EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
The Words of God Do Not Justify Cruelty to Women
Discrimination and abuse wrongly backed by doctrine are damaging society, argues the former US president
"Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status ..." (Article 2, Universal Declaration of Human Rights)
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28)
I have been a practicing Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world.
So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service. This was in conflict with my belief - confirmed in the holy scriptures - that we are all equal in the eyes of God.
This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. It is widespread. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths.
Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries. The male interpretations of religious texts and the way they interact with, and reinforce, traditional practices justify some of the most pervasive, persistent, flagrant and damaging examples of human rights abuses.
At their most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.
The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.
In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.
The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in Britain and the United States. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for everyone in society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.
It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and out-dated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.
I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive area to challenge.
But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.
The Elders have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights. We have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."
We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasise the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.
Although not having training in religion or theology, I understand that the carefully selected verses found in the holy scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar Biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.
At the same time, I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted holy scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.
I know, too, that Billy Graham, one of the most widely respected and revered Christians during my lifetime, did not understand why women were prevented from being priests and preachers. He said: "Women preach all over the world. It doesn't bother me from my study of the scriptures."
The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter.
Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.
The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


139 Comments so far
Show AllBut Jimmy if the elder Baptists don't subjugate women they would never get laid and have to continue buggering underage males.
Catholics don't recognize the Protestants.
Jews don't recognize the Muslims.
Hindus don't recognize the Buddhists.
And baptists don't recognize each other in the porn shop.
Ha ha! Nevertheless, subjugation of women is at least as serious as subjugation of say... blacks, Jews, Latinos, gays, homeless-underage males, etc.
I once read on a wall in Ecuador something that goes like this: "In order to have respect for one's dignity, it is sufficient to be human."
Shooting the messenger--Jimmy Carter-- detracts from the truth he is speaking now. Is there any religion that doesn't subjugate women? Even so I agree that the Southern Baptist leaders are a hoot.
Time to throw all the old fairy tales (religions) into the dustbin of history, and stop warping childrens minds with their insidious "teachings". They are used everywhere to justify oppression and to encourage ignorance. Why could Christians rape and pillage and steal and enslave? Because they had the one true faith and the whole world rightfully belonged to them. Why do the Jews own Palestine? Because the Torah tells them so, and to hell with the Palestinians. The examples of the destructive power of religion are without end. When are we going to face reality? When are we going to grow up?
Atheists have raped, pillaged, stolen and enslaved too you know.
If you were to face reality you would realize that there is only way to rid the world of violence and oppression and that would be to rid the world of the human race.
I agree with your second statement. On you first point, I think things are a bit more complicated than your statement implies.
Yes Atheists have raped, pillaged, stolen and enslaved also. But they didn't do it in the name of God or even Atheism. Usually atheism when part of a regime is not its driving force. It is hard to rally around a belief in no God. It is much easier to radicalize people and get them to do the rulers dirty work when religion is involved. You first have to raise them to be unquestioning believers, which most religions do. Then you can say things like, God is on our side, or God says you should fly that plane into a building, and if you do you will get three score and twelve virgins.
Now try that rally cry from the Atheists view point. No God is on our side, No God is telling you to fly that plane into that building, and if you do you will be dead, you will cease to exist in any way, and you aint getting any virgins, not a one.
I'm guessing that was probably the point fool was trying to make.
Sioux Rose
NC-TOM: Excellent explanation.
Oh really? Name even one example of an organized atheist power waging war on those with different beliefs, raping pillaging and enslaving as you claim.
Stalinist Communism, to name one.
Also Communist China in Tibet. Vietnam in Cambodia 1979-80. Religion has never been the only justification for terrible behavior.
Rainborowe
Quoted section: "Atheists have raped, pillaged, stolen and enslaved too you know."
Not because a they have displaced the authority for that intention to an imaginary other.
It is important to recognize immature people will always seek to displace their nasty impulses to a "higher authority". Marxists, for example, defer to a secular scripture, that is true. But you can debate a scripture, you can't debate a fictional being who is bestowed with "authority".
Atheism makes "blaming God" a tricky tactic! ; )
Gnosticism becomes despotism when it goes beyond the skin.
It is mistaken to confuse Christians (followers of Christ teachings) with Christianity (religious precepts determined by Paul after his epiphany on the road - and refined by religious leaders through the centuries) This confusion has led to all the ills of religious conflict. What religion sanctions or prohibits, as Mr. Carter points out, does not always represent the highest and best as Christ taught. Whatever religion a person claims, there can be no offense from any of the lessons taught by Jesus - as they consistently pointed to a better choice - never to conflict or disparaging. There is no fairy tale in directing to kindness, compassion, faithfulness, and love. Followers of Christ are not to blame for the obvious wrongs of people calling themselves Christian. Where religious zealotry leads to war, Christ's teachings lead only to peace.
"By their fruits ye shall know them."
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
I fail to see how they are not to be confused. You can't have Christianity without Christians nor Christians without Christianity. But I see what you are trying to say and although I do not deny that there are around the world millions of devout Christians who follow the messages of peace, charity, kindness and open-heartedness, they share the same source as those who spout hatred and bigotry.
Many Christians are trying to dissociate themselves from the wrong that has been, and keeps being done in the name of their religion, the same way they tend to disregard the ugly passages of, say, the Old Testament which are still part of the Bible nonetheless.
"the women must keep silent. They don't have the right to speak. They must take their place as Moses' Teachings say. If they want to know anything they should ask their husbands at home. It's shameful for a woman to speak in church." [1 Chorinthians 14 : 34-35]
Talk about charity.
You most certainly can have people who follow Christ - but do not follow the dictates of religion! Christ said he did not come to create a new religion. He said the Kingdom was within and available to all who embraced it, and that his teachings were the path to finding true belief.
You make my point by quoting Paul's words from Corinthians... one of his many letters of instruction to others as to how to be a "good Christian" ... words written long after the death of Christ and as the founder of a new religion based on his own perceptions. Paul made rules that Christ never alluded to. Oneness and the equality of all were hallmarks of the actual teachings of Jesus. All the wrong ascribed to Christianity can be traced to Paul's understandings, letters, and dictates, not to Jesus's teachings. They are NOT the same source and have two very different tones.
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
Fair enough.
So are you saying that the whole Bible was the making of men in order to found a religion, but the story of Jesus that's in it is genuine? You seem to apply double standards to what is supposed to be God's infallible words.
And what about the Old Testament where God HIMSELF made rules that Christ never alluded to either, like this gem:
"This is what you must do when a man rapes a virgin who isn't engaged. When the crime is discovered, the man who had sexual intercourse with her must give the girl's father 1¼ pounds of silver, and she will become his wife. Since he raped her, he can never divorce her as long as he lives." [Deuteronomy 22:28-29]
So apparently, there was a time when God didn't believe in oneness and equality.
Answer: New Testament... Mark12:28-34
Live Simply So That Others May Simply Live
Yeah, I love how he uses Adam and Eve as evidence of male dominance. But had the story involved gender equality, making a man out of dust, and a women out of his rib, who is then deceived by a talking servant - would be totally believable.
I think you mean "serpent", not servant. Two TOTALLY different things.
Yes, typo.
Actually, it was a great Freudian slip. If you read the book of Job in the Jewish and Christian scriptures, it would appear that he was very much a servant of YHWH in that he obeyed YHWH's command to not go to far in harming Job. ha-Satan in Hebrew means "the Accuser", i.e. God's Prosecuting Attorney. I think it's hilarious that the West's embodiment of evil is a goddamned lawyer.
I'll have to take umbrage with the former Amerikan President. Of course, the words of God justify cruelty to not just women but everyone. Just read the verses in the bible and you'll know. Not just the bible but, the Qur'an, the ahadith and the Talmud all say the same thing. God rules Men but, Men rule everything else. Don't like it? Then prepare to be stoned, beheaded, beaten, etc. I wouldn't worry about it though...it's God's will.
http://nobeliefs.com/DarkBible/DarkBibleContents.htm
Time also to rid ourselves of the pervasive religion of the nation-state: National Militarism Patriotism. Following some blood and agony stained piece of colored cloth justifying still more murder and slaughter of those whom some ruling elites have identified as "enemy", but whose major offense is often that they occupy lands and/or resources the ruling elites want to grab. All too often, religions have been willing collaborators, blessing the slaughters in the name of some male God or other and speaking of some mission of "God's chosen people". Such noble thinking is larded through US history, though rarely brought to the attention of students, grade school to grad school, as they are infused with the cleaned up version of history.
Sioux Rose
COURT JESTER: Right on. You have just defined the ethos of "Mars rules."
deleted
Great article, Jimmy, and I would vote for you again. You have proven over and over again that reason and common sense are the best way to approach difficult situations and there appears to be a vast void in those departments. Most problems today are approached with the attitude of "How lucretive is this going to be for me?"
Perhaps this is more sensible than another 2,000 years of arguing biblical interpretation:
http://www.egreenway.com/qigong/images/yyesb.gif
How do men do it? They go from worshiping their mommies, to chasing skirts, to disrespecting women? I think it is the realization that their Mommies were smarter and stronger than them, that the skirts were far more deft and givers of life to boot, that leaves Men looking into themselves and feeling vacuous and shallow by comparison by early "Manhood," they compensate for this "threat," by subjugating the smarter, stronger animal within their midst.
Femalia, sublime, ethereal,attuned in ways you cannot fathom.........and for which men are child's play too, ahh, the resentments in males weak and insecure, (most).
To the better, more caring, empathic and nurturing gender, oh, in SO many ways I respect your collective soul, joe.
Beautiful post.
Sioux Rose
If LOREN BLISS is reading, she could add much to this discussion.
JOE: Years ago when I studied in London I made it a point to visit the Royal Galleries and other museums. There I believe it was that I came upon a room size painting done by Botticelli on "Venus and Mars." The warrior looked like a little chubby infant who cowered next to the enormous being of Venus.
At that time it hit me that a lot of men would rather go to war, invent excuses to go to war, then surrender themselves fully to a woman via love. The full communion of bodies and souls diffuses the boundary ego prefers to live behind. Ego gets attached to its thought process, while the heart is like an open chalice.
Love transforms. Persons are never the same once they've been touched by this experience; and of course I believe love goes beyond lust, although it can begin there. Rajneesh said, "And lovers have often known what saints have not." Gibran adds immeasurably to what can be said about love, too.
Flora Purim, one of my favorite singers shares these lyrics, "Two become one, there's no search anymore... peace is inside, and you know." (And it's a double entendre as it can be heard, "To become one.")
Hi SR, yes. Loving another is looking into a mirror, seeing yourself reflected by the effects you have on the one you love, how you treat them, support them, nurture them or fail to.
Far less scary for the rabbit running from himself to find a .22 and go hunt hares...
Deepa
"Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views."
Even though Jimmy Carter's PRESENT stand is to be appreciated, his stand about the status of women comes at a time when he "no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy...." The stand of the Southern Baptist Chuch has been same for the past SIX DECADES when he was a faithfulful Baptist member. If he had questioned the Church's stand THEN, it would have costed his political life. Billy Graham's view about the status of women coincides with that of the Baptist Church. I am surprised why Carter used his name to support his PRESENT position.
- The second thing is: there is no consistent teaching in the Bible about any issue. Since there are several streams, one has to CONSCIOUSLY CHOOSE what he/she follows/believes. The God who commanded Israel "Thou shall not kill" is also a God who is directly or indirectly involved in genocidal violence, as some Biblical texts state/narrate.
This is same even with regards to the status of women. In Genesis chapters 1& 2 one may find equality of status. However, women are portrayed as inferior in the Moses' teaching. In the New Testament also the teaching is not consistent. One may see this in Galatians 3.28 cf. I Timothy 2.8-15.
Therefore, one may have to interpret the Bible in the light of Jesus' life, and words and deeds. Those who believe that BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD find it difficult to see a consitent teaching about issues in the Bible.
Therefore, the problem of Churches and Chirstian leaders like Billy Graham is: their faith is based on a SET OF DOCTRINES than on Jesus Christ. Their commitment is to the doctrines, NOT to be followers of Jesus Christ and his mission of establishment of the kingdom of God characterised by service and inclusion.
Sioux Rose
DEEPA: Every epoch had its Karl Roves.
Just as electricity always existed, but it took a mind like Edison's to make it work for humanity; the sort of mind control taught by the likes of Bernays and Pavlov, always existed, too.
My point is that the Bibles have been rewritten over the course of many centuries. Rove-like characters played a hand in WHAT was published. For anyone to place stock in a literal translation of words rendered into Biblical texts is like believing what comes round the circle when happy children play havoc in the game of Telephone.
Jimmy Carter is truly a godly man.
I don't know what religions believe that Souls were given freewill and with freewill there being reincarnation and so this is my take because I believe that we were given freewill and reincarnation is a fact and that being the case any body that can stand there and say that God said that woman was in any way a lesser soul than man has been using way too much of that cool stuff and puting his own pre-judgements to spew his hate because that is what it is.Cause and effect,karma,whatever is when the Soul meets itself and has to answer; what the hell have I been up to?Tony
I was raised Catholic and left the church years ago. As a child, I remember being turned off by religion because I was forced to attend religious classes that seemed more about indoctrinating us to the church rather than teaching us love and tolerance of our fellow beings. No one could ever adequately explain why a woman could never be Pope-- why weren't women allowed to be priests? Such questions were met with odd looks and the simple explanation that, "Well, priests are men." I was also turned off by the statements that "animals had no souls"; therefore, animals would not be rewarded with eternal life in the Kingdom of Heaven. The idea of Man having "stewardship" over all the animals also seemed to be a convenient way to justify treating animals however one sees fit. (One thing that has always bothered me is that if one treated their dogs and cats the way livestock are treated, they would be prosecuted for animal cruelty; so why isn't the same treatment of livestock considered cruel?). I see a correlation between Man's ill treatment of animals and women. Notice how lax animal cruelty laws are in countries where women have few rights. Needless to say, I never did find a church/religion where I felt there was true love and peace, tolerance and compassion. I am sure that belonging to an organized religion in childhood and having my questions go unanswered (even being discouraged from asking such questions in the first place) turned me away from all religions, for good.
Sioux Rose
NMLIB: Not only a relationship between the treatment of animals and women, but how about EARTH, the DIVINE Mother, herself! "Don't get dirty!" or "Don't go to that God-forsaken place."
People have been taught a disregard for nature, and that it's sinful to "get dirty." This also carries over into sex and distorts it.
Earth's resources have been everywhere raped and sold, as if the precious nonrenewable resources were equivalent to selling a prostitute on a weekend night. The sins against women and the Divine Femine/Mother Earth are greater than any! Yes, the Red race paid a huge price, as did the Black race, more recently the Yellow and Brown... but women have paid in EVERY society since patriarchal beliefs took hold. Witness today girls in their early teens sold to Afghani tribal lords and disgusting USA CIA shits handing these old rapists Viagra. My sense of justice is somewhat appeased by my understanding of the Law of Karma.
I have spent nearly 20 years on Moon Dance, and it is an indictment against orgtanized patriarchal religion, and makes quite a case for the damage done and what is required in the way of an all-out recovery. This is intended for both genders, but the book was written for women. Enlightened males (like Jimmy Carter) are always welcome! The heavens do not discriminate. The planetary arbiters in their rhythmic dancing orbs symbolize both genders.
Prostitution is not always about exploitation of a weaker sex.
There are whores who enter the trade willingly and exploit the weaknesses of their customers.
And there are those whose services provide sexual release which could otherwise not be obtained.
As for nonrenewability of "resources" . . .
"I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it."
Abraham Lincoln
Excellent quote, one with which I was not familiar. Thank you for posting it.
NMLib;Yeah,went to Cath. School for a couple of years and got disiplined by Nuns I survived that and got disiplined in public school too.Nuns ruler,public school paddle,ouch!All this happened in San Francisco,CA in the late 40's early 50's and I know rules are enforced differently from Parish to Parish and up the chain.Left it back in the 60's.I'm guessing you are from N.M.I was born there in Santa Fe many moons ago and left when 6 and grew up in S.F,CA.Found it a good place to grow up.Racial devides,hates and other stuff like that were not learned about by me until my joining the AF.What an awakening that was!Good and bad choices were made but that is life and where I'm at now there can be no regrets warts and all!Tony
Free, good to meet you. I grew up in the Midwest, came to NM in my 20s- but not Santa Fe; I'm in the conservative southern part of the state. Former AF wife- that's what brought me to NM. Can't say it was a bad choice, as it's what brought me to NM. It's always good to hear from another "recovering Catholic."
NMLib;It is always informative to read your posts;Santa Fe is not my favorite place anymore but loved Farmington!Tony
Sioux Rose
TONY: In my book MOON DANCE instead of using traditional Uranus for the sign of Aquarius (since it's the sign of rebels, radical new inventions, revolutions, Truth, and an interest in upsetting the status quo) I used Artemis. My reasoning was that Apollo could signify the mythological equivalent of Leo, as it is a masculine sign and "sun" ruled. Apollo is the entity that is credited with pulling the sun across the sky via his charity.
Well, as it turns out, Apollo happens to be a twin, and his sister is Artemis. So if Apollo, as Leo, represents the sun (son of) God, then his TWIN sister, having emerged from the same basic seed/genetic heritage would be the Divine daughter! The pair remind me of Luke and Leah from Star Wars, and together they help take down Darth and the death/military star command. Leo and Aquarius are opposite signs, and we believe that signs in polarity jointly influence events.
I like to create new amalgams, and this one is sure to upset traditionalists in the astrological community. Artemis fits the personality of Aquarius; and as the emergent Divine feminine, she will rock the global boat. The women in Iran are living up to their "inner Artemises!" Plus a lot of women have also been significant lately as key whistle blowers exposing Truth while essentially saying, "I am not going along." Amen to that!
Sioux Rose;hope you are well and glad to see that you doing your thing down in the Keys and getting paid for it;that it is a job and a calling is an ultimate goal.Since I'm an Aquarian (Feb 8 ) does this mean I should express my feminine side more? Tony
Sioux Rose
TONY: Aquarius is definitely the sign born to challenge the old ways! In my view the individual of tomorrow will be one who INTEGRATES both portions of their brains, beings, & psyche. Thus a BALANCE of masculine and feminine traits and expressions is probably going to become the norm in 50 years (or less).
I remember a man I knew in Puerto Rico who had half his planets in Aquarius. I swear his feet didn't touch the ground when he walked. He was a living sparkle! He was very good looking (and gay), and owned several popular discos with his partner. They would on occasion have me do readings for some event, and they were wonderful people, plus enormously generous.
They say Aquarians are born with dancing feet, and in my children's allegory of the Zodiac ("Cassandra's Tale") I used insects to portray the 12 original paths (or archetypal expressions) and yours is the FIREFLY! So sparkle on, and by all means flash others with your LIGHT! After all given your sign's spiritual mandate, it's the Light of Truth!)
Sioux Rose;Thank you and how can I not follow through on such a wonderful mandate?We must all become as children;yes?Tony
@mustbefree July 12th, 2009 3:05 pm
"when the Soul meets itself and has to answer; what the hell have I been up to?"
...is when the cleansing power of any necessary true shame can be released.
vdb;the hopeful effect of the cause along with remembrance to not repeat in any future incarnation.Tony
Sioux Rose
WOW! I am so moved by this that I am bypassing comments to let my impressions loose!
First, Jimmy Carter is a Libra, and that sign not only opposes the Mars-rules war-sign of Aries, but it happens to be the sign where the scales balance. As the sign of marriage, the balanced scales represent TRUE and EQUAL partnership. Jimmy Carter walks that walk! Bravo to him!
Years ago I was camped out with a companion on Sugarloaf Key (in the Keys) and I had just gone off to take a leak in the woods when my companion said, "There are secret service men all over the place." I thought he was kidding. He was not. Jimmy and Rosalyn were playing tennis right across the street at a little court that belonged to the owner of the property where we were camped.
Like John Dean, another Libra, both men are about principles!
Having read this, I am going to send Mr. & Mrs. Carter a copy of my new book, MOON DANCE: The Feminine Dimensions of Time as it comes to the same conclusion he does: that patriarchal religions have done a major disservice to women across the globe. And more so, without the counterbalances provided through the experiences and expressions of both genders (instead we see women becoming LIKE men by thinking they have "arrived" when they can also fire guns in the military or smoke cigarettes to "come a long way, baby," etc.) quite truly the navigational devices of our world (via its leadership and taught cultural values) have gone off track. We are veering towards species extinction, potential human extinction, war without meaning, criminal direction of global funds, and 100 other grotesque operations taken for "business as usual." These all degrade Venus so that only Mars can rule.
I am so grateful that Mr. Carter, who has been privileged to travel the world and own the presidential seat of power, is bearing witness to this critical Truth, as he also recently and bravely exposed the apartheid policies practiced by Israel.
Here is an individual who has grown enormously; and in his polite, steadfast manner he increasingly speaks truth to power. He is to be credited that having honored his marital bond, his wife has proven a TRUE inspiration. I'd like to see both their faces at Mount Rushmore, or a site fashioned to honor unity as a statement against centuries of sexism.
In my view, once the holy circle was co-opted by the premise of one god, and that God took on all the characteristics of Mars... that strategy undermined the Divine union or Holy partnership between men and women. From there, all the other prejudice-based ism divisions were made easier. The unequal yin-yang balance scales have corrupted our world and caused untold misery ever since.
I hope Rosalyn will Moon Dance!
http://www.scientology.org/
Siouxrose.
Might I suggest you read the book "The Ecology Of Eden".?
It is filled with metaphors and an entirely different take as to how Man usurped the role of Women in society, this staring with organized Agriculture .
He speaks to the Myth of the Sphinx and the Medusa and various other "beasts" slain by Male heroes making the case that these beasts represent "Wilderness" and "Nature" and "The Mother" which man fears and wishes to dominate.
"Wild nature" creates monsters which will devour man, therefore man must use force to dominate. This force comes via his technology. The sword/axe OR the Plow.