EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- 'Tip of the Iceberg': Senators Warn Far More Data May Not Be Safe
- Playing the Obama Bumper Sticker Game
- Intentional and Evil: Court Marshall Sexually Assaults Woman, Then Arrests Her When She Protests
- David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Keller Wish Snowden Had Just Followed Orders
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
- Bank of America Lied to Homeowners and Rewarded Foreclosures, Former Employees Say
- On PRISM, Partisanship and Propaganda
Popular content
Today's Top News
Explosion, Pollution, Massive Oil Spill Probable: North Sea Gas Leak
Issues with well were detected well before leak occured
The French energy company Total boasted today that they have discovered the source of the natural gas leak, which is steadily casting a plume of natural gas into the air and a six-mile long 'sheen' in the ocean surrounding the oil and gas platform in the North Sea; however, as fears of a catastrophic explosion increase, current options for plugging the leak carry great risks and may take months to complete.
Aerial shot of Total's Elgin Wellhead Platform in the North Sea off the shore of Scotland. (AP Photo / Greenpeace, Martin Langer) One option is to drill a relief well to stop the release of gas, which could take up to six months.
Meanwhile, environmental groups are now warning that a major oil spill could be triggered at the platform. Such a spill would have "catastrophic consequences for the environment, marine life and sea birds in Shetland, the Faroe Islands and the Norwegian coast," said Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland.
Scientists have also become increasingly concerned about drastic amounts of pollution already caused by the leak. 'Sour gas' is currently leaking into the ocean that contains elements that are poisonous to humans and aquatic life, which could lead to mass animal and plant deaths. Simultaneously, large amounts of methane are bellowing into the atmosphere; methane is one of the more potent greenhouse gases causing climate change.
Additionally, reports are now surfacing that Total suspected something might be wrong with the well weeks ago, adding suspicion of negligence to the list of concerns surrounding the disaster.
"We noticed about three or four weeks ago that there was a change in pressure [in the G4 well] that we weren't entirely happy about," said David Hainsworth, a health safety and environment manager at Total.
* * *
Total Identifies Source of North Sea Gas Leak (Agence France-Presse):
French energy giant Total said Thursday it had identified the source of a gas leak on a North Sea platform which has sparked fears of an explosion and wiped billions of euros off its market value.
Four days after the Elgin platform was hastily evacuated, Total said gas was emerging from a wellhead on the rig after rising 4,000 metres (13,100 feet) up a disused well from below the seabed.
Total said one option it was considering was to plug the well from the top using mud, but that would require a team to get on to the deserted platform which is currently engulfed in a low-lying cloud of gas. [...]
Three options are being considered to stop the leak.
One is to "kill the well" by plugging it from the wellhead on the platform using a large quantity of mud.
The second is to leave the well to "diminish naturally", Total said.
The third option is to drill a relief well. "In the area of the Elgin platform this could take up to six months," the company spokesman said.
* * *
Activists Worry Over North Sea Platform Gas Leak (Associated Press):
Environmental groups warned Thursday they fear an oil spill could be triggered at a North Sea offshore platform that has been leaking highly pressurized gas since the weekend. [...]
"Elgin is sending methane into the atmosphere, which is a greenhouse gas, so there is some environmental impact at the moment. There is also oil in that well, and Total need to move before an oil spill becomes part of this leak," said Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland.
He warned that any major spill would have "catastrophic consequences for the environment, marine life and sea birds in Shetland, the Faroe Islands and the Norwegian coast." [...]
"The U.K. industry, unions and regulatory authorities say they have the best and tightest safety regime in the world, but this leak proves that for all their efforts it remains unsafe," said Charlie Kronick, a senior climate adviser at Greenpeace U.K.
"The industry is trying to squeeze out the very last of the Earth's reserves and companies such as Total, BP and Royal Dutch Shell are pushing themselves into exploration that is extremely difficult, costly and risky," he said.
* * *
Fears Grow Over Pollution Risk from Leaking North Sea Gas Rig (The Guardian/UK):
Martin Preston, marine pollution specialist and honorary research fellow at the University of Liverpool, said that from an environmental standpoint, both greenhouse gas emissions and local fish deaths were a concern. "The methane release represents a very significant explosion hazard, and of course methane is a potent greenhouse gas. The gas in this field is 'sour gas' – ie it contains hydrogen sulphide which is very poisonous to humans and aquatic life – so localised risks to marine life are likely. The hydrogen sulphide content of the current release is unclear at present. Localised fish kills cannot be ruled out." [...]
John Sauven, executive director of Greenpeace, said: "According to Total, if the leak continues at its current flow for six months it will amount to nearly 800,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent, adding to the burden of greenhouse gases already going into the atmosphere.
"This incident shows us that if the oil and gas industry can't contain leaks in supposedly less risky places like the North Sea then there's no way they should be allowed to drill in fragile and high risk places like the Arctic."
* * *
Total: Suspected G4 Well Had Issue Weeks Before Leak (Washington Post):
ABERDEEN, Scotland (Dow Jones)--Total SA (TOT) said Thursday that it first suspected something might be wrong with the well believed to be the source of a gas leak at its Elgin North Sea platform weeks before the installation was evacuated.
"We noticed about three or four weeks ago that there was a change in pressure [in the G4 well] that we weren't entirely happy about," said David Hainsworth, a health safety and environment manager at Total.
"There was a concern that there had been a deterioration in one of the annuluses," he said, referring to the space between the drill pipe casing.
# # #
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



45 Comments so far
Show AllThe information Total is releasing about this situation is starting to acquire a surreal quality. For instance, this morning's article on CNN (first three paragraphs):
The first paragraph says the source of the leak is on the deck of the platform. The third paragraph cites Total's plan to drill a relief well or fill with mud. Fill what with mud? The deck of the rig?
They're not even trying to concoct a story which makes sense. We are in TEPCO land, here, with empty suits exercising Total control over the information.
Answer: Total are following BP's BS playbook and feeding us misinformation.
Modern day journalists suffer from a terrible amount of technical illiteracy.
To paraphrase ol' Casey - des je vous all over again.
We has met the enemy and he is us "Walt Kelley"
I am happy you have provided well for your family, it is too bad your grandchildren and great-grandchildren are going to inheirt a scorching polluted mess of a planet.
But God bless capitalism and growth and record profits for the oil companies! Thank god for the 40 years of jobs they provided and the scorched earth they leave behind.
How "cost effective" is a human life - and an environment that makes it possible? Oh, that's right, it is not your own life, so you could not really give a fuck.
Think of all the poeple in the third world who could be cost-efectively rendered into refined animal-fat to power your decadence. They are destined to famine and starvation anyway from golbal warming, so better harvest then now while thy still have some fat on their bones. Against the law? The law can easily be changed...
"Good jobs" freedomforall says.
Good Lord. Humans are doing a pretty good job of destroying the future of Life on planet Earth. What we're providing our children is an uninhabitable planet. That's what the USA is all about.
Our way of life is predatory. Someone is paying a price for the cheap energy we consume. Look into the eyes of your children and ask yourself whether it's a good trade-off to destroy their lives so that you can "enjoy the open road."
No it is not an "opinion" you purvey, it is just gross ignorance.
The problem is not population. Population growth and stabilization is directly linked to economic and health insecurity as well as lack of education, in short the imbalanced distribution of wealth from resources and global exploitation. So I guess it is the good'ol American way to take pride of having been able to bring up your kids on the petrodollar ripoff while pissing on all those whose economies which are made subservient and whose people are kept in abject poverty, ignorance or a state of war to subsidize your and your kids benefits.
I honestly hope you are able to get an education with what you have earned and you stop spouting such rubbish as you do now.
http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175521/tomgram%3A_chip_ward%2C_apologies...
The time has come to apply the criminal laws against oil company executives who destroy the environment, which in turn leads to many premature deaths. Not just national criminal laws, but international crimes against humanity laws, because oil disasters affect everyone.
Yes, the oil industry provides jobs but at massive costs. The oil and gas industry certainly destroys the jobs of fishermen and women and the tourist industry. Who wants to visit a polluted beach? Who wants to eat contaminated fish? What happens when there are no more fish to eat? What happens when there is no more air to breathe?
And if you think you are going to offend anyone here, by calling out their "democratic heroes" as in the Democratic party, then you are definitely on the wrong forum.
Interesting to note the constant shift in tactics as new crops cycle through. This one is purposefully stupid and insulting.
Also interesting that their sponsors continue to believe it worthwhile to disrupt Common Dreams. As sites go, posters here are fairly skilled at disrupting the disruptors. Readers here are also extremely unlikely to be swayed in opinion or understanding by these transparent tactics. But still they cycle through here. i think just the fact of creating noise and distraction is measured as providing a net gain in the cost-benefit analysis of the investment in disruption.
Meanwhile, we humans are starting to smell like burnt toast, and ALL of us are ultimately inside that toaster, along with myriad other species and the overall eco-system. But somehow, the tiny minority at the financial peak believe they gain real benefit from disabling the pop-up mechanism on the toaster.
Ultimately we all need to engage in action outside of comment threads, to stop the burning, unplug the toaster, dis-empower the tiny minority at the financial peak, and begin restoring balance and humility to our society and economy. We need to very seriously disrupt the disruptors, not here down-stream in minor tributaries like comment threads, but at the source of their power.
(Side note i can't help but make: Human; Humility; Humus; Humor, are all thought to have the same etymological roots. We Humans are "of the Humus, of the Earth," but have lost our Humility, our sense of Humor at the cosmic jest that is woven into existence.)
If he is indeed a paid shill, then wow.... they are really scraping the bottom of the barrel so to speak, and I don't think they're getting their money's worth.
His arguments seem just absurdly, cartoonishly cliche to me. The goal seems to be to simply not acknowledge anything real or problematic or complex-- just repeat over and over "I'm in my little consumer bubble, and that's where I will stay, the rest of the world be damned and I'm so proud of myself!"
But the skeptic in me wonders just how many levels of meta-irony/doublespeak are at work here. Do posters like freedomforME sound like ignorant simpletons to appeal to the genuine simpletons/impressionable people who somehow may have found their way to this site? Or is there some other reason that I don't understand? It's just hard for me to believe they honestly feel these types of arguments are adequate or convincing in any way. Surreal to say the least.