl, and a "profit-at-any-cost" economy based upon over-consumption, war, and commercial conquest.
As the winter of discontent turns, it's time to bury our illusions and
prepare for the battle of our lives. As the Director of the Organic
Consumers Association, I invite you to join us on the organic road, the Via
Organica, as we struggle to dismantle the old system and rebuild the new,
starting with our local households, communities, and regions. You can sign
up for our newsletter at: <http://www.organicconsumers.
Beyond the Darkest Days
Is This What Democracy Looks Like?
In 2009, indentured politicians, bought and sold by the corporate elite, crushed our hopes for peace and prosperity by spending trillions of our tax dollars on war, Wall Street, and corporate welfare. As a critical mass now understand, these trillions could and should have gone toward financing organic transitions, public health, and a Green New Deal. Given the fact that just over a year ago we drove the warmongers and corporate criminals of the Bush Administration out of office, and replaced them with a new set of so-called liberal Democrats, we should already be well on our way to changing course, averting economic meltdown and climate catastrophe. Instead Obama and his pompous cohorts have disillusioned an entire generation and stabbed the living Earth in the back. Riding on a Death Train full-throttle toward the abyss, it matters little whether the Commander in Chief is an outright fascist, like Bush, or merely a coward and a fraud, like Obama. Circumstances leave us no choice but to organize a mutiny and stop the Death Train.
Will We Survive the Climate Crisis?
World leaders abandoned the UN climate talks in Copenhagen without a binding agreement to reduce the threat of deadly greenhouse gases. The level of CO2 in the atmosphere, compounded by an excess of methane (from factory farms and rotting garbage) and nitrous oxide (from chemical fertilizers) already exceeds the dangerous tipping point of 350 parts per million (ppm). We're currently at 387ppm. Even if we are able to reduce CO2 to 350ppm, we will still experience a 2.7 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature by 2100, making life on the planet difficult, but still possible.
If we continue with business as usual, in 2100 the level will be 965ppm CO2 (+ 8.6 F). If the world acts on proposals for CO2 reduction confirmed in Copenhagen, in 2100 the level will be 770ppm CO2 (+ 7 F). That's the best-case scenario right now, a seven degree Fahrenheit average temperature rise, which some predict could come as early as 2060, in time for you or your children to experience Climate Hell first-hand. Unless we reverse global warming, the Earth, which is expected to have nine billion people in 2050, will have a carrying capacity for only one billion. This means billions will die.
If it's hard for you to imagine what life might be like as sea levels rise, droughts and floods become ever more common, crop failure becomes routine, the world's forests burn, glacier-fed rivers dry up, and a quarter of the planet's mammals go extinct, read this terrifying short story, "Diary of an Interesting Year."
Global Warming: An Organic Future, or No Future
One way or another, either planned or through necessity, humanity will return to organic and traditional agriculture, because it is the only farming system that can supply the world with sufficient quantities of healthy food in the emerging era of global warming, erratic weather, declining fossil fuels, and water scarcity. There is no other way.
In 2009, the Organic Consumers Association spent a good part of our efforts focusing on the connection between global warming and industrial agriculture and the promise of organic agriculture to mitigate and reverse climate change by:
1) Drastically reducing the global industrialized food system's 44-57% share of global greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, methane, and nitrous oxide) and 2) Sequestering billions of tons of CO2 in the soil.
If we convert the world's 3.5 billion acres of farmland to organic, we can sequester 40% of global greenhouse gas emissions, removing excess CO2 from the atmosphere and storing it in the soil, where it belongs. If we also organically manage most of the world's 11 billion acres of pastures, rangelands, and forests we can potentially sequester 100% of greenhouse gas emissions. This long-term process of organic transition will buy us the time to reduce fossil fuel use by 90% and retrofit our economy, transportation, and housing to renewable, clean energy.
Organic Transitions: Taking on the Fertilizer, Garbage and Sludge Industries
Why is there so much carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere and not enough carbon organic matter in the soil? Corporate agribusiness, industrial forestry, the garbage and sewage industry and agricultural biotechnology have literally killed the climate stabilizing, carbon sink capacity of the Earth's living soil. Industrial agriculture and forestry have eroded and depleted the soil food web, annihilating soil microorganisms and destroying plants, trees, and soil's natural capacity to clean the atmosphere and sequester CO2. This climate-disrupting ecocide is a direct result of the suicidal use of billions of pounds of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, soil destroying pesticides, herbicides and fungicides, insecticidal GMO crops, factory farm waste, and toxic sewage sludge--instead of feeding the soil and maintaining soil vitality (and its ability to sequester carbon) with organic compost and fertilizers and cover crops. In 2010 OCA and our allies will begin to expose this deadly chemical and GMO attack on the planet's soil food web and make genuine certified organic fertilizer and compost the norm, rather than just the green alternative.
In the US, we throw away, as food waste, 40% of all of our food each year. Production of that wasted food accounts for more than one-quarter of the US's total annual freshwater consumption and equates to 300 million barrels of oil. Even worse, this enormous volume of non-composted food waste rotting in landfills emits tremendous amounts of methane, a greenhouse gas 20-70 times more damaging than C02.
In the U.S. today about 80 gallons of water per day per person is flushed or dumped down the drain into our vast and ill-designed sewage system, much of it being valuable potable water flushed down the toilet. In the sewage or wastewater stream, this household sewage (unfortunately, in most households, already carrying toxic chemicals from non-organic body care, home cleaning products and pharmaceutical drugs) is mixed with hospital and industrial toxins and pathogens, pharmaceuticals, street storm water run-off and chemical lawn and farm run-off as it enters into the so-called "sewage treatment" plant. After nominal "treatment" this wastewater is sent downstream for the next community to chemically treat it and declare it "safe," while billions of pounds of toxic sludge are left behind.
Instead of isolating and containing America's toxic sewage sludge as hazardous waste--which is what it is--industry and city governments save money by renaming this toxic sludge "biosolids" and spreading it on non-organic farms (and backyard gardens and public lands) across the country. One of the most outrageous practices is the sale (in garden supply stores) or giveaway (to schools and backyard gardeners) of toxic sewage sludge as "organic fertilizer" or "organic compost."
The EPA has aided and abetted this hazardous practice for several decades by claiming that the toxic chemical poisons, heavy metals, pathogens, hormone disruptors, pesticides, and pharmaceutical drug residues routinely contained in sewage sludge are diluted to "acceptable levels." In 1998, the Organic Consumers Association and the organic community successfully fought to keep toxic sewage sludge out of national organic standards, but we now need to ban sewage sludge on non-organic farms (and all land applications) as well.
In the organic future, valuable organic matter in the waste stream will neither be wasted nor mixed with other garbage or toxins. It will be separated at the source, at homes and businesses, mixed with animal manures and green wastes in a central location, and made into valuable organic compost (natural fertilizer or food for the soil). This organic compost can then be supplied to organic and transition-to-organic farms, backyard gardens, lawns, and other land use applications. This is the only way we can eliminate the two billion pounds of chemical fertilizers applied to non-organic farms every year in the U.S. Nitrate fertilizers (banned in organic production) contaminate the atmosphere, kill the soil, and destabilize the climate with nitrous oxide. Moreover chemical fertilizers pollute city tap water and kill fish and marine life, creating hundreds of massive "dead zones" in the oceans.
Zero waste recycling and the creation of an abundant, affordable supply of organic compost is an essential part of our organic future. This means taking apart the profit at any cost garbage industry and the toxic sewage sludge cartel.
The High Costs of So-Called Cheap Food
Over the past 65 years, chemical agriculture, factory farms, and now genetic engineering have devastated public health, wrecked the environment, and destabilized the climate. The U.S. public now spends $2.4 trillion dollars a year on health care, $800 billion of which is directly attributable to consuming chemical-laden, nutritionally deficient processed food.
In only 15 years unregulated and unlabeled genetically engineered foods and crops (GMOs) have been planted on millions of acres of farm land. These GM crops are planted on soil which is then repeatedly doused with toxic pesticides and chemical fertilizers. GMO corn, cotton, canola and soy are currently laced into 80% of (non-organic) supermarket foods and restaurant items. The bodies of the majority of American adults and children are bloated and contaminated with so-called agricultural commodities: high fructose corn syrup, derived from GMO corn, trans-fats (GMO cotton, canola and soy oil), and meat and dairy foods derived from factory farmed animals fed and reared on GMOs and pesticide-tainted grains, antibiotics, hormones, and slaughterhouse waste.
As a direct result of chemical and GMO agriculture, most American consumers are ill-fed and disease-prone.
Overall, U.S. diet-related diseases cause an estimated 580,000 deaths every year.
* OBESITY. In the U.S. nearly 100 million people are seriously and dangerously overweight. Obesity kills thousands and costs taxpayers and employers $147 billion annually.
* HEART DISEASE. In 2010, heart disease will kill hundreds of thousands (in 2006, 831,272 people died of cardiovascular disease) which costs the US $503 billion.
* DIABETES. The number of people with diabetes in the US is expected to increase from 23.7 million to 44.1 million in the next 25 years. The cost of treating diabetes is expected to triple in that time from $113 billion per year to $336 billion per year.
* CANCER. Cancer has reached epidemic proportions, with 48% of men and 38% of women now stricken during their lifetimes. 35% percent of cancers are diet related. Diet-related cancers now out-pace smoking-related cancers (30% are smoking related).
* FOOD POISONING. The U.S. industrial, factory farm food system is responsible for 76 million cases of food-poisoning reported every year that result in over 300,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths. Food poisoning costs are substantial, estimated at up to $22 billion each year.
* ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE. In part because of the routine overuse of antibiotics on factory farms - in the US, animals consume 70% of the antibiotics - more than 63,000 people die in the US each year from hospital-acquired infections resistant to at least one antibiotic. This financial costs of this public health emergency are up to $5 billion dollars a year.
In 2007 over $2.2 trillion was spent on health care in the US.
After poisoning us with cheap food and destroying the environment, Big Food Inc. turns us over to Big Pharma and the Industrial Health Complex to repair the damage, or rather to keep us alive long enough to extract maximum profits. But from the warped perspective of the for-profit health insurance industry, overweight and diseased people aren't very profitable. That's why health insurance corporations spend $350 billion per year trying to avoid coverage and deny claims. The vast, paper-pushing bureaucracy the for-profit insurance industry has created to help them avoid providing services soaks up 31% of all health care spending!
If we shifted the 31% of health care spending taken up by the administrative costs of the for-profit health insurance industry to a single-payer, universal health care system, we could cover the uninsured without increasing total health-care spending. The Organic Consumers Association supports single-payer, universal health care, with a focus on preventive health, diet, nutrition and stress-reduction.
However:
IF PRESIDENT OBAMA SIGNS A BILL THAT TAKES AWAY OUR HEALTH RIGHTS, THAT FORCES AMERICANS TO BUY OVERPRICED, INADEQUATE COVERAGE FROM THE FOR-PROFIT HEALTH INSURANCE INDUSTRY, OCA WILL LAUNCH A BOYCOTT!
Forced health insurance is not health care reform, it's corporate welfare and it is a direct result of the nearly one billion dollars that the health care industry is projected to have spent to lobby and bribe the politicians who voted for the bill.
Not only does the for-profit health insurance industry spend 31 cents of every health insurance dollar pushing paper and avoiding claims, but the for-profit "health" system has become almost as deadly as the chemical and GMO food and farming system. Medical malpractice kills as many as 98,000 people in hospitals every year. Another 300,000 people are injured due to medical errors.
Pharmaceuticals are even more dangerous than medical malpractice:
More than 50 percent of all drugs have serious adverse reactions that are discovered only after the drugs have entered the market (e.g., they are not detected during pre-market testing) - making us all unwitting guinea pigs. About 2,270,000 patients per year incur hospital costs as a result of adverse drug reactions.
Another 4,300,000 visit other health care providers (physicians, hospital outpatient departments and emergency rooms) as a result of adverse drug reactions.
Approximately 230,000 die each year as a result of an adverse drug reaction (105,000 using drugs as directed and 125,000 as a result of mistakes). This is the third leading cause of death in the United States.
The total annual health care costs as a consequence of adverse drug reactions exceeds a staggering $200 billion - an amount equal to what is spent on Medicaid every year and almost half of what is spent on Medicare. Reforming our health care system is literally a matter of life or death.
Eventually, we have to stop arguing over who's going to pay for out-of-control health care costs and restore public health! The real solution to our health care crisis is to stop subsidizing chemical and GMO food and farming, along with the destruction of our environment and our climate, and make the long overdue transition to organics. Then, under universal health care or Medicare for All, we can shift from health care that treats sickness caused by unhealthy food and an unhealthy environment and lifestyle to holistic health care that promotes wellness.



133 Comments so far
Show AllI agree wholeheartedly with your statements in this article.
You have covered many facets of our problems and their solutions.
Grassroots actions like boycotts will probably be necessary!
what a tangled web, accurately laid out. with the exception of the effect all those drugs have on america's collective thought process.
thankfully, r. cummins is in a leadership position somewhere that might make a small difference. this article is a start.
I'm ready to boycott as well! Thank you for laying out what needs to be done. Great article.
Boycott? Sorry to break the news to you, but slaves dont boycott they rebel and get put down.
Cannot boycott? On an individual level, I definitely am choosy about what I buy, eat, and do. Until the sheriff or Blackwater/Xe comes to escort me to Walmart or compels me to purchase the 3/4 of the inedible foodstuffs in supermarkets or forces me to ingest unwanted pharmaceuticals, I certainly will be 'boycotting'.
If you don't already have "health care" insurance, you will soon be forced to purchase it, regardless of your ability to pay, otherwise the IRS will assess you a penalty. So, don't laugh when you mention other compulsory purchases in our now fascist system. For example, if we really want to preserve the auto industry in the United States, it should be required that every individual over age 21 purchase a new American built automobile every five years, regardless of ability to pay, or else be assessed by the IRS an amount equivalent to 50% of the price of a new car. Forced health care insurance purchases are at the top of a very slippery slope. As for Blackwater/Xe? I'm waiting for them. I'm right here. And I have a LOT of ammunition.
What a rotten century to be living in. I'd give anything to be back in the 1700's before Big Ag destroyed this country. Well at least I'll probably miss 2050. Nine billion morons clawing each other's eyes out will not make this a nice planet to be on.
Homo sapiens is doomed.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
I've been reading Howard Zinn's book A PEOPLES HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES. Believe me, if he is even close to being accurate, this is nothing new.
There have always been a tiny super rich parasitic minority that controlled all three branches of government. FDR's new deal and successful labor unions were an aberration which are gasping for their last breaths.
The fair minded Supreme Court of the sixties is gone. Johnson's great society was bought only at the expense of the war in Viet Nam. Congress has always been for sale.
Now the rich have a perpetual war going AND are dismantling any hard won rights the poor might once have had.
I won't vote for the two party system again. "I shoulda realized a lotta things befo'"---The Beatles.
"I've been reading Howard Zinn's book A PEOPLES HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES. Believe me, if he is even close to being accurate, this is nothing new."
There are quite a number of things in it that are accurate and many others that are not as accurate. Even Howard tell's you its a bit biased. He wrote it to balance the bias in regular history books and to point out there are certainly different views to history. At least thats my opinion.
But he is right, its nothing new.
The 1700s were no bargain: Slavery was thriving in all 13 colonies, the slave trade from Africa doing very well, native American cultures decimated by European-borne diseases and war, with the white settlers suffering hig infant mortality and lives shortened by tuberculosis, small pox, pneumonia - and that's only in what is now the eastern US. Looking to the past is no answer whenh it coimes ot finding ways to survive the future
Valatius, What rot. The absurdity of thinking a states-wide migrational hunter-gather society should be preserved when it disappeared from every continent in man's history (except maybe parts of Africa) is something I have never understood. In case you didn't know, most Native American Tribes had slaves in their possession as spoils of war.
Naw, I'd still take the 1700's with their problems over this oppressive polluted toxic dump. All the ails you mentioned are of man's; they still exist and always will. Slavery is common in many parts of the world. When Big Ag in the US knows subcontractors are confiscating passports and threaten deportment unless the hispanics slave in the fields, that's slavery my friend.
Infant mortality is not important anymore. There is NO shortage of bodies on this Earth. It's a indicator of toxicity only.
We once had a free Republic, where citizens in free states did not have slavery, not all thirteen Colonies as you assert. North of the Mason-Dixon line there was no slavery in any significant number, unless you agreed to it as an indentured serf.
Monopolies found their tea floating in the harbor. Every man could head West and claim some land. The citizen was somebody, and could show up in the commons and protest without fear of being locked up or tasered like today.
I strongly disagree. The past is our key and birthright to individual freedom. Once individual freedom and democracy are regained, the bigcorp agenda will be tossed into the harbor, and we can get on with the business of planetary survival.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
ThomasJefferson, without intending to turn this into a sub-topic on its own, I want to say that Valatius makes an important point. I have been thinking on this issue recently, and I'm coming around to the conclusion that the myth of the good-old-days is just that - a myth. Not just in the USA, but in many parts of the world. You didn't use those words, but I feel it's important to acknowledge this truth: despite some good intentions on the part of the founding fathers, the origin AND the subsequent years, decades and centuries - have all been tainted with so much negative stuff. The best that can be done is to try for a more perfect union, without insisting that the past was better. Sure, there have been deteriorations in so many aspects, but the single fact of the continuation of slavery - despite declaring that "self evident truth" (and continued segregation into the 20th century) should be enough to put aside such assertions that the past could show the way forward. There are others (e.g. Earthian December 26th, 2009 2:32 pm above) who have pointed to the need for a relook at the system itself. This is not so much a response to your post, as it's a sharing of something I've been thinking about - that there probably were never any good old days. Some things might have been better. The reason I say this is to focus our energy on building the best possible future - based on our current understanding.
Great posts by you Alcyon,
But it's not a myth. So many people wanted a slice of the American Dream that they left their home countries and risked it all even without the prospect of a job. And provided you weren't an Indian in America or an imported slave of the south (Todays equivalent to a Palestinian in Israel) your life as a citizen was pretty good. To have any vote at all was a big step up for masses at the time.
And the singular reason that enabled that Liberty was plentiful land and a government which would not interfere with religion or the pursuit of happiness and had an aversion to war (even if it produced abolition). A level playing field existed for all; unlike today (The cruel tyranny of Corporate Kings who have hi-jacked our government.)
Focusing on the single issue of slavery as a basis for disregarding the wisdom of the ages is not warranted imho. Keep in mind, it was Jefferson's Declaration and the Constitution that were used as the successful argument by Lincoln to finally abolish that brutal institution of African Slavery. Jefferson failed to do it, it's true. But he was only one man.
Prior to the United States the world was awash in darkness, slavery and ignorance. The USA was one of the first times democracy even showed her sweet face. To discard the lessons of history is to re-invent the wheel. The Civil-Rights lessons of Rome and Greece and Saxon don't have to be learned anew by each bumbling generation. True, in those societies Rights only were given to citizens, defined as they were at the time by archaic civilization, but they were the seeds of the Enlightenment, which allowed Lock and the other great writers to convince Jefferson that a nation ruled by common citizens was not only possible, but preferable to Monarchy, Merchants and Nepotism.
We have the keys in our hand already. No law that is in conflict with the US Constitution is valid. (First Chief Justice: John Marshal). We have simply run into the British East India Monopoly again, that's all. We must rebel and throw their tea in the harbor. We must take back our lands from the corp/gov. We must join our right wing loonies and compromise. Cut the government down by 90 percent and start over. But spare the Constitution unless you want about 500 years of oppression by a Bushmonkey Crime Family.
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
The "good old days"... when if you came from Europe it was sanctioned to take the land of the indigenas (by death and theft) and make it your own, 100s of acres per immigrant/settler.\a good old time when you could cut down huge swaths of forest or burn prairie to carve out a homestead for your family's enrichment... Where your entire lifestyle set the precedent now followed by the corporations. They were certainly not good days for humanity because they implanted on this continent the false belief that you could start your own "good" life by taking it by force.
The industrial poisoning of food, land, water, and air, is the result of that mindset. The only thing that will save humanity, is a return to tribal sensibilities... where each is valued as a member of the whole... even the plants, animals, and fish, that we are now taught to view as "resources"... even the frail, because they allow us to experience compassion and interconnection as integral.
A boycott of corporate goods would certainly alter the direction of nations... to that we must add the understanding that we are not punishing them for leading us to our misery... we are investing in life as quality rather than commodity.
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
Just wondering where you think the "Indigeneous" peoples got their land in the first place?
It is my understanding that the Indigenas (Spanish for native) moved to the North American continent primarily over the Northern land-bridge over 12 thousand years ago and from the more populated regions of South America 8 - 10 thousand years ago. They found a land that was not "claimed" for the most part by humanity or they assimilated into some of the tribes that had already created cultures in progress. With vast land and game/food to sustain them and a tribal culture that promoted sanctity of life over ownership, the taking and exclusiveness of territory was unnecessary and uncommon for many hundreds even thousands of years. In NY many different tribes shared hunting grounds and there is reason to believe (oral history) that was also true of many tribes in southwest, far west, northwest, midwest and other eastern regions. Certainly there were exceptions - tribes known for their brutality and war skills... but they were exceptions rather than the rule. There are many different histories written and told - but for the most part these tribal peoples did not displace others to live. ...and as the native sensibility is to steward rather than dominate an environment, their affect throughout histories of any sort was to live on the land in abidance with other life forms.
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
Excellent post!
tj,
your eyes are wide open on that one. we only think the hatred currently spewing forth in political debate is despicable. wait until our true reality check becomes a matter of survival. it won't be pretty.
So, basically, we're fucked.
On the other hand, it's business as usual.
Yes until it isn't. Negative growth is pushed by the multiplier effect. It begins slowly, eventually picks up speed and becomes evident, then almost overnight it overwhelms us in collapse. Such is the paradigm of geometric growth, it works both ways.
Great article--powerful suggestions for change.
the author is totally on point with his statement,"In 2009, indentured politicians, bought and sold by the corporate elite, crushed our hopes for peace and prosperity by spending trillions of our tax dollars on war, Wall Street, and corporate welfare.
what we do about it as a people will be interesting to watch. I only hope it is not too late.
Absolutely brilliant commentary! Finally, someone is putting blame where it truly lies..on the corporate contaminators!
As far as we the people go, we have to buy locally & organic whenever possible and get off big pharma's drug merry go round. Most things that ail us can be treated with proper diet and natural supplements which by the way, the government through Codex Alimentarius, wants to make very hard to obtain.
Organic farming and holistic medicine is the way to go. Let's decimate factory farms, big pharma and the medical industrial complex by going back to nature and eating REAL food not their frankenfood created in labs and meant to keep us hungry and sick and in turn enables all three industries to continually turn a profit !
As and inverse to "there are no atheists in the foxholes", I'm sure that if you get a cancer diagnosis, your faith in all this "natural" stuff will quickly be tossed aside. I have a friend who got a non-Hodgkins Lymphoma 5 years ago. He ate well and was fit. He is alive and healthy today because of modern effective chemotherapy protocols.
I am currently treating my cat who was diagnosed, unfortunately late, with intestinal lymphoma, using the oral chemo Leukran, plus prednisone. A "holistic" veterinarian first misdiagnosed the condition as chronic kidney failure, then prescribed "natural" treatments - Chinese herbs and some kind of pill from the proven quack "natural" remedy manufacturer Standard Process, that were actually harmful for the condition for which he was misdiagnosed!
In answer to your question. I have already decided, if god forbid I am striken with cancer, to NOT get the immune system destroying treatments of chemotherapy or radiation. I have seen three friends die of cancer and the so called "cure" was no better than the disease. Sure their lives were extended for a few years but there was no quality. They lived in fear and illness until their ultimate death. I'd rather take my chances with natural cures than suffer for years at the hands of for profit medicine.
I have decided to ask for palliative measures only if I should be diagnosed with cancer. This means morphine or oxycontin or dilaudid or similar and in unlimited quantities. I do NOT plan to commit suicide with these drugs, but only to maintain a degree of pain free life until the end. Big Medicine does NOT want to cure cancer. That would NOT be PROFITABLE. And BM does not care one bit about the suffering of the cancer patients who are their cash cows. If I am denied palliative measures, then I have a .357 magnum in the safe.
Sioux Rose
JULIA & KENT: A few years ago two persons were diagnosed with the same form of Cancer on Cedar Key. The woman decided to go on with her life, enjoy morning walks with her friends so long as she could, and eat well while loving her family members. The male opted for the in-hospital chemo style treatments.
A friend of mine is very wary of holistic health and tends to put her faith into the MDeity. She relayed to me the progress of these two persons. As it turned out the woman who "went au natural" out-lived the male by a matter of weeks. Sometimes when one's number comes up, there is no way to trick or delay fate, although Ingmar Bergman made an interesting film examining this very thing. I believe it was entitled "The Seventh Seal."
It's interesting how CIVIS and PDJ412 are not talking about the true indications of this most excellent article. The article goes to elaborate pains to tie together things like the US diet and how its capitalist systems operate to turn decent enough citizens into collateral damage. I was pleased to see points that I've raised (such as the degree to which we're being chemically poisoned, and then expected to pay for all forms of health-care, part of that necessity stemming from the trespasses of big business and its disabled pollution controls) brought up as they are highly relevant to the various dis-eases that are taking down not just American society; but to the degree these are exported, of threat to the world.
The entire emphasis on biotech and chemicals everywhere issues from ideological construct that's wedded to a false god, that man was given DOMINION over nature. (And of course the naked love of paper profit at ALL costs is another insidious part of this equation.) There is an utter lack of respect, and absolute lack of imagination in the degree to which ego-driven, for-profit persons, in lab coats or business suits, presume it is their right to decimate the natural world, as if they can "do it better" thanks to a few years in formal study, if that! What's actually taking place is an utter and absolute implosion of the entire ecological web that has evolved over so many millions of years to support life. It is a theft to the time-banks, those that represent HER investment in life itself. A poetic metaphor to the way so many societies treat not only women, but avoid any mention of the Divine feminine, as if God is just a guy with a dick like their own.
Petty nonsense about who drives an SUV is just a way of diverting this conversation away from the true essence of what it wisely seeks to portray: that modern agriculture is poisoning the Life-giving matrix as well as ourselves, and then offering chemicals which do not cure, but rather mask immediate symptoms. It is a recipe for death that runs parallel with the same society's investment in a bevy of hideous forms of armaments. Many in this forum are low on the energy usage "food chain," nor is the issue "Al Gore." It's about our society's bankrupt values, its homage to Mammon ($) and Mars (war), and how the pair effects a global suicide pact on a massive scale.
You are all writing as if all cancers are terminal, when in fact, thanks to modern medicine, a majority of cancers are cured - my friend with the non-Hodglins lymphoma has been cancer free for 5 years. Only a few years ago, this disease any kind of lymphoma including the now nearly 100% curable Hodgkins disease was invariably fatal.
There is an actual psychological diagnostic term for this obsession with a pure healthy, "natural", "raw", "vegan" or "orgainc" diet. It is called "orthorexia nervosa". My wife has it. It prevents us from ever traveling anywhere because she has to bring a car-trunk load of her organic veggies, blender and juicer wherever she goes. Now, she is projecting it onto our poor sick cat. Due to illness or treatment related anorexia (probably anemia) the cat is only eating his old favorite dry food. When I informed her if this, she went crazy. She seems to think dry foods - even high quality ones, are some kind of poison. She is willing to starve the poor sick cat to feed her mental disorder. I will not let this happen.
Sioux Rose
You mentioned this about your wife before and it's a case of you mistaking a personal and familiar issue for what motivates MILLIONS of persons. Anyone serious about assuming a spiritual path cares for the body as the temple of the living God-dess. Self-discipline is frequently the staple to any path of genuine spiritual discipleship. "He who conquers himself is greater than he who conquers a city."
Too many in this forum take an either-or attitude. I realize there are numerous factors that play into our health equations. Being conscious of what we eat and drink, honoring the "law" of moderation, and then doing what we can to offset the terribly toxic conditions of the world around is are intelligent practices. If any imbecile who pushes meat consumption or processed food wants to call those who take care the crazies, who gives a s--t. We now live in a society so off-balance and insane that things that should NEVER be passed for civil behaviors (or those on the part of political/fiscal elites) have become the twisted norms of the land. I find it equally objectionable that there should be a focus on "happiness studies" in a phase where millions are pushed to take anti-depressant drugs, and where the great numbers emotionally checking out seem to factor into the calculus of a society that's gone mad on not giving a damn. My way is to connect as many dots as possible, but some in this forum favor tunnel vision and a focus on ONE specific way of viewing things.
Your reply never addressed any of my concerns. Unhealthy self-absorbed obsessions are a fact - they destroy a person and those close to them. They are not "discipline".
Humans have little strokes and cancers their whole lives. But stem cells in the body fly to the rescue and in concert with the immune system, fix the problem. Since it is known now that many cancers are caused by a virus, a healthy immune system which non-GMO fruits and veggies provide is logical. Most breast removals now are believed to be unnecessary. The non-malignant cell anomaly is indistinguishable from the malignant variety with today's testing. Big Med is just another scam. Cancer is the number two killer in the US today. Once you already have it, you're hosed.
"I will not let this happen."
Gee, sounds like the voice of an Authoritarian, Right-wing nut, trying to pass for a progressive to me.
What a control freak. What a pawn of the processed-food empire. And now you're a self-trained cat doctor as well and an amateur physiologist. Did it ever occur to you that the non-FDA unmonitored cat food might be what is killing the cat?
Tell ya what. YOU eat the spoiled bovine brain stems that are mixed in with the cat food and we'll see what happens to you....
TJ
"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." - Thomas Jefferson
Sioux Rose
As a cancer survivor myself, that chose Chemotherapy, I feel qualified to make a comment here. I also had a friend that choose not to take it and passed away quite quickly.
The above two statements prove absolutely nothing. The results could just as easily been reversed as has proved the case with other friends. I believe at this point, that the individual person has a lot to do with the effect of treatment or non-treatment. Although there are times when it makes no difference which you choose.
As the Prof. pointed out above, he was lucky to be a Canadian because he got that choice. Many of us don't, nor will we under this sewage Congress is trying to pass off as reform. Who really knows what works for which person?
I would suggest respectfully that you are defining those guys with:
"There is an utter lack of respect, and absolute lack of imagination in the degree to which ego-driven, for-profit persons, in lab coats or business suits, presume it is their right to decimate the natural world, as if they can "do it better" thanks to a few years in formal study"
as being completely wrong. Are you not doing exactly what you accused them of? Are you not saying only you and the folks that think like you or hold your opinions are right?
Clumsy I know, but can you see what I'm saying?
Sioux Rose...this is an edit.
I don't think that came across correctly. I'm going to add:
Unless we return to an agrarian economy what you propose is impossible, though you can certainly be partially correct. Extrapolate from that, which I know YOU can do and you will see better what I was trying to say.
Sioux Rose
CIVIS: I am glad you survived and opted for your own medical choices, and I realize many will have slim to no choices. The article lit my fuse in igniting a connection that's seldom seen in print: that between the toxic environments in which we increasingly live (thanks to the over-emphasis on "better living through chemistry") and the rates of cancer which I see directly attributable to this exposure.
My comment about the men in lab coats was directed at biogenetic engineering, the making of sterile seeds, the Monsanto-species of monopolizing what should belong to all, i.e. the commons, and certainly the Indigenous of foreign lands who were the tenders of those seeds over many centuries. Science, which often becomes the rationale for the extension of "property rights" has messed with what belongs to no one. This trespass upon the natural world that now has moved to the stage of ownership of genes as well as seeds is EVIL and a form of collective suicide. THAT rings my bells, sir.
Right now my boyfriend is in the hospital and he's been there for 2 weeks. He is a stubborn person raised by very intellectually narrow parents, and he is CLUELESS about diet. He is not making much progress and I am APPALLED by what the hospital calls "Food." It is incredibly frustrating to see his condition, a young, fit, usually very strong male, deteriorate and the doctors are running him through all kinds of machines, taking all kinds of blood samples, but they serve things like: salsbury steak. (a joke), canned vegetables (denatured of the most remote form of nutrition), ice tea (ditto)... and when I asked if I could bring him fresh juice and/or a protein shake, the nurse said it was not on his "renal diet."
Modern medicine will (if mankind survives) be seen as one notch over bleeding persons with leeches. I much prefer the energy medicine and dietary adjustments seen in Chinese medicine and the organic holistic field.
Since human beings come in 12 basic models, I believe there is truth to the idea of "different strokes for different folks." When I had a baby at home in the presence of a midwife, and when I saw that my body could heal a number of things that others would go to conventional/invasive medical sources to affect... I had my own epiphany. I also watched a male friend overcome a brain tumor with major dietary changes. We all believe in the evidence of our experiences, and I recognize that one size does not fit all. That takes me back to the totalitarian premise I am responding most vehemently to: that we all MUST buy INSURANCE, when the medical model it serves is NOT one I advocate. Even prayer has been seen to heal some, and the Christian Scientists have their own evidence in that arena. In any case, peace.
Sioux Rose
I am exteremely sorry to hear about your guy. And Modern medecine can indeed learn a lot from past eras and other methods. It would benefit from blending I believe.
Hospital food? YUK. They could do a LOT better if they cared to. There is no need to be "institutional" about their cooking. We agree completely. The kitchen is too centralized and to big. Bigger is NOT always better.
And yes, the blood suckers are sticking you every time you turn around. I've learned tio ask why they need a sample and to ask the fools why they can't use the results of the sample that was taken for another test just days before....the answer usually is "Oh, didn't know about it"
You are spot on about diet. And attitude. The mind can do great things I'm convinced. Got you on the "Bell Ringing" that you meant.
"That takes me back to the totalitarian premise I am responding most vehemently to: that we all MUST buy INSURANCE, when the medical model it serves is NOT one I advocate. Even prayer has been seen to heal some, and the Christian Scientists have their own evidence in that arena. In any case, peace."
Now there's something that rings MY bell too! The very idea of forcing anyone to buy "insurance" for what someone decides to offer is anathama to me. They surpass their authority. I saw the idiot Sen. Spector this morning saying it was legal because Mass. did it. Do these fools not know that righrts are reserved to the States and the Feds do not have all the power? Jezzzeeee! If by accidenty they should pass this travesty they better bring their friends if they try to enforce it.
I just smiled because I have this big picture of a Fed showing up on your door step and telling you that you HAVE to buy a health insurance policy that doesnt offer coverage for your choice of treatments! I'd pay to see that!!
I pray that he recovers quickly and you can get him away from there and make some improvements to his diet to help him. When you are younger you don't think you'll get sick, maybe he'll listen closer to your wisdom. Best wishes for your hospital "stay" too.
Peace indeed.
Old Marines never die, they just reincarnate.
Sioux Rose
CIVIS: Is that you my friend, Thomas? I had a sense of it... if so, your spelling has improved (LOL). I can't tell you what a surreal ordeal this has been. My guy was feeling depressed and took a few of his mother's anti-depressants, got dizzy, fell and now it's all cascaded from there. I saw him as made of such tough stuff, the way he was always so physical with outside labors. He's a great carpenter, can fix almost anything, and does all kinds of lawn & tree work when there are no better paying gigs. Now I wonder about the time needed for recovery atop the healing process? He was given (to him the good news) that he will get a full disability. And, due to his born again parents, he's reading the Bible, telling me a lot about Jesus. Strange Christmas for a mystic, one of Jewish family origin. I find that life always sends me strange encounters and this no doubt factors into why I take a celestial view of persons and events. The typical definitions have never worked for my life script. (A discussion enjoyed better over that beer I promised you a ways back.)
I have always looked to personal experiences for fodder for creative writing projects. The next one, LAID OFF, was based on him as I saw in this young man the prototype of the macho American blue collar worker who has a limited understanding of the larger world and how its nation's acts impact that realm. Seems the very real call to a healing process (now a part of his life) will factor into this script. I knew that this guy needed to incorporate more VENUS, which is to say empathy, for others... males identified too closely with Mars factor greatly into our nation's ethos and expressed priorities.
When he told me he was feeling depressed (we had taken a time out for a few weeks), I asked if he'd be OK with my reading his Tarot cards. The DEATH card showed up in the future position, and I took it to symbolize a major rebirth process which I recognized through the astrological factors pressing down on him. I never thought a brush with death in earnest would show up. My best friend reminded me of a tarot reading I did for a man in his 50's in the Keys, right in front of his daughter. He insisted on this reading... and there was the death card, and he died very shortly thereafter. This card CAN symbolize major processes of transformation, and when I read for clients I almost never mention death when the card comes up. In astrology, Pluto represents Scorpio, the sign signature for death and rebirth. It is now in early Capricorn meeting my guy's Venus (which rules the kidneys), and he's had some MAJOR kidney problems. For those who think astrology is bogus, I wish I could elaborate on how many times I have seen evidence of stellar synchronicity at work. My family members only ask me to read their cards on rare occasions, and my best friend tells me she'd rather NOT know. "There is a divinity that shapes our ends..."
Yep! Your feelings are always correct!!
I hope he doesn't get to carried away with Jesus. I'm a devout Christian, but I don't go to church because of the hypocrisy. And please remind him that the bible he is reading from is the intepretation of an intepretation of an intepretation of an intepretation...etc! Don't get to carried away with it. Factually there is a lot of mysticism in the bible when you think about it.
"if so, your spelling has improved (LOL)" Actually its my typing and I'm trying to slow down and proof read my posts more. :) My spelling has always been atrocious anyway. Vocabulary is fine, spelling...oh well!
Very true about the Macho part, especially the young guys. They don't understand that you can cry in public, show sympathy, even for an enemy, walk away from fights and still be tougher than the blustering bully. They mistake bravado for toughness. Mistake keeping a game face on with being a man. Its hard for them to learn.
The best way I can explain my attitude to Tarot cards, reading the future, etc is that I don't particularly believe it while I certainly don't disbelieve it. Make sense?
You can help him heal if he will let you, mature women that have that maternal warmth can heal easily, especially helping a lover or dear one. Seen it often. I'm glad he has his disability, it may allow him time to think, to consider that he has never had before. I hope so.
Try getting him to take better care of himself, keep at him if you care. I feel that he can't do it without you.
An article or book about thetypical American worker would certainly be timely right now. They have been betrayed on every side. I hope you will follow through with it.
Be well my dear friend. Have a beer on me! Happy New Year!!
Sioux Rose
CIVIS: Thank you for the kind words of support in response. I definitely COULD help him, but I never met a person who was more arrogant in my life! And therein lies the rub. I've been in the mystical field for nearly 30 years and met a handful of people (against a backdrop of MANY pretenders) who could read something known as "The Akashic Record." Just as our computer chips hold massive amounts of data, it's believed that our universe is itself a sentient interactive energetic field, and every word and HELD thought of anyone gets "recorded" in its filament "structure." In any case, of the handful that have the gift of reading the very codes of time (our past life records), I was told that this guy was a Chinese emperor (or of some nobility in China), and as was the custom then, he had many wives. I was the eldest. According to the reading/analysis, he came to rely upon my good judgment and basically spent more time with me than the other wives.
One thing that really resonates with that assessment is that for a white, caucasian guy, he fathered children (or would have) with a large pool of women. This was something I came upon when I spent time in Puerto Rico, as it's a given with most Latin men of looks and/or means, but a white protestant? So, I've shared that with you to suggest that the EGO of a ruler is still very much with him. I am the type of woman that NO man bosses around, and so our interaction is at times about as funny as the thinking that led to creatures such as marsupials. The cosmos DEFINITELY has a sense of humor! And it's often designed for didactic purposes. As tends to be the case in any empire, it is usually ONLY the "fool" (clown, court comedian) who can tell the KING the truth about the conditions in the kingdom. Following my own covert advice here, I try to get deep truths TO him via humor. Each of us is a work in progress. And I try to hold onto that thought, too. Perhaps when the book is completed, he and I will be free to go separate ways. I hope he recovers entirely. This whole thing reminds me of one of the many wisdoms the Buddhists teach: that human life (and our basic state) is SO ephemeral. Life can indeed turn on a dime!
Sioux Rose,
It's not me. I'm an atheist who prays nobody will notice my bad spelling ;-)
I just happened to be arguing with somebody in this thread when I saw my screen name in your post. "spot-on" is Male Military speak. Slang like "shit-hot", "good-to-go", "spot-on" are phrases I've never heard civilians use. Of course, now I just helped the pentagon trolls blend in....
Hope you are fine,
TJ
"I speak for myself unless otherwise noted; one personality is enough thank you" - anonymous
Sioux Rose
TJ: Our friend Civis has morphed in terms of his nomenclature, so the comment was directed at him. On a different note, I enjoyed your patriotic, "Daniel Boone, Elbow Room" discourse with several others on different parts of this thread. Alas, the issue of patriotism, place for that matter, and its reference to how at home we feel in any PLACE.
I was thinking about the spectrum loosely defined as "species of sentience" when I just had a very therapeutic bike ride in rather chilly temperatures. What crossed my mind is the way the mind and senses open when one is immersed in nature. It's as if invisible tentacles or antennae spring up and allow (or encourage) us to feel things that many people ordinarily bypass.
When I am in a city, that sentience is at times PAINFUL because those who live in noisy, congested places train their senses to essentially shut down and NOT pick up on all the sounds and energetic fields of all the people being brushed up against or crowded into elevators with. It seems counter-intuitive for me to shut off the sentience I've spent a long time developing.
These insights led me to think about Copenhagen and how such a conference should have been held in a national park or natural preserve where all the members sat on the ground, listened to birds, watched the sky, felt at one with the trees. And then having been immersed in THAT ambiance, made decisions from a more enlightened perspective... instead of the concrete & steel business ethos that is itself anti-LIFE, unless it can patent and sell it, full contents or parts.
Then the idea for a hilarious script hit me, sort of a pro-ecology take on the Eddie Murphy film "Trading Places." I don't mind putting this idea out into the ethers should someone better positioned than myself care to take the allusion and run with it. Basically, the idea would be that a medicine man would trade places with a hot shot corporate CEO and the company would be run according to the Medicine man's ethos, whereas the tribe (that forfeited its medicine man) would be run by the CEO. I think that premise, developed, could be a scream, plus impart significant lessons to audiences who are not accustomed to thinking outside of the pre-fab worldview fed to them like cultural pabulum by the 24/7 MSM.
What do you think? I have enough ideas/scripts to last another decade, and that's based on the production schedule of usually completing at least one major project a year.
Sioux Rose, are you a working screenwriter? I want you to know that my husband and I wrote a script a few years back that is somewhat similar in theme to what you described above. It's not a comedy but it does deal with a confrontation between corporate and tribal medicine.
I became interested in this theme back in the late 1980s, when I had the good fortune to meet Wilburn Ferguson and read his non-fiction memoir, Tzansa. His story was the inspiration for Medicine Man, although that movie did not do his life work justice (to put it mildly).
I think a comedy on the topic is a great idea, and that your 'Trading Places' analogy is a clever pitch. If you want to hash it out with a professional 'reader' or Hollywood story consultant, please let me know. I worked in this capacity for over ten years.
Sioux Rose
BETH: I hope you return to this thread. I have written 6 movie scripts (and 2 stage plays) and always had faith that each was entertaining while holding valuable insights, most with mystical and/or metaphysical implications. It's always been an odd fact of my destiny as a writer that I have been able to make a living writing articles, usually horoscope features (regular gigs) for an impressive number of periodicals, some national, while I have not been able to secure a literary agent.
If you feel you could pitch this "Trading Places" idea, I'd love that! Here is quick synopsis of completed scripts:
1. The Caretakers: Begins with a circle of Druid Monks meeting to share their prophetic intimations on the new millennium (first) about to unfold. When their visions show a series of calamitous outcomes, they vow to return (reincarnate) in whatever form is necessary to alter this tide. The story fast-forwards to the l960's, just before the turn into the next millennium... and camped out at Stonehenge are young people, all of whom later go into medicine and/or biotech. Over time, members of this group found a covert organization with the intention of cloning the first human being before the for-profit corporations get in on the act. We do not learn until the final pages of the script/story that the individual selected for the project, now successfully cloned with two living in the U.S. and several others residing in other nations... is none other than Ralph Nader, the individual most likely to thwart the rise of global corporate capitalism without conscience!
2. Fat Chance: This comedy examines not only the epidemic of obesity in America but the parallel trend towards overconsuming resources of the earth. Although it begins when frustrated husbands send their wives off for a "guaranteed weight loss cruise," and it's guaranteed because the women only get to eat what they can hunt down, fish, or forage... with their wives away, the men pig out on junk food and thus when the wives return in much better shape, turns out it's now their hubbies' turn to get on board! The fat flotilla becomes so popular that there's one cruise set for pets and their owners. (I'm sure you've seen how often an owner resembles their pet and vice versa.) So there are persons boarding with chubby pets so that BOTH can benefit from this novel weight loss approach.
3. To See Among the Blind: This is my rival myth to End Times. (If you find these synopses interesting, I can continue via personal email: Astrologo77@yahoo.com)
4. Dolphinity (or The Dolphin's Double)
5. Born Again (a musical... and lately I feel the need to revise it so that a sort of "West Side Story" theme merges with Norman Lear's "All In the Family" to follow the love story set between a very progressive woman from a blue state, and her involvement with a very conservative Bible-studying type from a red state. (It was previously written to involve a lawyer with a tendency to dissolve his moral turpitude in a bottle of booze.)
6. Doggone: Another comedy. This one intended as a stage play.
7. Immortally Yours. A love story between a god from Olympus, surreptitiously conceived by Aphrodite, unbeknownst to Zeus (the entity's father)... to come to earth to minister to the needs of the "sexually challenged and romantically dispossessed... who are many."
8. Seinfeld episode
I hope I didn't overwhelm you. I just finished the line by line review of galleys for a 2nd edition of a children's book that introduces "The oldest story never told." It's my allegory of the 12 rays, or 12 spiritual paths... I believe it is intended as an animated film, and am considering pitching this idea in Asia where there's a chance I could find funding for such an item.
I welcome any help, support, or ideas as I've had to self-publish all my best works over the past 10 years. With Internet publishing now affordable, I intend to convert each of these scripts into a novella and publish it. So far I completed 3 and have the rest to go.
Thanks for sharing you episode with your cat. I had a similar travesty involving my beloved Chow, Billingsley, some years ago. I wrote a book about her, "The Adventures of a Hawaiian Lion in Paradise," and in it, the dog, acting as a sort of Moses-style ambassador delivers new commandments to guide human beings' relationship to nature and the natural world. I may self-publish this one, too, in time.
Happy New Year. Hope to hear back from you, or via email: Astrologo77@yahoo.com
http://www.gerson.org/
Terran
You would be mistaken, Julia, I'm afraid.
In 2001, I had a major heart attack, angioplasty saved my life. For full five years afterwards I was religiously vegan, yet I got an aggressive bladder cancer which was removed by cystoscopy. I was getting a quarterly BCG treatment for the first two years and, since the cancer didn't recur, now I have treatment twice a year. Hopefully, it will be reduced to once a year.
My point is that we shouldn't be exclusive. Modern medical science is wonderfull, when applied appropriatelly. In both of my major conditions, I was given a non-invazive treatment which surely had a huge impact on the strength of my immune system. Living healthily on top of it is what I call a true integral, holistic, approach.
Your arrogance is justified by your good health. Diseases are humbling and humiliating more than anything else and I honestly wish you not to experience it.
A healthy human comes to see his good health as a right and sickness as an injustice.
Anyone suffering from any injustice is humiliated by her own impotence, angered by her own helplessness, and the capriciousness of chance. Healthy persons suspect the sick must have done something to bring this on themselves.
Read Job.
Good observation, Nietzsche. Diseases are "not fair" and, if they do happen to us, we strongly believe we can overcome them by quasy-treatments - from consuming organic food all the way to "think positive" attitude. No wonder Barbara Ehrenreich got mad with such an escapism.
We keep ignoring the fact that diseases are natural state of life leading to the ultimate death as Nature's way of enriching biodiversity. I'm sure Stephen Hawking understands it - he's obviously enjoying himslef. Now, that's the spirit!
Whether or not to have cancer chemotherapy is a personal choice and there are many different cancers with different prognoses. I'm currently into my 12th year since I was diagnosed with a form of non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. I've have two treatment cycles of chemotherapy 3 years apart, a failed response to Leukeran/prednisone and have just finished treatment with one of those protein bio-engineered antibodies.
I'm fortunate my condition is indolent and chronic rather than acute and severe. I'm also fortunate to be Canadian since my last treatment cost $25,000 for the drug over 2 years and had to approved by the clinical review committee for the medical plan - the kind of thing that could easily have been refused by for profit health insurance despite proof that the biological component of my Leukeran/prednisone treatment was effective.
At the age of 66 and in general good health I've reached the point where I expect I might well die with my disease rather than from it.
"At the age of 66 and in general good health I've reached the point where I expect I might well die with my disease rather than from it."
What a terrific viewpoint.
pjd412, your faith in "modern effective chemotherapy protocols" and apparent contempt for "natural stuff" seems to border on arrogance. And, judging from your other posts, so is your idea about organic food.
Cancer doesn't happen by itself. There is much in the so-called "modern" system - of food production, chemicals, radiation, and so on - that could be playing an active role in causing or triggering the cancer in the first place. T. Colin Campbell's "The China Study: The Most Comprehensive Study of Nutrition Ever Conducted and the Startling Implications for Diet, Weight Loss and Long-term Health" is one book that specifically talks about the role of diet in certain diseases - including certain forms of cancer.
I know for a variety of reasons that's beyond my understanding, some people turn defensive, and as a consequence, go on the offensive, whenever topics such as organic or vegan diet is brought up. I run into such people all the time, and despite continuing efforts on my part, I haven't found a way to bring up such topics without making such people defensive.
Your personal experience might have made you feel more confident about modern medicine and somewhat contemptuous about natural treatments. That is fine. I too have a friend - a guy from China, but now living in Canada, who would have nothing to do with any natural or vegan stuff. His daughter was recently diagnosed with a certain kind of auto-immune disease. After some attempts at treatment in Canada, he has decided to send his daughter off to China to try their nature cure - apparently there is one doctor who has developed some system for such disorders. His wife quit her job in Canada, and is in China with her daughter. I sent him copies of "China Study" - in English and Chinese (yes - I found a Chinese version too). I've known him for so many years, and he was never interested in hearing about a vegan diet. I gave him this book particularly since some of the autoimmune diseases have been linked to animal food - including dairy, and the stopping of those foods have brought about a reversal of those diseases. Right now, he is much more open, and sincerely thanked me for the books. Recently he told me that his daughter was doing much better in China.
The way I see it logically is this: you CANNOT possibly cause anymore harm by eating organic food, compared to eating food produced using "modern" methods. The latter has been documented to cause problems in some cases. Personally, I would include vegan, too - but I tell others to take supplements if it helps them feel better.
Of course I want everyone's food (and not jut my own) to be a free of harmful substances, and be grown in as sustainable a way as possible. Because I'm a rich white middle I can afford to and do eat organic stuff, and only rarely meat, myself.
But this article makes the ludicrous claims that if everyone just goes organic and vegan, the problem of global warming is solved. The solutions this person proposes will make very little contribution to alleviating global warming.
And this over-emphasis on personal food consumption and health, in place of just and equitable healthcare for all seems to be a uniquely USAn thing. One hears very little of it in other countries. My hypothesis is that it is a reflection of the highly self-absorbed. personalized world-view of USAns, and maybe a consequence of the helplessness that our health care system produces, causing people to seek "alternate" solutions as the only way a person can feel they have any control under such a system.
>>>pjd412 wrote:...this article makes the ludicrous claims that if everyone just goes organic and vegan, the problem of global warming is solved. The solutions this person proposes will make very little contribution to alleviating global warming.
Actually the article does not mention a vegan diet, which I find rather unfortunate. It also makes me wonder if the author is one of those who will go only so far, and not touch the role of meat consumption due to personal preferences or political correctness. But coming back to your assertion, meat production DOES play a major role in GHG emissions. While this has been known for quite some time, a UN-FAO report that came out in 2006 has for the first time taken an official stand on this issue - it turns out that livestock production is a major, major contributor to climate change.
"Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options"
http://www.fao.org/docrep/010/a0701e/a0701e00.HTM
>>>And this over-emphasis on personal food consumption and health, in place of just and equitable healthcare for all seems to be a uniquely USAn thing. One hears very little of it in other countries.
Why would you want to brush off personal choice as insignificant? What is the alternative? To buy just whatever is available at the supermarket? I know that's NOT what you are proposing. Even where universal health-care is available, if people were to follow a healthier lifestyle, thus reducing the load on the system, I'm pretty sure it will benefit all taxpayers. It's the exact equivalent of more safe drivers and less accidents/claims benefiting those who pay auto insurance, especially where it's a single-payer system. It should lead to lower premiums. (It's a different matter that it doesn't happen always - instead, the "surplus" going to pay fat bonuses to insurance co. executives and staff).
I had a cat with cancer as well, and I commend you for your desire to give yours a fighting chance at life. Unfortunately, I can only warn you that feline oncology is a very lucrative and often corrupt business. I took my cat to a 'renowned' veterinary specialist in this field who, it turned out, was conducting research on experimental drugs for pharmaceutical companies, using people's pets in off-label procedures in ways that violated federal law. Despite this doctor's international reputation, our cat was brutally tortured to death for his personal and professional gain. As you may know, testing of drugs on companion animals is an unsupervised step in the process of approval of human clinical trials. Laboratory animals have more protection under the Animal Welfare Act than people's pets; due to loopholes in the AWA, veterinarians who conduct research on 'outpatients' escape the jurisdiction of USDA Animal Care. Ultimately, this particular doctor was fined and cited for gross negligence and other infractions by the California Veterinary Medical Board, but it took our presentation of 700 pages of documentation to achieve this pyrrhic victory. Over the course of two years of painstaking research, my husband and I interviewed numerous veterinary doctors, technicians, bureaucrats and activists about the far-reaching implications of our case. Unfortunately, the vertical integration of the veterinary industry, the consolidation of veterinary offices, diagnostic laboratories, prescription pet food manufacturers and others in a collusive partnership with the pharmaceutical industry leaves the pet owner with almost nowhere to turn when their animals are exploited. The head of the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine, Neal Batteler, told us that the CVM did not have the manpower to investigate this issue. The USDA told us to call our congressperson to close the loopholes in the Animal Welfare Act. Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim and other drug makers referred us to their public relations departments. PETA told us it had its own pet projects, no pun intended. Animal rights lawyers said there was no money in our case because our cat was personal property, not even a purebred, probably only a $5 value. The Humane Society was very helpful but told us that the forensic evidence it developed on our case and numerous others was never requested for review by anyone in a position of authority. In short, do not be so quick to trust the diagnoses you are given or the treatments prescribed. What happened to our cat is widespread, and has been going on for many years. And it is not only the torture of animals that is a heinous crime. The results of such research are, no surprise, skewed in favor of the drug companies that fund it, and thus lead to similar exploitation of human guinea pigs. While I hope that nothing untoward occurs in the treatment of your cat, I also hope that you demand all of your cat's medical records, examine them carefully, save every receipt, and stop extolling to others the glory of "modern effective chemotherapy protocols", parroting the pep talks you have undoubtedly received from your veterinary oncology 'team'.