Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Back to the Drawing Board
Without a public option, Senate bill is a sop to the insurance industry.
The Senate health care bill betrays the promise of fundamental "change" Democrats made during the 2008 election. It cloaks a handout to the health industry in the veneer of "reform."
Though it includes some positive subsidies and regulatory tweaks, the bill creates few mechanisms to halt premium increases, bust insurance monopolies and end price discrimination - and it includes no public insurance option.
Worst of all, it doesn't actually extend "new coverage" to 30 million more Americans. Through the "individual mandate," it simply makes people criminals if they don't buy expensive insurance from the private corporations that helped create the health care crisis in the first place.
President Obama says this legislation "stand(s) up to the special interests" - but after spending millions of dollars on campaign contributions and lobbying, the special interests clearly disagree. When the Senate bill was unveiled, health stocks skyrocketed. Meanwhile, an insurance insider told reporters, "We win."
For these reasons, the Senate must vote "no" and start over.
Notice the loudest argument against that move is procedural, not substantive. While Senate Democrats acknowledge the bill's shortcomings, they nonetheless echo Princess Leia's melodramatic plea in Star Wars, insisting their bill is our "only hope." This, from lawmakers who didn't even allow floor votes on a stronger bill.
The "only hope" rationale, of course, is an artificially manufactured assumption, not some Law of Nature. It's the same assumption that justified unregulated bank bailouts and hasty war resolutions - and it is a canard because it comes from the very politicians controlling the legislative schedule. Indeed, there's no concrete reason Democrats cannot take a month to rewrite this bill.
Some counter that quick passage is necessary to immediately help the uninsured. But since many of this legislation's minimal benefits don't begin until 2014, there's no obvious rush.
Others cite the aftermath of 1994's health care defeat as proof
Congress will drop the issue if this bill dies. Unlike the past,
though, Democrats are publicly staking their entire name on passing a
bill. As Rep.
To date, such desperation has compromised away nearly every genuine reform that might have been in this legislation. But if the Senate now musters a "no" vote, that same desperation means Democrats will almost certainly go back to the drawing board. And when they do, public outrage at the current bill's corruption will compel them to fulfill, rather than ignore, their original promise of "change we can believe in."
- Posted in


3 Comments so far
Show Allbarileatherfurniture.
candiceolsonsofas
now is not the time to ask for chairman mao's health plan or for "immaculate conception healthcare"TM;
now is the time to further shame and sabotage the re-election chances of demobliRat senators and representatives, e.g., by comparing W's Medicare reform’s give away to the pharmaceutical industry with the obscene extra trillion dollars about to be thrown by demobliRats at the healthcare leeches;
now is the time to demand that the full brunt of antitrust legislation be imposed on the healthcare industry immediately (so that demobliRat senators and representatives have to defend from competition --in front of the cameras, directly and shamelessly-- the profits of the healthcare leeches );
now it's the time to call for binding legislation to bring down healthcare's share of the GPD to below 10% *before* obama's 1st term will end.
these are hard numbers and measures that demobliRat senators and representatives cannot equivocate around, hard numbers and measures that won't allow the few progressive push-overs (like sanders) or venalo-progressives (like byrd) to hide behind tear-jerking statements like "now we can give healthcare to another 20,001 rural grandmothers" while at the same time voting for the healthcare cartel to increase its share of the GPD to 30%.
obama is not going to commit political suicide just to satisfy blinded-bull leftwing hotheads._ he cannot afford to become a target of the right and of the ultra rich, period._ lefties should go after by-bribe-only senators and representatives._ and no, obie (and the ballet dancer) cannot tell you that directly either !
but ask yourselves now: when before in the history of the usa have by-bribe-only senators and representatives from both parties been compelled to show the nation almost daily how disgustingly venal and callously indifferent to the well-being of the nation they are ?
don't you guys/gals sniff the huge opportunity here that is expanding almost daily ?_ that's the chance that obama's election and presidency are offering the left, i.e., a political and media environment that is propitious for a huge mobilization that can foil the reelection of many, if not most, of the by-bribe-only demobliRat senators and representatives.
but no, armchair-warrior spontaneo-leftist idiots prefer to whine hysterically that their --formely secretly beloved-- daddy obama is not going on TV to wave valiantly his finger and shout very loudly and angrily at the bad guys (and attain nothing).
obama is only at his 1st term and cannot force the reform of anything unless he can hide behind congressmen by saying "i accept this new legislation passed by congress bla bla bla"._ he cannot become the ultra rich's sole problem and so tell them that by eliminating him they would be fine (and they would, since demobliRat senators and representatives wouldn't resign if obama were taken out by some "patriotic" assassin)!
without "change" coming to congress to chase away by-bribe-only senators and representatives, obama must play minimalist and wait for his 2nd term (since as of now the hysterical screeds by blinded-bull hotheadish spontaneo-leftist idiots have not changed the fact that the incumbent president remains heavily favored to win re-election; but please let's not work towards changing this, let's work instead towards screwing by-bribe-only senators and representatives!).
we shall ask more from obama but only after his 2nd term will be a certainty or, before, only after congress is finally cleansed._ there are indeed perhaps only 10 senators who could vote for mildly anti-ultrarich policies right now, certainly not 59.9999 (plus snow, etc., yeah right!).