EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Michigan Teacher Fired For Helping Student Fundraiser For Trayvon Martin
The Southern Poverty Law Center is calling for the reinstatement of a Michigan teacher who was fired recently for helping students organize a fundraiser for the family of Trayvon Martin, the teenage boy who was shot to death in a Florida neighborhood in February.
Brooke Harris Brooke Harris, an eighth grade teacher at a charter school (the Pontiac Academy for Excellence Middle School) in Pontiac, Michigan, saw Trayvon Martin’s death as a moment when many of her students were politically engaged and energized. They wanted to help Martin’s parents, and so she tried to take the moment as an opportunity to teach them how to plan a fundraiser. They came up with a proposal: Every student would donate one dollar to wear a hoodie for the day.
According to the SPLC, the principal of the school signed off on the kids’ proposal, but then superintendent Jacqueline Cassell (cassellj@pontiacacademy.org) got involved:
She refused to approve the proposal, despite having supported many other “dress down” fundraisers. Brooke’s students took the disappointment in stride, but asked to present their idea to Cassell in person. . . . Brooke asked that a few of her students be allowed to attend her meeting with Cassell. Outraged by the request, Cassell suspended Brooke for two days. The explanation given—she was being paid to teach, not to be an activist.
Those two days morphed into a two-week, unpaid suspension when Brooke briefly stopped by the afterschool literacy fair (she had previously organized) to drop off prizes (paid for with her own money) and to pick up materials for several students whose parents were unable to attend. Supporting her students was insubordination.
The final offense? Brooke asked Cassell to clarify her original transgression so she could learn from her mistake. Cassell referred her to the minutes of their first meeting. Still confused, Brooke again requested an explanation. Cassell fired her.
* * *
The Detroit Free Press reports:
A national civil rights group is calling on a Pontiac charter school to reinstate a teacher who said she was fired for helping students organize a fund-raiser to benefit the family of slain Florida teenager Trayvon Martin. [...]
Brooke Harris, the fired teacher, said Monday that students in her yearbook class came to her a couple of weeks ago, wanting to organize a fund-raiser in which each would pay $1 to veer from the school's dress code to wear hoodies to school. They would be similar to the hoodie Martin was wearing when he was killed Feb. 26 in Sanford, Fla.
Harris said the principal signed off on the fund-raiser, but Cassell said no. Harris said she asked whether students could meet with Cassell to make their case, as they had suggested, and she was suspended for two days.
"I was told I was a bad teacher, that I was being unprofessional, that I'm being paid to teach, not to be an activist. When I tried to defend myself, it was construed as insubordination.""I was told I was a bad teacher, that I was being unprofessional, that I'm being paid to teach, not to be an activist. When I tried to defend myself, it was construed as insubordination," Harris said.
Harris came to the school while suspended, which she said was in part to drop off prizes for a literacy fair she helped organize. Harris said her suspension was extended to two weeks, but during a meeting with Cassell, she was fired instead after questioning it.
"I was astonished. I couldn't figure out what I did wrong," Harris said.
Cassell said legal reasons prevent her from discussing the termination, but made it clear she has no problem with the students expressing their views about the Martin case. She said she used to be a member of the SPLC.
"I am a child of the '60s. I lived the civil rights movement. If anybody has a reason to want to be sympathetic, empathetic, the whole nine yards, it would be me," Cassell said. "I certainly would not use this issue as a reason to terminate anybody."
She said she objected to the fund-raiser because it wasn't appropriate for the students to wear hoodies in the manner they planned -- with the hoods over their heads.
Cassell, who earlier announced she is stepping down when the current school year is over, said she has worked during the last three years to turn the school into a charter district.
The SPLC has a petition at www.change.org, demanding Harris' reinstatement. A rally for Harris is being held at 6 tonight at the Historic King Solomon Baptist Church in Detroit.
Harris said she is not sure what her next step is because her contract provides little due process. "I want my job back, but I'm not entirely sure if that's even possible," she said.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

79 Comments so far
Show AllWe are so lucky that we do not live under Soviet style communism where we might end up being fired for acting too independently.
Imagine living under a system where any creativity, imagination, or decency was considered "insubordination" by some gray, reactionary, mid-level member of the nomenklatura.
I can only shudder to think of it!
Luckily, we live in the land of the free.
I also love the word "inappropriate", a haughty multi-purpose word used to condemn anything, anytime, without specifying what is appropriate. What is appropriate when students are upset that someone just like them was shot down by a vigilante while he was waltking in his neighborhood?
Hope the teachers' union will stand up for this "creative" teacher, who was trying to "empower" her students, teach "critical thinking", "compassion", "initiative", foster "responsibility" and "life skills" and all those fine words that we are not really supposed to take seriously. Hope this teacher will also see the underlying agenda of the charter school movement for which she teaches. Calling it an "Academy for Excellence" is marketing, and does not make it so.
Harris may justly be "accused" of being subversive in the true, i.e. non-pejorative, sense of the term.
As endless reports of school-based controversy reveal, school bureaucracies seem to breed a special kind of bumptious, reactionary middle-management pissant, here personified in Superintendent Cassell.
That is our Obedient Servant.....You just got to love the way OS puts things..
Thomas Gilbert-
The fact that the school is a charter should be the MOST important concern of the article.
If this teacher worked in a non-charter public school with a union, any disciplinary action including termination would have to proceed thru DUE PROCESS. That process would have showed that the reasons for the teacher's discipline and termination were spurious. The superintendent would know this and would never have said anything. The teacher would not have lost her job, she would have continued her fundraiser for Trayvon and there would be no article to read.
In a charter school teachers have no protection. They can be fired (or disciplined) without cause. Administrators do not have to provide ANY reason when terminating someone (let alone a good reason).
Don't think that other charter school teachers won't notice what happened to Brooke Harris. If they want to keep their jobs they will conform. This is exactly what privatization is all about: the dis-empowering of working people both ideologically and economically. It's not about education; it's about profit.
Of those 12%, half are required by state law to be part of the local district contract. The other 6% are unionized either because the founders chose to do so, or because the teachers voted to unionize. Notably, when charter schools unionize against the interests of the school's culture or administration, report interviewees say it is "most commonly a result of a breakdown in trust between labor and management or just poor treatment of employees."
From the same article:
"...the very notion of charter school unionization is a severe blow to the overall charter ethos."
~~~
Somewhere less than 6% of charters were unionized by teachers. What kind contracts are these charter school unions able to negotiate when they are not part of the regular public school unions and their organizational strength? Do they have due process? Does the fact that a minority of charters are unionized change anything? What is your point?
BTW, the Association of American Educators (your link) is NOT pro-union. On their website they indicate their opposition to "forced unionization" which is code for "right-to-work" anti-union legislation. The proponents of “right to work” really want to hurt the ability of unions to represent their members and their ability to represent them politically. That’s the real issue. And it’s a major one, especially in the current political climate.
So, just by the numbers your link provided, I am - at least - 94% right, that is, the "grey" in this debate is statistically insignificant. It is as "black and white" as anything in our society can be. Which raises the question: whose side are you on? The truth? Riiight.
http://tinyurl.com/7pfzdgs
Now, I know this doesn't mesh well with the anti-charter and pro-charter orthodoxy, but the fact is charter schools and unions are not mutually exclusive.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Charter schools are sold as remedies to communities who have long suffered inferior education for their children. What you get are schools that are empirically on the average no better for children than the public schools, but that open up opportunities for local operators and service providers. It is another expensive gimmick and diversion from providing systematic quality in public education by means well-known and well-tested in much of the civilized world.
They are all for choice-- unless you want a choice that they are not offering.
Generally, their "choice" for you is to make sure to include an even larger slice of the pie for them.
Now line up and submit to your daily gropi... I mean Government sanctioned mandatory 'voluntary genitalia inspection'.
The boss probably demanded that he be made a "friend" on Ms. Harris's facebook page. That sealed her fate.
The first is for "Just Cause" which is for things like breach of contract, theft, violence, etc... When an employer invokes "Just Cause", the burden of proof lies with the employer. In a "Just Cause" firing, the employment is terminated immediately, and the employer is not obligated to pay severance.
The second way is firing for ANY reason (within the scope of the employment contract), with either adequate notice, or severance in lieu of notice. So. If you get fired and the company pays you proper severance, you can not file suit for wrongful dismissal. If they withhold severance, or claim just cause without adequate proof, a wrongful dismissal suit is in order.